comparison john/english/John2.html @ 31:25a799388159

originals from http://www.josephkenny.joyeurs.com/CDtexts/SSJohn.htm
author ht
date Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:16:17 +0000
parents
children 178aed5d2c3c
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
30:b56c501d878e 31:25a799388159
1 <html>
2 <head>
3 </head>
4 <body style=text-align:justify><blockquote>
5 <p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-size: 60pt">2</span></p>
6 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in">LECTURE I</p>
7 <BLOCKQUOTE><p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">1 On the third day there was a wedding at Cana in Galilee, and the mother of Jesus was there. 2
8 Jesus and his disciples were also invited to the feast. 3 When the wine ran out, the mother of
9 Jesus said to him, &#8220;They have no more wine.&#8221; 4 Jesus then said to her, &#8220;Woman, what does that
10 have to do with me and you? My time has not yet come.&#8221; 5 His mother said to the servants, &#8220;Do
11 whatever he tells you.&#8221; 6 Now there were six stone water jars near by for purifications according
12 to Jewish customs, each holding two or three metretes. 7 Jesus said to them, &#8220;Fill those jars with
13 water.&#8221; And they filled them to the top. 8 Then Jesus said to them, &#8220;Now pour out a drink and
14 take it to the head waiter.&#8221; They did as he instructed them. 9 Now when the head waiter tasted
15 the water made wine, and not knowing where it came from (although the servants knew, since
16 they had drawn the water), he called the groom over 10 and said to him, &#8220;People usually serve
17 the choice wines first, and when the guests have had their fill, then they bring out inferior wine;
18 but you have saved the best wine until now.&#8221; 11 This beginning of signs Jesus worked in Cana
19 of Galilee; and Jesus revealed his glory, and his disciples believed in him.</p></BLOCKQUOTE>
20 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">335 Above, the Evangelist showed the dignity of the incarnate Word and gave various evidence
21 for it. Now he begins to relate the effects and actions by which the divinity of the incarnate Word
22 was made known to the world. First, he tells the things Christ did, while living in the world, that
23 show his divinity. Secondly, he tells how Christ showed his divinity while dying; and this from
24 chapter twelve on.</p>
25 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">As to the first he does two things. First, he shows the divinity of Christ in relation to the power
26 he had over nature. Secondly, in relation to the effects of grace; and this from chapter three on.
27 Christ&#8217;s power over nature is pointed out to us by the fact that he changed a nature. And this
28 change was accomplished by Christ as a sign: first, to his disciples, to strengthen them; secondly,
29 to the people, to lead them to believe (2:12). This transformation of a nature, in order to
30 strengthen the disciples, was accomplished at a marriage, when he turned water into wine. First,
31 the marriage is described. Secondly, those present. Thirdly, the miracle performed hy Christ.</p>
32 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">330 In describing the marriage, the time is first mentioned. Hence he says. On the <span style="font-weight: bold">third day
33 there was a wedding, </span>i.e., after the calling of the disciples mentioned earlier. For, after being
34 made known by the testimony of John, Christ also wanted to make himself known. Secondly, the
35 place is mentioned; hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">at Cana in Galilee. </span>Galilee is a province, and Cana a small
36 village located in that province.</p>
37 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">337 As far as the literal meaning is concerned, we should note that there are two opinions about
38 the time of Christ&#8217;s preaching. Some say that there were two and a half years from Christ&#8217;s
39 baptism until his death. According to them, the events at this wedding took place in the same year
40 that Christ was baptized. However, both the teaching and practice of the Church are opposed to
41 this. For three miracles are commemorated on the feast of the Epiphany: the adoration of the
42 Magi, which took place in the first year of the Lord&#8217;s birth; secondly, the baptism of Christ,
43 which implies that he was baptized on the same day thirty years later; thirdly, this marriage,
44 which took place on the same day one year later. It follows from this that at least one year elapsed
45 between his baptism and this marriage. In that year the only things recorded to have been done
46 by the Lord are found in the sixth chapter of Matthew: the fasting in the desert, and the
47 temptation by the devil; and what John tells us in this Gospel of the testimony by the Baptist and
48 the conversion of the disciples. After this wedding, Christ began to preach publicly and to
49 perform miracles up to the time of his passion, so that he preached publicly for two and one half
50 years.</p>
51 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">338 In the mystical sense, marriage signifies the union of Christ with his Church, because as the
52 Apostle says: &#8220;This is a great mystery: I am speaking of Christ and his Church&#8221; (Eph 5:32). And
53 this marriage was begun In the womb of the Virgin, when God the Father united a human nature
54 to his Son in a unity of person. So, the chamber of this union was the womb of the Virgin: &#8220;He
55 established a chamber for the sun&#8221; (Ps 18:6). Of this marriage it is said: &#8220;The kingdom of heaven
56 is like a king who married his son&#8221; (Mt 22:2), that is, when God the Father joined a human nature
57 to his Word in the womb of the Virgin. It was made public when the Church was joined to him
58 by faith: &#8220;I will bind you to myself in faith&#8221; (Hos 2:20). We read of this marriage: &#8220;Blessed are
59 they who are called to the marriage supper of the Lamb&#8221; (Rv 19:9). It will be consummated when
60 the bride, i.e., the Church, is led into the resting place of the groom, i.e., into the glory of heaven.</p>
61 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">The fact that this marriage took place on the third day is not without it own mystery. For the first
62 day is the time of the law of nature; the second day is the time of the written law. but the third
63 day is the time of grace, when the incarnate Lord celebrated the marriage: &#8220;He will revive Lis
64 after two days: on the third day he will raise us up&#8221; (Hos 6:3).</p>
65 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">The place too is appropriate. For &#8220;Cana&#8221; means &#8220;zeal and &#8220;Galilee&#8221; means &#8220;passage.&#8221; So this
66 marriage was celebrated in the zeal of a passage, to suggest that those persons are most worthy
67 of union with Christ who, burning with the zeal of a conscientious devotion, pass over from the
68 state of guilt to the grace of the Church. &#8220;Pass over to me, all who desire me&#8221; (Sir 24:26). And
69 they pass from death to life, i.e., from the state of mortality and misery to the state of immortality
70 and glory: &#8220;I make all things new&#8221; (Rv 21:5).</p>
71 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">339 Then the persons invited are described. Mention is made of three: the mother of Jesus, Jesus
72 himself, and the disciples.</p>
73 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">340 The mother of Jesus is mentioned when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">the mother of Jesus was there</span>. She is
74 mentioned first to indicate that Jesus was still unknown and not invited to the wedding as a
75 famous person, but merely as one acquaintance among others; for as they invited the mother, so
76 also her son. Or, perhaps his mother is invited first because they were uncertain whether Jesus
77 would come to a wedding if invited, because of the unusual piety they noticed in him and because
78 they had not seen him at other social gatherings. So I think that they first asked his mother
79 whether Jesus should be invited. That is why the Evangelist expressly said first that his mother
80 was at the wedding, and that later Jesus was invited.</p>
81 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">341 And this is what comes next: <span style="font-weight: bold">Jesus was invited. </span>Christ decided to attend this wedding, first
82 of all, to give us an example of humility. For he did not look to his own dignity, but &#8220;just as he
83 condescended to accept the form of a servant, so he did not hesitate to come to the marriage of
84 servants,&#8221; as Chrysostom says. And as Augustine says: &#8220;Let man blush to be proud, for God
85 became humble.&#8221; For among his other acts of humility, the Son of the Virgin came to a marriage,
86 which he had already instituted in paradise when he was with his Father. Of this example it is
87 said: &#8220;Learn from me, for I am gentle and humble of heart&#8221; (Mt 11:29).</p>
88 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">He came, secondly, to reject the error of those who condemn marriage, for as Bede says: &#8220;If there
89 were sin in a holy marriage bed and in a marriage carried out with due purity, the Lord would not
90 have come to the marriage.&#8221; But because he did come, he implies that the baseness of those who
91 denounce marriage deserves to be condemned. &#8220;If she marries, it is not a sin&#8221; (1 Cor 7:36).</p>
92 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">342 The disciples are mentioned when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">and his disciples.</span></p>
93 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">343 In its mystical meaning, the mother of Jesus, the Blessed Virgin, is present in spiritual
94 marriages as the one who arranges the marriage, because it is through her intercession that one
95 is joined to Christ through grace: &#8220;In me is every hope of life and of strength&#8221; (Sir 24:25). Christ
96 is present as the true groom of the soul, as is said below (3:29): &#8220;It is the groom who has the
97 bride.&#8221; The disciples are the groomsmen uniting the Church to Christ, the one of whom it is said:
98 &#8220;I betrothed you to one husband, to present you as a chaste virgin to Christ&#8221; (2 Cor 11:2).</p>
99 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">344 At this physical marriage some role in the miracle belongs to the mother of Christ, some to
100 Christ, and some to the disciples. When he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">When the wine ran out, </span>he indicates the part
101 of each. The role of Christ&#8217;s mother was to superintend the miracle; the role of Christ to perform
102 it; and the disciples were to bear witness to it. As to the first, Christ&#8217;s mother assumed the role
103 of a mediatrix. Hence she does two things. First, she intercedes with her Son. In the second place,
104 she instructs the servants. As to the first, two things are mentioned. First, his mother&#8217;s
105 intercession; secondly, the answer of her Son.</p>
106 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">345 In Mary&#8217;s intercession, note first her kindness and mercy. For it is a quality of mercy to
107 regard another&#8217;s distress as one&#8217;s own, because to be merciful is to have a heart distressed at the
108 distress of another: &#8220;Who is weak, and I am not weak?&#8221; (2 Cor 11:29). And so because the
109 Blessed Virgin was full of mercy, she desired to relieve the distress of others. So he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">When
110 the wine ran out, the mother of Jesus said to him.</span></p>
111 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">Note, secondly, her reverence for Christ: for because of the reverence we have for God it is
112 sufficient for us merely to express our needs: &#8220;Lord, all my desires are known by you&#8221; (Ps 37:10).
