comparison john/english/John5.html @ 35:178aed5d2c3c

convert to XML
author ht
date Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:05:42 +0000
parents 25a799388159
children
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
34:2bc1f3a24bc0 35:178aed5d2c3c
1 <html> 1 <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
2 "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
3 <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
2 <head> 4 <head>
5 <meta name="generator" content=
6 "HTML Tidy for Cygwin (vers 25 March 2009), see www.w3.org" />
7 <title></title>
3 </head> 8 </head>
4 <body style=text-align:justify><blockquote> 9 <body style="text-align:justify">
5 <CENTER><p><span style="font-size: 60pt">5</span></p> 10 <blockquote>
6 <p><span style="font-weight: bold">LECTURE 1</span></p></CENTER> 11 <center>
7 <BLOCKQUOTE><p>1 After this there was a Jewish festival, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem. 2 Now at Jerusalem 12 <p><span style="font-size: 60pt">5</span></p>
8 there is a Sheep Pool, called in Hebrew Bethsaida, having five porticoes. 3 In these porticoes lay 13 <p><span style="font-weight: bold">LECTURE 1</span></p>
9 a great number of people: feeble, blind, lame and withered, waiting for the movement of the 14 </center>
10 water. 4 From time to time an angel of the Lord used to come down into the pool and the water 15 <blockquote>
11 was stirred up, and the first one into the pool after it was stirred was healed of whatever ailment 16 <p>1 After this there was a Jewish festival, and Jesus went up to
12 he had. 5 There was one man lying there who had been sick for thirty-eight years with his 17 Jerusalem. 2 Now at Jerusalem there is a Sheep Pool, called in
13 infirmity. 6 Jesus, seeing him lying there and knowing that he had been sick a long time, said to 18 Hebrew Bethsaida, having five porticoes. 3 In these porticoes lay a
14 him, &#8220;Do you wish to be healed?&#8221; 7 The sick man said, &#8220;Sir, I have no one to plunge me into the 19 great number of people: feeble, blind, lame and withered, waiting
15 pool once the water is stirred up. By the time I get there, someone else has gone in before me.&#8221; 20 for the movement of the water. 4 From time to time an angel of the
16 8 Jesus said to him, &#8220;Stand up, pick up your mat and walk!&#8221; 9a The man was immediately cured; 21 Lord used to come down into the pool and the water was stirred up,
17 he picked up his mat, and walked.</p></BLOCKQUOTE> 22 and the first one into the pool after it was stirred was healed of
18 <p>699 Above, our Lord dealt with spiritual rebirth; here he deals with the benefits God gives to 23 whatever ailment he had. 5 There was one man lying there who had
19 those who are spiritually reborn. Now we see that parents give three things to those who are 24 been sick for thirty-eight years with his infirmity. 6 Jesus,
20 physically born from them: life, nourishment, and instruction or discipline. And those who are 25 seeing him lying there and knowing that he had been sick a long
21 spiritually reborn receive these three from Christ: spiritual life, spiritual nourishment, and 26 time, said to him, &ldquo;Do you wish to be healed?&rdquo; 7 The
22 spiritual teaching. And so these three things are considered here: first, the giving of spiritual life; 27 sick man said, &ldquo;Sir, I have no one to plunge me into the pool
23 secondly, the giving of spiritual food (c 6); and thirdly, spiritual teaching (c 7).</p> 28 once the water is stirred up. By the time I get there, someone else
24 <p>About the first he does three things. First, he sets forth a visible sign in which he shows Christ&#8217;s 29 has gone in before me.&rdquo; 8 Jesus said to him, &ldquo;Stand up,
25 power to produce and to restore life. This is the usual practice in this Gospel: to always join to 30 pick up your mat and walk!&rdquo; 9a The man was immediately cured;
26 the teaching of Christ some appropriate visible action, so that what is invisible can be made 31 he picked up his mat, and walked.</p>
27 known through the visible. Secondly, the occasion for this teaching is given (v 9b). Thirdly, the 32 </blockquote>
28 teaching itself is given (v 19). As to the first he does three things. First, the place of the miracle 33 <p>699 Above, our Lord dealt with spiritual rebirth; here he deals
29 is given. Secondly, the illness involved. Thirdly, the restoration of the sick person to health (v 34 with the benefits God gives to those who are spiritually reborn.
30 8).</p> 35 Now we see that parents give three things to those who are
31 <p>700 The place of this miracle is described in two ways: in general and in particular. The general 36 physically born from them: life, nourishment, and instruction or
32 place is Jerusalem; so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">After this, </span>i.e., after the miracle performed in Galilee, <span style="font-weight: bold">there was 37 discipline. And those who are spiritually reborn receive these
33 a Jewish festival, </span>that is Pentecost, according to Chrysostom. For above, when Christ went to 38 three from Christ: spiritual life, spiritual nourishment, and
34 Jerusalem, it was the Passover that was mentioned; and now, on the following festival of 39 spiritual teaching. And so these three things are considered here:
35 Pentecost, <span style="font-weight: bold">Jesus went up to Jerusalem </span>again. For as we read in Exodus (23:17), the Lord 40 first, the giving of spiritual life; secondly, the giving of
36 commanded that all Jewish males be presented in the temple three times a year: on the festival 41 spiritual food (c 6); and thirdly, spiritual teaching (c 7).</p>
37 days of the Passover, Pentecost, and the Dedication.</p> 42 <p>About the first he does three things. First, he sets forth a
38 <p>There were two reasons why our Lord went up to Jerusalem for these festivals. First, so that he 43 visible sign in which he shows Christ&rsquo;s power to produce and
39 would not seem to oppose the law, for he said himself: &#8220;I have not come to destroy the law, but 44 to restore life. This is the usual practice in this Gospel: to
40 to complete it&#8221; (Mt 5:17); and in order to draw the many people gathered there on the feast days 45 always join to the teaching of Christ some appropriate visible
41 to God by his signs and teaching: &#8220;I will praise him in the midst of the people&#8221; (Ps 108:30); and 46 action, so that what is invisible can be made known through the
42 again, &#8220;I have declared your justice in the great assembly&#8221; (Ps 39:10). So Christ himself says, as 47 visible. Secondly, the occasion for this teaching is given (v 9b).
43 we read below (18:20): &#8220;1 have spoken openly to the world.&#8221;</p> 48 Thirdly, the teaching itself is given (v 19). As to the first he
44 <p>701 The specific place of the miracle was the pool called the Sheep Pool; so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Now at 49 does three things. First, the place of the miracle is given.
45 Jerusalem there is a Sheep Pool. </span>This is described here in four ways: by its name, its structure, 50 Secondly, the illness involved. Thirdly, the restoration of the
46 from its occupants, and from its power.</p> 51 sick person to health (v 8).</p>
47 <p>702 First, it is described from its name when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">there is a Sheep Pool </span>(<i>probatica piscina</i>),<i> 52 <p>700 The place of this miracle is described in two ways: in
48 </i>for <i>probaton </i>is Greek for &#8220;sheep.&#8221; It was called the Sheep Pool for it was there that the priests 53 general and in particular. The general place is Jerusalem; so he
49 washed the sacrificial animals; especially the sheep, who were used more than the other animals. 54 says, <span style="font-weight: bold">After this,</span> i.e.,
50 And so in Hebrew it was called <span style="font-weight: bold">Bethsaida, </span>that is, the &#8220;house of sheep.&#8221; This pool was located 55 after the miracle performed in Galilee, <span style=
56 "font-weight: bold">there was a Jewish festival,</span> that is
57 Pentecost, according to Chrysostom. For above, when Christ went to
58 Jerusalem, it was the Passover that was mentioned; and now, on the
59 following festival of Pentecost, <span style=
60 "font-weight: bold">Jesus went up to Jerusalem</span> again. For as
61 we read in Exodus (23:17), the Lord commanded that all Jewish males
62 be presented in the temple three times a year: on the festival days
63 of the Passover, Pentecost, and the Dedication.</p>
64 <p>There were two reasons why our Lord went up to Jerusalem for
65 these festivals. First, so that he would not seem to oppose the
66 law, for he said himself: &ldquo;I have not come to destroy the
67 law, but to complete it&rdquo; (Mt 5:17); and in order to draw the
68 many people gathered there on the feast days to God by his signs
69 and teaching: &ldquo;I will praise him in the midst of the
70 people&rdquo; (Ps 108:30); and again, &ldquo;I have declared your
71 justice in the great assembly&rdquo; (Ps 39:10). So Christ himself
72 says, as we read below (18:20): &ldquo;1 have spoken openly to the
73 world.&rdquo;</p>
74 <p>701 The specific place of the miracle was the pool called the
75 Sheep Pool; so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Now at
76 Jerusalem there is a Sheep Pool.</span> This is described here in
77 four ways: by its name, its structure, from its occupants, and from
78 its power.</p>
79 <p>702 First, it is described from its name when he says,
80 <span style="font-weight: bold">there is a Sheep Pool</span>
81 (<i>probatica piscina</i>),for <i>probaton</i> is Greek for
82 &ldquo;sheep.&rdquo; It was called the Sheep Pool for it was there
83 that the priests washed the sacrificial animals; especially the
84 sheep, who were used more than the other animals. And so in Hebrew
85 it was called <span style="font-weight: bold">Bethsaida,</span>
86 that is, the &ldquo;house of sheep.&rdquo; This pool was located
51 near the temple, and formed from collected rain water.</p> 87 near the temple, and formed from collected rain water.</p>
52 <p>703 In its mystical sense, this pool, according to Chrysostom, has prefigured Baptism. For the 88 <p>703 In its mystical sense, this pool, according to Chrysostom,
53 Lord, wishing to prefigure the grace of baptsim in different ways, first of all chose water: for this 89 has prefigured Baptism. For the Lord, wishing to prefigure the
54 washes the body from the uncleanness which came from contact with what was legally unclean 90 grace of baptsim in different ways, first of all chose water: for
55 (Nm 19). Secondly, he gave this pool a power that expresses even more vividly than water the 91 this washes the body from the uncleanness which came from contact
56 power of Baptism: for it not only cleansed the body from its uncleanness, but also healed it from 92 with what was legally unclean (Nm 19). Secondly, he gave this pool
57 its illness; for symbols are more expressive, the closer they approach the reality. Thus it signified 93 a power that expresses even more vividly than water the power of
58 the power of Baptism: for as this water when applied to the body had the power (not by its own 94 Baptism: for it not only cleansed the body from its uncleanness,
59 nature, but from an angel) to heal its illness, so the water of Baptism has the power to heal and 95 but also healed it from its illness; for symbols are more
60 cleanse the soul from sins: &#8220;He loved us, and washed us from our sins&#8221; (Rv 1:5). This is the 96 expressive, the closer they approach the reality. Thus it signified
61 reason why the passion of Christ, prefigured by the sacrifices of the Old Law, is represented in 97 the power of Baptism: for as this water when applied to the body
62 Baptism: &#8220;All of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus, have been baptized into his death&#8221; 98 had the power (not by its own nature, but from an angel) to heal
63 (Rom 6:3).</p> 99 its illness, so the water of Baptism has the power to heal and
64 <p>According to Augustine, the water in this pool signified the condition of the Jewish people, 100 cleanse the soul from sins: &ldquo;He loved us, and washed us from
65 according to: &#8220;The waters are the peoples&#8221; (Rv 17:15). The Gentiles were not confined within 101 our sins&rdquo; (Rv 1:5). This is the reason why the passion of
66 the limits of the divine law, but each of them lived according to the vanity of his heart (Eph 102 Christ, prefigured by the sacrifices of the Old Law, is represented
67 4:17). But the Jews were confined under the worship of the one God: &#8220;We were kept under the 103 in Baptism: &ldquo;All of us who have been baptized into Christ
68 law, confined, until the faith was revealed&#8221; (Gal 3:23). So this water, confined to the pool, 104 Jesus, have been baptized into his death&rdquo; (Rom 6:3).</p>
69 signified the Jewish people. And it was called the Sheep Pool, for the Jews were the special 105 <p>According to Augustine, the water in this pool signified the
70 sheep of God: &#8220;We are his people, his sheep&#8221; (Ps 94:7).</p> 106 condition of the Jewish people, according to: &ldquo;The waters are
71 <p>704 The pool is described in its structure as <span style="font-weight: bold">having five porticoes, </span>i.e., round about, so that a 107 the peoples&rdquo; (Rv 17:15). The Gentiles were not confined
72 number of the priests could stand and wash the animals without inconvenience. In the mystical 108 within the limits of the divine law, but each of them lived
73 sense these five porticoes, according to Chrysostom, signify the five wounds in the body of 109 according to the vanity of his heart (Eph 4:17). But the Jews were
74 Christ; about which we read: &#8220;Put your hand into my side, and do not be unbelieving, but 110 confined under the worship of the one God: &ldquo;We were kept
75 believe&#8221; (below 20:27). But according to Augustine, these five porticoes signify the five books 111 under the law, confined, until the faith was revealed&rdquo; (Gal
76 of Moses.</p> 112 3:23). So this water, confined to the pool, signified the Jewish
77 <p>705 The pool is also described from its occupants, for <span style="font-weight: bold">in these porticoes lay a great number 113 people. And it was called the Sheep Pool, for the Jews were the
78 of people: feeble, blind, lame and withered. </span>The literal explanation of this is that since all the 114 special sheep of God: &ldquo;We are his people, his sheep&rdquo;
79 afflicted persons gathered because of the curative power of the water, which did not always cure 115 (Ps 94:7).</p>
80 nor cure many at the same time, it was inevitable that there be many hanging around waiting to 116 <p>704 The pool is described in its structure as <span style=
81 be cured. The mystical meaning of this, for Augustine, was that the law was incapable of healing 117 "font-weight: bold">having five porticoes,</span> i.e., round
82 sins: &#8220;It is impossible that sins be taken away by the blood of bulls and goats&#8221; (Heb 10:4). The 118 about, so that a number of the priests could stand and wash the
83 law merely shed light on them, for &#8220;The knowledge of sin comes from the law&#8221; (Rom 3:20).</p> 119 animals without inconvenience. In the mystical sense these five
84 <p>706 And so, subject to various illnesses, these people lay there, unable to be cured. They are 120 porticoes, according to Chrysostom, signify the five wounds in the
85 described in four ways. First, by their posture: for there they lay, i.e., clinging to earthly things 121 body of Christ; about which we read: &ldquo;Put your hand into my
86 by their sins; for one who is lying down is in direct contact with the earth: &#8220;He had compassion 122 side, and do not be unbelieving, but believe&rdquo; (below 20:27).
87 on them, for they were suffering, and lying like sheep without a shepherd&#8221; (Mt 9:36). But the just 123 But according to Augustine, these five porticoes signify the five
88 do not lie down, but stand upright, toward the things of heaven: &#8220;They,&#8221; i.e., sinners, &#8220;are bound, 124 books of Moses.</p>
89 and have fallen down; but we,&#8221; the just, &#8220;have stood and are erect&#8221; (Ps 19:9).</p> 125 <p>705 The pool is also described from its occupants, for
90 <p>Secondly, they are described as to their number, for there was a <span style="font-weight: bold">great number </span>of them: &#8220;The evil 126 <span style="font-weight: bold">in these porticoes lay a great
91 are hard to correct, and the iiurnber of fools is infinite&#8221; (Ecc 1:15); and in Matthew (7:13): &#8220;The 127 number of people: feeble, blind, lame and withered.</span> The
92 road that leads to destruction is wide, and many go this way.&#8221;</p> 128 literal explanation of this is that since all the afflicted persons
93 <p>Thirdly, these sick people are described as to their condition. And he mentions four things which 129 gathered because of the curative power of the water, which did not
94 a person brings on himself through sin. First, a person who is ruled by sinful passions is made 130 always cure nor cure many at the same time, it was inevitable that
95 listless or feeble: and so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">feeble</span>. So it is that Cicero calls certain passions of the soul, 131 there be many hanging around waiting to be cured. The mystical
96 such as anger and concupiscence and the like, illnesses of the soul. And the Psalm says: &#8220;Have 132 meaning of this, for Augustine, was that the law was incapable of
97 mercy on me, O Lord, for I am week&#8221; (Ps 6:3).</p> 133 healing sins: &ldquo;It is impossible that sins be taken away by
98 <p>Secondly, due to the rule and victory of a man&#8217;s passions, his reason is blinded by consent; and 134 the blood of bulls and goats&rdquo; (Heb 10:4). The law merely shed
99 he says as to this, <span style="font-weight: bold">blind, </span>that is, through sins. According to Wisdom (2:21): &#8220;Their own evil 135 light on them, for &ldquo;The knowledge of sin comes from the
100 blinded them&#8221;; and in the Psalm (57:9): &#8220;Fire,&#8221; that is the fire of anger and concupiscence, &#8220;fell 136 law&rdquo; (Rom 3:20).</p>
101 on them, and they did not see the sun.&#8221;</p> 137 <p>706 And so, subject to various illnesses, these people lay
102 <p>Thirdly, a person who is feeble and blind is inconstant in his works and is, in a way, lame. So we 138 there, unable to be cured. They are described in four ways. First,
103 read in Proverbs (11:18): &#8220;The work of the wicked is unsteady.&#8221; With respect to this the 139 by their posture: for there they lay, i.e., clinging to earthly
104 Evangelist says, lame. &#8220;How long will you be lame?&#8221; (1 Kgs 18:2 1).</p> 140 things by their sins; for one who is lying down is in direct
105 <p>Fourthly, a man who is thus feeble, blind in understanding, and lame in his exterior actions, 141 contact with the earth: &ldquo;He had compassion on them, for they
106 becomes dry in his affections, in the sense that all the fatness of devotion withers within him. 142 were suffering, and lying like sheep without a shepherd&rdquo; (Mt
107 This devotion is sought in the Psalm (62:6): &#8220;May my soul be filled with fat and marrow.&#8221; With 143 9:36). But the just do not lie down, but stand upright, toward the
108 respect to this the Evangelist says, withered. &#8220;My strength is dried up like baked clay&#8221; (Ps 21:16).</p> 144 things of heaven: &ldquo;They,&rdquo; i.e., sinners, &ldquo;are
109 <p>But there are some so afflicted by the lassitude of sin, who do not wait for the motion of the 145 bound, and have fallen down; but we,&rdquo; the just, &ldquo;have
110 water, wallowing in their sins, according to Wisdom (14:22): &#8220;They live in a great strife of 146 stood and are erect&rdquo; (Ps 19:9).</p>
111 ignorance, and they call so many and great evils peace.&#8221; We read of such people: &#8220;They are glad 147 <p>Secondly, they are described as to their number, for there was a
112 when they do evil, and rejoice in the worst of things&#8221; (Prv 2:14). The reason for this is that they 148 <span style="font-weight: bold">great number</span> of them:
113 do not hate their sins: they do not sin from ignorance or weakness, but from malice. But others, 149 &ldquo;The evil are hard to correct, and the iiurnber of fools is
114 who do not sin from malice, do not wallow in their sins, but wait by desire for the motion of the 150 infinite&rdquo; (Ecc 1:15); and in Matthew (7:13): &ldquo;The road
115 water. So he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">waiting. </span>&#8220;Every day of my service I wait for my relief to come&#8221; (Jb 14:14). 151 that leads to destruction is wide, and many go this way.&rdquo;</p>
116 This is the &#8216;way those in the Old Testament waited for Christ: &#8220;I will wait for your salvation, O 152 <p>Thirdly, these sick people are described as to their condition.
