--- a/summa/english/FP_ix.html	Sun Feb 26 16:39:39 2012 +0000
+++ b/summa/english/FP_ix.html	Sun Feb 03 10:50:36 2013 +0000
@@ -6735,9 +6735,12 @@
                   <p id="FP_Q89_A1-p10">
                      <b>Reply to Objection 1:</b> The Philosopher's words carefully examined will show that he said this on the previous supposition that understanding is
                      a movement of body and soul as united, just as sensation is, for he had not as yet explained the difference between intellect
-                     and sense. We may also say that he is referring to the way of understanding by turning to phantasms. This is also the meaning
-                     of the second objection.
-                  </p>
+                     and sense. We may also say that he is referring
+	to the way of understanding by turning to phantasms.
+	</p>
+<p id="FP_Q89_A1-p10a">
+<b>Reply to Objection 2:</b> This is also the meaning
+                     of the second objection.</p>
                   <p id="FP_Q89_A1-p11">
                      <b>Reply to Objection 3:</b> The separated soul does not understand by way of innate species, nor by species abstracted then, nor only by species retained,
                      and this the objection proves; but the soul in that state understands by means of participated species arising from the influence
@@ -7992,7 +7995,7 @@
                      the semen belongs to the perfection of the begetter, and is released by a natural and pleasurable operation. Much more, therefore,
                      was it possible that by the Divine power the body of the woman should be produced from the man's rib.
                   </p>
-                  <p id="FP_Q92_A3-p10"> From this it is clear how to answer the third objection.</p>
+                  <p id="FP_Q92_A3-p10"><b>Reply to Objection 3:</b> From this it is clear how to answer the third objection.</p>
                   <p id="FP_Q92_A3-p11"></p>
                   <p id="FP_Q92_A3-p12"></p>
                   <a href="summa.FP_Q92_A2.html"></a>
@@ -8888,7 +8891,7 @@
                      fixed than our knowledge. And it was on account of this excellence of knowledge that Gregory says that "he enjoyed the company
                      of the angelic spirits."
                   </p>
-                  <p id="FP_Q94_A2-p9"> This makes clear the reply to the first objection.</p>
+                  <p id="FP_Q94_A2-p9"><b>Reply to Objection 1:</b> This makes clear the reply to the first objection.</p>
                   <p id="FP_Q94_A2-p10">
                      <b>Reply to Objection 2:</b> That the soul of the first man fell short of the knowledge regarding separate substances, was not owing to the fact that
                      the body was a load upon it; but to the fact that its connatural object fell short of the excellence of separate substances.