113 But it is not our business to wonder about the way in which God will help us, for as it is said:
114 &#8220;We do not know what we should pray for as we ought&#8221; (Rom 8:26). And so his mother merely
115 told him of their need, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">They have no more wine.</span></p>
116 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">Thirdly, note the Virgin&#8217;s concern and care. For she did not wait until they were in extreme need,
117 but <span style="font-weight: bold">When the wine ran out, </span>that is, immediately. This is similar to what is said of God: &#8220;A
118 helper in times of trouble&#8221; (Ps 9:10).</p>
119 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">346 Chrysostom asks: Why did Mary never encourage Christ to perform any miracles before this
120 time? For she had been told of his power by the angel, whose work had been confirmed by the
121 many things she had seen happening in his regard, all of which she remembered, thinking them
122 over in her heart (Lk 2:5 1). The reason is that before this time he lived like any other person. So,
123 because the time was not appropriate, she put off asking him. But now, after John&#8217;s witness to
124 him and after the conversion of his disciples, she trustingly prompted Christ to perform miracles.
125 In this she was true to the symbol of the synagogue, which is the mother of&#8217; Christ: for it was
126 customary for the Jews to require miracles: &#8220;The Jews require signs&#8221; (1 Cor 1:22).</p>
127 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">347 She says to him, <span style="font-weight: bold">They have no more wine. </span>Here we should note that before the incarnation
128 of Christ three wines were running out: the wine of justice, of wisdom, and of charity or grace.
129 Wine stings, and in this respect it is a symbol of justice. The Samaritan poured wine and oil into
130 the wounds of the injured man, that is, he mingled the severity of justice with the sweetness of
131 mercy. &#8220;You have made us drink the wine of sorrow&#8221; (Ps 59:5). But wine also delights the heart,
132 &#8220;Wine cheers the heart of man&#8221; (Ps 103:15). And in this respect wine is a symbol of wisdom, the
133 meditation of which is enjoyable in the highest degree: &#8220;Her companionship has no bitterness&#8221;
134 (Wis 8:16). Further, wine intoxicates: &#8220;Drink, friends, and be intoxicated, my dearly beloved&#8221;
135 (Sg 5:1). And in this respect wine is a symbol of charity: &#8220;I have drunk my wine with my milk&#8221;
136 (Sg 5:1). It is also a symbol of charity because of charity&#8217;s fervor: &#8220;Wine makes the virgins
137 flourish&#8221; (Zec 9:17).</p>
138 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">The wine of justice was indeed running out in the old law, in which justice was imperfect. But
139 Christ brought it to perfection: &#8220;Unless your justice is greater than that of the scribes and of the
140 Pharisees, you will not enter into the kingdom of heaven&#8221; (Mt 5:20). The wine of wisdom was
141 also running out, for it was hidden and symbolic, because as it says in 1 Corinthians (10:11): &#8220;All
142 these things happened to them in symbol.&#8221; But Christ plainly brought wisdom to light: &#8220;He was
143 teaching them as one having authority&#8221; (Mt 7:29). The wine of charity was also running out,
144 because they had received a spirit of serving only in fear. But Christ converted the water of fear
145 into the wine of charity when he gave &#8220;the spirit of adoption as sons, by which we cry: &#8216;Abba,
146 Father&#8217;&#8221; (Rom 8:15), and when &#8220;the charity of God was poured out into our hearts,&#8221; as Romans
147 (5:5) says.</p>
148 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">348 Then when he says, Jesus said to her, the answer of Christ is given. This answer has been
149 the occasion for three heresies.</p>
150 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">349 The Manicheans claim that Christ had only an imaginary body, not a real one. Valentinus
151 maintained that Christ assumed a celestial body and that, as far as his body was concerned, Christ
152 was not related to the Virgin at all. The source of this error was that he understood, <span style="font-weight: bold">Woman,
153 what does that have to do with me and you? </span>as if it meant: &#8220;I have received nothing from
154 you.&#8221; But this is contrary to the authority of Sacred Scripture. For the Apostle says: &#8220;God sent
155 his Son, made from a woman&#8221; (Gal 4:4). Now Christ could not be said to have been made from
156 her, unless he had taken something from her. Further, Augustine argues against them: &#8220;How do
157 you know that our Lord said, <span style="font-weight: bold">What does that have to do with me and you? </span>You reply that it
158 is because John says so. But he also says that the Virgin was the mother of Christ. So, if you
159 believe the Evangelist when he states that Jesus said this to his mother, you should also believe
160 him when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">and the mother of Jesus was there</span>.&#8221;<span style="font-weight: bold"></span></p>
161 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">350 Then there was Ebion who said that Christ was conceived from a man&#8217;s seed, and Elvidius,
162 who said that the Virgin did not remain a virgin after childbirth. They were deceived by the fact
163 that he said, Woman, which seems to imply the loss of virginity. But this is false, for in Sacred
164 Scripture the word &#8220;woman&#8221; sometimes refers merely to the female sex, as it does in &#8220;made from
165 a woman&#8221; (Gal 4:4). This is obvious also by the fact that Adam, speaking to God about Eve, said:
166 &#8220;The woman whom you gave me as a companion, gave me fruit from the tree, and I ate it&#8221; (Gn
167 3:12); for Eve was still a virgin in Paradise, where Adam had not know her. Hence the fact that
168 the mother of Christ is here called &#8220;woman&#8221; in this Gospel does not imply a loss of virginity, but
169 refers to her sex.</p>
170 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">351 The Priscillianists, however, erred by misunderstanding the words of Christ, <span style="font-weight: bold">My time has
171 not yet come. </span>They claimed that all things happen by fate, and that the actions of men, including
172 those of Christ, are subject to predetermined times. And that is why, according to them, Christ
173 said, <span style="font-weight: bold">My time has not yet come.</span></p>
174 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">But this is false for any man. For since man has free choice, and this is because he has reason and
175 will, both of which are spiritual, then obviously, as far as choice is concerned, man, so far from
176 being subject to bodies, is really their master. For spiritual things are superior to material things,
177 so much so that the Philosopher says that the wise man is master of the stars. Further, their heresy
178 is even less true of Christ, who is the Lord and Creator of the stars. Thus when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">My time
179 has not yet come, </span>he is referring to the time of his passion, which was fixed for him, not by
180 necessity, according to divine providence. What is said in Sirach (33:7) is also contrary to their
181 opinion: &#8220;Why is one day better than another?&#8221; And the answer is: &#8220;They have been
182 differentiated by the knowledge of the Lord,&#8221; i.e., they were differentiated from one another not
183 by chance, but by God&#8217;s providence.</p>
184 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">352 Since we have eliminated the above opinions, let us look for the reason why our Lord
185 answered, <span style="font-weight: bold">Woman, what does that have to do with me and you? </span>For Augustine, Christ has
186 two natures, the divine and the human. And although the same Christ exists in each, nevertheless
187 things appropriate to him according to his human nature are distinct from what is appropriate to
188 him according to his divine nature. Now to perform miracles is appropriate to him according to
189 his divine nature, which he received from the Father; while to suffer is according to his human
190 nature, which he received from his mother. So when his mother requests this miracle, he answers,
191 <span style="font-weight: bold">Woman, what does that have to do with me and you? </span>as if saying: I did not receive from you
192 that in me which enables me to perform miracles, but that which enables me to suffer, i.e., that
193 which makes it appropriate for me to suffer, i.e., I have received a human nature from you. And
194 so I will recognize you when this weakness hangs on the cross. And so he continues with, <span style="font-weight: bold">My
195 time has not yet come. </span>As if to say: I will recognize you as my mother when the time of my
196 passion arrives. And so it was that on the cross he entrusted his mother to the disciple.</p>
197 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">353 Chrysostom explains this differently. He says that the Blessed Virgin, burning with zeal for
198 the honor of her Son, wanted Christ to perform miracles at once, before it was opportune; but that
199 Christ, being much wiser than his mother, restrained her. For he was unwilling to perform the
200 miracle before the need for it was known; otherwise, it would have been less appreciated and less
201 credible. And so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Woman, what does that have to do with me and you? </span>As if to say:
202 Why bother me? <span style="font-weight: bold">My time has not yet come</span>, i.e., I am not yet known to those present. Nor do
203 they know that the wine ran out; and they must first know this, because when they know their
204 need they will have a greater appreciation of the benefit they will receive.</p>
205 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">354 Now although his mother was refused, she did not lose hope in her Son&#8217;s mercy. So she
206 instructs the servants, Do whatever he tells you, in which, indeed, consists the perfection of all
207 justice. For perfect justice consists in obeying Christ in all things: &#8220;We will do all that the Lord
208 commanded us&#8221; (Ex 29:35). Do whatever he tells you, is fittingly said of God alone, for man can
209 err now and then. Hence in matters that are against God, we are not held to obey men: &#8220;We ought
210 to obey God rather than men&#8221; (Acts 5:29). We ought to obey God, who does not err and cannot
211 be deceived, in all things.</p>
212 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">355 Now Christ&#8217;s completion of the miracle is set forth. First, the vessels in which the miracle
213 was performed are described. Secondly, the matter of the miracle is stated (v 7). Thirdly, we have
214 how the miracle was made known and approved (v 8).</p>
215 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">356 The miracle was performed in six vessels; <span style="font-weight: bold">Now there were six stone water jars near by.