117 Lord&#8221; (Gn 49:18).</p> 153 And he mentions four things which a person brings on himself
118 <p>707 Finally, the power of the pool is described, for it healed all physical illnesses in virtue of an 154 through sin. First, a person who is ruled by sinful passions is
119 angel who came to it; so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">From time to time an angel of the Lord used to come down 155 made listless or feeble: and so he says, <span style=
120 into the pool. </span>In certain ways, the power of this pool is like that of Baptism. It is like it, first, in 156 "font-weight: bold">feeble</span>. So it is that Cicero calls
121 the fact that its power was unperceived: for the power of the water in this pool did not come from 157 certain passions of the soul, such as anger and concupiscence and
122 its very nature, otherwise it would have healed at all times; its power was unseen, being from an 158 the like, illnesses of the soul. And the Psalm says: &ldquo;Have
123 angel. So he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">From time to time an angel of the Lord used to come down into the pool. 159 mercy on me, O Lord, for I am week&rdquo; (Ps 6:3).</p>
124 </span>The water of Baptism is like this in that precisely as water it does not have the power to cleanse 160 <p>Secondly, due to the rule and victory of a man&rsquo;s passions,
125 souls, but this comes from the unseen power of the Holy Spirit, according to: &#8220;Unless one is born 161 his reason is blinded by consent; and he says as to this,
126 again ofwater and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God&#8221; (above 3:5). It is like it, 162 <span style="font-weight: bold">blind,</span> that is, through
127 in a second way, in its effect: for as the water of Baptism heals, so also the water of that pool 163 sins. According to Wisdom (2:21): &ldquo;Their own evil blinded
128 healed. So he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">the first one into the pool was healed. </span>Further, God gave to that water the 164 them&rdquo;; and in the Psalm (57:9): &ldquo;Fire,&rdquo; that is
129 power to heal so that men by washing might learn through their bodily health to seek their 165 the fire of anger and concupiscence, &ldquo;fell on them, and they
130 spiritual health.</p> 166 did not see the sun.&rdquo;</p>
131 <p>Yet the water of this pool differs from the water of Baptism in three ways. First, in the source of 167 <p>Thirdly, a person who is feeble and blind is inconstant in his
132 its power: for the water in the pool produced health because of an angel, but the water of Baptism 168 works and is, in a way, lame. So we read in Proverbs (11:18):
133 produces its effect by the uncreated power not only of the Holy Spirit, but of the entire Trinity. 169 &ldquo;The work of the wicked is unsteady.&rdquo; With respect to
134 Thus the entire Trinity was present at the baptism of Christ: the Father in the voice, the Son in 170 this the Evangelist says, lame. &ldquo;How long will you be
135 person, and the Holy Spirit in the form of a dove. This is why we invoke the Trinity in our 171 lame?&rdquo; (1 Kgs 18:2 1).</p>
136 baptism.</p> 172 <p>Fourthly, a man who is thus feeble, blind in understanding, and
137 <p>Secondly, this water differs in its power: for the water in the pool did not have a continuous 173 lame in his exterior actions, becomes dry in his affections, in the
138 power to cure, but only <span style="font-weight: bold">from time to time; </span>while the water of Baptism has a permanent power 174 sense that all the fatness of devotion withers within him. This
139 to cleanse, according to: &#8220;On that day a fountain will be open to the house of David, and to the 175 devotion is sought in the Psalm (62:6): &ldquo;May my soul be
140 inhabitants of Jerusalem, to cleanse the sinner and the unclean&#8221; (Zee 13:1).</p> 176 filled with fat and marrow.&rdquo; With respect to this the
141 <p>Thirdly, this water differs as regards the number of people healed: for only one person was cured 177 Evangelist says, withered. &ldquo;My strength is dried up like
142 when the water of this pool was moved; but all are healed when the water of Baptism is moved. 178 baked clay&rdquo; (Ps 21:16).</p>
143 And no wonder: for the power of the water in the pool, since it is created, is finite and has a finite 179 <p>But there are some so afflicted by the lassitude of sin, who do
144 effect; but in the water of Baptism there is an infinite power capable of cleansing an infinite 180 not wait for the motion of the water, wallowing in their sins,
145 number of souls, if there were such: &#8220;I will pour clean water upon you, and you will be cleansed 181 according to Wisdom (14:22): &ldquo;They live in a great strife of
146 from all your uncleanness&#8221; (Ez 36:25).</p> 182 ignorance, and they call so many and great evils peace.&rdquo; We
147 <p>708 According to Augustine, however, the angel signifies Christ, according to this reading of 183 read of such people: &ldquo;They are glad when they do evil, and
148 Isaiah (9:6): &#8220;He will be called great counsel.&#8221; Just as the angel descended at certain times into 184 rejoice in the worst of things&rdquo; (Prv 2:14). The reason for
149 the pool, so Christ descended into the world at a time fixed by the Father: &#8220;The time is near&#8221; (Is 185 this is that they do not hate their sins: they do not sin from
150 14:1); &#8220;When the fulness of time had come God sent his Son, made from a woman, inade under 186 ignorance or weakness, but from malice. But others, who do not sin
151 the law&#8221; (Gal 4:4). Again, just as the angel was not seen except by the motion of the water, so 187 from malice, do not wallow in their sins, but wait by desire for
152 Christ was not known as to his divinity, for &#8220;If they had known, they would never have crucified 188 the motion of the water. So he says, <span style=
153 the Lord of glory&#8221; (1 Cor 2:8). For as Isaiah (45:15) says: &#8220;Truly, you are a hidden God.&#8221; And 189 "font-weight: bold">waiting.</span> &ldquo;Every day of my service
154 so the motion of the water was seen, but not the one who set it in motion, because, seeing the 190 I wait for my relief to come&rdquo; (Jb 14:14). This is the
155 weakness of Christ, the people did not know of his divinity. And just as the one who went into 191 &lsquo;way those in the Old Testament waited for Christ: &ldquo;I
156 the pool was healed, so a person who humbly believes in God is healed by his passion: &#8220;Justified 192 will wait for your salvation, O Lord&rdquo; (Gn 49:18).</p>
157 by faith, through the redemption which is in Christ, whoin God put forward as an expiation&#8221; 193 <p>707 Finally, the power of the pool is described, for it healed
158 (Rom 3:24). Only one was healed, because no one can be healed except in the oneness or unity 194 all physical illnesses in virtue of an angel who came to it; so he
159 of the Church: &#8220;One Lord, one faith, one baptism&#8221; (Eph 4:5). Therefore, woe to those who hate 195 says, <span style="font-weight: bold">From time to time an angel of
160 unity, and divide men into sects.</p> 196 the Lord used to come down into the pool.</span> In certain ways,
161 <p>709 Then (v 5), the Evangelist mentions the disability of a man who lay by the pool. First, we are 197 the power of this pool is like that of Baptism. It is like it,
162 told how long he was disabled; and secondly, why it was so long (v 7).</p> 198 first, in the fact that its power was unperceived: for the power of
163 <p>7 10 He was disabled for a long time, for <span style="font-weight: bold">There was one man lying there who had been sick 199 the water in this pool did not come from its very nature, otherwise
164 for thirty-eight years with his infirmity. </span>This episode is very aptly mentioned: the man who 200 it would have healed at all times; its power was unseen, being from
165 could not be cured by the pool was to be cured by Christ, because those whom the law could not 201 an angel. So he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">From time to
166 heal, Christ heals perfectly, according to: &#8220;God did what the law, weakened by the flesh, could 202 time an angel of the Lord used to come down into the pool.</span>
167 not do: by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and as a sin-offering, he 203 The water of Baptism is like this in that precisely as water it
168 condemned sin in his flesh&#8221; (Rom 8:3), and in Sirach (36:6): &#8220;Perform new signs and wonders.&#8221;</p> 204 does not have the power to cleanse souls, but this comes from the
169 <p>711 The number thirty-eight is well-suited to his infirmity, for we see it associated with sickness 205 unseen power of the Holy Spirit, according to: &ldquo;Unless one is
170 rather than with health. For, as Augustine says, the number forty signifies the perfection of 206 born again ofwater and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom
171 justice, which consists in observing the law. But the law was given in ten precepts, and was to 207 of God&rdquo; (above 3:5). It is like it, in a second way, in its
172 be preached to the four corners of the world, or be completed by the four Gospels, according to: 208 effect: for as the water of Baptism heals, so also the water of
173 &#8220;The end of the law is Christ&#8221; (Rom 10:4). So since ten times four is forty, this appropriately 209 that pool healed. So he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">the
174 signifies perfect justice. Now if two is subtracted from forty, we get thirty-eight. This two is the 210 first one into the pool was healed.</span> Further, God gave to
175 two precepts of charity, which effects perfect justice. And so this man was sick because he had 211 that water the power to heal so that men by washing might learn
176 forty minus two, that is, his justice was imperfect, for &#8220;On these two commandments all the law 212 through their bodily health to seek their spiritual health.</p>
177 and the prophets depend&#8221; (Mt 22:40).</p> 213 <p>Yet the water of this pool differs from the water of Baptism in
178 <p>712 Now the reason for the length of the man&#8217;s illness is considered. First, we have the Lord&#8217;s 214 three ways. First, in the source of its power: for the water in the
179 query; secondly, the sick man&#8217;s answer (v 7).</p> 215 pool produced health because of an angel, but the water of Baptism
180 <p>713 John says, Jesus, seeing him, the man, <span style="font-weight: bold">lying there. </span>Jesus saw him not only with his physical 216 produces its effect by the uncreated power not only of the Holy
181 eyes, but also with the eyes of his mercy; this is the way David begged to be seen, saying: 217 Spirit, but of the entire Trinity. Thus the entire Trinity was
182 &#8220;Look.at me, O Lord, and have mercy on me&#8221; (Ps 85:16). And Jesus <span style="font-weight: bold">knowing that he had been 218 present at the baptism of Christ: the Father in the voice, the Son
183 sick a long time</span>&#8212;which was repugnant to the heart of Christ as well as to the sick man himself: 219 in person, and the Holy Spirit in the form of a dove. This is why
184 &#8220;A long illness is a burden to the physician&#8221; (Sir 10:11)&#8212;said to him, <span style="font-weight: bold">Do you wish to be 220 we invoke the Trinity in our baptism.</p>
185 healed? </span>He did not say this because he did not know the answer, for it was quite evident that the 221 <p>Secondly, this water differs in its power: for the water in the
186 man wanted to be healed, he said it to arouse the sick man&#8217;s desire, and to show his patience in 222 pool did not have a continuous power to cure, but only <span style=
187 waiting so many years to be cured of his sickness. and in not giving up. We see from this that 223 "font-weight: bold">from time to time;</span> while the water of
188 he was all the worthier to be cured: &#8220;Act bravely, and let your heart be strengthened, all you who 224 Baptism has a permanent power to cleanse, according to: &ldquo;On
189 hope in the Lord&#8221; (Ps 30:25). Jesus incites the man&#8217;s desires because we keep more securely what 225 that day a fountain will be open to the house of David, and to the
190 we perceive with desire and more easily acquire. &#8220;Knock,&#8221; by your desire, &#8220;and it will be opened 226 inhabitants of Jerusalem, to cleanse the sinner and the
191 to you,&#8221; as we read in Matthew (7:7).</p> 227 unclean&rdquo; (Zee 13:1).</p>
192 <p>Note that in other situations the Lord requires faith: &#8220;Do you believe that I can do this for you&#8221; 228 <p>Thirdly, this water differs as regards the number of people
193 (Mt 9:28); but here he does not make any such demand. The reason is that the others had heard 229 healed: for only one person was cured when the water of this pool
194 of the miracles of Jesus, of which this man knew nothing. And so Jesus does not ask faith from 230 was moved; but all are healed when the water of Baptism is moved.
195 him until after the miracle has been performed.</p> 231 And no wonder: for the power of the water in the pool, since it is
196 <p>714 Then (v 7), the answer of the sick man is given. Two reasons are given for the length of his 232 created, is finite and has a finite effect; but in the water of
197 illness: his poverty and his weakness. As he was poor, he could not afford a man to plunge him 233 Baptism there is an infinite power capable of cleansing an infinite
198 into the pool; so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Sir, I have no one to plunge me into the pool. </span>Perhaps he thought, as 234 number of souls, if there were such: &ldquo;I will pour clean water
199 Chrysostom says, that Christ might even help to put him into the water. Someone else always 235 upon you, and you will be cleansed from all your uncleanness&rdquo;
200 reached the pool before him because he was weak and not able to move fast; so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">By the 236 (Ez 36:25).</p>
201 time I get there, someone else has gone in before me. </span>He could say with Job: &#8220;I cannot help 237 <p>708 According to Augustine, however, the angel signifies Christ,
202 myself&#8221; (Jb 6:13). This signifies that no mere man could save the human race, for all had sinned 238 according to this reading of Isaiah (9:6): &ldquo;He will be called
203 and needed the grace of God. Mankind had to wait for the coming of Christ, God and man, by 239 great counsel.&rdquo; Just as the angel descended at certain times
204 whom it would be healed.</p> 240 into the pool, so Christ descended into the world at a time fixed
205 <p>715 Now we see the man restored to health, i.e., the working of the miracle. First, the Lord&#8217;s 241 by the Father: &ldquo;The time is near&rdquo; (Is 14:1);
206 command is given; secondly, the man&#8217;s obedience (v 9).</p> 242 &ldquo;When the fulness of time had come God sent his Son, made
207 <p>716 The Lord commanded both the nature of the man and his will, for both are under the Lord&#8217;s 243 from a woman, inade under the law&rdquo; (Gal 4:4). Again, just as
208 power. He commanded his nature when he said, Stand up. This command was not directed to the 244 the angel was not seen except by the motion of the water, so Christ
209 man&#8217;s will, for this was not within the power of his will. But it was within the power of his 245 was not known as to his divinity, for &ldquo;If they had known,
210 nature, to which the Lord gave the power to stand by his command. He gave two commands to 246 they would never have crucified the Lord of glory&rdquo; (1 Cor
211 the man&#8217;s will: <span style="font-weight: bold">pick up your mat and walk! </span>The literal meaning for this is that these two things 247 2:8). For as Isaiah (45:15) says: &ldquo;Truly, you are a hidden
212 were commanded in order to show that the man had been restored to perfect health. For in all his 248 God.&rdquo; And so the motion of the water was seen, but not the
213 miracles the Lord produced a perfect work, according to what was best in the nature of each case: 249 one who set it in motion, because, seeing the weakness of Christ,
214 &#8220;The works of God are perfect&#8221; (Dt 32:4). Now this man was lacking two things: first, his own 250 the people did not know of his divinity. And just as the one who
215 energy, since he could not stand up by himself, thus our Lord found him lying by the pool. 251 went into the pool was healed, so a person who humbly believes in
216 Secondly, he lacked the help of others; so he said, <span style="font-weight: bold">I have no one. </span>So our Lord, in order that this 252 God is healed by his passion: &ldquo;Justified by faith, through
217 man might recognize his perfect health, ordered him who could not help himself to pick up his 253 the redemption which is in Christ, whoin God put forward as an
218 mat, and him who could not walk to walk.</p> 254 expiation&rdquo; (Rom 3:24). Only one was healed, because no one
219 <p>717 These are the three things which the Lord commands in the justification of a sinner. First, 255 can be healed except in the oneness or unity of the Church:
220 he should <span style="font-weight: bold">stand up, </span>by leaving his sinful ways: &#8220;Rise up, you who sleep, and arise from the 256 &ldquo;One Lord, one faith, one baptism&rdquo; (Eph 4:5).
221 dead&#8221; (Eph 5:14). Secondly, he is commanded to <span style="font-weight: bold">pick up your mat</span>, by making satisfaction for 257 Therefore, woe to those who hate unity, and divide men into
222 the sins he has committed. For the mat on which a man rests signifies his sins. And so a man 258 sects.</p>
223 takes up his mat when he begins to do the penance given to him for his sins. &#8220;I will bear the anger 259 <p>709 Then (v 5), the Evangelist mentions the disability of a man
224 of God, because I have sinned against him&#8221; (Mi 7:9). Thirdly, he is commanded to <span style="font-weight: bold">walk</span>, by 260 who lay by the pool. First, we are told how long he was disabled;
225 advancing in what is good, according to: &#8220;They will go from strength to strength&#8221; (Ps 83:8).</p> 261 and secondly, why it was so long (v 7).</p>
226 <p>718 According to Augustine, this sick man was lacking two things: the two precepts of charity. 262 <p>7 10 He was disabled for a long time, for <span style=
227 And so our Lord gives two commands to his will, which is perfected by charity: to take up his 263 "font-weight: bold">There was one man lying there who had been sick
228 mat, and to walk. The first concerns the love of neighbor, which is first in the order of doing; the 264 for thirty-eight years with his infirmity.</span> This episode is
229 second concerns the love of God, which is first in the order of precept. Christ says, with respect 265 very aptly mentioned: the man who could not be cured by the pool
230 to the first, <span style="font-weight: bold">pick up you mat. </span>As if to say: When you are weak, your neighbor bears with you 266 was to be cured by Christ, because those whom the law could not
231 and, like a mat, patiently supports you: &#8220;We who are stronger ought to bear with the infirmities 267 heal, Christ heals perfectly, according to: &ldquo;God did what the
232 of the weak, and not seek to please ourselves&#8221; (Rom 15:1). Thus, after you have been cured, <span style="font-weight: bold">pick 268 law, weakened by the flesh, could not do: by sending his own Son in
233 up your mat, </span>i.e., bear and support your neighbor, who carried you when you were weak: &#8220;Carry 269 the likeness of sinful flesh, and as a sin-offering, he condemned
234 each other&#8217;s burdens&#8221; (Gal 6:2). About the second he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">walk, </span>by drawing near God; so we 270 sin in his flesh&rdquo; (Rom 8:3), and in Sirach (36:6):
235 read: &#8220;They will go from strength to strength&#8221; (Ps 83:8); &#8220;Walk while you have the light&#8221; (below 271 &ldquo;Perform new signs and wonders.&rdquo;</p>
236 12:35).</p> 272 <p>711 The number thirty-eight is well-suited to his infirmity, for
237 <p>719 Next we see the man&#8217;s obedience. First, the obedience of his nature, because, <span style="font-weight: bold">The man was 273 we see it associated with sickness rather than with health. For, as
238 immediately cured. </span>And no wonder, because Christ is the Word through whom heaven and earth 274 Augustine says, the number forty signifies the perfection of
239 were made: &#8220;He commanded and they were created&#8221; (Ps 148:5); &#8220;By the Word of the Lord the 275 justice, which consists in observing the law. But the law was given
240 heavens were made&#8221; (Ps 32:6). Secondly, we see the obedience of the man&#8217;s will: first, because 276 in ten precepts, and was to be preached to the four corners of the
241 <span style="font-weight: bold">he picked up his mat, </span>and secondly, because he <span style="font-weight: bold">walked. </span>&#8220;We will do everything that the Lord 277 world, or be completed by the four Gospels, according to:
242 commands, and obey him&#8221; (Ex 24:7).</p> 278 &ldquo;The end of the law is Christ&rdquo; (Rom 10:4). So since ten
243 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">&#160;</p> 279 times four is forty, this appropriately signifies perfect justice.
244 <p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-weight: bold">LECTURE 2</span></p> 280 Now if two is subtracted from forty, we get thirty-eight. This two
245 <BLOCKQUOTE><p>9b That day, however, was a Sabbath. 10 Therefore the Jews told the man who had been cured, 281 is the two precepts of charity, which effects perfect justice. And
246 &#8220;It is the Sabbath; it is not permitted for you to carry your mat.&#8221; 11 He replied to them, &#8220;He who 282 so this man was sick because he had forty minus two, that is, his
247 cured me said to me: &#8216;Pick up your mat and walk.&#8217;&#8221; 12 They then asked him, &#8220;Who is this man 283 justice was imperfect, for &ldquo;On these two commandments all the
248 who told you to pick up your mat and walk?&#8221; 13 But he who was cured had no idea who it was, 284 law and the prophets depend&rdquo; (Mt 22:40).</p>
249 for Jesus had slipped away from the crowd that had gathered in that place. 14 Later, Jesus found 285 <p>712 Now the reason for the length of the man&rsquo;s illness is
250 the man in the temple and said to him, &#8220;Remember, you have been made well; now do not sin 286 considered. First, we have the Lord&rsquo;s query; secondly, the
251 again lest something worse happen to you.&#8221; 15 The man went off and related to the Jews that it 287 sick man&rsquo;s answer (v 7).</p>
252 was Jesus who had cured him. 16 For reasons like this the Jews began to persecute Jesus, because 288 <p>713 John says, Jesus, seeing him, the man, <span style=
253 he performed such works on the Sabbath. 17 But Jesus had a reply for them: &#8220;My Father works 289 "font-weight: bold">lying there.</span> Jesus saw him not only with
254 even until now, and so do I.&#8221; 18 Consequently, the Jews tried all the harder to kill him, because 290 his physical eyes, but also with the eyes of his mercy; this is the
255 he not only broke the Sabbath rest, but even called God his own Father, making himself equal 291 way David begged to be seen, saying: &ldquo;Look.at me, O Lord, and
256 to God.</p></BLOCKQUOTE> 292 have mercy on me&rdquo; (Ps 85:16). And Jesus <span style=
257 <p>720 Having seen a visible miracle which shows the power of Christ to restore spiritual life, we 293 "font-weight: bold">knowing that he had been sick a long
258 now see an opportunity given to him to teach. This opportunity was the persecution launched 294 time</span>&mdash;which was repugnant to the heart of Christ as
259 against him by the Jews. These Jews, who were envious of Christ, persecuted him for two 295 well as to the sick man himself: &ldquo;A long illness is a burden
260 reasons: first, the above act of his mercy; secondly, his teaching of the truth (v 17). As to the first, 296 to the physician&rdquo; (Sir 10:11)&mdash;said to him, <span style=
261 the Evangelist does three things. First, he gives the occasion for their persecution. Secondly, the 297 "font-weight: bold">Do you wish to be healed?</span> He did not say
262 false accusation against the man who was just cured (v 10). And thirdly, their attempt to belittle 298 this because he did not know the answer, for it was quite evident
299 that the man wanted to be healed, he said it to arouse the sick
300 man&rsquo;s desire, and to show his patience in waiting so many
301 years to be cured of his sickness. and in not giving up. We see
302 from this that he was all the worthier to be cured: &ldquo;Act
303 bravely, and let your heart be strengthened, all you who hope in
304 the Lord&rdquo; (Ps 30:25). Jesus incites the man&rsquo;s desires
305 because we keep more securely what we perceive with desire and more
306 easily acquire. &ldquo;Knock,&rdquo; by your desire, &ldquo;and it
307 will be opened to you,&rdquo; as we read in Matthew (7:7).</p>
308 <p>Note that in other situations the Lord requires faith: &ldquo;Do
309 you believe that I can do this for you&rdquo; (Mt 9:28); but here
310 he does not make any such demand. The reason is that the others had
311 heard of the miracles of Jesus, of which this man knew nothing. And
312 so Jesus does not ask faith from him until after the miracle has
313 been performed.</p>
314 <p>714 Then (v 7), the answer of the sick man is given. Two reasons
315 are given for the length of his illness: his poverty and his
316 weakness. As he was poor, he could not afford a man to plunge him
317 into the pool; so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Sir, I
318 have no one to plunge me into the pool.</span> Perhaps he thought,
319 as Chrysostom says, that Christ might even help to put him into the
320 water. Someone else always reached the pool before him because he
321 was weak and not able to move fast; so he says, <span style=
322 "font-weight: bold">By the time I get there, someone else has gone
323 in before me.</span> He could say with Job: &ldquo;I cannot help
324 myself&rdquo; (Jb 6:13). This signifies that no mere man could save
325 the human race, for all had sinned and needed the grace of God.
