--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/summa/english/XP_i.html	Sun Jan 03 14:43:02 2010 +0000
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" id="XP.i" class="div2">
+            <a href="summa.XP.html"></a>
+            <a href="summa.XP.ii.html"></a>
+            <h2 id="XP.i-p0.1">EDITOR'S NOTE:</h2>
+            <p id="XP.i-p1"> After writing these few questions of the treatise on Penance, St. Thomas was called to the heavenly reward which he had merited
+               by writing so well of his Divine Master. The remainder of the Summa Theologica, known as the Supplement, was compiled probably
+               by Fra Rainaldo da Piperno, companion and friend of the Angelic Doctor, and was gathered from St. Thomas's commentary on the
+               Fourth Book of the Sentences of Peter Lombard. This commentary was written in the years 1235-1253, while
+               			 St. Thomas was under thirty years of age. Everywhere it reveals the influence of him whom St. Thomas always called the
+               Master. But that influence was not to be always supreme. That the mind of the Angelic Doctor moved forward to positions which
+               directly contradicted the Master may be seen by any student of the Summa Theologica. The compiler of the Supplement was evidently
+               well acquainted with the commentary on the Sentences, which had been in circulation for some twenty years or more, but it
+               is
+               			 probable that he was badly acquainted with the Summa Theologica. This will be realized and must be borne in mind when
+               we read the Supplement, notably 
+               <a id="XP.i-p1.1" shape="rect" href="summa.TP_Q62_A1.html">TP, Q[62], A[1]</a>; also Q[43], A[3], ad 2 of the Supplement.
+            </p>
+            <a href="summa.XP.html"></a>
+            <a href="summa.XP.ii.html"></a>
+         `
+     </div>
\ No newline at end of file