216 </span>Here we should note, that as mentioned in Mark (7:2), the Jews observed many bodily washings
217 and the cleansing of their cups and dishes. So, because they were in Palestine where there wis
218 a shortage of water, they had vessels in which they kept the purest water to be used for washing
219 themselves and their utensils. Hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">there were six stone water jars near by, </span>i.e.,
220 vessels for holding water, <span style="font-weight: bold">for purifications according to Jewish customs, </span>i.e., to use for
221 <span style="font-weight: bold">purification, each holding two or three metretes </span>of liquid, that is, two or three measures; for
222 the Greek &#8220;metrete&#8221; is the same as the Latin &#8220;mensura.&#8221;</p>
223 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">These jars were standing there, as Chrysostom says, in order to eliminate any suspicion about the
224 miracle: both on account of their cleanliness, lest anyone suspect that the water had acquired the
225 taste of wine from the dregs of wine previously stored in them, for these jars were standing there
226 <span style="font-weight: bold">for purifications according to Jewish customs, </span>and so had to be very pure; and also on account
227 of the capacity of the jars, so that it would be abundantly clear that the water in such jars could
228 be changed into wine only by divine power.</p>
229 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">357 In the mystical sense, the six water jars signify the six eras of the Old Testament during
230 which the hearts of men were prepared and made receptive of God&#8217;s Scriptures, and put forward
231 as an example for our lives.</p>
232 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">The term <span style="font-weight: bold">metretes</span>, according to Augustine, refers to the Trinity of persons. And they are
233 described as <span style="font-weight: bold">two or three </span>because at times in Scripture three persons in the Trinity are distinctly
234 mentioned: &#8220;Baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit&#8221;
235 (Mt 28:19), and at other times only two, the Father and the Son, in whom the Holy Spirit, who
236 is the union of the two, is implied: &#8220;If anyone loves me, he will keep my word, and my Father
237 will love him, and we will come to him&#8221; (below 14:23). Or they are described as two on account
238 of the two states of mankind from which the Church arose, that is, Jews and Gentiles. Or three
239 on account of the three sons of Noe, from whom the human race arose after the deluge.</p>
240 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">358 Then when he says that Jesus instructed them, <span style="font-weight: bold">Fill those jars with water, </span>he gives the
241 material of the miracle. Here we might ask why this miracle was performed with already existing
242 material, and not from nothing. There are three reasons for this. The first reason is literal, and is
243 given by Chrysostom: to make something from nothing is much greater and more marvelous than
244 to make something from material already existing; but it is not so evident and believable to many.
245 And so, wishing to make what he did more believable, Christ made wine from water, thus
246 condescending to man&#8217;s capacity.</p>
247 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">Another reason was to refute wrong dogmas. For there are some (as the Marcionists and
248 Manicheans) who said that the founder of the world was someone other than God, and that all
249 visible things were established by such a one, that is, the devil. And so the Lord performed many
250 miracles using created and visible substances in order to show that these substances are good and
251 were created by God.</p>
252 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">The third reason is mystical. Christ made the wine from water, and not from nothing, in order to
253 show that he was not laying down an entirely new doctrine and rejecting the old, but was
254 fulfilling the old: &#8220;I have not come to destroy the law, but to fulfill it&#8221; (Mt 5:17). In other words,
255 what was prefigured and promised in the old law, was disclosed and revealed by Christ: &#8220;Then
256 he opened their minds so they could understand the Scriptures&#8221; (Lk 24:45).</p>
257 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">Finally, he had the servants fill the jars with water so that he might have witnesses to what he
258 did; so it is said, <span style="font-weight: bold">the servants knew, since they had drawn the water.</span></p>
259 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">359 Then, the miracle is made known. For as soon as the jars were filled, the water was turned
260 into wine. So the Lord reveals the miracle at once, saying: <span style="font-weight: bold">Now pour out a drink and take it
261 to the head waiter. </span>First, we have the command of Christ selecting who is to test the wine;
262 secondly, the judgment of the head waiter who tasted it.</p>
263 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">360 <span style="font-weight: bold">Then Jesus said to them, </span>i.e., to the servants, <span style="font-weight: bold">Now pour out a drink, </span>that is, of wine, from
264 the jars, <span style="font-weight: bold">and take it to the head waiter </span>(<i>arch itriclin us</i>)<i>. </i>Here we should note that a <i>triclinium
265 </i>is a place where there are three rows of tables, and it is called a <i>trichinium </i>from its three rows
266 of dining couches: for <i>cline </i>in Greek means couch. For the ancients were accustomed to eat
267 reclining on couches, ais Maximus Valerius recounts. This is the reason why the Scriptures speak
268 of lying next to and lying down. Thus the <i>architriclinus </i>was (fie first and chief among those
269 dining. Or, according to Chrysostom, the <i>architriclinus </i>was the one in charge of the whole
270 banquet. And because he had been busy and had not tasted anything, the Lord wanted him, and
271 not the guests, to be the judge of what had been done, so some could not detract from the miracle
272 by saying the guests were drunk and, their senses dulled, could not tell wine from water. For
273 Augustine, the <i>architriclinus </i>was the chief guest, as was inentioned; and Christ wanted to have
274 the opinion of this person in high position so it would be more acceptable.</p>
275 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">361 In the mystical sense, those who pour out the water are preachers: &#8220;With joy you will draw
276 water from the springs of the Savior&#8221; (Is 12:3). And the <i>architriclinus is </i>someone skilled in the
277 law, as Nicodenius, Gamaliel or Paul. So, when the word of the Gospel, which was hidden under
278 the letter of the law, is entrusted to such persons, it is as though wine made from water is poured
279 out for the <i>architriclinus</i>, who, when he tastes it, gives his assent to the faith of Christ.</p>
280 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">362 Then the judgment of the one examining the wine is given. First, he inquires into the truth
281 of the fact; secondly, he gives his opinion.</p>
282 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">He says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Now when the head waiter tasted the water made wine, and not knowing where
283 it came from, </span>because he did not know that the water had miraculously been made wine by
284 Christ, <span style="font-weight: bold">although the servants knew, </span>the reason being, <span style="font-weight: bold">since they had drawn the water, he
285 called the groom over, </span>in order to learn the truth and give his opinion of the wine. Hence he
286 adds: <span style="font-weight: bold">People usually serve the choice wines first, and when the guests have had their fill,
287 then they bring out inferior wine.</span></p>
288 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">Here we should consider, according to Chrysostom, that everything is most perfect in the
289 miracles of Christ. Thus, he restored most complete health to Peter&#8217;s mother-in-law, so that she
290 arose at once and waited on them, as we read in Mark (1:30) and Matthew (7:14). Again, he
291 restored the paralytic to health so perfectly that he also arose immediately, took up his mat, and
292 went home, as we read below (5:9). And this is also evident in this miracle, because Christ did
293 not make mediocre wine from the water, but the very best possible. And so the head waiter says,
294 <span style="font-weight: bold">People usually serve the choice wines first, and when the guests have had their fill, then
295 they bring out inferior wine, </span>because they drink less, and because good wine consumed in
296 quantity along with a quantity of food causes greater discomfort. It is as though he were saying:
297 Where did this very good wine come from which, contrary to custom, you saved until now?</p>
298 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">363 This is appropriate to a mystery. For in the mystical sense, he serves good wine first who,
299 with an intent to deceive others, does not first mention the error he intends, but other things that
300 entice his hearers, so that he can disclose his evil plans after they have been intoxicated and
301 enticed to consent. We read of such wine: &#8220;It goes down pleasantly, but finally it will bite like
302 a serpent&#8221; (Prv 23:3 1). Again, he serves good wine first who begins to live in a saintly and
303 spiritual manner at the start of his conversion, but later sinks into a carnal life: &#8220;Are you so
304 foolish as, having begun in the Spirit, to end in the flesh?&#8221; (Gal 3:3).</p>
305 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">Christ, however, does not serve the good wine first, for at the outset he proposes things that are
306 bitter and hard: &#8220;Narrow is the way that leads to life&#8221; (Mt 7:14). Yet the more progress a person
307 makes in his faith and teaching, the more pleasant it becomes and he becomes aware of a greater
308 sweetness: &#8220;I will lead You by the path of justice, and when you walk you will not be hindered&#8221;
309 (Prv 4:11). Likewise, all those who desire to live conscientiously in Christ stiffer bitterness and
310 troubles in this world: &#8220;You will weep and mourn&#8221; (below 16:20). But later they will experience
311 delights and joys. So he goes on: &#8220;but your sorrow will be turned into joy.&#8221; &#8220;I consider that the
312 sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory to come, which will
313 be revealed in us,&#8221; as is said in Romans (8:18).</p>
314 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">&#160;</p>
315 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">364 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">This beginning of signs Jesus worked in Cana of Galilee, </span>he gives
316 the disciples&#8217; acknowledgment of the miracle. We can see from this the falsity of the <i>History of
317 the Infancy of the Savior, </i>which recounts many miracles worked by Christ as a boy. For if these
318 accounts were true, the Evangelist would not have said, <span style="font-weight: bold">This beginning of signs Jesus worked.