326 Mankind had to wait for the coming of Christ, God and man, by whom
327 it would be healed.</p>
328 <p>715 Now we see the man restored to health, i.e., the working of
329 the miracle. First, the Lord&rsquo;s command is given; secondly,
330 the man&rsquo;s obedience (v 9).</p>
331 <p>716 The Lord commanded both the nature of the man and his will,
332 for both are under the Lord&rsquo;s power. He commanded his nature
333 when he said, Stand up. This command was not directed to the
334 man&rsquo;s will, for this was not within the power of his will.
335 But it was within the power of his nature, to which the Lord gave
336 the power to stand by his command. He gave two commands to the
337 man&rsquo;s will: <span style="font-weight: bold">pick up your mat
338 and walk!</span> The literal meaning for this is that these two
339 things were commanded in order to show that the man had been
340 restored to perfect health. For in all his miracles the Lord
341 produced a perfect work, according to what was best in the nature
342 of each case: &ldquo;The works of God are perfect&rdquo; (Dt 32:4).
343 Now this man was lacking two things: first, his own energy, since
344 he could not stand up by himself, thus our Lord found him lying by
345 the pool. Secondly, he lacked the help of others; so he said,
346 <span style="font-weight: bold">I have no one.</span> So our Lord,
347 in order that this man might recognize his perfect health, ordered
348 him who could not help himself to pick up his mat, and him who
349 could not walk to walk.</p>
350 <p>717 These are the three things which the Lord commands in the
351 justification of a sinner. First, he should <span style=
352 "font-weight: bold">stand up,</span> by leaving his sinful ways:
353 &ldquo;Rise up, you who sleep, and arise from the dead&rdquo; (Eph
354 5:14). Secondly, he is commanded to <span style=
355 "font-weight: bold">pick up your mat</span>, by making satisfaction
356 for the sins he has committed. For the mat on which a man rests
357 signifies his sins. And so a man takes up his mat when he begins to
358 do the penance given to him for his sins. &ldquo;I will bear the
359 anger of God, because I have sinned against him&rdquo; (Mi 7:9).
360 Thirdly, he is commanded to <span style=
361 "font-weight: bold">walk</span>, by advancing in what is good,
362 according to: &ldquo;They will go from strength to strength&rdquo;
363 (Ps 83:8).</p>
364 <p>718 According to Augustine, this sick man was lacking two
365 things: the two precepts of charity. And so our Lord gives two
366 commands to his will, which is perfected by charity: to take up his
367 mat, and to walk. The first concerns the love of neighbor, which is
368 first in the order of doing; the second concerns the love of God,
369 which is first in the order of precept. Christ says, with respect
370 to the first, <span style="font-weight: bold">pick up you
371 mat.</span> As if to say: When you are weak, your neighbor bears
372 with you and, like a mat, patiently supports you: &ldquo;We who are
373 stronger ought to bear with the infirmities of the weak, and not
374 seek to please ourselves&rdquo; (Rom 15:1). Thus, after you have
375 been cured, <span style="font-weight: bold">pick up your
376 mat,</span> i.e., bear and support your neighbor, who carried you
377 when you were weak: &ldquo;Carry each other&rsquo;s burdens&rdquo;
378 (Gal 6:2). About the second he says, <span style=
379 "font-weight: bold">walk,</span> by drawing near God; so we read:
380 &ldquo;They will go from strength to strength&rdquo; (Ps 83:8);
381 &ldquo;Walk while you have the light&rdquo; (below 12:35).</p>
382 <p>719 Next we see the man&rsquo;s obedience. First, the obedience
383 of his nature, because, <span style="font-weight: bold">The man was
384 immediately cured.</span> And no wonder, because Christ is the Word
385 through whom heaven and earth were made: &ldquo;He commanded and
386 they were created&rdquo; (Ps 148:5); &ldquo;By the Word of the Lord
387 the heavens were made&rdquo; (Ps 32:6). Secondly, we see the
388 obedience of the man&rsquo;s will: first, because <span style=
389 "font-weight: bold">he picked up his mat,</span> and secondly,
390 because he <span style="font-weight: bold">walked.</span> &ldquo;We
391 will do everything that the Lord commands, and obey him&rdquo; (Ex
392 24:7).</p>
393 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">
394 &nbsp;</p>
395 <p style="text-align: center"><span style=
396 "font-weight: bold">LECTURE 2</span></p>
397 <blockquote>
398 <p>9b That day, however, was a Sabbath. 10 Therefore the Jews told
399 the man who had been cured, &ldquo;It is the Sabbath; it is not
400 permitted for you to carry your mat.&rdquo; 11 He replied to them,
401 &ldquo;He who cured me said to me: &lsquo;Pick up your mat and
402 walk.&rsquo;&rdquo; 12 They then asked him, &ldquo;Who is this man
403 who told you to pick up your mat and walk?&rdquo; 13 But he who was
404 cured had no idea who it was, for Jesus had slipped away from the
405 crowd that had gathered in that place. 14 Later, Jesus found the
406 man in the temple and said to him, &ldquo;Remember, you have been
407 made well; now do not sin again lest something worse happen to
408 you.&rdquo; 15 The man went off and related to the Jews that it was
409 Jesus who had cured him. 16 For reasons like this the Jews began to
410 persecute Jesus, because he performed such works on the Sabbath. 17
411 But Jesus had a reply for them: &ldquo;My Father works even until
412 now, and so do I.&rdquo; 18 Consequently, the Jews tried all the
413 harder to kill him, because he not only broke the Sabbath rest, but
414 even called God his own Father, making himself equal to God.</p>
415 </blockquote>
416 <p>720 Having seen a visible miracle which shows the power of
417 Christ to restore spiritual life, we now see an opportunity given
418 to him to teach. This opportunity was the persecution launched
419 against him by the Jews. These Jews, who were envious of Christ,
420 persecuted him for two reasons: first, the above act of his mercy;
421 secondly, his teaching of the truth (v 17). As to the first, the
422 Evangelist does three things. First, he gives the occasion for
423 their persecution. Secondly, the false accusation against the man
424 who was just cured (v 10). And thirdly, their attempt to belittle
263 Christ (v 12).</p> 425 Christ (v 12).</p>
264 <p>721 Their opportunity to persecute Christ was the fact that he cured the man on the Sabbath; 426 <p>721 Their opportunity to persecute Christ was the fact that he
265 accordingly, the Evangelist says, <span style="font-weight: bold">That day, however, was a Sabbath, </span>when Christ performed 427 cured the man on the Sabbath; accordingly, the Evangelist says,
266 the miracle ofcommanding the man to pick up his mat.</p> 428 <span style="font-weight: bold">That day, however, was a
267 <p>Three reasons are given why our Lord began to work on the Sabbath. The first is given by 429 Sabbath,</span> when Christ performed the miracle ofcommanding the
268 Ambrose, in his commentary, <i>On Luke. </i>He says that Christ came to renovate the work of 430 man to pick up his mat.</p>
269 creation, that is, man, who had become deformed. And so he should have begun where the 431 <p>Three reasons are given why our Lord began to work on the
270 Creator had left off the work of creation, that is, on a Sabbath, as mentioned in Genesis (c 1). 432 Sabbath. The first is given by Ambrose, in his commentary, <i>On
271 Thus Christ began to work on the Sabbath to show that he was the renovator of the whole 433 Luke.</i> He says that Christ came to renovate the work of
272 creature.</p> 434 creation, that is, man, who had become deformed. And so he should
273 <p>Another reason was that the Sabbath day was celebrated by the Jews in memory of the first 435 have begun where the Creator had left off the work of creation,
274 creation. But Christ came to make, in a way, a new creature, according to Galatians (6:15): &#8220;In 436 that is, on a Sabbath, as mentioned in Genesis (c 1). Thus Christ
275 Christ Jesus, neither circumcision nor the lack of circumcision is a benefit; what counts is a new 437 began to work on the Sabbath to show that he was the renovator of
276 creation,&#8221; i.e., through grace, which comes through the Holy Spirit: &#8220;You will send forth your 438 the whole creature.</p>
277 Spirit, and they will be created ; and you will renew the face of the earth&#8221; (Ps 103:30). And so 439 <p>Another reason was that the Sabbath day was celebrated by the
278 Christ worked on the Sabbath to show that a new creation, a re-creation, was taking place through 440 Jews in memory of the first creation. But Christ came to make, in a
279 him: &#8220;that we might be the first fruits of his creatures&#8221; (Jas 1:18).</p> 441 way, a new creature, according to Galatians (6:15): &ldquo;In
280 <p>The third reason was to show that he was about to do what the law could not do: &#8220;God did what 442 Christ Jesus, neither circumcision nor the lack of circumcision is
281 the law, weakened by the flesh, could not do: by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful 443 a benefit; what counts is a new creation,&rdquo; i.e., through
282 flesh, he condemned sin in his flesh, in order that the requirements of the law might be 444 grace, which comes through the Holy Spirit: &ldquo;You will send
283 accomplished in us&#8221; (Rom 8:3).</p> 445 forth your Spirit, and they will be created ; and you will renew
284 <p>The Jews, however, did not do any work on the Sabbath, as a symbol that there were certain 446 the face of the earth&rdquo; (Ps 103:30). And so Christ worked on
285 things pertaining to the Sabbath which were to be accomplished, but which the law could not do. 447 the Sabbath to show that a new creation, a re-creation, was taking
286 This is clear in the four things which God ordained for the Sabbath: for he sanctified the Sabbath 448 place through him: &ldquo;that we might be the first fruits of his
287 day, blessed it, completed his work on it, and then rested. These things the law was not able to 449 creatures&rdquo; (Jas 1:18).</p>
288 do. It could not sanctify; so we read: &#8220;Save me, O Lord, for there are no holy people left&#8221; (Ps 450 <p>The third reason was to show that he was about to do what the
289 11:1). Nor could it bless; rather, &#8220;Those who rely on the works of the law are under a curse&#8221; (Gal 451 law could not do: &ldquo;God did what the law, weakened by the
290 3:10). Neither could it, complete and perfect, because &#8220;the law brought nothing to perfection&#8221; 452 flesh, could not do: by sending his own Son in the likeness of
291 (Heb 7:19). Nor could it bring perfect rest: &#8220;If Joshua had given them rest, God would not be 453 sinful flesh, he condemned sin in his flesh, in order that the
292 speaking after of another day&#8221; (Heb 4:8).</p> 454 requirements of the law might be accomplished in us&rdquo; (Rom
293 <p>These things, which the law could not do, Christ did. For he sanctified the people by his passion: 455 8:3).</p>
294 &#8220;Jesus, in order to sanctify the people with his own blood, suffered outside the gate&#8221; (Heb 13:12). 456 <p>The Jews, however, did not do any work on the Sabbath, as a
295 He blessed them by an inpouring of grace: &#8220;Blessed be God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, 457 symbol that there were certain things pertaining to the Sabbath
296 who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing of heaven, in Christ&#8221; (Eph 1:3). He brought the 458 which were to be accomplished, but which the law could not do. This
297 people to perfection by instructing them in the ways of perfect justice: &#8220;Be perfect, as your 459 is clear in the four things which God ordained for the Sabbath: for
298 heavenly Father is perfect&#8221; (Mt 5:48). He also led them to true rest: &#8220;We who have believed will 460 he sanctified the Sabbath day, blessed it, completed his work on
299 find rest,&#8221; as is said in Hebrews (4:3). Therefore, it is proper for him to work on the Sabbath, who 461 it, and then rested. These things the law was not able to do. It
300 is able to make perfect those things that pertain to the Sabbath, from which an impotent law 462 could not sanctify; so we read: &ldquo;Save me, O Lord, for there
463 are no holy people left&rdquo; (Ps 11:1). Nor could it bless;
464 rather, &ldquo;Those who rely on the works of the law are under a
465 curse&rdquo; (Gal 3:10). Neither could it, complete and perfect,
466 because &ldquo;the law brought nothing to perfection&rdquo; (Heb
467 7:19). Nor could it bring perfect rest: &ldquo;If Joshua had given
468 them rest, God would not be speaking after of another day&rdquo;
469 (Heb 4:8).</p>
470 <p>These things, which the law could not do, Christ did. For he
471 sanctified the people by his passion: &ldquo;Jesus, in order to
472 sanctify the people with his own blood, suffered outside the
473 gate&rdquo; (Heb 13:12). He blessed them by an inpouring of grace:
474 &ldquo;Blessed be God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has
475 blessed us with every spiritual blessing of heaven, in
476 Christ&rdquo; (Eph 1:3). He brought the people to perfection by
477 instructing them in the ways of perfect justice: &ldquo;Be perfect,
478 as your heavenly Father is perfect&rdquo; (Mt 5:48). He also led
479 them to true rest: &ldquo;We who have believed will find
480 rest,&rdquo; as is said in Hebrews (4:3). Therefore, it is proper
481 for him to work on the Sabbath, who is able to make perfect those
482 things that pertain to the Sabbath, from which an impotent law
301 rested.</p> 483 rested.</p>
302 <p>722 Then (v 10), the Evangelist gives the accusation brought against the man who was healed. 484 <p>722 Then (v 10), the Evangelist gives the accusation brought
303 First, we have the accusation; and secondly, the explanation given by the man who was healed 485 against the man who was healed. First, we have the accusation; and
304 (v 11).</p> 486 secondly, the explanation given by the man who was healed (v
305 <p>723 The man was accused for carrying his mat on the Sabbath, and not for being healed; so they 487 11).</p>
306 say: <span style="font-weight: bold">It is the Sabbath; it is not permitted for you to carry your mat. </span>There are several reasons 488 <p>723 The man was accused for carrying his mat on the Sabbath, and
307 foi this. One is that the Jews, although frequently charging Christ with healing on the Sabbath, 489 not for being healed; so they say: <span style=
308 had been embarrassed by him on the ground that they themselves used to pull their cattle from 490 "font-weight: bold">It is the Sabbath; it is not permitted for you
309 ditches on the Sabbath in order to save them. For this reason the Jews did not mention his 491 to carry your mat.</span> There are several reasons foi this. One
310 healing, as it was useful and necessary; but they charge him with carrying his mat, which did not 492 is that the Jews, although frequently charging Christ with healing
311 seem to be necessary. As if to say: Although your cure need not have been postponed, there was 493 on the Sabbath, had been embarrassed by him on the ground that they
312 no need for you to carry your mat, or for the order to carry it. Another reason was that the Lord 494 themselves used to pull their cattle from ditches on the Sabbath in
313 had shown, contrary to their opinion, that it was lawful to do good on the Sabbath. And so, 495 order to save them. For this reason the Jews did not mention his
314 because being healed is not the same as doing good, but being done a good, they attack the one 496 healing, as it was useful and necessary; but they charge him with
315 healed rather than the one healing. The third reason was that the Jews thought that they were 497 carrying his mat, which did not seem to be necessary. As if to say:
316 forbidden by the law to do any work on the Sabbath; and it was the carrying of burdens that was 498 Although your cure need not have been postponed, there was no need
317 especially forbidden on the Sabbath: &#8220;Do not carry a burden on the Sabbath&#8221; (Jer 17:2 1). 499 for you to carry your mat, or for the order to carry it. Another
318 Accordingly, they made a special point of being against the carrying of anything on the Sabbath, 500 reason was that the Lord had shown, contrary to their opinion, that
319 as being opposed to the teaching of the prophet. But this command of the prophet was mystical: 501 it was lawful to do good on the Sabbath. And so, because being
320 for when he forbade them to carry burdens, he wanted to encourage them to rest from the burdens 502 healed is not the same as doing good, but being done a good, they
321 of their sins on the Sabbath. Of these sins it is said: &#8220;My iniquities are a heavy burden and have 503 attack the one healed rather than the one healing. The third reason
322 weighed me down&#8221; (Ps 37.5). Therefore, since the time had come to explain the meaning of 504 was that the Jews thought that they were forbidden by the law to do
323 obscure symbols, Christ commanded him to take up his mat, i.e, to help his neighbors in their 505 any work on the Sabbath; and it was the carrying of burdens that
324 weaknesses: &#8220;Bear one another&#8217;s burdens, and so you will fulfil the law of Christ&#8221; (Gal 6:2).</p> 506 was especially forbidden on the Sabbath: &ldquo;Do not carry a
325 <p>724 Then (v 11), we see the man who was healed defending himself. His defense is wisely taken: 507 burden on the Sabbath&rdquo; (Jer 17:2 1). Accordingly, they made a
326 for a doctrine is never so well proved to be divinely inspired as by miracles which can be 508 special point of being against the carrying of anything on the
327 accomplished only by divine power: &#8220;Going out, they preached everywhere, and the Lord worked 509 Sabbath, as being opposed to the teaching of the prophet. But this
328 with them and confirmed the word by the signs that followed&#8221; (Mk 16:20). Thus he argued with 510 command of the prophet was mystical: for when he forbade them to
329 those who were defaming the one who healed him, saying: <span style="font-weight: bold">He who cured me said to me. </span>As if 511 carry burdens, he wanted to encourage them to rest from the burdens
330 to say: You say that I am forbidden to carry a burden on the Sabbath, and this on divine authority; 512 of their sins on the Sabbath. Of these sins it is said: &ldquo;My
331 but I was commanded by the same authority to pick up my mat. For, <span style="font-weight: bold">he who cured me, </span>and by 513 iniquities are a heavy burden and have weighed me down&rdquo; (Ps
332 restoring my health showed that he had divine power, said to me, <span style="font-weight: bold">Pick up your mat and walk. 514 37.5). Therefore, since the time had come to explain the meaning of
333 </span>Therefore, I was duty bound to obey the commands of one who has such power and who had 515 obscure symbols, Christ commanded him to take up his mat, i.e, to
334 done me such a favor. &#8220;I will never forget your precepts because you have brought me to life by 516 help his neighbors in their weaknesses: &ldquo;Bear one
335 them&#8221; (Ps 118:93).</p> 517 another&rsquo;s burdens, and so you will fulfil the law of
336 <p>725 Then, since they could not very well charge the man who was cured, they try to belittle 518 Christ&rdquo; (Gal 6:2).</p>
337 Christ&#8217;s cure, for this man defended himself through Christ. But since he did not indicate 519 <p>724 Then (v 11), we see the man who was healed defending
338 precisely who he was, they maliciously ask him who it was. With respect to this, first, the search 520 himself. His defense is wisely taken: for a doctrine is never so
339 for Christ is set down. Secondly, his discovery. And thirdly, his persecution (v 16).</p> 521 well proved to be divinely inspired as by miracles which can be
340 <p>726 Three things are mentioned about the first: the Jews&#8217; interrogation; the ignorance of the man 522 accomplished only by divine power: &ldquo;Going out, they preached
341 who was cured, and the cause of that ignorance.</p> 523 everywhere, and the Lord worked with them and confirmed the word by
342 <p>As to the first, we read: <span style="font-weight: bold">They then asked him, </span>not with the good intention of making progress, 524 the signs that followed&rdquo; (Mk 16:20). Thus he argued with
343 but for the evil purpose of persecuting and destroying Christ: &#8220;You will seek me, and you will 525 those who were defaming the one who healed him, saying:
344 die in your sin&#8221; (below 8:21), Their very words show their malice: for while our Lord had 526 <span style="font-weight: bold">He who cured me said to me.</span>
345 commanded the man who was sick to become healed and to pick up his mat, they ignored the 527 As if to say: You say that I am forbidden to carry a burden on the
346 first, which is an undeniable sign of divine power, and harped on the second, which seemed to 528 Sabbath, and this on divine authority; but I was commanded by the
347 be against the law, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">Who is this man who told you to pick up you mat and walk? </span>&#8220;He 529 same authority to pick up my mat. For, <span style=
348 lies in wait, and turns good into evil, and he will put blame,&#8221; i.e., attempt to put blame, &#8220;on the 530 "font-weight: bold">he who cured me,</span> and by restoring my
349 elect&#8221; (Sir 11:33).</p> 531 health showed that he had divine power, said to me, <span style=
350 <p>727 As to the second, the Evangelist says, <span style="font-weight: bold">But he who was cured had no idea who it was. </span>This 532 "font-weight: bold">Pick up your mat and walk.</span> Therefore, I
351 cured man signifies those who believe and have been healed by the grace of Christ: &#8220;You are 533 was duty bound to obey the commands of one who has such power and
352 saved by grace&#8221; (Eph 2:8). Indeed, they do not know who Christ is, but they know only his 534 who had done me such a favor. &ldquo;I will never forget your
353 effects: &#8220;While we are in the body, we are absent from the Lord: for we walk by faith, and not 535 precepts because you have brought me to life by them&rdquo; (Ps
354 by sight&#8221; (2 Cor 5:6). We will know who Christ is when &#8220;we shall see him as he is,&#8221; as said in 536 118:93).</p>
355 1 John (3:2).</p> 537 <p>725 Then, since they could not very well charge the man who was
356 <p>728 Next, the Evangelist gives the reason for the man&#8217;s ignorance, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">for Jesus had slipped 538 cured, they try to belittle Christ&rsquo;s cure, for this man
357 away from the crowd that had gathered in that place. </span>There are both literal and mystical 539 defended himself through Christ. But since he did not indicate
358 reasons why Christ left. Of the two literal reasons, the first is to give us the example of 540 precisely who he was, they maliciously ask him who it was. With
359 concealing our good deeds and of not using them to seek the applause of men: &#8220;Take care not to 541 respect to this, first, the search for Christ is set down.