319 </span>We have already given the reason why Christ worked no miracles during his childhood, that is,
320 lest men regard them as illusions.</p>
321 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">It was for the reason given above, then, that Jesus performed this miracle of turning water into
322 wine at Cana of Galilee; and this was the first of the signs he did. <span style="font-weight: bold">And Jesus revealed his glory,
323 </span>i.e., the power by which he is glorious: &#8220;The Lord of hosts, he is the King of glory&#8221; (Ps 23:10).</p>
324 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">365 <span style="font-weight: bold">And his disciples believed in him. </span>But how did they believe? For they already were his
325 disciples and had believed before this. I answer that sometimes a thing is described not according
326 to what it is at the time, but according to what it will be. For example, we say that the apostle
327 Paul was born at Tarsus, in Cilicia; not that an actual apostle was born there, but a future one
328 was. Similarly, it says here that <span style="font-weight: bold">his disciples believed in him, </span>i.e., those who would be his
329 disciples. Or, one might answer that previously they had believed in him as a good man,
330 preaching what was right and just; but now they believed in him as God.</p>
331 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">&#160;</p>
332 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style="font-weight: bold">LECTURE 2</span></p>
333 <BLOCKQUOTE><p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">12 After this he went down to Capernaum together with his mother, his brethren and his
334 disciples; but they did not remain there many clays. 13 The Jewish Passover was near at hand,
335 and Jesus went up to Jerusalem. 14 In the temple precincts he came upon merchants selling oxen,
336 sheep and doves, and moneychangers seated at tables. 15 And when he had made a kind of whip
337 from cords, he drove everyone, including sheep and oxen, out of the temple, swept away the gold
338 of the money changers, and knocked over their tables. 16 To those selling doves he said, &#8220;Get
339 Out of here! And stop making my Father&#8217;s house into a marketplace.&#8221; 17 His disciples then
340 remembered that it is written: &#8220;Zeal for your house consumes me.&#8221;</p></BLOCKQUOTE>
341 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">366 Above, the Evangelist presented the sign Christ worked in order to confirm his disciples; and
342 this sign pertained to his power to change nature. Now he deals with the sign of his resurrection;
343 a sign pertaining to the same power, but proposed by Christ to convert the people.</p>
344 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">The Evangelist does two things as to this miracle. First, he mentions its occasion. Secondly, the
345 prediction of the miracle (v 18). As to the first he does two things. First, he describes the place.
346 Secondly, he tells of the incident which was the occasion for proposing this miracle (v 14). Now
347 the place where this happened was Jerusalem. And so the Evangelist recounts step by step how
348 the Lord had come to Jerusalem. First, then, he shows how he went down to Capernaum.
349 Secondly, how he then went up to Jerusalem. As to the first he does three things. First, he
350 mentions the place to which he went down. Secondly, he describes his company. Thirdly, he
351 mentions the length of his stay.</p>
352 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">367 The place to which Christ went down was Capernaum; and so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">After this, </span>i.e., the
353 miracle of the wine, <span style="font-weight: bold">he went down to Capernaum. </span>Now as far as the historical truth is
354 concerned, this seems to conflict with Matthew&#8217;s account that the Lord went down to Capernaum
355 after John had been thrown into prison (Mt 4:12), while the entire series of events the Evangelist
356 refers to here took place before John&#8217;s imprisonment.</p>
357 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">I answer that in order to settle this question we should bear in mind what is learned from the
358 <i>Ecclesiastical History, </i>that is, that the other Evangelists, Matthew, Mark and Luke, began their
359 account of the public life of Christ from the time that John was thrown into prison. Thus
360 Matthew (4:12), after describing the baptism, fast and temptation of Christ, began at once to
361 weave his story after John&#8217;s imprisonment, saying: &#8220;When Jesus heard that John had been
362 arrested.&#8221; And Mark (1:14) says the same: &#8220;After John had been arrested, Jesus came into
363 Galilee.&#8221; John, who outlived the other three Evangelists, approved the accuracy and truth of their
364 accounts when they came to his notice. Yet he saw that certain things had been left unsaid,
365 namely, things which the Lord had done in the very first days of his preaching before John&#8217;s
366 imprisonment. And so, at the request of the faithful, John, after he began his own Gospel in a
367 loftier manner, recorded events that took place during the first year in which Christ was baptized
368 before John&#8217;s imprisonment, as is plain from the order of the events in his Gospel. According to
369 this, then, the Evangelists are not in disagreement. Rather, the Lord went down to Capernaum
370 twice: once before John&#8217;s imprisonment (which is the one dealt with here), and once after his
371 imprisonment, which is dealt with in Matthew (4:13) and Luke (4:31 ).</p>
372 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">368 Now &#8220;Capernaum&#8221; means &#8220;very pretty village,&#8221; and signifies this world, which has its beauty
373 from the order and disposition of divine wisdom: &#8220;The beauty of the land is mine&#8221; (Ps 49:2). So
374 the Lord went down to Capernaum, i.e., this world, with his mother and brethren and disciples.
375 For in heaven the Lord has a Father without a mother; and on earth a mother without a father.
376 Thus, he significantly mentions only his mother. In heaven he does not have brothers either, but
377 is &#8220;the Only Begotten Son, who is in the bosom of the Father&#8221; (above 1:18). But on earth he is
378 &#8220;the Firstborn of many brothers&#8221; (Rom 8:29). And on earth he has disciples, to whom he can
379 teach the mysteries of the divinity, which were not known to men before: &#8220;In these days he has
380 spoken to us in his Son&#8221; as we read in Hebrews (1:1).</p>
381 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">Or, &#8220;Capernaum&#8221; means &#8220;the field of consolation&#8221;; and this signifies every man who bears good
382 fruit: &#8220;The odor of my son is like the odor of a fruitful field&#8221; (Gn 27:27). Such a person is called
383 a field of consolation because the Lord is consoled and rejoices in his achievement: &#8220;God will
384 rejoice over you&#8221; (Is 62:5), and because the angels rejoice over his good: &#8220;There is joy in the
385 angels of God over one repentant sinner&#8221; (Lk 15:10).</p>
386 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">369 His companions were, first of all, his mother. So he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">with his mother, </span>for because she
387 had come to the wedding and had brought about the miracle, the Lord accompanied her back to
388 the village of Nazareth. Nazareth was a village in Galilee, whose chief town was Capernaum.</p>
389 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">370 Secondly, his companions were his brethren; and so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">his brethren </span>(<i>fratres, </i>brothers,
390 brethren). We must avoid two errors here. First, that of Elvidius, who said that the Blessed Virgin
391 had other sons after Christ; and he called these the brothers of the Lord. This is heretical, because
392 our faith maintains that just as the mother of Christ was a virgin before giving birth, so in giving
393 birth and after giving birth, she remained a virgin. We must also avoid the error of those who say
394 that Joseph fathered sons with another wife, and that these are called the brothers of the Lord;
395 for the Church does not admit this.</p>
396 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">Jerome refutes this opinion: for on the cross the Lord entrusted his virgin mother to the care of
397 his virgin disciple. Therefore, since Joseph was the special guardian of the Virgin, and of the
398 Savior too, in his childhood, one may believe that he was a virgin. Consequently, it is a
399 reasonable interpretation to say that the brothers of the Lord were those related to his virgin
400 mother in some degree of consanguinity, or even to Joseph, who was the reputed father. And this
401 conforms to the custom of Scripture which generally refers to relatives as brothers. Thus we read:
402 &#8220;Let us not quarrel, for we are brothers&#8221; (Gn 13:8), as Abram said to Lot, who was his nephew.
403 And note that he distinguishes between relatives and disciples, because not all of Christ&#8217;s
404 relatives were his disciples; hence we read: &#8220;Even his brethren did not believe in him&#8221; (below
405 7:5) .</p>
406 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">371 Thirdly, his disciples were his companions; hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">and his disciples. </span>But who were
407 his disciples? For it seems, according to Matthew, that the first ones to be converted to Christ
408 were Peter and Andrew, John and James; but they were called after John&#8217;s imprisonment, as is
409 clear from Matthew (4:18). Thus it does not seem that they went down to Capernaum with Christ,
410 as it says here, since this was before John&#8217;s imprisonment.</p>
411 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">There are two answers to this. One is from Augustine, in his <i>De Consensu Evangelistarum,
412 </i>namely, that Matthew does not follow the historical order, but in summarizing what he omitted,
413 relates events that occurred before John&#8217;s imprisonment as though they happened after. So,
414 without any suggestion of a time lapse he says, &#8220;As Jesus was walking by the Sea of Galilee, he
415 saw two brothers&#8221; (Mt 4:18), without adding &#8220;after this&#8221; or &#8220;at that time.&#8221; The other answer, also
416 by Augustine, is that in the Gospel not only the twelve whom the Lord chose and named apostles
417 are called disciples of the Lord (Lk 6:13), but also all who believed in him and were instructed
418 for the kingdom of heaven by his teaching. Therefore, it is possible that although those twelve
419 did not yet follow him, others who adhered to him are called disciples here. But the first answer
420 is better.</p>
421 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">372 His stay there was short; hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">but they did not remain there many days. </span>The
422 reason for this was that the citizens of Capernaum were not eager to accept the teachings of
423 Christ, being very corrupt, so that in Matthew (11:23) the Lord rebukes them for not doing
424 penance in spite of the miracles done there and of Christ&#8217;s teaching: &#8220;And you Capernaum, will
425 you be lifted up to heaven? You will go down to hell. For if the mighty works that were done in
426 you had been performed in Sodom, it would have stood until this day.&#8221; But although they were
427 evil, he went there to accompany his mother, and to stay there for a few days for her consolation
428 and honor.</p>
429 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">373 As for its mystical sense, this signifies that some cannot remain long with the many words
430 spoken by Christ; a few of these words are enough for them, to enlighten them, because of the
431 weakness of their understanding. Hence as Origen said, Christ reveals few things to such persons,
432 according to &#8220;I have many things to tell you, but you cannot bear them now&#8221; (Jn 16:12).</p>
433 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">374 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">The Jewish Passover was near at hand,</span> he mentions the place to
434 which he went tip. And concerning this he does two things. First, the occasion is given. Secondly,
435 the going up.</p>
436 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">375 Now the occasion for his going up was the Jewish Passover. For in Exodus (13:17) it is
437 commanded that every male be presented to the Lord three times a year; and one of these times
438 was the Jewish Passover. So, since the Lord came to teach everyone by his example of humility
439 and perfection, he wished to observe the law as long as it was in force. For he did not come to
440 destroy the law, but to fulfill it (Mt 5:17). And so, because the Passover of the Jews was at hand,
441 he went up to Jerusalem. So we, after his example, should carefully observe the divine precepts.
442 For if the Son of God fulfilled the decrees of a law he himself had given, and celebrated the great
443 feasts, with what zeal for good works ought we both to prepare for them and observe them?</p>
444 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">376 It should be noted that in John&#8217;s Gospel mention is made of the Passover in three passages:
445 here, and in (6:4), when he worked the miracle of the loaves, where it is said: &#8220;Now the Jewish
446 Passover was near at hand&#8221; , and again in (13:1), where it says: &#8220;Before the feast day of the
447 Passover.&#8221; So, according to this Gospel, we understand that after the miracle of the wine Christ
448 preached for two years plus the interval between his baptism and this Passover. For what he did
449 here occurred near the Passover, as it says here, and then a year later, near the time of another
450 Passover, he performed the miracle of the loaves, and in the same year John was beheaded. Thus
451 John was beheaded near the time of the Passover, because we read in Matthew (14:13) that
452 immediately after John was beheaded Christ withdrew to the desert, where he worked the miracle
453 of the loaves; and this miracle took place near Passover time, as stated below (6:4). Nevertheless,
454 the feast of this beheading of John is celebrated on the day his head was found. It was later,
455 during another Passover, that Christ suffered.</p>
456 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">So, according to the opinion of those who say that the miracle worked at the wedding and the
457 events being discussed here occurred in the same year in which Christ was baptized, there was
458 an interval of two and one half years between Christ&#8217;s baptism and his passion. So, according to
459 them, the Evangelist says, <span style="font-weight: bold">The Jewish Passover was near at hand, </span>in order to show that Christ
460 had been baptized just a few days before.</p>
461 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">But the Church holds the opposite. For we believe that Christ worked the miracle of the wine on
462 the first anniversary of the day of his baptism; then a year later, near Passover time, John was
463 beheaded; and then there was another year between the Passover near which John was beheaded
464 and the Passover during which Christ suffered. So between the baptism of Christ and the miracle
465 of the wine there had to be another Passover which the Evangelist does not mention. And so,
466 according to what the Church holds, Christ preached for three and one half years.</p>
467 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">377 He says, <span style="font-weight: bold">the Jewish Passover, </span>not as though the people of other nations celebrated a
468 Passover, but for two reasons. One, because when people celebrate a feast in a holy and pure
469 way, it is said that they celebrate it for the Lord; but when they celebrate it in neither of those
470 ways, they do not celebrate it for the Lord, but for themselves: &#8220;My soul hates your new moons
471 and your feasts&#8221; (Is 1:14). It is as though he said: Those who celebrate for themselves and not for
472 me, do not please me: &#8220;When you fasted, did you fast for me?&#8221; (Zec 7:5), as if to say: You did
473 not do it for me, but for yourselves. And so because these Jews were corrupt and celebrated their
474 Passover in an unbecoming manner, the Evangelist does not say, &#8220;the Passover of the Lord,&#8221; but
475 the Jewish Passover was at hand.</p>
476 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">Or, he says this to differentiate it from our Passover. For the Passover of the Jews Was symbolic,
477 being celebrated by the immolation of a lamb which was a symbol. But our Passover is true, in
478 which we recall the true passing [passion] of the Immaculate Lamb: &#8220;Christ, our Passover, has
479 been sacrificed&#8221; (1 Cor 5:7).</p>
480 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">378 The journey was to Jerusalem, and so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">and Jesus went up to Jerusalem. </span>Note here
481 that according to the historical order, Jesus went up to Jerusalem near the time of the Passover
482 and expelled the merchants from the temple on two occasions. The first, before John&#8217;s
483 imprisonment, is the one the Evangelist mentions here; the other is mentioned by Matthew
484 (21:13) as occurring when the Passover and the hour of his passion were at hand. For the Lord
485 frequently repeated works that were similar. For example, the two cases of giving sight to the
486 blind: one in Matthew (9:28) and another in Mark (10:46). In like manner he twice cast
487 merchants from the temple.</p>
488 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">379 In the mystical sense, Jesus went up to Jerusalem, which is translated as the &#8220;vision of
489 peace,&#8221; and signifies eternal happiness. It is to here that Jesus ascended, and he took his own with
490 him. There is no lack of mystery in the fact that he went down to Capernaum and later went up
491 to Jerusalem. For if he did not first go down, he would not have been suited to go up, because,
492 as it is said: &#8220;He who descended is the same as he who ascended&#8221; (Eph 4:10). Further, no
493 mention is made of the disciples in the ascent to Jerusalem because the ascent of the disciples
494 comes from the ascent of Christ: &#8220;No one has gone up to heaven except the one who came down
495 from heaven, the Son of Man, who lives in heaven&#8221; (below 3:13).</p>
496 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">380 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">In the temple precincts he came upon merchants selling oxen, sheep
497 and doves, </span>the Evangelist sets down what moved Christ to propose the sign of the resurrection.
498 He does three things with this. First, he exposes the faulty behavior of the Jews. Secondly, he
499 discloses Christ&#8217;s remedy (v 15). Thirdly, he gives the announcement of the prophecy (v 22).</p>
500 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">381 With respect to the first, we should note that the devil plots against the things of God and
501 strives to destroy them. Now among the means by which he destroys holy things, the chief is
502 avarice; hence it is said: &#8220;The shepherds have no understanding. All have turned aside to their
503 own way; everyone after his own gain, from the first one to the last&#8221; (Is 56:11). And the devil has
504 done this from the earliest times. For the priests of the Old Testament, who had been established
505 to care for divine matters, gave free rein to avarice. God commanded, in the law, that animals
506 should be sacrificed to the Lord on certain feasts. And in order to fulfill this command, those who
507 lived nearby brought the animals with them. But those who came a long distance were unable to
508 bring animals from their own homes. And so because offerings of this kind resulted in profit for
509 the priests, and so animals to offer would not be lacking to those who came from a distance, the
510 priests themselves saw to it that animals were sold in the temple. And so they had them shown
511 for sale in the temple, i.e., in the atrium of the temple. And this is what he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">In the temple
512 precincts he came upon merchants selling oxen, sheep and doves.</span></p>
513 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">Mention is first made of two land animals, which according to the law could be offered to the
514 Lord: the ox and the sheep. The third land animal offered, the goat, is implied when he says
515 &#8220;sheep&#8221;, similarly, the turtle-dove is included when he says &#8220;doves.&#8221;</p>
516 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">382 It sometimes happened that some came to the temple not only without animals, but also
517 without money to buy them. And so the priests found another avenue for their avarice; they set
518 up moneychangers who would lend money to those who came without it. And although they
519 would not accept a usurious gain, because this was forbidden in the law, nevertheless in place
520 of this they accepted certain &#8220;<i>collibia</i>&#8221;, i.e., trifles and small gifts. So this also was turned to the
521 profit of the priests. And this is what he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">moneychangers seated at tables, </span>i.e., in the
522 temple, ready to lend money.</p>
523 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">383 This can be understood mystically in three ways. First of all, the merchants signify those who
524 sell or buy the things of the Church: for the oxen, sheep and doves signify the spiritual goods of
525 the Church and the things connected with them. These goods have been consecrated and
526 authenticated by the teachings of the apostles and doctors, signified by the oxen: &#8220;When there
527 is an abundant harvest the strength of the ox is evident&#8221; (Prv 14:4); and by the blood of the
528 martyrs, who are signified by the sheep: so it is said for them: &#8220;We are regarded as sheep for the
529 slatighter&#8221; (Rom 8:36): and by the gifts of the Holy Spirit, signified by the doves, for as stated
530 above, the Holy Spirit appeared in the form of a dove. Therefore, those who presume to sell the
531 spiritual goods of the Church and the goods connected with them are selling the teachings of the
532 apostles, the blood of the martyrs, and the gifts of the Holy Spirit.</p>
533 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">Secondly, it happens that certain prelates or heads of churches sell these oxen, sheep and doves,
534 not overtly by simony, but covertly by negligence; that is, when they are so eager for and
535 occupied with temporal gain that they neglect the spiritual welfare of their subjects. And this is
536 the way they sell the oxen, sheep and doves, i.e., the three classes of people subject to them. First
537 of all, they sell the preachers and laborers, who are signified by the oxen: &#8220;Happy are you who
538 sow beside all the streams, letting the ox and the donkey range free&#8221; (Is 32:20);.because prelates
539 ought to arrange the oxen, i.e., teachers and wise men, with the donkeys, i.e., the simple and
540 uneducated. They also sell those in the active life, and those occupied with ministering, signified
541 by the sheep: &#8220;My sheep hear my voice&#8221; (below 10:27); and as is said in 2 Samuel (24:17): &#8220;But
542 these, who are the sheep, what have they done?&#8221; They also sell the contemplatives, signified by
543 the doves: &#8220;Who will give me wings like a dove, and I will fly?&#8221; (Ps 54:7).</p>
544 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">Thirdly, by the temple of God we can understand the spiritual soul, as it says: &#8220;The temple of
545 God is holy, and that is what you are&#8221; (1 Cor 3:17). Thus a man sells oxen, sheep and doves in
546 the temple when he harbors bestial movements in his soul, for which he sells himself to the devil.