360 perform your good actions in the sight of men, in order to be seen by them&#8221; (Mt 6:1). The second 542 Secondly, his discovery. And thirdly, his persecution (v 16).</p>
361 literal reason is to show us that, in all ouractions, we should leave and avoid those who are 543 <p>726 Three things are mentioned about the first: the Jews&rsquo;
362 envious, so as not to feed and increase their envy: &#8220;Do not be provoked by one who speaks evil 544 interrogation; the ignorance of the man who was cured, and the
363 of you, so he will not trap you by your own words&#8221; (Sir 8:14).</p> 545 cause of that ignorance.</p>
364 <p>There are also two mystical reasons why Christ slipped away. First, it teaches us that Christ is 546 <p>As to the first, we read: <span style="font-weight: bold">They
365 not easy to find in the midst of men, or in the whirlwind of temporal cares; rather, he is found in 547 then asked him,</span> not with the good intention of making
366 spiritual seclusion: &#8220;I will lead her into the wilderness, and there I will speak to her heart&#8221; (Hos 548 progress, but for the evil purpose of persecuting and destroying
367 2:14); and in Ecclesiastes (9.17): &#8220;The words of the wise are heard in silence.&#8221; Secondly, this 549 Christ: &ldquo;You will seek me, and you will die in your
368 suggests to us that Christ was to leave the Jews for the Gentiles: &#8220;He hid his face for a while from 550 sin&rdquo; (below 8:21), Their very words show their malice: for
369 the house of Jacob&#8221; (Is 8:17), i.e., he withdrew the knowledge of his truth from the Jewish 551 while our Lord had commanded the man who was sick to become healed
370 people.</p> 552 and to pick up his mat, they ignored the first, which is an
371 <p>729 Then (v 14), the Evangelist tells us how Jesus was found. First, he says that he was found. 553 undeniable sign of divine power, and harped on the second, which
372 Secondly, that after having been found, he taught. Thirdly, that after having taught, his identity 554 seemed to be against the law, saying, <span style=
555 "font-weight: bold">Who is this man who told you to pick up you mat
556 and walk?</span> &ldquo;He lies in wait, and turns good into evil,
557 and he will put blame,&rdquo; i.e., attempt to put blame, &ldquo;on
558 the elect&rdquo; (Sir 11:33).</p>
559 <p>727 As to the second, the Evangelist says, <span style=
560 "font-weight: bold">But he who was cured had no idea who it
561 was.</span> This cured man signifies those who believe and have
562 been healed by the grace of Christ: &ldquo;You are saved by
563 grace&rdquo; (Eph 2:8). Indeed, they do not know who Christ is, but
564 they know only his effects: &ldquo;While we are in the body, we are
565 absent from the Lord: for we walk by faith, and not by sight&rdquo;
566 (2 Cor 5:6). We will know who Christ is when &ldquo;we shall see
567 him as he is,&rdquo; as said in 1 John (3:2).</p>
568 <p>728 Next, the Evangelist gives the reason for the man&rsquo;s
569 ignorance, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">for Jesus had
570 slipped away from the crowd that had gathered in that place.</span>
571 There are both literal and mystical reasons why Christ left. Of the
572 two literal reasons, the first is to give us the example of
573 concealing our good deeds and of not using them to seek the
574 applause of men: &ldquo;Take care not to perform your good actions
575 in the sight of men, in order to be seen by them&rdquo; (Mt 6:1).
576 The second literal reason is to show us that, in all ouractions, we
577 should leave and avoid those who are envious, so as not to feed and
578 increase their envy: &ldquo;Do not be provoked by one who speaks
579 evil of you, so he will not trap you by your own words&rdquo; (Sir
580 8:14).</p>
581 <p>There are also two mystical reasons why Christ slipped away.
582 First, it teaches us that Christ is not easy to find in the midst
583 of men, or in the whirlwind of temporal cares; rather, he is found
584 in spiritual seclusion: &ldquo;I will lead her into the wilderness,
585 and there I will speak to her heart&rdquo; (Hos 2:14); and in
586 Ecclesiastes (9.17): &ldquo;The words of the wise are heard in
587 silence.&rdquo; Secondly, this suggests to us that Christ was to
588 leave the Jews for the Gentiles: &ldquo;He hid his face for a while
589 from the house of Jacob&rdquo; (Is 8:17), i.e., he withdrew the
590 knowledge of his truth from the Jewish people.</p>
591 <p>729 Then (v 14), the Evangelist tells us how Jesus was found.
592 First, he says that he was found. Secondly, that after having been
593 found, he taught. Thirdly, that after having taught, his identity
373 was reported to the Jews.</p> 594 was reported to the Jews.</p>
374 <p>730 The Evangelist tells us both where and the way in which Christ was found. The way in which 595 <p>730 The Evangelist tells us both where and the way in which
375 he was found was remarkable, for Christ is not found unless he first finds; hence he says, Later, 596 Christ was found. The way in which he was found was remarkable, for
376 after the above events, <span style="font-weight: bold">Jesus found the man. </span>For we cannot find Jesus by our own power unless 597 Christ is not found unless he first finds; hence he says, Later,
377 Christ first presents himself to us; so we read: &#8220;Seek your servant&#8221; (Ps 118:176); and, &#8220;She 598 after the above events, <span style="font-weight: bold">Jesus found
378 [wisdom] goes to meet those who desire her&#8221; (Wis 6:14).</p> 599 the man.</span> For we cannot find Jesus by our own power unless
379 <p>The place Christ was found was holy, <span style="font-weight: bold">in the temple, </span>according to: &#8220;The Lord is in his holy 600 Christ first presents himself to us; so we read: &ldquo;Seek your
380 temple&#8221; (Ps 10:5). For his mother had also found him in the temple (Lk 2:46); and he was there 601 servant&rdquo; (Ps 118:176); and, &ldquo;She [wisdom] goes to meet
381 for he had to be concerned with his Father&#8217;s affairs. We see from this that this man was not cured 602 those who desire her&rdquo; (Wis 6:14).</p>
382 in vain, but having been converted to a religious way of life, he visited the temple and found 603 <p>The place Christ was found was holy, <span style=
383 Christ: because if we desire to come to a knowledge of the Creator, we must run from the tumult 604 "font-weight: bold">in the temple,</span> according to: &ldquo;The
384 of sinful affections, leave the company of evil men, and flee to the temple of our heart, where 605 Lord is in his holy temple&rdquo; (Ps 10:5). For his mother had
385 God condescends to visit and live.</p> 606 also found him in the temple (Lk 2:46); and he was there for he had
386 <p>731 After Christ was found, he began to teach (v 14). First, Christ reminded the man of the gift 607 to be concerned with his Father&rsquo;s affairs. We see from this
387 he was given. Secondly, he offered him sound advice. And thirdly, he pointed out an imminent 608 that this man was not cured in vain, but having been converted to a
609 religious way of life, he visited the temple and found Christ:
610 because if we desire to come to a knowledge of the Creator, we must
611 run from the tumult of sinful affections, leave the company of evil
612 men, and flee to the temple of our heart, where God condescends to
613 visit and live.</p>
614 <p>731 After Christ was found, he began to teach (v 14). First,
615 Christ reminded the man of the gift he was given. Secondly, he
616 offered him sound advice. And thirdly, he pointed out an imminent
388 danger.</p> 617 danger.</p>
389 <p>732 The gift was remarkable, for it was a sudden restoration to health; so he says, Remember, 618 <p>732 The gift was remarkable, for it was a sudden restoration to
390 you have been made well. Therefore, you should always keep this in mind, according to: &#8220;I will 619 health; so he says, Remember, you have been made well. Therefore,
391 remember the tender mercies of the Lord&#8221; (Is 63:7).</p> 620 you should always keep this in mind, according to: &ldquo;I will
392 <p>733 His advice, too, was useful, that is, <span style="font-weight: bold">do not sin again. </span>&#8220;My son, you have sinned. Do not sin 621 remember the tender mercies of the Lord&rdquo; (Is 63:7).</p>
393 again&#8221; (Sir 21:1).</p> 622 <p>733 His advice, too, was useful, that is, <span style=
394 <p>Why did our Lord mention sin to this paralytic and to certain others that he cured, and not to the 623 "font-weight: bold">do not sin again.</span> &ldquo;My son, you
395 rest? He did this to show that illness comes to certain people as a result of their previous sins, 624 have sinned. Do not sin again&rdquo; (Sir 21:1).</p>
396 according to: &#8220;For this reason many of you are weak and sick, and many have died&#8221; (1 Cor 625 <p>Why did our Lord mention sin to this paralytic and to certain
397 11:30). In this way he even showed himself to be God, pointing out sins and the hidden secrets 626 others that he cured, and not to the rest? He did this to show that
398 of the heart: &#8220;Hell and destruction are open to the Lord; how much more the hearts of the 627 illness comes to certain people as a result of their previous sins,
399 children of men&#8221; (Prv 15:11). And so Christ mentioned sin only to some he cured and not to all, 628 according to: &ldquo;For this reason many of you are weak and sick,
400 for not all infirmities are due to previous sins: some come from one&#8217;s natural disposition, and 629 and many have died&rdquo; (1 Cor 11:30). In this way he even showed
401 some are permitted as a trial, as with Job. Or, Christ might have brought up sin to some because 630 himself to be God, pointing out sins and the hidden secrets of the
402 they were better prepared for his correction: &#8220;Do not rebuke one who mocks, lest he hate you; 631 heart: &ldquo;Hell and destruction are open to the Lord; how much
403 rebuke a wise man, and he will love you&#8221; (Prv 9:8). Or, we could say, in telling some not to sin, 632 more the hearts of the children of men&rdquo; (Prv 15:11). And so
404 he intended his words for all the others.</p> 633 Christ mentioned sin only to some he cured and not to all, for not
405 <p>734 The imminent danger was great, so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">lest something worse happen to you. </span>This can 634 all infirmities are due to previous sins: some come from
406 be understood in two ways, according to the two events that preceded. For this man was first 635 one&rsquo;s natural disposition, and some are permitted as a trial,
407 punished with a troublesome infirmity, and then received a marvelous favor. Accordingly, 636 as with Job. Or, Christ might have brought up sin to some because
408 Christ&#8217;s statement can refer to each. To the first, for when anyone is punished for his sin, and the 637 they were better prepared for his correction: &ldquo;Do not rebuke
409 punishment does not check him from sinning, it is just for him to be punished more severely. So 638 one who mocks, lest he hate you; rebuke a wise man, and he will
410 Christ says, <span style="font-weight: bold">do not sin again, </span>because if you do sin, something worse will happen to you: &#8220;I have 639 love you&rdquo; (Prv 9:8). Or, we could say, in telling some not to
411 struck your children in vain&#8221; (Jer 2:30). It can refer to the second, for one who falls into sin after 640 sin, he intended his words for all the others.</p>
412 receiving favors deserves a more severe punishment because of his ingratitude, as we see in 2 641 <p>734 The imminent danger was great, so he says, <span style=
413 Peter (2:20): &#8220;It would be better for them not to know the way of truth, than to turn back after 642 "font-weight: bold">lest something worse happen to you.</span> This
414 knowing it.&#8221; Also, because after a man has once returned to sin, he sins more easily, according 643 can be understood in two ways, according to the two events that
415 to Matthew (12:45): &#8220;The last state of that man becomes worse than the first&#8221;; and in Jeremiah 644 preceded. For this man was first punished with a troublesome
416 (2:20): &#8220;You broke your yoke a long time ago, and snapped off your chains, and said: I will not 645 infirmity, and then received a marvelous favor. Accordingly,
417 serve.&#8217;&#8221;</p> 646 Christ&rsquo;s statement can refer to each. To the first, for when
418 <p>735 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">The man went off and related to the Jews, </span>we see Jesus identified. 647 anyone is punished for his sin, and the punishment does not check
419 Some think, as Chrysostom reports, that this man identified Jesus out of malice. But this does 648 him from sinning, it is just for him to be punished more severely.
420 not seem probable: that he would be so ungrateful after receiving such a favor. He <span style="font-weight: bold">related to the 649 So Christ says, <span style="font-weight: bold">do not sin
421 Jews that it was Jesus who had cured him, </span>in order to make it clear that Christ had the power 650 again,</span> because if you do sin, something worse will happen to
422 to heal: &#8220;Come ... and I will tell you what great things the Lord has done for me,&#8221; as we read in 651 you: &ldquo;I have struck your children in vain&rdquo; (Jer 2:30).
423 the Psalm (65:16). This is obvious, for they had asked him who commanded him to pick up his 652 It can refer to the second, for one who falls into sin after
424 mat, but he told them that <span style="font-weight: bold">it was Jesus who had cured him.</span></p> 653 receiving favors deserves a more severe punishment because of his
425 <p>736 Next (v 16), we have the persecution of Christ, begun because he performed a work of mercy 654 ingratitude, as we see in 2 Peter (2:20): &ldquo;It would be better
426 on the Sabbath. Thus the Evangelist says, <span style="font-weight: bold">For reasons like this the Jews began to persecute 655 for them not to know the way of truth, than to turn back after
427 Jesus, because he performed such works on the Sabbath. </span>&#8220;Princes have persecuted me 656 knowing it.&rdquo; Also, because after a man has once returned to
428 without cause&#8221; (Ps 118:16 1).</p> 657 sin, he sins more easily, according to Matthew (12:45): &ldquo;The
429 <p>737 Then (v 17), the second reason for his persecution is given: what he taught. First, we are 658 last state of that man becomes worse than the first&rdquo;; and in
430 given the truth he taught; and secondly, the perversity of his persecutors (v 18).</p> 659 Jeremiah (2:20): &ldquo;You broke your yoke a long time ago, and
431 <p>73 8 Our Lord taught the truth while justifying his breaking of the Sabbath. Here we should note 660 snapped off your chains, and said: I will not
432 that our Lord justified both himself and his disciples from breaking the Sabbath. He justified his 661 serve.&rsquo;&rdquo;</p>
433 disciples, since they were men, by comparing them to other men: as the priests who, although 662 <p>735 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">The man
434 they worked in the temple on the Sabbath, did not break the Sabbath; and to David, who, while 663 went off and related to the Jews,</span> we see Jesus identified.