547 For oxen, which are used for cultivating the earth, signify earthly desires; sheep, which are stupid
548 animals, signify man&#8217;s obstinacy; and the doves signify man&#8217;s instability. It is God who drives
549 these things out of men&#8217;s hearts.</p>
550 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">384 The Lord&#8217;s remedy is at once set forth (v 15). Here the Lord&#8217;s remedy consisted in action and
551 in words, in order to instruct those who have charge of the Church that they must correct their
552 subjects in deed and in word. And he does two things with respect to this. First, he gives the
553 remedy Christ applied by his action. Secondly, the remedy he applied by word (v 16).</p>
554 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">385 As to the first he does three things. First, he drives the men out. Secondly, the oxen and
555 sheep. Thirdly, he sweeps away the money.</p>
556 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">He drives the men out with a whip; and this is what he <span style="font-weight: bold">says, when he had made a kind of whip
557 from cords. </span>This is something that could be done only by divine power. For as Origen says, the
558 divine power of Jesus was as able, when he willed, to quench the swelling anger of men as to still
559 the stornis of minds: &#8220;The Lord brings to nought the thoughts of men&#8221; (Ps 32:10). He makes the
560 whip from cords because, as Augustine says, it is from our own sins that he forms the matter with
561 which he punishes us: for a series of sins, in which sins are added to sins, is called a cord: &#8220;He
562 is bound fast by the cords of his own sins&#8221; (Prv 5:22); &#8220;Woe to you who haul wickedness with
563 cords&#8221; (Is 5:18). Then, just as he drove the merchants from the temple, so he swept away the gold
564 of the moneychangers and knocked over their tables.</p>
565 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">386 And mark well that if he expelled from the temple things that seemed somehow licit, in the
566 sense that they were ordained to the worship of God, how much more if he comes upon unlawful
567 things? The reason he cast them out was because in this matter the priests did not intend God&#8217;s
568 glory, but their own profit. Hence it is said: &#8220;It is for yourselves that you placed guardians of my
569 service in my sancturay&#8221; (Ez 44:8)</p>
570 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">Further, our Lord showed zeal for the things of the law so that he might by this answer the chief
571 priests and the priests who were later to bring a charge against him on this very point. Again, by
572 casting things of this kind out of the temple he let it be understood that the time was coming in
573 which the sacrifices of the law were due to cease, and the true worship of God transferred to the
574 Gentiles: &#8220;The kingdom of God will be taken away from you&#8221; (Mt 21:43). Also, this shows us
575 the condemnation of those who sell spiritual things: &#8220;May your money perish together with you&#8221;
576 (Acts 8:20).</p>
577 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">387 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">To those selling doves he said, </span>he records the treatment which the Lord
578 applied by word. Here it should be noted that those who engage in simony should, of course, first
579 be expelled from the Church. But because as long as they are alive, they can change themselves
580 by free will and by the help of God return to the state of grace, they should not be given up as
581 hopeless. If, however, they are not converted, then they are not merely to be expelled, but handed
582 over to those to whom it is said: &#8220;Bind him hand and foot, and cast him into outer darkness&#8221; (Mt
583 22:13). And so the Lord, attending to this, first warns them, and then gives the reason for his
584 warning, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">stop making my Father&#8217;s house into a marketplace.</span></p>
585 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">388 He warns those selling the doves by reproaching them, for they signify those who sell the
586 gifts of the Holy Spirit, i.e., those who engage in simony.</p>
587 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">389 He gives his reason for this when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">stop making my Father&#8217;s house into a
588 marketplace. </span>&#8220;Take away your evil from my sight&#8221; (Is 1:10). Note that Matthew (2 1:13) says:
589 &#8220;Do not make my house a den of thieves,&#8221; while here he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">a marketplace. </span>Now the Lord
590 does this because, as a good physician, he begins first with the gentler things; later on, he would
591 propose harsher things. Now the action recorded here was the first of the two; hence in the
592 beginning he does not call them thieves but merchants. But because they did not stop such
593 business out of obstinacy, the Lord, when driving them out the second time (as mentioned in
594 Mark 11:15), rebukes them more severely, calling robbery what he had first called business.</p>
595 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">He says, <span style="font-weight: bold">my Father&#8217;s house, </span>to exclude the error of Manicheus, who said that while the God of
596 the New Testament was the Father of Christ, the God of the Old Testament was not. But if this
597 were true, then since the temple was the house of the Old Testament, Christ would not have
598 referred to the temple as <span style="font-weight: bold">my Father&#8217;s house.</span></p>
599 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">390 Why were the Jews not disturbed here when he called God his Father, for as is said below
600 (5:18), this is why they persecuted him? I answer that God is the Father of certain men through
601 adoption; for example, he is the Father of the just in this way. This was not a new idea for the
602 Jews: &#8220;You will call me Father, and you will not cease to walk after me&#8221; (Jer 3:19). However,
603 by nature he is the Father of Christ alone: &#8220;The Lord said to me: &#8216;You are my Son&#8217; &#8220; (Ps 2:7), i.e.,
604 the true and natural Son. It is this that was unheard of among the Jews. And so the Jews
605 persecuted him because he called himself the true Son of God: &#8220;the Jews tried all the harder to
606 kill him, because he not only broke the Sabbath rest, but even called God his own Father, making
607 himself equal to God&#8221; (below 5:18). But when he called God his Father on this occasion, they
608 said it was by adoption.</p>
609 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">391 That the house of God shall not be made a marketplace is taken from-Zechariah (14:21): &#8220;On
610 that day there will no longer be any merchants in the house of the Lord of hosts&#8221;; and from the
611 Psalm (70:16), where one version has the reading: &#8220;Because I was not part of the marketplace,
612 I will enter into the strength of the Lord.&#8221;</p>
613 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">392 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">His disciples then remembered, </span>he sets down a prophecy which was
614 written in Psalm 69 (v 9): &#8220;Zeal for your house consumes me.&#8221; Here we should remark that zeal,
615 properly speaking, signifies an intensity of love, whereby the one who loves intensely does not
616 tolerate anything which is repugnant to his love. So it is that men who love their wives intensely
617 and cannot endure their being in the company of other men, as this conflicts with their own love,
618 are called &#8220;zelotypes.&#8221; Thus, properly speaking, one is said to have zeal for God who cannot
619 patiently endure anything contrary to the honor of God, <span style="font-weight: bold">whoin</span> he loves above all else: &#8220;I have
620 been very zealous for the Lord God of hosts&#8221; (1 Kgs 19:10). Now we should love the house of
621 the Lord, according to the Psalm (25:8): &#8220;O Lord, I have loved the beauty of your house.&#8221; Indeed,
622 we should love it so much that our zeal consumes us, so that if we notice anything amiss being
623 done, we should try to eliminate it, no matter how dear to us are those who are doing it; nor
624 should we fear any evils that we might have to endure as a result. So the Gloss says: &#8220;Good zeal
625 is a fervor of spirit, by which, scorning the fear of death, one is on fire for the defense of the
626 truth. He is consumed by it who takes steps to correct any perversity he sees; and if he cannot,
627 he tolerates it with sadness.&#8221;</p>
628 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">&#160;</p>
629 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style="font-weight: bold">LECTURE 3</span></p>
630 <BLOCKQUOTE><p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">18 At this the Jews responded and said, &#8220;What sign can you show us authorizing you to do these
631 things?&#8221; 19 Jesus replied, &#8220;Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up again.&#8221; 20 The
632 Jews then retorted, &#8220;This temple took forty-six years to build, and you are going to raise it up
633 again in three days!&#8221; 21 He was speaking, however, of the temple of his body. 22 When,
634 therefore, he had risen from the dead, his disciples recalled that he had said this; they then
635 believed the Scriptures and the statement Jesus had made. 23 While he was in Jerusalem during
636 the Passover feast, many people, seeing the signs he was working, believed in his name. 24 But
637 Jesus did not trust himself to them, for he knew all men, 25 and he did not need anyone to give
638 him testimony about men. He was well aware of what was in man&#8217;s heart.</p></BLOCKQUOTE>
639 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">393 Having set forth the occasion for showing the sign, the Evangelist then states the sign which
640 would be given. First, he gives the sign. Secondly, he mentions the fruit of the signs Christ
641 performed (v 23). As to the first he does three things. First, the request for the sign is given.