435 Ahinielech was priest, took the consecrated bread from the temple oil the Sabbath when he was 664 Some think, as Chrysostom reports, that this man identified Jesus
436 running from Saul (1 Sm 21:1).</p> 665 out of malice. But this does not seem probable: that he would be so
437 <p>Our Lord, who was both God and man, sometimes justified himself in breaking the Sabbath by 666 ungrateful after receiving such a favor. He <span style=
438 comparing himself to men, as in Luke (14:5): &#8220;Which of you, if his donkey or ox falls into a pit, 667 "font-weight: bold">related to the Jews that it was Jesus who had
439 will not take him out on the Sabbath?&#8221; And sometimes he justified himself by comparing himself 668 cured him,</span> in order to make it clear that Christ had the
440 to God: particularly on this occasion, when he said: <span style="font-weight: bold">My Father works even until now, and so 669 power to heal: &ldquo;Come ... and I will tell you what great
441 do I. </span>As if to say: Do not think that my Father rested on the Sabbath in such a way that from that 670 things the Lord has done for me,&rdquo; as we read in the Psalm
442 time he does not work; rather, just as he is working even now without laboring, so I also am 671 (65:16). This is obvious, for they had asked him who commanded him
443 working.</p> 672 to pick up his mat, but he told them that <span style=
444 <p>By saying this, Christ eliminated the misunderstanding of the Jews: for in their desire to imitate 673 "font-weight: bold">it was Jesus who had cured him.</span></p>
445 God, they did not do any work on the Sabbath, as if God entirely ceased from work on that day. 674 <p>736 Next (v 16), we have the persecution of Christ, begun
446 In fact, although God rested on the Sabbath from producing new creatures, he is working always 675 because he performed a work of mercy on the Sabbath. Thus the
447 and continuously even till now, conserving creatures in existence. Hence it is significant that 676 Evangelist says, <span style="font-weight: bold">For reasons like
448 Moses used the word &#8220;rest,&#8221; after recounting the works of God from which he rested: for this 677 this the Jews began to persecute Jesus, because he performed such
449 signifies, in its hidden meaning, the spiritual rest which God, by the example of his own rest, 678 works on the Sabbath.</span> &ldquo;Princes have persecuted me
450 promised to the faithful, after they have done their own good works. So we may say that this 679 without cause&rdquo; (Ps 118:16 1).</p>
451 command was a foreshadowing of something that lay in the future.</p> 680 <p>737 Then (v 17), the second reason for his persecution is given:
452 <p>739 He expressly says, <span style="font-weight: bold">works even until now, </span>and not &#8220;has worked,&#8221; to indicate that God&#8217;s work 681 what he taught. First, we are given the truth he taught; and
453 is continuous. For they might have thought that God is the cause of the world as a craftsman is 682 secondly, the perversity of his persecutors (v 18).</p>
454 the cause of a house, i.e., the craftsman is responsible only for the making or coming into 683 <p>73 8 Our Lord taught the truth while justifying his breaking of
455 existence of the house: in other words, just as the house continues in existence even when the 684 the Sabbath. Here we should note that our Lord justified both
456 craftsman has ceased working, so the world would exist if God&#8217;s influence ceased. But according 685 himself and his disciples from breaking the Sabbath. He justified
457 to Augustine, God is the cause of all creatures in such a way as to be the cause of their existing: 686 his disciples, since they were men, by comparing them to other men:
458 for it his power were to cease even for a moment, all things in nature would at once cease to be, 687 as the priests who, although they worked in the temple on the
459 just as we may say that the air is illuminated only as long as the light of the sun remains in it. The 688 Sabbath, did not break the Sabbath; and to David, who, while
460 reason for this is that things which depend on a cause only for their coming into existence, are 689 Ahinielech was priest, took the consecrated bread from the temple
461 able to exist when that cause ceases; but things that depend on a cause not only for their coming 690 oil the Sabbath when he was running from Saul (1 Sm 21:1).</p>
462 into existence but also to exist, need that cause for their continuous conservation in existence.</p> 691 <p>Our Lord, who was both God and man, sometimes justified himself
463 <p>740 Further, in saying that <span style="font-weight: bold">My Father works even until now,</span> he rejects the opinion of those 692 in breaking the Sabbath by comparing himself to men, as in Luke
464 who say that God creates through the instrumentality of secondary causes. This opinion conflicts 693 (14:5): &ldquo;Which of you, if his donkey or ox falls into a pit,
465 with Isaiah (26:12): &#8220;O Lord, you have accomplished all our works for LIS.&#8221; Therefore, just as 694 will not take him out on the Sabbath?&rdquo; And sometimes he
466 my <span style="font-weight: bold">Father, </span>who in the beginning created nature, <span style="font-weight: bold">works even until now, by </span>preserving and 695 justified himself by comparing himself to God: particularly on this
467 conserving his creation by the same activity, so (to I work, because I am the Word of the Father, 696 occasion, when he said: <span style="font-weight: bold">My Father
468 through whom he accomplishes all things: &#8220;God said: &#8216;Let there be light&#8217;&#8221; (Gn 1:3). Thus, just 697 works even until now, and so do I.</span> As if to say: Do not
469 as he accomplished the first production of things through the Word, so also their conservation. 698 think that my Father rested on the Sabbath in such a way that from
470 Consequently, if he <span style="font-weight: bold">works even until now, so do I, </span>because I am the Word of the Father, 699 that time he does not work; rather, just as he is working even now
471 through whom all things are made and conserved.</p> 700 without laboring, so I also am working.</p>
472 <p>741 Then (v 18), the Evangelist mentions the persecution of Christ, which resulted from his 701 <p>By saying this, Christ eliminated the misunderstanding of the
473 teaching: for it was because of his teaching that <span style="font-weight: bold">the Jews tried all the harder, </span>i.e., with greater 702 Jews: for in their desire to imitate God, they did not do any work
474 eagerness and a higher pitch of zeal, <span style="font-weight: bold">to kill him. </span>For in the law two crimes were punished by 703 on the Sabbath, as if God entirely ceased from work on that day. In
475 death: the crime of breaking the Sabbath&#8212;thus anyone who gathered wood on the Sabbath was 704 fact, although God rested on the Sabbath from producing new
476 stoned, as we see from Numbers (15:32); and the crime of blasphemy&#8212;so we read: &#8220;Bring the 705 creatures, he is working always and continuously even till now,
477 blasphemer outside the camp ... and let all the children of Israel stone him&#8221; (Lv 24:14). Now they 706 conserving creatures in existence. Hence it is significant that
478 thought it was blasphemy for a man to claim that he was God: &#8220;We are not stoning you for any 707 Moses used the word &ldquo;rest,&rdquo; after recounting the works
479 good work, but for blasphemy: because although you are a man, you make yourself God&#8221; (below 708 of God from which he rested: for this signifies, in its hidden
480 10:33). It was these two crimes they imputed to Christ: the first because he broke the Sabbath; 709 meaning, the spiritual rest which God, by the example of his own
481 the second because he said he was equal to God. So the Evangelist says that <span style="font-weight: bold">the Jews tried all 710 rest, promised to the faithful, after they have done their own good
482 the harder to kill him, because he not only broke the Sabbath rest, but even called God his 711 works. So we may say that this command was a foreshadowing of
483 own Father.</span></p> 712 something that lay in the future.</p>
484 <p>Because other just man had also called God their Father, as in &#8220;You will call me &#8216;Father&#8217;&#8221; (Jer 713 <p>739 He expressly says, <span style="font-weight: bold">works
485 3:19), they do not just say that he <span style="font-weight: bold">called God his own Father, </span>but added what made it 714 even until now,</span> and not &ldquo;has worked,&rdquo; to
486 blasphemy, <span style="font-weight: bold">making himself equal to God, </span>which they understood from his statement: <span style="font-weight: bold">My 715 indicate that God&rsquo;s work is continuous. For they might have
487 Father works even until now, and so do I. </span>He said that God was his Father so that we might 716 thought that God is the cause of the world as a craftsman is the
488 understand that God is his Father by nature, and the Father of others by adoption. He referred to 717 cause of a house, i.e., the craftsman is responsible only for the
489 both of these when he said: &#8220;I am going to my Father,&#8221; by nature, &#8220;and to your Father,&#8221; by grace 718 making or coming into existence of the house: in other words, just
490 (below 20:17). Again, he said that as the Father works, so he works. This answers the accusation 719 as the house continues in existence even when the craftsman has
491 of the Jews about his breaking the Sabbath: for this would not be a valid excuse unless he had 720 ceased working, so the world would exist if God&rsquo;s influence
492 equal authority with God in working. It was for this reason they said he made himself equal to 721 ceased. But according to Augustine, God is the cause of all
722 creatures in such a way as to be the cause of their existing: for
723 it his power were to cease even for a moment, all things in nature
724 would at once cease to be, just as we may say that the air is
725 illuminated only as long as the light of the sun remains in it. The
726 reason for this is that things which depend on a cause only for
727 their coming into existence, are able to exist when that cause
728 ceases; but things that depend on a cause not only for their coming
729 into existence but also to exist, need that cause for their
730 continuous conservation in existence.</p>
731 <p>740 Further, in saying that <span style="font-weight: bold">My
732 Father works even until now,</span> he rejects the opinion of those
733 who say that God creates through the instrumentality of secondary
734 causes. This opinion conflicts with Isaiah (26:12): &ldquo;O Lord,
735 you have accomplished all our works for LIS.&rdquo; Therefore, just
736 as my <span style="font-weight: bold">Father,</span> who in the
737 beginning created nature, <span style="font-weight: bold">works
738 even until now, by</span> preserving and conserving his creation by
739 the same activity, so (to I work, because I am the Word of the
740 Father, through whom he accomplishes all things: &ldquo;God said:
741 &lsquo;Let there be light&rsquo;&rdquo; (Gn 1:3). Thus, just as he
742 accomplished the first production of things through the Word, so
743 also their conservation. Consequently, if he <span style=
744 "font-weight: bold">works even until now, so do I,</span> because I
745 am the Word of the Father, through whom all things are made and
746 conserved.</p>
747 <p>741 Then (v 18), the Evangelist mentions the persecution of
748 Christ, which resulted from his teaching: for it was because of his
749 teaching that <span style="font-weight: bold">the Jews tried all
750 the harder,</span> i.e., with greater eagerness and a higher pitch
751 of zeal, <span style="font-weight: bold">to kill him.</span> For in
752 the law two crimes were punished by death: the crime of breaking
753 the Sabbath&mdash;thus anyone who gathered wood on the Sabbath was
754 stoned, as we see from Numbers (15:32); and the crime of
755 blasphemy&mdash;so we read: &ldquo;Bring the blasphemer outside the
756 camp ... and let all the children of Israel stone him&rdquo; (Lv
757 24:14). Now they thought it was blasphemy for a man to claim that
758 he was God: &ldquo;We are not stoning you for any good work, but
759 for blasphemy: because although you are a man, you make yourself
760 God&rdquo; (below 10:33). It was these two crimes they imputed to
761 Christ: the first because he broke the Sabbath; the second because
762 he said he was equal to God. So the Evangelist says that
763 <span style="font-weight: bold">the Jews tried all the harder to
764 kill him, because he not only broke the Sabbath rest, but even
765 called God his own Father.</span></p>
766 <p>Because other just man had also called God their Father, as in
767 &ldquo;You will call me &lsquo;Father&rsquo;&rdquo; (Jer 3:19),
768 they do not just say that he <span style="font-weight: bold">called
769 God his own Father,</span> but added what made it blasphemy,
770 <span style="font-weight: bold">making himself equal to God,</span>
771 which they understood from his statement: <span style=
772 "font-weight: bold">My Father works even until now, and so do
773 I.</span> He said that God was his Father so that we might
774 understand that God is his Father by nature, and the Father of
775 others by adoption. He referred to both of these when he said:
776 &ldquo;I am going to my Father,&rdquo; by nature, &ldquo;and to
777 your Father,&rdquo; by grace (below 20:17). Again, he said that as
778 the Father works, so he works. This answers the accusation of the
779 Jews about his breaking the Sabbath: for this would not be a valid
780 excuse unless he had equal authority with God in working. It was
781 for this reason they said he made himself equal to God.</p>
782 <p>742 How great then is the blindness of the Arians when they. say
783 that Christ is less than God the Father: for they cannot understand
784 in our Lord&rsquo;s words what the Jews were able to understand.
785 For the Arians say that Christ did not make himself equal to God,
786 while the Jews saw this. There is another way to settle this, from
787 the very things mentioned in the text. For the Evangelist says that
788 the Jews persecuted Christ because he broke the Sabbath, because he
789 said God is his Father, and because he made hiniselfequal to God.
790 But Christ is either a liar or equal to God. But if he is equal to
791 God, Christ is God by nature.</p>
792 <p>743 Finally, the Evangelist says, <span style=
793 "font-weight: bold">making himself equal to God,</span> not as
794 though he was making himself become equal to God, because he was
795 equal to God through an eternal generation. Rather, the Evangelist
796 is speaking according to the understanding of the Jews who, not
797 believing that Christ was the Son of God by nature, understood him
798 to say that he was the Son of God in the sense of wishing to make
799 himself equal to God; but they could not believe he was such:
800 &ldquo;because although you are a man, you make yourself God&rdquo;
801 (below 10:33), i.e., you say that you are God, understanding this
802 as you wish to make yourself God.</p>
803 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">
804 &nbsp;</p>
805 <p style="text-align: center"><span style=
806 "font-weight: bold">LECTURE 3</span></p>
807 <blockquote>
808 <p>19 Jesus therefore replied and said to them:</p>
809 <p style="margin-left: 0.5in">&ldquo;Amen, amen, I say to
810 you,<br />
811 the Son cannot do anything of himself,<br />
812 but only what he sees the Father doing.<br />
813 For whatever the Father does,<br />
814 the Son does likewise.<br />
815 20a For the Father loves the Son,<br />
816 and shows him everything that he does.&rdquo;</p>
817 </blockquote>
818 <p>744 Here we have Christ&rsquo;s teaching on his life-giving
819 power. First, his teaching is presented. Secondly, it is confirmed
820 (v 3 1). Two things are done with the first. First, Christ&rsquo;s
821 teaching on his life-giving power in general is given. Secondly, it
822 is presented in particular (v 20b). As to the first, three things
823 are done. First, the origin of this power is mentioned. Secondly,
824 the greatness of this power, at (v 19b). Thirdly, the reason for
825 each is given (v 20).</p>
826 <p>745 We should point out, with respect to the first, that the
827 Arians use what Christ said here, <span style=
828 "font-weight: bold">the Son cannot do anything of himself,</span>
829 to support their error that the Son is less than the Father. As the
830 Evangelist said, the Jews persecuted Christ for making himself
831 equal to God. But the Arians say that when our Lord saw that this
832 disturbed the Jews, he tried to correct this by stating that he was
833 not equal to the Father, saying, <span style=
834 "font-weight: bold">Amen, amen, I say to you, the Son cannot do
835 anything of himself, but only what he sees the Father doing.</span>
836 As if to say: Do not interpret what I said, &ldquo;My Father works
837 even until now, and so do I, as meaning that I work as though I am
838 equal to the Father. for I cannot do anything of myself. Therefore,
839 they say, because the Son can do only <span style=
840 "font-weight: bold">what he sees the Father doing</span>, he is
841 less than the Father. But this interpretation is false and
842 erroneous. For if the Son were not equal to the Father, then the
843 Son would not be the same as the Father; and this is contrary to:
844 &ldquo;I and the Father are one&rdquo; (below 10:30). For equality
845 is considered with respect to greatness, which in divine realities
846 is the essence itself. Hence, if the Son were not equal to the
847 Father, he would be different from him in essence.</p>
848 <p>746 To get the true meaning of Christ&rsquo;s statement, we
849 should know that in those matters which seem to imply inferiority
850 in the Son, it could be said, as some do, that they apply to Christ
851 according to the nature he assumed; as when he said: &ldquo;The
852 Father is greater than I&rdquo; (below 14:28). According to this,
853 they would say that our Lord&rsquo;s statement, <span style=
854 "font-weight: bold">the Son cannot do anything of himself,</span>
855 should be understood of the Son in his assumed nature. However,
856 this does not stand up, because then one would be forced to say
857 that whatever the Son of God did in his assumed nature, the Father
858 had done before him. For example, that the Father had walked upon
859 the water as Christ did: otherwise, he would not have said,
860 <span style="font-weight: bold">but only what he sees the Father
861 doing.</span></p>
862 <p>And if we say that whatever Christ did in his flesh, God the
863 Father also did in so far as the Father works in him, as said below
864 (14:10): &ldquo;The Father, who lives in me, he accomplishes the
865 works,&rdquo; then Christ would be saying that <span style=
866 "font-weight: bold">the Son cannot do anything of himself, but only
867 what he sees the Father doing</span> in him, i.e., in the Son. But
868 this cannot stand either, because Christ&rsquo;s next statement,
869 <span style="font-weight: bold">For whatever the Father, does, the
870 Son does likewise,</span> could not, in this interpretation, be
871 applied to him, i.e., to Christ. For the Son, in his assumed
872 nature, never created the world, as the Father did. Consequently,
873 what we read here must not be understood as pertaining to
874 Christ&rsquo;s assumed nature.</p>
875 <p>747 According to Augustine, however, there is another way of
876 understanding statements which seem to, but do not, imply
877 inferriority in the Son: namely, by referring them to the origin of
878 the Son coming or begotten from the Father. For although the Son is
879 equal to the Father in all things, he receives all these things
880 from the Father in an eternal begetting. But the Father gets these
881 from no one, for he is unbegotten. According to this explanation,
882 the continuity of thought is the following: Why are you offended
883 because I said that God is my Father, and because I made myself
884 equal to the Father? <span style="font-weight: bold">Amen, amen, I
885 say to you, the Son can do nothing of himself.</span> As if to say:
886 I am equal to the Father, but in such a way as to be from him, and
887 not he from me; and whatever I may do, is in me from the
888 Father.</p>
889 <p>748 According to this interpretation, mention is made of the
890 power of the Son when he says, can, and of his activity when he
891 says, do. Both can be understood here, so that, first of all, the
892 derivation of the Son&rsquo;s power from the Father is shown, and
893 secondly, the conformity of the Son&rsquo;s activity to that of the
894 Father.</p>
895 <p>749 As to the first, Hilary explains it this way: Shortly above
896 our Lord said that he is equal to the Father. Some heretics, basing
897 themselves on certain scriptural texts which assert the unity and
898 equality of the Son to the Father, claim that the Son is
899 unbegotten. For example, the Sabellians, who say that the Son is
900 identical in person with the Father. Therefore, so you do not
901 understand this teaching in this way, he says, <span style=
902 "font-weight: bold">the Son cannot do anything of himself,</span>
903 for the Son&rsquo;s power is identical with his nature. Therefore
904 the Son has his power from the same source as he has his being
905 (<i>esse</i>); but he has his being (<i>esse</i>) from the Father:
906 &ldquo;I came forth from the Father, and I have come into the
907 world&rdquo; (Jn 16:28). He also has his nature from the Father,
908 because he is God from God; therefore, it is from him that the Son
909 has his power (<i>posse</i>)<i>.</i></p>
910 <p>So his statement, <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son cannot
911 do anything of himself, but only what he sees the Father
912 doing,</span> is the same as saying: The Son, just as he does not
913 have his being (<i>esse</i>) except from the Father, so he cannot
914 do anything except from the Father. For in natural things, a thing
915 receives its power to act from the very thing from which it
916 receives its being: for example, fire receives its power to ascend
917 from the very thing from which it receives its form and being.
918 Further, in saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son cannot
919 do anything of himself,</span> no inequality is implied, because
920 this refers to a relation; while equality and inequality refer to
921 quantity.</p>
922 <p>750 Someone might misunderstand his saying, <span style=
923 "font-weight: bold">but only what he sees the Father doing,</span>
924 and take it to mean that the Son works or acts in the way he sees
925 the Father acting, i.e., that the Father acts first, and when the
926 Son sees this, then the Son begins to act. It would be like two
927 carpenters, a master and his apprentice, with the apprentice making
928 a cabinet in the way he saw the master do. But this is not true for
929 the Word, for it was said above (1:3): &ldquo;All things were made
930 through him.&rdquo; Therefore, the Father did not make something in
931 such a way that the Son saw him doing it and so learned from
932 it.</p>
933 <p>But this is said so that the communication of paternity to the
934 Son might be designated in terms of begetting or generation, which
935 is fittingly described by the verb sees, because knowledge is
936 conveyed to us by another through seeing and hearing. For we
937 receive our knowledge from things through seeing. and we receive
938 knowledge from words through hearing, Now the Son is not other than
939 Wisdom, as we read: &ldquo;I came forth out of the mouth of the
940 Most High, the first-born before all creatures&rdquo; (Sir 24:5).
941 Accordingly, the derivation of the Son from the Father is nothing
942 other than the derivation of divine Wisdom. And so, because the act
943 of seeing indicates the derivation of knowledge and wisdom from
944 another, it is proper for the generation of the Son from the Father
945 to be indicated by an act of seeing; so that for the Son to see the
946 Father doing something is nothing other than to proceed by an
947 intellectual procession from the acting Father.</p>
948 <p>Another possible explanation of this is given by Hilary. For
949 him, the word sees eliminates all imperfection from the generation
950 of the Son or Word. For in physical generation, what is generated
951 changes little by little in the course of time from what is
952 imperfect to what is perfect, for such a thing is not perfect when
953 it is first generated. But this is not so in eternal generation,
954 since this is the generation of what is perfect from what is
955 perfect. And so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">but only
956 what he sees the Father doing.</span> For since the act of seeing
957 is the act of a perfect thing, it is plain that the Son was
958 begotten as perfect at once, as seeing at once, and not as coming
959 to perfection over a course of time.</p>
960 <p>751 Apropos of the second point, Chrysostom explains it as
961 showing the conformity of the Father to the Son in operation. So
962 that the sense is: I say that it is lawful for me to work on the
963 Sabbath, because my Father, too, continues to work, and I cannot do
964 anything opposed to him: and this is because <span style=
965 "font-weight: bold">the Son cannot do anything of himself.</span>
966 For one does something of himself when he does not conform himself
967 to another in his actions. But whoever is from another sins, if he
968 is opposed to him: &ldquo;Whoever speaks on his own, seeks his own
969 glory&rdquo; (below 7:18). Therefore, whoever exists from another,
970 but acts of himself, sins. Now the Son is from the Father; thus, if
971 he acts of himself, he sins; and this is impossible. So by saying,
972 <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son cannot do anything of
973 himself,</span> he means nothing more than that the Son cannot sin.
974 As if to say: You are persecuting me unjustly for breaking the
975 Sabbath, because I cannot sin, since I do not act in a way opposed
976 to my Father.</p>
977 <p>Augustine makes use of both of these explanations, that of of
978 Hilary and the one given by Chrysostom, but in different
979 places.</p>
980 <p>752 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">For
981 whatever the Father does, the Son does likewise,</span> he affirms
982 the greatness of Christ&rsquo;s power. He excludes three things in
983 the power of Christ: limitation, difference, and imperfection.</p>
984 <p>First, limitation is excluded. Since there are diverse agents in
985 the world, and the first universal agent has power over all other
986 agents, but the other agents, which are from him, have a limited
987 power in proportion to their rank in the order of causality, some
988 might think that since the Son is not of himself, that he must have
989 a power limited to certain existents, rather than a universal power
990 over all, as the Father has. And so to exclude this he says,
991 <span style="font-weight: bold">whatever the Father does,</span>
992 i.e., to all the things to which the Father&rsquo;s power extends,
993 the Son&rsquo;s power also extends: &ldquo;All things were made
994 through him&rdquo; (above 1:3).</p>
995 <p>Secondly, difference is excluded. For sometimes a thing that
996 exists from another is able to do whatever that from which it
997 exists does. And yet the things the former does are not the same as
998 those done by that from which it is. For example, if one fire which
999 exists from another can do whatever that other does, i.e., cause
1000 combustion, the act of causing combustion would be specifically the
1001 same in each, even though one fire ignites certain things and the
1002 other fire ignites different things. And so that you do not think
1003 that the Son&rsquo;s activity is different from the activity of the
1004 Father in this way, he says, <span style=
1005 "font-weight: bold">whatever</span> the Father does, the Son does,
1006 i.e., not different things, but the very same.</p>
1007 <p>Thirdly, imperfection is excluded. Sometimes one and the same
1008 thing comes from two agents: from one as the principal and perfect
1009 agent, and from the other as an instrumental and imperfect agent.
1010 But it does not come in the same way, because the principal agent
1011 acts in a different way from the instrumental agent: for the
1012 instrumental agent acts imperfectly, and in virtue of the other.
1013 And so that no one thinks that this is the way the Son does
1014 whatever the Father does, he says that whatever the Father does,
1015 the Son does <span style="font-weight: bold">likewise</span>, i.e.,
1016 with the same power by which the Father acts, the Son also acts;
1017 because the same power and the same perfection are in the Father
1018 and the Son: &ldquo;I was with him, forming all things&rdquo; (Prv
1019 8:30).</p>
1020 <p>753 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">For the
1021 Father loves the Son,</span> he gives the reason for each, i.e.,
1022 for the origin of the Son&rsquo;s power and for its greatness. This
1023 reason is the love of the Father, who loves the Son. Thus he says,
1024 <span style="font-weight: bold">For the Father loves the
1025 Son.</span></p>
1026 <p>In order to understand how the Father&rsquo;s love for the Son
1027 is the reason for the origin or communication of the Son&rsquo;s
1028 power, we Should point out that a thing is loved in two ways. For
1029 since the good alone is loveable, a good can be related to love in
1030 two ways: as the cause of love, or as caused by love. Now in us,
1031 the good causes love: for the cause of our loving something is its
1032 goodness, the goodness in it. Therefore, it is not good because we
1033 love it, but rather we love it because it is good. Accordingly. in
1034 us, love is caused by what is good. But it is different with God,
1035 because God&rsquo;s love itself is the cause of the goodness in the
1036 things that are loved. For it is because God loves us that we are
1037 good, since to love is nothing else than to will a good to someone.
1038 Thus, since God&rsquo;s will is the cause of things, for
1039 &ldquo;whatever he willed he made&rdquo; (Ps 113:3), it is clear
1040 that God&rsquo;s love is the cause of the goodness in things. Hence
1041 Denis says in <i>The Divine Names</i> (c. 4) that the divine love
1042 did not allow itself to be without issue. So, if we wish to
1043 consider the origin of the Son, let us see whether the love with
1044 which the Father loves the Son, is the principle of his origin, so
1045 that he proceeds from it.</p>
1046 <p>In divine realities, love is taken in two ways: essentially, so
1047 far as the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit love; and
1048 notionally or personally, so far as the Holy Spirit proceeds as
1049 Love. But in neither of these ways of taking love can it be the
1050 principle of origin of the Son. For if is is taken essentially, it
1051 implies an act of the will; and if that were the sense in which it
1052 is the principle of origin of the Son, it would follow that the
1053 Father generated the Son, not by nature, but by will&mdash;and this
1054 is false. Again, love is not understood notionally, as pertaining
1055 to the Holy Spirit. For it would then follow that the Holy Spirit
1056 would be the principle of the Son&mdash;which is also false.
1057 Indeed, no heretic ever went so far as to say this. For although
1058 love, notionally taken, is the principle of all the gifts given to
1059 us by God, it is nevertheless not the principle of the Son; rather
1060 it proceeds from the Father and the Son.</p>
1061 <p>Consequently, we must say that this explanation is not taken
1062 from love as from a principle (<i>ex principio</i>), but as from a
1063 sign (<i>ex signo</i>)<i>.</i> For since likeness is a cause of
1064 love (for every animal loves its like), wherever a perfect likeness
1065 of God is found, there also is found a perfect love of God. But the
1066 perfect likeness of the Father is in the Son, as is said: &ldquo;He
1067 is the image of the invisible God&rdquo; (1:15); and &ldquo;He is
1068 the brightness of the Father&rsquo;s glory, and the image of his
1069 substance&rdquo; (Heb 1:3). Therefore, the Son is loved perfectly
1070 by the Father, and because the Father perfectly loves the Son, this
1071 is a sign that the Father has shown him everything and has
1072 communicated to him his very own [the Father&rsquo;s] power and
1073 nature. And it is of this love that we read above (3:5): &ldquo;The
1074 Father loves the Son, and has put everything into his hands&rdquo;;
1075 and, &ldquo;This is my beloved. Son&rdquo; (Mt 3:17).</p>
1076 <p>754 With respect to what follows, <span style=
1077 "font-weight: bold">and shows him everything that he does,</span>
1078 we should point out that someone can show another his works in two
1079 ways: either by sight, as an artisan shows his apprentice the
1080 things he has made, or by hearing, as when he verbally instructs
1081 him). In whatever of these ways shows is understood, there can
1082 follow something which is not appropriate, that is, something that
1083 is not present when the Father shows things to the Son. For if we
1084 say the Father shows things to the Son by sight, then it follows,
1085 as with humans, that the Father first does something which he then
1086 shows to the Son; and that he does this by himself, without the
1087 Son. But the Father does not show the Son things which he did
1088 before, for the Son himself says: &ldquo;The Lord possessed me at
1089 the beginning of his ways, before he made anything&rdquo; (Prv
1090 8:22). Nor does the Father show the Son things he has done without
1091 the Son, for the Father does all things through the Son: &ldquo;All
1092 things were made through him&rdquo; (above 1:3). If <span style=
1093 "font-weight: bold">shows</span> is understood as a kind of
1094 hearing, two things seem to follow. For the one who teaches by word
1095 first points out something to the one who is ignorant; again, the
1096 word is something intermediate between the one showing and the one
1097 being shown. But it is in neither of these ways that the Father
1098 shows things to the Son: for he does not do so to one who is
1099 ignorant, since the Son is the Wisdom of the Father: &ldquo;Christ
1100 is the power of God, and the wisdom of God&rdquo; (1 Cor 1:24); nor
1101 does the Father use some intermediate word, because the Son himself
1102 is the Word of the Father: &ldquo;The Word was with God&rdquo;
1103 (above 1:1).</p>
1104 <p>Therefore, it is said that the Father <span style=
1105 "font-weight: bold">shows</span> all that he does to the Son,
1106 inasmuch as he gives the Son a knowledge of all of his works. For
1107 it is in this way that a master is said to show something to his
1108 disciple, inasmuch as he gives him a knowledge of the things he
1109 makes. Hence, according to Augustine, for the Father to show
1110 anything to the Son is nothing more than for the Father to beget or
1111 generate the Son. And for the Son to see what the Father does is
1112 nothing more than for the Son to receive his being (<i>esse</i>)
1113 and nature from the Father.</p>
1114 <p>Nevertheless, this showing can be considered similar to seeing
1115 insofar as the Son is the brightness of the paternal vision, as we
1116 read in Hebrews (1:3): for the Father, seeing and understanding
1117 himself, conceives the Son, who is the concept of this vision.
1118 Again, it can be considered similar to hearing insofar as the Son
1119 proceeds from the Father as the Word. As if to say: <span style=
1120 "font-weight: bold">The Father shows him everything,</span> insofar
1121 he he generates him as the brightness and concept of his own
1122 wisdom, and as the Word. Thus the words, <span style=
1123 "font-weight: bold">The Father shows,</span> refer to what was said
1124 before: <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son cannot do anything
1125 of himself, but only what he sees the Father doing.</span> And the
1126 word, everything, refers to, <span style="font-weight: bold">For
1127 whatever the Father does, the Son does likewise.</span></p>
1128 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">
1129 &nbsp;</p>
1130 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style=
1131 "font-weight: bold">LECTURE 4</span></p>
1132 <blockquote>
1133 <p>20b &ldquo;Indeed, he will show him even greater works than
1134 these, such that you will be amazed. 21 For just as the Father
1135 raises the dead and grants life, so the Son grants life to those to
1136 whom he wishes. 22 The Father himself judges no one, but he has
1137 given all judgment to the Son, 23 so that all men may honor the Son
1138 as they honor the Father. Whoever does not honor the Son does not
1139 honor the Father who sent him. 24 Amen, amen, I say to you, that
1140 whoever hears my voice and believes in him who sent me, possesses
1141 eternal life; and he will not encounter judgment, but has passed
1142 from death to life. 25 Amen, amen, I say to you, the hour is
1143 coming, and is now here, when the dead shall hear the voice of the
1144 Son of God; and those who hear it will live.&rdquo;</p>
1145 </blockquote>
1146 <p>755 Having pointed out the power of the Son in general, he now
1147 shows it in more detail. First, the Lord discloses his life-giving
1148 power. Secondly, he clarifies what seemed obscure in what was said
1149 before (v 26). As to the first he does two things. First, he shows
1150 that the Son has life-giving power. Secondly, he teaches how life
1151 is received from the Son (v 24). Concerning the first he does three
1152 things. First, he presents the life-giving power of the Son.
1153 Secondly, he gives a reason for what he says (v 22). Thirdly, he
1154 shows the effect of this (v 23). With respect to the first he does
1155 two things. First, he sets forth this life-giving power in general.
1156 Secondly, he expands on it (v 21).</p>
1157 <p>756 He says, to the first, <span style=
1158 "font-weight: bold">Indeed, he will show even greater works than
1159 these.</span> As if to say: You are astonished and affected by the
1160 power of the Son in his healing of the sick man, but the Father
1161 will show <span style="font-weight: bold">even greater works than
1162 these,</span> as in raising the dead, such that you will be
1163 amazed.</p>
1164 <p>757 This passage gives rise to two difficulties. First, about
1165 his saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">he will show</span>.
1166 For the earlier statement that the Father shows everything to the
1167 Son (5:20) refers to his eternal generation. How, then, can he say
1168 here, <span style="font-weight: bold">he will show</span>, if the
1169 Son is coeternal with him and eternity does not allow of a future?
1170 The second difficulty is over, <span style="font-weight: bold">such
1171 that you will be amazed</span>. For if he intends to show something
1172 to amaze the Jews, then he will be showing it to the Son at the
1173 same time as to them; for they could not be amazed unless they saw
1174 it. And yet the Son saw all things from eternity with the
1175 Father.</p>
1176 <p>758 We must say that this is explained in three ways. The first
1177 way is given by Augustine, and in it this future showing is
1178 referred to the disciples. For it is Christ&rsquo;s custom that now
1179 and then he says that what happens to his members happens to
1180 himself, as in Matthew (25:40): &ldquo;As long as you did it to one
1181 of the least of my brethren, you did it to me.&rdquo; And then the
1182 meaning is this: You saw the Son do something great in healing the
1183 sick man, and you were amazed; but the Father <span style=
1184 "font-weight: bold">will show him even greater works than
1185 these,</span> in his members, that is, the disciples: &ldquo;He
1186 will do greater things than these,&rdquo; as we read below (14:12).
1187 He then says, <span style="font-weight: bold">such that you will be
1188 amazed,</span> for the miracles of the disciples so amazed the Jews
1189 that a great many of them were converted to the faith, as we see in
1190 the Acts.</p>
1191 <p>759 The second explanation, also by Augustine, refers this
1192 showing to Christ according to his assumed nature. For in Christ
1193 there is both a divine nature and a human nature, and in each he
1194 has life-giving power from the Father, although not in the same
1195 way. According to his divinity he has the power to give life to
1196 souls; but according to his assumed nature, he gives life to
1197 bodies. Hence Augustine says: &ldquo;The Word gives life to souls;
1198 but the Word made flesh gives life to bodies.&rdquo; For the
1199 resurrection of Christ and the mysteries which Christ fulfilled in
1200 his flesh are the cause of the future resurrection of bodies:
1201 &ldquo;God, who is rich in mercy, has brought us to life in
1202 Christ&rdquo; (Eph 2:5); &ldquo;If it is preached that Christ rose
1203 from the dead, how can some of you say that there is no
1204 resurrection of the dead&rdquo; (1 Cor 15:12). The first
1205 life-giving power he has from eternity; and he indicated this when
1206 he said: &ldquo;The &lsquo; Father shows him everything that he
1207 does&rdquo; (above 4:20), all of which he shows to his flesh.</p>
1208 <p>The other life-giving power he has in time, and concerning this
1209 he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">he will show him even
1210 greater works than these,</span> i.e., his power will be shown by
1211 the fact that he will do greater works, by raising the dead. He
1212 will raise some of the dead here: as Lazarus, the young girl, and
1213 the mother&rsquo;s only son; and finally he will raise all on the
1214 day of judgment.</p>
1215 <p>760 A third explanation refers this showing to Christ in his
1216 divine nature, according to the custom of Scripture in sayfng that
1217 a thing is beginning to take place when it is beginning to be
1218 known. For example: &ldquo;All power has been given to me, in
1219 heaven and on earth&rdquo; (Mt 28:18); for although Christ had the
1220 complete fulness of power from eternity (because &ldquo;whatever
1221 the Father does, the Son does likewise&rdquo;), he still speaks of
1222 this power as being given to him after the resurrection, not
1223 because he was then receiving it for the first time, but because it
1224 was through the glory of the resurrection that it became most
1225 known. In this interpretation, then, he says that power is given to
1226 him insofar as he exercises it in some work. As if to say:
1227 <span style="font-weight: bold">he will show him even greater works
1228 than these,</span> i.e., he will show by his works what has been
1229 given to him. And this will come about when you are amazed, i.e.,
1230 when the one who seems to you to be a mere man is revealed to be a
1231 person of divine power and as God.</p>
1232 <p>We could also take the word show as referring to an act of
1233 seeing, as was explained above [750].</p>
1234 <p>761 Now he explains in more detail the life-giving power of the
1235 Son by indicating those greater works which the Father will show
1236 the Son (v 21). Here we should point out that in the Old Testament
1237 the divine power is particularly emphasized by the fact that God is
1238 the author of life: &ldquo;The Lord kills, and brings to
1239 life&rdquo; (1 Sm 2:6); &ldquo;1 will kill, and bring to life
1240 again&rdquo; (Dt 32:39). Now just as the Father has this power, so
1241 also does the Son; hence he says, <span style=
1242 "font-weight: bold">For just as the Father raises the dead and
1243 grants life, so the Son grants life to those to whom he
1244 wishes.</span> As if to say: These are those greater works that the
1245 Father will show the Son, that is, he will give life to the dead.
1246 Such works are obviously greater, for it is greater to raise the
1247 dead than for a sick man to become well. Thus <span style=
1248 "font-weight: bold">the Son grants life to those to whom he
1249 wishes,</span> i.e., by giving initial life to the living, and by
1250 raising the dead.</p>
1251 <p>We should not think that some are raised up by the Father and
1252 others by the Son. Rather, the same ones who are raised and
1253 vivified by the Father, are raised and vivified by the Son also:
1254 because just as the Father does all things through the Son, who is
1255 his power, so he also gives life to all through the Son, who is
1256 life, as he says below: &ldquo;I am the way, and the truth, and the
1257 life&rdquo; (14:6).</p>
1258 <p>The Father does not raise up and give life through the Son as
1259 through an instrument, because then the Son would not have freedom
1260 of power. And so to exclude this he says, <span style=
1261 "font-weight: bold">the Son grants life to those to whom he
1262 wishes,</span> i.e., it lies in the freedom of his power to grant
1263 life to whom he wills. For the Son does not will anything different
1264 than the Father wills: for just as they are one substance, so they
1265 have one will; hence Matthew (20:15) says: &ldquo;Is it not lawful
1266 for me to do as I will?&rdquo;</p>
1267 <p>762 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">The
1268 Father himself judges no one,</span> he gives the reason for what
1269 was said above, and indicates his own power. It should be remarked
1270 that there are two expositions for the present passages: one is
1271 given by Augustine, and the other by Hilary and Chrysostom.</p>
1272 <p>Augustine&rsquo;s explanation is this. The Lord had said that
1273 just as the Father raises the dead, so also does the Son. But so
1274 that we do not think that this refers only to those miracles the
1275 Son performs in raising the dead to this life, and not to the
1276 Son&rsquo;s raising to eternal life, he leads them to the deeper
1277 consideration of the resurrection to occur at the future judgment.
1278 Thus he refers explicitly to the judgment, saying, <span style=
1279 "font-weight: bold">The Father himself judges no one.</span></p>
1280 <p>Another explanation by Augustine, in which the same meaning is
1281 maintained, is that the earlier statement, <span style=
1282 "font-weight: bold">just as the Father raises the dead and grants
1283 life, so the Son,</span> should be referred to the resurrection of
1284 souls, which the Son causes inasmuch as he is the Word; but the
1285 text, <span style="font-weight: bold">The Father himself judges no
1286 one,</span> should be referred to the resurrection of bodies, which
1287 the Son causes inasmuch as he is the Word made flesh. For the
1288 resurrection of souls is accomplished through the person of the
1289 Father and of the Son; and for this reason he mentions the Father
1290 and Son together, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">just as
1291 the Father raises the dead ... so the Son.</span> But the
1292 resurrection of bodies is accomplished through the humanity of the
1293 Son, according to which he is not coeternal with the Father.
1294 Consequently, he attributes judgment solely to the Son.</p>
1295 <p>763 Note the wonderful variety of expressions. The Father is
1296 first presented as acting and the Son as resting, when it says:
1297 &ldquo;the Son cannot do anything of himself, but only what he sees
1298 the Father doing&rdquo; (5:19); but here, on the contrary, the Son
1299 is presented as acting and the Father as resting: <span style=
1300 "font-weight: bold">The Father himself judges no one, but he has
1301 given all judgment to the Son.</span> We can see from this that he
1302 is speaking from different points of view at different times. At
1303 first, he was speaking of an action which belongs to the Father and
1304 the Son; thus he says that &ldquo;the Son cannot do anything of
1305 himself, but only what he sees the Father doing&rdquo;; but here he
1306 is speaking of an action by which the Son, as man, judges, and the
1307 Father does not: thus he says that the Father <span style=
1308 "font-weight: bold">has given all judgment to the Son.</span> For
1309 the Father will not appear at the judgment because, in accord with
1310 what is just, God cannot appear in his divine nature before all who
1311 are to be judged: for since our happiness consists in the vision of
1312 God, if the wicked were to see God in his own nature, they would be
1313 enjoying happiness. Therefore, only the Son will appear, who alone
1314 has an assumed nature. Therefore, he alone will judge who alone
1315 will appear to all. Yet he will judge with the authority of the
1316 Father: &ldquo;He is the one appointed by God to be the judge of
1317 the living and of the dead&rdquo; (Acts 10:42); and in the Psalm
1318 (71:1) we read: &ldquo;O Lord, give your judgment to the
1319 king.&rdquo;</p>
1320 <p>764 Then when he says, so <span style="font-weight: bold">that
1321 all men may honor the Son,</span> he gives the effect which results
1322 from the power of the Son. First, he gives the effect. Secondly, he
1323 excludes an objection (v 23b).</p>
1324 <p>765 He says that the Father has given all judgment to the Son,
1325 according to his human nature, because in the incarnation the Son
1326 emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, under which form he
1327 was dishonored by men, as is said below (8:49): &ldquo;I honor my
1328 Father, and you have dishonored me.&rdquo; Therefore, judgment was
1329 given to the Son in his assumed nature in order <span style=
1330 "font-weight: bold">that all men may honor the Son as they honor
1331 the Father.</span> For on that day &ldquo;they will see the Son of
1332 Man coming with great power and glory&rdquo; (Lk 21:27);
1333 &ldquo;They fell on their faces and worshipped, saying:
1334 &lsquo;Blessing and glory, and wisdom and thanks, and honor, power
1335 and strength, to our God&rsquo;&rdquo; (Rv 7:11).</p>
1336 <p>766 Someone might say: I am willing to honor the Father, but do
1337 not care about the Son. This cannot be, because <span style=
1338 "font-weight: bold">Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor
1339 the Father who sent him.</span> For it is one thing to honor God
1340 precisely as God, and another to honor the Father. For someone may
1341 well honor God as the omnipotent and immutable Creator without
1342 honoring the Son. But no one can honor God as Father without
1343 honoring the Son; for he cannot be called Father if he does not
1344 have a Son. But if you dishonor the Son by diminishing his power,
1345 this also dishonors the Father; because where you give less to the
1346 Son, you are taking away from the power of the Father.</p>
1347 <p>767 Another explanation, given by Augustine, is this. A twofold
1348 honor is due to Christ. One, according to his divinity, in regard
1349 to which he is owed an honor equal to that given the Father; and
1350 with respect to this he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">that
1351 all men may honor the Son as they honor the Father.</span> Another
1352 honor is due the Son according to his humanity, but not one equal
1353 to that given the Father; and with respect to this he says,
1354 <span style="font-weight: bold">Whoever does not honor the Son does
1355 not honor the Father who sent him.</span> Thus in the first case he
1356 significantly used &ldquo;as&rdquo;; but now, the second time, he
1357 does not say &ldquo;as,&rdquo; but states absolutely that the Son
1358 should be honored: &ldquo;He who rejects you, rejects me; and he
1359 who rejects me, rejects <span style="font-weight: bold">him
1360 who</span> sent me,&rdquo; as we read in Luke (10:16).</p>
1361 <p>768 Hilary and Chrysostom give a more literal explanation, but
1362 it is only slightly different. They explain it this way. Our Lord
1363 said above, <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son grants life to
1364 those to whom he wishes.</span> Now whoever does anything according
1365 to the free decision of his will acts because of his own judgment.
1366 But it was stated above that &ldquo;whatever the Father does, the
1367 Son does likewise&rdquo; (5:19). Therefore, the Son enjoys a free
1368 decision of his own will in all things, since he acts because of
1369 his own judgment. Thus he immediately mentions judgment, saying
1370 that <span style="font-weight: bold">the Father himself judges no
1371 one,</span> i.e., without or apart from the Son. Our Lord used this
1372 way of speaking below (12:47): &ldquo;I do not judge him,&rdquo;
1373 i.e., I alone, &ldquo;but the word that I have spoken will judge
1374 him on the last day.&rdquo; <span style="font-weight: bold">But he
1375 has given all judgment to the Son,</span> as he has given all
1376 things to him. For as he has given him life and begotten him as
1377 living, so he has given him all judgment, i.e., begotten him as
1378 judge: &ldquo;I judge only as I hear it&rdquo; (below 5:30), i.e.,
1379 just as I have being (<i>esse</i>)from the Father, so also
1380 judgment. The reason for this is that the Son is nothing other than
1381 the conception of the paternal wisdom, as was said. But each one
1382 judges by the concept of his wisdom. Hence, just as the Father does
1383 all things through the Son, so he judges all things through him.
1384 And the fruit of this is <span style="font-weight: bold">that all
1385 men may honor the Son as they honor the Father,</span> i.e., that
1386 they may render to him the cult of &ldquo;latria&rdquo; as they do
1387 the Father. The rest does not change.</p>
1388 <p>769 Hilary calls our attention to the remarkable relationship of
1389 the passages so that the errors concerning eternal generation can
1390 be refuted. Two heresies have arisen concerning this eternal
1391 generation. One was that of Arius, who said that the Son is less
1392 than the Father; and this is contrary to their equality and unity.