642 Secondly, the sign itself (v 19). Thirdly, the way the sign was understood (v 20).</p>
643 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">394 The Jews ask for a sign; and this is what he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">What sign can you show us authorizing
644 you to do these things?</span></p>
645 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">395 Here we should note that when Jesus drove the merchants Out of the temple, two things
646 could be considered in Christ: his rectitude and zeal, which pertain to virtue; and his power or
647 authority. <span style="font-weight: bold">It was not appropriate to </span>require a sign from Christ concerning the virtue and zeal
648 with which he did the above action, since everyone may lawfully act according to virtue. But he
649 could be required to give a sign concerning his authority for driving them out of the temple, since
650 it is not lawful for anyone to do this unless he has the authority.</p>
651 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">And so the Jews, not questioning his zeal and virtue, ask for a sign of his authority; and so they
652 say, <span style="font-weight: bold">What sign can you show us authorizing you to do these things? </span>i.e., Why do you drive
653 us out with such power and authority, for this does not seem to be your office? They say the same
654 thing in Matthew (21:23): &#8220;By what authority are you doing these things?&#8221;</p>
655 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">396 The reason they ask for a sign is that it was the usual thing for Jews to require a sign, seeing
656 that they were called to the law by signs: &#8220;There did not arise again in Israel a prophet like
657 Moses, whom, the Lord knew face to face, with all his signs and wonders,&#8221; as is said in
658 Deuteronomy (34:10), and &#8220;The Jews require signs,&#8221; as we find in 1 Corinthians (1:22). Hence
659 David complains for the Jews saying: &#8220;We have not seen our signs&#8221; (Ps 73:9). However, they
660 asked him for a sign not in order to believe, but in the hope that he would not be able to provide
661 the sign, and then they could obstruct and restrain him. And so, because they asked in an evil
662 manner, he did not give them an evident sign, but a sign clothed in a symbol, a sign concerning
663 the resurrection.</p>
664 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">397 Hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Jesus replied, </span>and he gives the sign for which they asked. He gives them the
665 sign of his future resurrection because this shows most strikingly the power of his divinity. For
666 it is not within the power of mere man to raise himself from the dead. Christ alone, who was free
667 among the dead, did this by the power of his divinity. tie shows them a similar sign in Matthew
668 (12:30): &#8220;An evil and adulterous generation asks for a sign. And a sign will not be given it,
669 except the sign of Jonah the prophet.&#8221; And although he gave a hidden and symbolic sign on both
670 occasions, the first was stated more clearly, and the second more obscurely.</p>
671 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">398 We should note that before the incarnation, God gave a sign of the incarnation to come: &#8220;The
672 Lord himself will give you a sign. A virgin will conceive, and give birth to a son&#8221; (Is 7:14). And
673 in like manner, before the resurrection he gave a sign of the resurrection to come. And he did this
674 because it is especially by these two events that the power of the divinity in Christ is evidenced.
675 For nothing more marvelous could be done than that God become man and that Christ&#8217;s
676 humanity should become a partaker of divine immortality after his resurrection: &#8220;Christ, rising
677 froni the dead, will not die again ... his life is life with God&#8221; (Roin 6:9), i.e., in a likeness to God.</p>
678 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">399 We should note the words Christ used in giving this sign. For Christ calls his body a temple,
679 because a temple is something in which God dwells, according to &#8220;The Lord is in his holy
680 temple&#8221; (Ps 10:5). And so a holy soul, in which God dwells, is also called a temple of God: &#8220;The
681 temple of God is holy, and that is what you are&#8221; (1 Cor 3:17). Therefore, because the divinity
682 dwells in the body of Christ, the body of Christ is the temple of God, not only according to the
683 soul but also according to the body: &#8220;In him all the fulness of the divinity dwells bodily&#8221; (Col
684 2:9). God dwells in us by grace, i.e., according to an act of the intellect and will, neither of which
685 is an act of the body, but of the soul alone. But he dwells in Christ according to a union in the
686 person; and this union includes not only the soul, but the body as well. And so the very body of
687 Christ is God&#8217;s temple.</p>
688 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">400 But Nestorius, using this text in support of his error, claims that the Word of God was joined
689 to human nature only by an indwelling, from which it follows that the person of God is distinct
690 from that of man in Christ. Therefore it is important to insist that God&#8217;s indwelling in Christ
691 refers to the nature, since in Christ human nature is distinct from the divine, and not to the
692 persom, which in the case of Christ is the same for both God and man, that is, the person of the
693 Word, as was said above.</p>
694 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">401 Therefore, granting this, the Lord does two things with respect to this sign. First, he foretells
695 his future death. Secondly, his resurrection.</p>
696 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">402 Christ foretells his own death when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Destroy this temple. </span>For Christ died and was
697 killed by others: &#8220;And they will kill him&#8221; (Mt 17:22), yet with him willing it: because as is said:
698 &#8220;He was offered because it was his own will&#8221; (Is 53:7). And so he says, Destroy this temple, i.e.,
699 my body. He does not say, &#8220;it will be destroyed,&#8221; lest you suppose he killed himself. He says,
700 Destroy, which is not a command but a prediction and a permission. A prediction, so that the
701 sense is, <span style="font-weight: bold">Destroy this temple, </span>i.e., you will destroy. And a permission, so that the sense is,
702 <span style="font-weight: bold">Destroy this temple, </span>i.e., do with my body what you will, I submit it to you. As he said to Judas:
703 &#8220;What you are going to do, do quickly&#8221; (below 13:27), not as commanding him, but as
704 abandoning himself to his decision.</p>
705 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style="font-weight: bold">He says Destroy, </span>because the death of Christ is the dissolution of his body, but in a way different
706 from that of other men. For the bodies of other men are destroyed by death even to the point of
707 the body&#8217;s returning to dust and ashes. But Such a dissolution did not take place in Christ, for is
708 it is said: &#8220;You will not allow your Holy One to see corruption&#8221; (Ps 15:10). Nevertheless, death
709 did bring a dissolution to Christ, because his soul was separated from his body as a form from
710 matter, and because his blood was separated from his body, and because his body was pierced
711 with nails and a lance.</p>
712 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">403 He foretells his resurrection when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">and in three days I will raise it up again, </span>that
713 is, his body; i.e., I will raise it from the dead. He does not say, &#8220;I will be raised up,&#8221; or &#8220;The
714 Father will raise it up,&#8221; but <span style="font-weight: bold">I will raise it up, </span>to show that he would rise from the dead by his
715 own power. Yet we do not deny that the Father raised him from the dead, because as it is said:
716 &#8220;Who raised Jesus from the dead&#8221; (Rom 8:11); and &#8220;O Lord, have pity on me, and raise me up&#8221;
717 (Ps 40:10). And so God the Father raised Christ from the dead, and Christ arose by his own
718 power: &#8220;I have slept and have taken my rest, and I have risen, because the Lord has taken me&#8221;
719 (Ps 3:6). There is no contradiction in this, because the power of both is the same; hence
720 &#8220;whatever the Father does, the Son does likewise&#8221; (below 5:19). For if the Father raised him up,
721 so too did the Son: &#8220;Although he was crucified through weakness, he lives through the power of
722 God&#8221; (2 Cor 13:4).</p>
723 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">404 He says, <span style="font-weight: bold">and in three days, </span>and not &#8220;after three days,&#8221; because he did not remain in the
724 tomb for three complete days; but, as Augustine says, he is employing synecdoche, in which a
725 part is taken for the whole.</p>
726 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">Origen, however, assigns a mystical reason for this expression, and says: The true body of Christ
727 is the temple of God, and this body symbolizes the mystical body, i.e., the Church: &#8220;You are the
728 body of Christ&#8221; (1 Cor 12:27). And as the divinity dwells in the body of Christ through the grace
729 of union, so too he dwells in the Church through the grace of adoption. Although that body may
730 seem to be destroyed mystically by the adversities of persecutions with which it is afflicted,
731 nevertheless it is raised up in &#8220;three days,&#8221; namely, in the &#8220;day&#8221; of the law of nature, the &#8220;day&#8221;
732 of the written law, and the &#8220;day&#8221; of the law of grace; because in those days a part of that body
733 was destroyed, while another still lived. And so he says, in three days, because the spiritual
734 resurrection of this body is accomplished in three days. But after those three days we will be
735 perfectly risen, not only as to the first resurrection, but also as to the second: &#8220;Happy are they
736 who share in the second [sic] resurrection&#8221; (Rv 20:6).</p>
737 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">405 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">The Jews then retorted, </span>we have the interpretation of the sign he gave.