1393 The other was that of Sabellius, who said that that there is no
1394 distinction of persons in the divinity; and this is contrary to
1395 their origin.</p>
1396 <p>So, whenever he mentions the unity and equality [of the Father
1397 and Son] , he immediately also adds their distinction as persons
1398 according to origin, and conversely. Thus, because he mentions the
1399 origin of the persons when he says, &ldquo;the Son cannot do
1400 anything of himself, but only what he sees the Father doing&rdquo;
1401 (5:19), then, so we do not think this involves inequality, he at
1402 once adds: &ldquo;for whatever the Father does, the Son does
1403 likewise.&rdquo; Conversely, when he states their equality by
1404 saying: <span style="font-weight: bold">For just as the Father
1405 raises the dead and grants life, so the Son grants life to those to
1406 whom he wishes,</span> then, so that we do not deny that the Son
1407 has an origin and is begotten, he adds, <span style=
1408 "font-weight: bold">the Father himself judges no one, but he has
1409 given all judgment to the Son.</span> Similarly, when he mentions
1410 the equality of the persons by saying. <span style=
1411 "font-weight: bold">so that all men may honor the Son as they honor
1412 the Father.</span> he immediately adds something about a
1413 &ldquo;mission,&rdquo; which indicates an origin, saying:
1414 <span style="font-weight: bold">Whoever does not honor the Son does
1415 not honor the Father who sent him,</span> but not in such a way
1416 that involves a separation. Christ mentions such mission below
1417 (8:29) in saying: &ldquo;He who sent me is with me, and he has not
1418 left me alone.&rdquo;</p>
1419 <p>770 Above, our Lord showed that he had life-giving power; here
1420 he shows how someone can share in this life coming from him. First,
1421 he tells how one can share in this life through him. Secondly, he
1422 predicts its fulfillment (v 25).</p>
1423 <p>771 With respect to the first, we should point out that there
1424 are four grades of life. One is found in plants, which take
1425 nourishment, grow, reproduce, and are reproduced. Another is in
1426 animals which only sense. Another in living things that move, that
1427 is, the perfect animals. Finally, there is another form of life
1428 which is present in those who understand. Now among those grades of
1429 life that exist, it is impossible that the foremost life be that
1430 found in plants, or in those with sensation, or even in those with
1431 motion. For the first and foremost life must be that which is
1432 <i>per se,</i> not that which is participated. This can be none
1433 other than intellectual life, for the other three forms are common
1434 to a corporal and spiritual creature [as man]. Indeed, a body that
1435 lives is not life itself, but one participating in life. Hence
1436 intellectual life is the first and foremost life, which is the
1437 spiritual life, that is immediately received from the first
1438 principle of life, whence it is called the life of wisdom. For this
1439 reason in the Scriptures life is attributed to wisdom: &ldquo;He
1440 who finds me finds life, and has salvation from the Lord&rdquo;
1441 (Prv 8:35). Therefore we share life from Christ, who is the Wisdom
1442 of God, insofar as our soul receives wisdom from him.</p>
1443 <p>Now this intellectual life is made perfect by the true knowledge
1444 of divine Wisdom, which is eternal life: &ldquo;This is eternal
1445 life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ,
1446 whom you have sent&rdquo; (below 17:3). But no one can arrive at
1447 any wisdom except by faith. Hence it is that in the sciences, no
1448 one acquires wisdom unless he first believes what is said by his
1449 teacher. Therefore, if we wish to acquire this life of wisdom, we
1450 must believe through faith the things that are proposed to us by
1451 it. &ldquo;He who comes to God must believe that he is and rewards
1452 those who seek him&rdquo; (Heb 11:6); &ldquo;If you do not believe,
1453 you will not understand,&rdquo; as we read in another version of
1454 Isaiah (28:16).</p>
1455 <p>772 Thus, our Lord fittingly shows that the way of obtaining
1456 life is through faith, saying, <span style=
1457 "font-weight: bold">whoever hears my voice and believes in him who
1458 sent me, possesses eternal life.</span> First, he mentions the
1459 merit of faith. Secondly, the reward of&rsquo; faith, <span style=
1460 "font-weight: bold">eternal life.</span></p>
1461 <p>773 Concerning the merit of faith, he first indicates how faith
1462 is brought to us; and secondly, the foundation of faith, that on
1463 which it rests.</p>
1464 <p>Faith comes to us through the words of men: &ldquo;Faith comes
1465 through hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ&rdquo; (Rom
1466 10:17). But faith does not rest on man&rsquo;s word, but on God
1467 himself: &ldquo;Abram believed God, who counted this as his
1468 justification&rdquo; (Gn 15:6); &ldquo;You who fear the Lord,
1469 believe in him&rdquo; (Sir 2:8). Thus we are lead to believe
1470 through the words of men, not in the man himself who speaks, but in
1471 God, whose words he speaks: &ldquo;When you heard the word we
1472 brought you as God&rsquo;s word, you did not receive it as the word
1473 of men, but, as what it really is, the word of God&rdquo; (1 Thes
1474 2:13). Our Lord mentions these two things. First, how faith is
1475 brought to us, when he says, whoever hears my voice [literally,
1476 word], which leads to faith. Secondly, he mentions that on which
1477 faith rests, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">and believes
1478 in him who sent me,</span> i.e., not in me, but in him in virtue of
1479 whom I speak.</p>
1480 <p>This text can apply to Christ, as man, insofar as it is through
1481 Christ&rsquo;s human words that men were converted to the faith.
1482 And it can apply to Christ, as God, insofar as Christ is the Word
1483 of God. For since Christ is the Word of God, it is clear that those
1484 who heard Christ were hearing the Word of God, and as a
1485 consequence, were believing in God. And this is what he says:
1486 whoever hears my word, i.e., me, the Word of God, and believes in
1487 him, i.e., the Father, whose Word I am.</p>
1488 <p>774 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">possesses
1489 eternal life,</span> he mentions the reward of faith, and states
1490 three things we will possess in the state of glory; but they are
1491 mentioned in reverse order. First, there will be the resurrection
1492 from the dead. Secondly, we will have freedom from the future
1493 judgment. Thirdly, we will enjoy everlasting life, for as we read
1494 in Matthew (c 25), the just will enter into everlasting life. He
1495 mentions these three as belonging to the reward of faith; and the
1496 third was mentioned first since it is desired more than the
1497 others.</p>
1498 <p>775 So he says, whoever believes, i.e., through faith,
1499 <span style="font-weight: bold">possesses eternal life,</span>
1500 which consists in the full vision of God. And it is fitting that
1501 one who believes on account of God certain things that he does not
1502 see, should be brought to the full vision of these things:
1503 &ldquo;These things are written that you may believe ... and that
1504 believing you may have life in his name&rdquo; (below 20:31).</p>
1505 <p>776 He mentions the second when he says, <span style=
1506 "font-weight: bold">and he will not encounter judgment.</span> But
1507 the Apostle says something which contradicts this: &ldquo;We must
1508 all appear before the judgment seat of Christ&rdquo; (2 Cor 5:10),
1509 even the apostles. Therefore, even one who does believe will
1510 encounter judgment. I answer that there are two kinds of judgment.
1511 One is a judgment of condemnation, and no one encounters that
1512 judgment if he believes in God with a faith that is united with
1513 love [ a &ldquo;formed faith&rdquo;]. We read about this judgment:
1514 &ldquo;Do not enter into judgment with your servant, for no living
1515 man is just in your sight&rdquo;; and it was said above (3:18):
1516 &ldquo;Whoever believes is not judged.&rdquo; There is also a
1517 judgment of separation and examination; and, as the Apostle says,
1518 all must present themselves before the tribunal of Christ for this
1519 judgment. Of this judgment we read: &ldquo;Judge me, O God, and
1520 distinguish my cause from those people who are not holy&rdquo; (Ps
1521 42:1).</p>
1522 <p>777 Thirdly, he mentions a reward when he says, <span style=
1523 "font-weight: bold">but has passed from death to life,</span> or
1524 &ldquo;will pass,&rdquo; as another version says. This statement
1525 can be explained in two ways. First, it can refer to the
1526 resurrection of the soul. In this case the obvious meaning is that
1527 he is saying: Through faith we attain not only to eternal life and
1528 freedom from judgment, but also to the forgiveness of our sins as
1529 well. Hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">but has
1530 passed,</span> from unbelief to belief, from injustice to justice:
1531 &ldquo;We know that we have passed from death to life&rdquo; (1 Jn
1532 3:14).</p>
1533 <p>Secondly, this statement can be explained as referring to the
1534 resurrection of the body. Then it is an elaboration of the phrase,
1535 <span style="font-weight: bold">possesses eternal life</span>. For
1536 some might think from what was said, that whoever believes in God
1537 will never die, but live forever. But this is impossible, because
1538 all men must pay the debt incurred by the. first sin, according to:
1539 &ldquo;Where is the man who lives, and will not see death?&rdquo;
1540 (Ps 88:49). Consequently, we should not think that one who believes
1541 has eternal life in such a way as never to die; rather, he will
1542 pass from thi&rsquo;s life, through death, to life, i.e., through
1543 the death of the body he will be revived to eternal life.</p>
1544 <p>Or, &ldquo;will pass,&rdquo; might refer to the cause [of
1545 one&rsquo;s resurrection] for when a person believes, he already
1546 has the merit for a glorious resurrection: &ldquo;Your dead will
1547 live, your slain will rise&rdquo; (Is 26:19). And then, once
1548 released from the death of the old man, we will receive the life of
1549 the new man, that is, Christ.</p>
1550 <p>778 <span style="font-weight: bold">Amen, amen, I say to
1551 you...</span> Since some might doubt if any would pass from death
1552 to life, our Lord predicts that this will happen, saying: I say
1553 that he [who believes] &ldquo;will pass from death to life&rdquo;;
1554 and I say it before it actually occurs. And this is what he states,
1555 saying: <span style="font-weight: bold">Amen, amen, I say to you,
1556 the hour is coming,</span> not determined by a necessity of fate,
1557 but by God&rsquo;s decree: &ldquo;It is the last hour&rdquo; (1 Jn
1558 2:18). And so that we do not think that it is far off, he adds,
1559 <span style="font-weight: bold">and is now here</span> &ldquo;it is
1560 now the time for us to rise froin sleep&rdquo; (Rom
1561 13:11)&mdash;i.e., the hour is now here <span style=
1562 "font-weight: bold">when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son
1563 of God; and those who hear it will live.</span></p>
1564 <p>779 This can be explained in two ways. In one way as referring
1565 to the resurrection of the body, and so it is said that
1566 <span style="font-weight: bold">the hour is coming, and is now
1567 here,</span> as if he had said: It is true that eventually all will
1568 rise, but even now is the hour when some, whom the Lord was about
1569 to resuscitate, <span style="font-weight: bold">shall hear the
1570 voice of the Son of God.</span> This is the way Lazarus heard it
1571 when it was said to him, &ldquo;Come forth,&rdquo; as we read below
1572 (11:43); and in this way the daughter of the leader of the
1573 synagogue heard it (Mt 9:18); and the widow&rsquo;s son (Lk 7:12).
1574 Therefore, he says significantly, <span style=
1575 "font-weight: bold">and is now here,</span> because through me the
1576 dead already are beginning to be raised.</p>
1577 <p>Another explanation is given by Augustine, according to which
1578 <span style="font-weight: bold">and is now here</span> refers to
1579 the resurrection of the soul. For as was said above, resurrection
1580 is of two kinds: the resurrection of bodies, which will happen in
1581 the future; this does not take place now, but will occur at the
1582 future judgment. The other is the resurrection of souls from the
1583 death of unbelief to the life of faith, and from the life of
1584 injustice to that of justice; and this is now here. Hence he says,
1585 <span style="font-weight: bold">the hour is coming, and is now
1586 here, when the dead,</span> i.e., unbelievers and sinners,
1587 <span style="font-weight: bold">shall hear the voice of the Son of
1588 God; and those who hear it will live,</span> according to the true
1589 faith.</p>
1590 <p>780 This passage seems to imply two strange occurrences. One,
1591 when he says that the dead will hear. The other, when he adds that
1592 it is through hearing that they will come to life again, as though
1593 hearing comes before life, whereas hearing is a certain function of
1594 life. However, if we refer this to the resurrection, it is true
1595 that the dead will hear, i.e., obey the voice of the Son of God.
1596 For the voice expresses the interior concept. Now all nature obeys
1597 the slightest command of the divine will: &ldquo;He calls into
1598 existence what does not exist&rdquo; (Rom 4:17). According to this,
1599 then, wood, stones, all things, not just the dry bones but also the
1600 dust of dead bodies, <span style="font-weight: bold">shall hear the
1601 voice of the Son of God</span> so far as they obey his slightest
1602 will. And this belongs to Christ, not insofar as he is the Son of
1603 Man, but insofar as he is the Son of God, because all things obey
1604 the Word of God. And so he significantly says, <span style=
1605 "font-weight: bold">of the Son of God;</span> &ldquo;What kind of
1606 man is this, for the sea and winds obey him?&rdquo; (Mt 8:27).</p>
1607 <p>If this statement (25b) is understood as referring to the
1608 resurrection of souls, then the reason for it is this: the voice of
1609 the Son of God has a life-giving power, that voice by which he
1610 moves the hearts of the faithful interiorly by inspiration, or
1611 exteriorly by his preaching and that of others: &ldquo;The words
1612 that I have spoken to you are spirit and life&rdquo; (below 6:64).
1613 And so he gives life to the dead when he justifies the wicked. And
1614 since hearing is the way to life, either of nature through
1615 obedience, namely, by repairing nature, or the hearing of faith by
1616 repairing life and justice, he therefore says, <span style=
1617 "font-weight: bold">and those who hear it,</span> by obedience as
1618 to the resurrection of the body, or by faith as to the resurrection
1619 of souls, will live, in the body in eternal life, and injustice in
1620 the life of grace.</p>
1621 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">
1622 &nbsp;</p>
1623 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style=
1624 "font-weight: bold">LECTURE 5</span></p>
1625 <blockquote>
1626 <p>26 &ldquo;Indeed, just as the Father possesses life in himself,
1627 so he has given it to the Son to have life in himself. 27 And he
1628 [the Father] gave him the power to pass judgment, because he is the
1629 Son of Man. 28 Do not be surprised at this, since the hour is
1630 coming when all those burried in tombs will hear the voice of the
1631 Son of God. 29 And those who have done well will come forth to a
1632 resurrection of life; those who have done evil will come forth to a
1633 resurrection of judgment [i.e., condemnation]. 30 I cannot do
1634 anything of myself, but I judge only as I hear it; and my judgment
1635 is just, because I am not seeking my own will, but the will of him
1636 who sent me.&rdquo;</p>
1637 </blockquote>
1638 <p>781 Above, our Lord showed that he had the power to give life
1639 and to judge; and he explained each by its effect. Here he shows
1640 how each of these powers belongs to him. First, he shows this with
1641 respect to his life-giving power. Secondly, with respect to his
1642 power to judge (v 27).</p>
1643 <p>782 So he says, first: I say that as the Father raises the dead,
1644 so I do also; and anyone who hears my word has eternal life. And I
1645 possess this because, <span style="font-weight: bold">just as the
1646 Father possesses life in himself, so he has given it to the Son to
1647 have life in himself.</span></p>
1648 <p>Apropos of this, we should note that some who live do not have
1649 life in themselves: as Paul, &ldquo;I am living by faith in the Son
1650 of God&rdquo; (Gal 2:20); and again in the same place: &ldquo;it is
1651 not I who now live, but Christ lives in me.&rdquo; Thus he lived,
1652 yet not in himself, but in another through whom he lived: as a body
1653 lives, although it does not have life in itself, but in a soul
1654 through which it lives. So that has life in itself which has an
1655 essential, non-participated life, i.e., that which is itself life.
1656 Now in every genus of things, that which is something through its
1657 essence is the cause of those things that are it by participation,
1658 as fire is the cause of all things afire. And so, that which is
1659 life through its essence, is the cause and principle of all life in
1660 living things. Accordingly, if something is to be a principle of
1661 life, it must be life through its essence. And so our Lord
1662 fittingly shows that he is the principle of all life by saying that
1663 he has life in himself, i.e., through his essence, when he says:
1664 <span style="font-weight: bold">just as the Father possesses life
1665 in himself,</span> i.e., as he is living through his essence, so
1666 does the Son. Therefore, as the Father is the cause of life, so
1667 also is his Son.</p>
1668 <p>Further, he shows the equality of the Son to the Father when he
1669 says, as <span style="font-weight: bold">the Father possesses life
1670 in himself;</span> and he shows their distinction when he says,
1671 <span style="font-weight: bold">he has given it to the Son</span>.
1672 For the Father and the Son are equal in life; but they are
1673 distinct, because the Father gives, and the Son receives. However,
1674 we should not understand this to mean that the Son receives life
1675 from the Father as if the Son first existed without having life, as
1676 in lower things a first matter, already existing, receives a form,
1677 and as a subject receives accidents: because in the Son there is
1678 nothing that exists prior to the reception of life. For as Hilary
1679 says: &ldquo;the Son has nothing unless it is begotten,&rdquo;
1680 i.e., nothing but what he receives through his birth. And since the
1681 Father is life itself, the meaning of, <span style=
1682 "font-weight: bold">he has given it to the Son to have life in
1683 himself,</span> is that the Father produced the Son as living. As
1684 if one were to say: the mind gives life to the word, not as though
1685 the word existed and then receives life, but because the mind
1686 produces the word in the same life by which it lives.</p>
1687 <p>783 According to Hilary, this passage destroys three heresies.
1688 First, that of the Arians, who said that the Son is inferior to the
1689 Father. They were forced by what was stated earlier, that is,
1690 &ldquo;For whatever the Father does, the Son does likewise&rdquo;
1691 (5:19), to say that the Son is equal to the Father in power; but
1692 they still denied that the Son is equal to the Father in nature.
1693 But now, this too is refuted by this statement, namely,
1694 <span style="font-weight: bold">just as the Father possesses life
1695 in himself, so he has given it to the Son to have life in
1696 himself.</span> For since life pertains to the nature, if the Son
1697 has life in himself as does the Father, it is clear that he has in
1698 himself, by his very origin, a nature indivisible froin and equal
1699 to that ofthe Father.</p>
1700 <p>The second error is also Arian: their denial that the Son is
1701 coeternal with the Father, when they say that the Son began to
1702 exist in time. This is destroyed when he says, <span style=
1703 "font-weight: bold">the Son has life in himself.</span> For in all
1704 living things whose generation occurs in time, it is always
1705 possible to find something that at some time or other was not
1706 living. But in the Son, whatever is, is life itself. Consequently,
1707 he so received life itself that he has life in himself, so as
1708 always to have been living.</p>
1709 <p>Thirdly, by saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">he has
1710 given,</span> he destroys the error of Sabellius, who denied the
1711 distinction of persons. For if the Father gave life to the Son, it
1712 is obvious that the Father, who gave it, is other than the Son, who
1713 received it.</p>
1714 <p>784 Then (v 27), he makes it clear that he has the power to
1715 judge. First, he reveals his judiciary power. Secondly, he gives a
1716 reason for what he has said (v 30). As to the first he does two
1717 things. First, he indicates the origin of his judiciary power.
1718 Secondly, he shows that his judgment is just (v 29).</p>
1719 <p>785 With regard to the first, we should note that his statement,
1720 <span style="font-weight: bold">he [the Father] gave him the
1721 power,</span> can be understood in two ways. One way is that of
1722 Augustine; the other is that of Chrysostom.</p>
1723 <p>786 If we understand it as Chrysostom does, then this section is
1724 divided into two parts. First, he reveals the origin of his
1725 judiciary power. Secondly, he settles a difficulty (v 27b).</p>
1726 <p>Chrysostom punctuates this section in the following way.
1727 <span style="font-weight: bold">He gave him the power to pass
1728 judgment.</span> And then a new sentence begins: <span style=
1729 "font-weight: bold">Because he is the Son of Man, do not be
1730 surprised at this.</span> The reason for this punctuation is that
1731 Paul of Samosata, an early heretic, who like Photius said that
1732 Christ was only a man and took his origin from the Virgin,
1733 punctuated it as: <span style="font-weight: bold">He gave him the
1734 power to pass judghnent because he is the Son of Man.</span> And
1735 then he began a new sentence: <span style="font-weight: bold">Do
1736 not be surprised at this, since the hour is coming.</span> It was
1737 as if he thought that it was necessary for judiciary power to be
1738 given to Christ because he is the Son of Man, that is, a mere man,
1739 who, of himself, cannot judge men. And so, if Christ is to judge
1740 others, he must be given the power to judge.</p>
1741 <p>But this, according to Chrysostom, cannot stand, because it is
1742 not at all in agreement with what is stated. For if it is because
1743 he is a man that he receives judiciary power, then for the same
1744 reason, since it would belong to every man to have judiciary power
1745 in virtue of his human nature, it would not belong to Christ any
1746 more than to other men. So we should not understand it this way.