738 First, the false interpretation of the Jews. Secondly, its true understanding by the apostles (v 21).</p>
739 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">406 The interpretation of the Jews was false, because they believed that Christ was saying this
740 of the material temple in which he then was; consequently, they answer according to this
741 interpretation and say: <span style="font-weight: bold">This temple took forty-six years to build, </span>i.e., this material temple in
742 which we are standing, <span style="font-weight: bold">and you are going to raise it up again in three days!</span></p>
743 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">407 There is a literal objection against this. For the temple in Jerusalem was built by Solomon,
744 and it is recorded in 2 Chronicles (6:1) that it was completed by Solomon in seven years. How
745 then can it be said that this temple took forty-six years to build? I answer that according to some
746 this is not to be understood of the very first temple, which was completed by Solomon in seven
747 years: for that temple built by Solomon was destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar. But it is to be
748 understood of the temple rebuilt under Zerubbabel, after they returned from captivity, as recorded
749 in the book of Ezra (5:2). However, this rebuilding was so hindered and delayed by the frequent
750 attacks of their enemies on all sides, that the temple was not finished until forty-six years had
751 passed.</p>
752 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">408 Or it could be said, according to Origen, that they were speaking of Solomon&#8217;s temple: and
753 it did take forty-six years to build if the time be reckoned from the day when David first spoke
754 of building a temple and discussed it with Nathan the prophet, as we find in 2 Samuel (7:2), until
755 its final completion under Solomon. For from that first day onward David began preparing the
756 material and the things necessary for building the temple. Accordingly, if the time in question
757 is carefully calculated, it will come to forty-six years.</p>
758 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">409 But although the Jews referred their interpretation to the material temple, nevertheless,
759 according to Augustine, it can be referred to the temple of Christ&#8217;s body. As he says in <i>The Book
760 of Eighty-tnree Questions, </i>the conception and formation of the human body is completed in
761 forty-five days in the following manner. During the first six days, the conception of a human
762 body has a likeness to milk; during the next nine days it is converted into blood; then in the next
763 twelve days, it is hardened into flesh; then the remaining eighteen days, it is formed into a perfect
764 outlining of all the members. But if we add six, nine, twelve and eighteen, we get forty-five; and
765 if we add &#8220;one&#8221; for the sacrament of unity, we get forty-six.</p>
766 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">410 However a question arises about this: because this process of formation does not seem to
767 have taken place in Christ, who was formed and animated at the very instant of conception. But
768 one may answer that although in the formation of Christ&#8217;s body there was something unique, in
769 that Christ&#8217;s body was perfect at that instant as to the outlining of its members, it was not perfect
770 as to the quantity due the body; and so he remained in the Virgin&#8217;s womb until he attained the
771 due quantity.</p>
772 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">However, let us take the above numbers and select six, which was the first, and forty-six, which
773 was the last, and let us multiply one by the other. The result is two hundred seventy-six. Now if
774 we assemble these days into months, allotting thirty days to a month, we get nine months and six
775 days. Thus it was correct to say that it took forty-six years to build the temple, which signifies
776 the body of Christ; the suggestion being that there were as many years in building the temple as
777 there were days in perfecting the body of Christ. For from March twenty-five, when Christ was
778 conceived, and (as is believed) when he suffered, to December twenty-five, there are this number
779 of days, namely, two hundred seventy-six, a number that is the result of multiplying forty-six by
780 six.</p>
781 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">411 Augustine (as is plain from the Gloss) has another mystical interpretation of this number. For
782 he says that if one adds the letters in the name &#8220;Adam,&#8221; using for each the number it represented
783 for the Greeks, the result is forty-six. For in Greek, A represents the number one, since it is the
784 first letter of the alphabet. And according to this order, D is four. Adding to the sum of these
785 another one for the second A and forty for the letter M, we have forty-six. This signifies that the
786 body of Christ was derived from the body of Adam.</p>
787 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">Again, according to the Greeks, the name &#8220;Adam&#8221; is composed of the first letters of the names
788 of the four directions of the world: namely, Anathole, which is the east; Disis, which is the west;
789 Arctos, which is the north; and Mensembria, the south. This signifies that Christ derived his flesh
790 from Adam in order to gather his elect from the four parts of the world: &#8220;He will gather his elect
791 from the four winds&#8221; (Mt 24:31).</p>
792 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">412 Then, the true interpretation of this sign as understood by the apostles is given (v 2 1). First,
793 the way they understood it is given. Secondly, the time when they understood it (v 22).</p>
794 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">413 He says therefore: The Jews said this out of ignorance. But Christ did not understand it in
795 their way; in fact, he meant the temple of his body, and this is what he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">He was speaking,
796 how</span>ever, of <span style="font-weight: bold">the temple of his body. </span>We have already explained why the body of Christ could
797 be called a temple.</p>
798 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">Apollinaris misunderstood this and said that the body of Christ was inanimate matter because the
799 temple was inanimate. He was mistaken in this for when it is said that the body of Christ is a
800 temple, one is speaking metaphorically. And in this way of speaking a likeness does not exist in
801 all respects, but only in some respect, namely, as to indwelling, which is referred to the nature,
802 as was explained. Further, this is evident from the authority of Sacred Scriptuire. when Christ
803 himself said: &#8220;I have the power to lay down my life,&#8221; as we read below (10:18).</p>
804 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">414 The time when the apostles acquired this true understanding is then shown by the Evangelist
805 when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">When, therefore, he had risen from the dead, his disciples recalled that he had
806 said this. </span>Prior to the resurrection it was difficult to understand this. First, because this statement
807 asserted that the true divinity was in the body of Christ; otherwise it could not be called a temple.
808 And to understand this at that time was above human ability. Secondly, because in this statement
809 mention is made of the passion and resurrection, when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">I will raise it up again; </span>and this
810 is something none of the disciples had heard mentioned before. Consequently, when Christ spoke
811 of his resurrection and passion to the apostles, Peter was scandalized when he heard it, saying,
812 &#8220;God forbid, Lord&#8221; (Mt 16:22). But after the resurrection, when they now clearly understood that
813 Christ was God, through what he had shown in regard to his passion and resurrection, and when
814 they had learned of the mystery of his resurrection, <span style="font-weight: bold">his disciples recalled that he had said this
815 </span>of his body, and <span style="font-weight: bold">they then believed the Scriptures, </span>i.e., the prophets: &#8220;He will revive us after
816 two days; on the third day he will raise us up&#8221; (Hos 6:3), and &#8220;Jonah was in the belly of the fish
817 three days and three nights&#8221; (Jon 2:1). So it is that on the very day of the resurrection he opened
818 their understanding so that they might understand the Scriptures <span style="font-weight: bold">and the statement Jesus had
819 made, </span>namely, <span style="font-weight: bold">Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up again.</span></p>
820 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">415 In the anagogical sense, according to Origen, we understand by this that in the final
821 resurrection of nature we will be disciples of Christ, when in the great resurrection the entire
822 body of Jesus, that is, his Church, will be made certain of the things we now hold through faith
823 in a dark manner. Then we shall receive the fulfillment of faith, seeing in actual fact what we
824 now observe through a mirror.</p>
825 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">416 Then (v 23) he sets forth the fruit which resulted from the signs, namely, the conversion of
826 certain believers. Concerning this he does three things. First, he mentions those who believed on
827 account of the miracles. Secondly, he shows the attitude of Christ to them (v 24). Thirdly, he
828 gives the reason for this (v 25).</p>
829 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">417 The fruit which developed from the signs of Jesus was abundant, because many believed and
830 were converted to him; and this is what he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">While he was in Jerusalem during the
831 Passover feast, many people, seeing the signs he was working, believed in his name, </span>i.e., in
832 him.</p>
833 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">418 Note that they believed in two ways: sorne on account of the iniracles they saw, and sonic
834 oil account of the revelation and prophecy of&#8217; hidden things. Now those who believe oil account
835 of doctrine are more commendable, because they are more spiritual than those who believe on
836 account of signs, which are grosser and on the level of sense. Those who were converted are
837 shown to be more on the level of sense by the fact that they did not believe on account of the
838 doctrine, as the disciples did, but <span style="font-weight: bold">seeing the signs he was working: </span>&#8220;Prophecies are for those
839 who believe&#8221; (1 Cor 14:22).</p>
840 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">419 One might ask which signs worked by Jesus they saw, for we do not read of any sign worked
841 by him in Jerusalem at that time. According to Origen, there are two answers to this. First, Jesus
842 did work many miracles there at that time, which are not recorded here; for the Evangelist
843 purposely omitted many of Christ&#8217;s miracles, since he worked so many that they could not easily
844 be recorded: &#8220;Jesus did many other signs, and if every one was written, the world itself, I think,
845 would not be able to contain the books that would be written&#8221; (below 21:25). And the Evangelist
846 expressly shows this when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">seeing the signs he was working, </span>without mentioning them,
847 because it was not the intention of the Evangelist to record all the signs of Jesus, but as many as
848 were needed to instruct the Church of the faithful. The second answer is that among the miracles
849 the greatest could be the sign in which Jesus by himself drove from the temple a crowd of men
850 with a whip of small cords.</p>
851 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">420 The attitude of Jesus to those who believed in him is shown when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">But Jesus did
852 not trust himself to them, </span>i.e., those who had believed in him. What is this, men entrust
853 themselves to God, and Jesus himself does not entrust himself to them? Could they kill him
854 against his will? Some will say that he did not trust himself to them because he knew that their
855 belief was not genuine. But if this were true, the Evangelist would surely not have said that many
856 believed in his name, and yet he did not trust himself to them. According to Chrysostom, the
857 reason is that they did believe in him, but imperfectly, because they were not yet able to attain
858 to the profound mysteries of Christ, and so <span style="font-weight: bold">Jesus did not trust himself to them, </span>i.e., he did not
859 yet reveal his secret mysteries to them; for there were many things he would not reveal even to
860 the apostles: &#8220;I still have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now&#8221; (below
861 16:12), and &#8220;I could not speak to you as spiritual persons, but as sensual&#8221; (1 Cor 3:1). And so it
862 is significant that in order to show that they believed imperfectly, the Evangelist does not say that
863 they believed &#8220;in him,&#8221; because they did not yet believe in his divinity, but he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">in his name,
864 </span>i.e., they believed what was said about him, nominally, i.e., that he was just, or something of that
865 sort.</p>
866 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">Or, according to Augustine, these people represent the catechumens in the Church, who, although
867 they believe in the name of Christ, Jesus does not trust himself to them, because the Church does
868 not give them the body of Christ. For just as no priest except one ordained in the priesthood can
869 consecrate that body, so no one but a baptized person may receive it.</p>
870 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">421 The reason Jesus did not trust himself to them arises from his perfect knowledge; hence he
871 says, <span style="font-weight: bold">for he knew all men. </span>For although one must ordinarily presume good of everyone, yet after
872 the truth about certain people is known, one should act according to their condition. Now because
873 nothing in man was unknown to Christ and since he knew that they believed imperfectly, he did
874 not trust himself to them.</p>
875 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">422 The universal knowledge of Christ is then described: for he knew not only those who were
876 on close terms with him, but strangers too. And therefore he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">for he knew all men; </span>and this
877 by the power of his divinity: &#8220;The eyes of the Lord are far brighter than the sun&#8221; (Sir 23:28). Now
878 a man, although he may know other people, cannot have a sure knowledge of them, because he
879 sees only what appears; consequently, he must rely on the testimony of others. But Christ knows
880 with the greatest certainty, because he beholds the heart; and so <span style="font-weight: bold">he did not need anyone to give
881 testimony about men. </span>In fact, he is the one who gives testimony: &#8220;Look, my witness is in
882 heaven&#8221; (Jb 16:20)</p>
883 <p style="text-align: justify; margin-bottom: 0.125in">His knowledge was perfect, because it extended not only to what was exterior, but even to the
884 interior; thus he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">He was well aware of what was in man&#8217;s heart, </span>i.e., the secrets of the
885 heart: &#8220;Hell and destruction are open to the Lord: how much more the hearts of the children of
886 men&#8221; (Prv 15:11).</p>
887 </body>
888
889 </html>