1747 Rather, we should say that because Christ is the ineffable Son of
1748 God, he is on that account also judge. And this is what he says:
1749 The Father not only give him the power to give life, but
1750 <span style="font-weight: bold">also he gave him the power,</span>
1751 through eternal <span style="font-weight: bold">generation, to pass
1752 judgment,</span> just as he gave him, through eternal generation,
1753 to have life in himself: &ldquo;He is the one appointed by God to
1754 be the judge of the living and of the dead,&rdquo; as we read in
1755 Acts (10:42).</p>
1756 <p>He settles a difficulty when he says, <span style=
1757 "font-weight: bold">Do not be surprised at this.</span> First, he
1758 mentions the difficulty. Secondly, he clears it up.</p>
1759 <p>787 The difficulty arose in the minds of the Jews and they were
1760 surprised because while they thought that Christ was no more than a
1761 man, he was saying things about himself that surpassed man and even
1762 the angels. So he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not be
1763 surprised at this,</span> that is, that I have said that the Son
1764 gives life to the dead and has the power to judge precisely
1765 <span style="font-weight: bold">because he is the Son of
1766 Man.</span> They were surprised because, although they thought he
1767 was only a man, they saw that he accomplished divine effects:
1768 &ldquo;What kind of man is this, for the sea and winds obey
1769 him?&rdquo; (Mt 8:27). And he gives a reason why they should not be
1770 surprised, which is, because he who is the Son of Man is the Son of
1771 God. Although, as Chrysostom says, is it not said explicitly that
1772 the Son of Man is the Son of God, our Lord lays down the premises
1773 from which this statement necessarily follows: just as we notice
1774 that those who use syllogisms in their teaching do not express
1775 their main conclusion, but only that from which it follows with
1776 necessity. So our Lord does not say that he is the Son of God, but
1777 that the Son of Man is such that at his voice all the dead will
1778 rise. From this it necessarily follows that he is the Son of God:
1779 for it is a proper effect of God to raise the dead. Thus he says,
1780 <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not be surprised at this, since
1781 the hour is coming when all those burried in tombs will hear the
1782 voice of the Son of God.</span> But he does not say of this hour,
1783 as he said above, &ldquo;and is now here&rdquo; (5:25). Again, here
1784 he says, all, which he did not say above: because at the first
1785 resurrection he raised only some, as Lazarus, the widow&rsquo;s son
1786 and the young girl; but at the future resurrection, at the time of
1787 judgment, <span style="font-weight: bold">all will hear the voice
1788 of the Son of God,</span> and will rise. &ldquo;I will open your
1789 graves, and lead you out of your tombs&rdquo; (Ez 37:12).</p>
1790 <p>788 Augustine punctuates this passage in the following way.
1791 <span style="font-weight: bold">And he gave him the power to pass
1792 judgment because he is the Son of Man.</span> And then a new
1793 sentence follows: <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not be
1794 surprised at this.</span> In this interpretation there are two
1795 parts. The first concerns the power to judge granted to the Son of
1796 Man. In the second, the granting of an even greater power is made
1797 clear, at <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not be surprised at
1798 this.</span></p>
1799 <p>789 As to the first we should note that, according to the mind
1800 of Augustine, he spoke above of the resurrection of souls, which is
1801 accomplished through the Son of God, but here he is speaking of the
1802 resurrection of bodies, which is accomplished through the Son of
1803 Man. And because the general resurrection of bodies will take place
1804 at the time of judgment, he mentions the judgment first, in saying,
1805 <span style="font-weight: bold">And he [the Father] gave
1806 him,</span> i.e., Christ, <span style="font-weight: bold">the power
1807 to pass Judgment,</span> and this, <span style=
1808 "font-weight: bold">because he is the Son of Man,</span> i.e.,
1809 according to his human nature. Thus it is also after the
1810 resurrection that he says in Matthew (28:18): &ldquo;All power has
1811 been given to me, in heaven and on earth.&rdquo;</p>
1812 <p>There are three reasons why judiciary power has been given to
1813 Christ as man. First, in order that he might be seen by all: for it
1814 is necessary that a judge be seen by all who are to be judged. Now
1815 both the good and the wicked will be judged. And the good will see
1816 Christ in his divinity and in his humanity; while the wicked will
1817 not be able to see him in his divinity, because this vision is the
1818 happiness of the saints and is seedonly by the pure in heart:
1819 &ldquo;Happy are the pure in heart, for they will see God&rdquo;
1820 (Mt 5:8). And so, in order that Christ can be seen at the judgment
1821 not only by the good, but also by the wicked, he will judge in
1822 human form: &ldquo;Every eye will see him, and all who pierced
1823 him&rdquo; (Rv 1:7).</p>
1824 <p>Secondly, the power to judge was given to Christ as man because
1825 by the self-abasement of his passion he merited the glory of an
1826 exaltation. Thus, just as he who died arose, so that [human] form
1827 which was judged, will judge, and he who stood before a human judge
1828 will preside at the judgment of men. He who was falsely found
1829 guilty will condemn the truly guilty, as Augustine remarks in his
1830 work, <i>The Sayings of the Lord.</i> &ldquo;Your cause has been
1831 judged as that of the wicked; but cause and judgment you will
1832 recover&rdquo; (Jb 3 6.17).</p>
1833 <p>Thirdly, Christas man was given judiciary power to suggest the
1834 compassion of the judge. For it is very terrifying for a man to be
1835 judged by God: &ldquo;It is a terrible thing to fall into the hands
1836 of the living God&rdquo; (Heb 10:31); but it produces confidence
1837 for a man to have another man as his judge. Accordingly, so you can
1838 experience the compassion of your judge, you will have a man as
1839 judge: &ldquo;We do not have a high priest who cannot have
1840 compassion on our weakness&rdquo; (Heb 4:15).</p>
1841 <p>Thus, <span style="font-weight: bold">he gave him</span>,
1842 Christ, <span style="font-weight: bold">the power to pass judgment
1843 because he is the Son of Man.</span></p>
1844 <p>790 <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not be surprised at
1845 this,</span> for he has given him a greater power, that is, the
1846 power to raise the dead. Thus he says, <span style=
1847 "font-weight: bold">since the hour is coming,</span> that is, the
1848 last hour at the end of the world: &ldquo;The time has come, the
1849 day of slaughter is near&rdquo; (Ez 7:7), <span style=
1850 "font-weight: bold">when all those burried in tombs will hear the
1851 voice of the Son of God.</span> Above he did not say
1852 &ldquo;all,&rdquo; because there he was speaking of the spiritual
1853 resurrection, in which all did not rise at his first coming, for we
1854 read: &ldquo;All do not have faith&rdquo; (2 Thes 3:2). But here he
1855 is speaking of the resurrection of the body, and all will rise in
1856 this way, as we read in 1 Corinthians (15:20). He adds,
1857 <span style="font-weight: bold">those burried in tombs,</span>
1858 which he had not mentioned above, because only bodies, not souls,
1859 are in tombs, and it is the resurrection of bodies that will then
1860 take place.</p>
1861 <p><span style="font-weight: bold">All those burried in tombs will
1862 hear the voice of the Son of God.</span> This voice will be a sense
1863 perceptible sign of the Son of God, at whose sound all will be
1864 raised: &ldquo;The Lord will come with the cry of the archangel and
1865 with the trumpet of God&rdquo; (1 Thes 4:15); we find the same in 1
1866 Corinthians (15:52) and in Matthew (25:6): &ldquo;There was a cry
1867 at midnight.&rdquo; This voice will derive its power from the
1868 divinity of Christ: &ldquo;He will make his voice a powerful
1869 voice,&rdquo; as the Psalm (67:34) says.</p>
1870 <p>791 As we saw, Augustine says that the resurrection of the body
1871 will be accomplished through the Word made flesh, but the
1872 resurrection of the soul is accomplished through the Word. One may
1873 wonder how to understand this: whether we are talking about a first
1874 cause or a meritorious cause. If we are referring to a first cause,
1875 then it is clear that the divinity of Christ is the cause of the
1876 corporal and spiritual resurrection, i.e., of the resurrection of
1877 bodies and of souls, according to: &ldquo;I will kill, and I will
1878 bring to life again&rdquo; (Dt 32:39). But if we are referring to a
1879 meritorious cause, then it is the humanity of Christ which is the
1880 cause of both resurrections: because through the mysteries
1881 accomplished in the flesh of Christ we are restored not only to an
1882 incorruptible life in our bodies, but also to a spiritual life in
1883 our souls: &ldquo;He was put to death on account of our sins, and
1884 he rose for our justification&rdquo; (Rom 4:25). Accordingly, what
1885 Augustine says does not seem to be true.</p>
1886 <p>I answer that Augustine is speaking of the exemplary cause and
1887 of that cause by which that which is brought to life is made
1888 conformable to that which brings it to life: for everything that
1889 lives through another is conformed to that through which it lives.
1890 Now the resurrection of souls does not consist in souls being
1891 conformed to the humanity of Christ, but to the Word, because the
1892 life of the soul is through the Word alone; and so he says that the
1893 resurrection of souls takes place through the Word. But the
1894 resurrection of the body will consist in our bodies being conformed
1895 to the body of Christ through the life of glory, that is, through
1896 the glory of our bodies, according to: &ldquo;He will change our
1897 lowly body so it is like his glorious body&rdquo; (Phil 3:2 1). And
1898 it is from this point of view that he says that the resurrection of
1899 the body will take place through the Word made flesh.</p>
1900 <p>792 Then (v 29), he shows the justness of his judgment: because
1901 the good will be rewarded, and so he says, <span style=
1902 "font-weight: bold">And those who have done well will come forth to
1903 a resurrection of life,</span> i.e., to living in eternal glory;
1904 but the wicked will be damned, and so he says, <span style=
1905 "font-weight: bold">those who have done evil will come forth to a
1906 resurrection of judgment [i.e., condemnation],</span> i.e., they
1907 will rise for condemnation: &ldquo;These,&rdquo; the wicked,
1908 &ldquo;will go into everlasting punishment; but the just will go to
1909 eternal life&rdquo; (Mt 25:46); &ldquo;Many of those who sleep in
1910 the dust of the earth will awake: some to an everlasting life, and
1911 others to everlasting shame&rdquo; (Dn 12:2).</p>
1912 <p>793 Note than when he was speaking above of the resurrection of
1913 souls, he said, &ldquo;those who hear it,&rdquo; the voice of the
1914 Son of God, &ldquo;will live&rdquo; (5:25); but here he says,
1915 <span style="font-weight: bold">will come forth.</span> He says
1916 this because of the wicked, who will be condemned: for their life
1917 should not be called a life, but rather an eternal death. Again,
1918 above he mentioned only faith, saying, &ldquo;Whoever hears my
1919 voice and believes in him who sent me, possesses eternal life; and
1920 he will not encounter judgment&rdquo; (5:24). But here he mentions
1921 works, so that we do not think that faith alone, without works, is
1922 sufficient for salvation, saying: <span style=
1923 "font-weight: bold">And those who have done well will come forth to
1924 a resurrection of life.</span> As if to say: <span style=
1925 "font-weight: bold">Those will come forth to a resurrection of
1926 life</span> who do not just believe, but who have accomplished good
1927 works along with their faith: &ldquo;Faith without works is
1928 dead,&rdquo; as we see from James (2:26).</p>
1929 <p>794 Then when he says, I cannot do anything of myself, he gives
1930 the reason for what he has just said. Now he had spoken of two
1931 things: the origin of his power, and the justness of his judgment.
1932 Consequently, he mentions the reason for each.</p>
1933 <p>795 The first point, when he says, <span style=
1934 "font-weight: bold">I cannot do anything of myself,</span> can be
1935 understood in two ways, even according to Augustine. First, as
1936 referring to the Son of Man in this manner: You say that you have
1937 the power to raise the dead because you are the Son of Man. But do
1938 you have this power precisely because you are the Son of Man? No,
1939 because <span style="font-weight: bold">I cannot do anything of
1940 myself, but I judge only as I hear it.</span> He does not say,
1941 &ldquo;as I see,&rdquo; as he said above; &ldquo;The Son cannot do
1942 anything of himself, but only what he sees the Father doing&rdquo;
1943 (5:19). But he does say, <span style="font-weight: bold">as I hear
1944 it:</span> for in this context &ldquo;to hear&rdquo; is the same as
1945 &ldquo;to obey.&rdquo; Now to obey belongs to one who receives a
1946 command, while to command pertains to one who is superior.
1947 Accordingly, because Christ, as man, is inferior to the Father, he
1948 says, <span style="font-weight: bold">as I hear it,</span> i.e., as
1949 infused into my soul by God. We read of this kind of hearing in
1950 Psalm 84 (v 9): &ldquo;1 will hear what the Lord God says in
1951 me.&rdquo; But above he said &ldquo;sees,&rdquo; because he was
1952 then speaking of himself as the Word of God.</p>
1953 <p>796 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">and my
1954 judgment is just,</span> he shows the justness of his judgment. For
1955 he had said: &ldquo;Those who have done well will come forth to a
1956 resurrection of life.&rdquo; But some might say: Will he be partial
1957 and uneven when he punishes and rewards? So he answers: No, saying:
1958 <span style="font-weight: bold">my judgment is just;</span> and the
1959 reason is <span style="font-weight: bold">because I am not seeking
1960 my own will, but the will of him who sent me.</span> For there are
1961 two wills in our Lord Jesus Christ: one is a divine will, which is
1962 the same as the will of the Father; the other is a human will,
1963 which is proper to himself, just as it is proper to him to be a
1964 man. A human will is borne to its own good; but in Christ it was
1965 ruled and regulated by right reason, so that it would always be
1966 conformed in all things to the divine will. Accordingly he says:
1967 <span style="font-weight: bold">I am not seeking my own
1968 will,</span> which as such is inclined to its own good,
1969 <span style="font-weight: bold">but the will of him who sent
1970 me,</span> that is, the Father: &ldquo;I have desired to do your
1971 will, my God&rdquo; (Ps 39:9); &ldquo;Not as I will, but as you
1972 will&rdquo; (Mt 26:39).</p>
1973 <p>If this is carefully considered, the Lord is assigning the true
1974 nature of a just judgment, saying: <span style=
1975 "font-weight: bold">because I am not seeking my own will.</span>
1976 For one&rsquo;s judgment is just when it is passed according to the
1977 norm of law. But the divine will is the norm and the law of the
1978 created will. And so, the created will, and the reason, which is
1979 regulated according to the norm of the divine will, is just, and
1980 its judgment is just.</p>
1981 <p>797 Secondly, it is explained as referring to the Son of God;
1982 and then the aforesaid division still remains the same. Thus
1983 Christ, as the Divine Word showing the origin of his power, says:
1984 <span style="font-weight: bold">I cannot do anything of
1985 myself,</span> in the way he said above, &ldquo;the Son cannot do
1986 anything of himself&rdquo; (5:19). For his very doing and his power
1987 are his being (<i>esse</i>); but being (<i>esse</i>) in him is from
1988 another, that is, from his Father. And so, just as he is not of
1989 himself (a <i>se</i>), so of himself he cannot do anything:
1990 &ldquo;I do nothing of myself&rdquo; (below 8:28).</p>
1991 <p>His statement, <span style="font-weight: bold">I judge only as I
1992 hear it,</span> is explained as his previous statement, &ldquo;only
1993 what he sees the Father doing&rdquo; (above 5:19). For we acquire
1994 science or any knowledge through sight and hearing (for these two
1995 senses are those most used in learning). But because sight and
1996 hearing are different is us, we acquire knowledge in one way
1997 through sight, that is, by discovering things, and in a different
1998 way through hearing, that is, by being taught. But in the Son of
1999 God, sight and hearing are the same; thus, when he says either
2000 &ldquo;sees&rdquo; or &ldquo;hears,&rdquo; the meaning is the same
2001 so far as the acquisition of knowledge is concerned. And because
2002 judgment in any intelletual nature comes from knowledge, he says
2003 significantly, <span style="font-weight: bold">I judge only as I
2004 hear it,</span> i.e., as I have acquired knowledge together with
2005 heing from the Father, so I judge: &ldquo;Everything I have heard
2006 from my Father I have made known to you&rdquo; (below 15:15).</p>
2007 <p>798 Showing the justness of his judgment he says: <span style=
2008 "font-weight: bold">and my judgment is just:</span> the reason
2009 being, <span style="font-weight: bold">because I am not seeking my
2010 own will</span>. But do not the Father and the Son have the same
2011 will? I answer that the Father and the Son do have the same will,
2012 but the Father does not have his will from another, whereas the Son
2013 does have his will from another, i.e., from the Father. Thus the
2014 Son accomplishes his own will as from another, i.e., as having it
2015 from another; but the Father accomplishes his will as his own,
2016 i.e., not having it from another. Thus he says: <span style=
2017 "font-weight: bold">I am not seeking my own will</span>, that is,
2018 such as would be mine if it originated from myself, but my will, as
2019 being from another, that is from the Father.</p>
2020 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">
2021 &nbsp;</p>
2022 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style=
2023 "font-weight: bold">LECTURE 6</span></p>
2024 <blockquote>
2025 <p style="margin-left:0.5in">31 &ldquo;If I were to bear witness to
2026 myself,<br />
2027 my testimony would not be valid.<br />
2028 32 But there is someone else who testifies<br />
2029 on my behalf, and I know that the witness<br />
2030 he bears on my behalf is true.<br />
2031 33 You sent [messengers] to John;<br />
2032 and he bore witness to the truth.<br />
2033 34 I myself do not need proof from men;<br />
2034 but I say this in order that you may be saved.<br />
2035 35 He was a lamp, blazing and burning brightly.<br />
2036 And for a while you yourselves exulted in his light.<br />
2037 36 But I have testimony that is greater than that of John.<br />
2038 The very works which my Father has given me<br />
2039 to perform&mdash;those works that I myself perform&mdash;<br />
2040 they bear witness to me that the Father sent me.<br />
2041 37 Moreover, the Father who sent me has himself<br />
2042 given testimony on my behalf,<br />
2043 but you have neither heard his voice,<br />
2044 nor seen his image;<br />
2045 38 and you do not have his word abiding in your hearts,<br />
2046 for you do not believe in him whom he has sent.<br />
2047 39 Search the Scriptures,<br />
2048 since you think you have eternal life in them;<br />
2049 they too bear witness to me.<br />
2050 40 Yet you are unwilling to come to me<br />
2051 in order to possess that life.&rdquo;</p>
2052 </blockquote>
2053 <p>799 Having given us the teaching on the life-giving power of the
2054 Son, he now confirms it. First, he confirms, with several
2055 testimonies, what he had said about the excellence of his power. In
2056 the second place, he reproves them because of their slowness to
2057 believe (v 41). He does two things about the first. First, he
2058 states why there was a need to resort to such testimonies.
2059 Secondly, he invokes the testimonies (v 32).</p>
2060 <p>800 The need to appeal to testimony arose because the Jews did
2061 not believe in him; for this reason he says: <span style=
2062 "font-weight: bold">If I were to bear witness to myself, my
2063 testimony would not be valid</span> (<i>verum</i>, valid, true).
2064 Some may find this statement puzzling: for if our Lord says of
2065 himself, &ldquo;I am the truth&rdquo; (below 14:6), how can his
2066 testimony not be valid? If he is the truth, in whom shall one
2067 believe if the truth itself is not believed in? We may answer,
2068 according to Chrysostom, that our Lord is speaking here of himself
2069 from the point of view of the opinion of others, so that his
2070 meaning is: <span style="font-weight: bold">If I were to bear
2071 witness to myself, my testimony would not be valid</span> so far as
2072 your outlook is concerned, because you do not accept what I say
2073 about myself unless it is confirmed by other testimony: &ldquo;You
2074 are bearing witness to yourself; your testimony is not valid&rdquo;
2075 (below 8:13).</p>
2076 <p>801 Next, he presents these testimonies: first, a human
2077 testimony; secondly, a divine testimony. He does two things about
2078 the first. First, he mentions the testimony of John; secondly, he
2079 tells why this testimony was given (v 34). With respect to the
2080 first he does two things. First, he brings in the testimony;
2081 secondly, he commends it (v 32).</p>
2082 <p>802 He brings on the witness when he says: <span style=
2083 "font-weight: bold">But there is someone else who testifies on my
2084 behalf.</span> This is, in the opinion of Chrysostom, John the
2085 Baptist, of whom we read above: &ldquo;There was a man sent by God,
2086 whose name was John. He came as a witness, that he might bear
2087 witness to the light&rdquo; (1:6).</p>
2088 <p>803 He commends John&rsquo;s testimony on two grounds: first,
2089 because of its truth; secondly, because of its authority, for the
2090 Jews had sought it (v 33).</p>
2091 <p>804 He commends his testimony because of its truth, saying:
2092 <span style="font-weight: bold">And I know,</span> from certain
2093 experience, that the witness he, that is, John, <span style=
2094 "font-weight: bold">bears on my behalf is true.</span> His father,
2095 Zechariah, had prophesied this of him: &ldquo;You will go before
2096 the face of the Lord to prepare his way, to give his people a
2097 knowledge of salvation&rdquo; (Lk 1:76). Now it is obvious that
2098 false testimony is not a testimony that saves, because lying is a
2099 cause of death: &ldquo;A lying mouth kills the soul&rdquo; (Wis
2100 1:11). Therefore, if John&rsquo;s testimony was for the purpose of
2101 giving knowledge of salvation to his people, his testimony is
2102 true.</p>
2103 <p>805 The Gloss has a different explanation of this: <span style=
2104 "font-weight: bold">If I were to bear witness to myself, my
2105 testimony would not be valid.</span> For above, Christ was
2106 referring to himself as God, but here he is referring to himself as
2107 a man. And the meaning is: If I, namely, a man, were to bear
2108 witness to myself, i.e., apart from God, that is, which God the
2109 Father does not certify, then it follows that <span style=
2110 "font-weight: bold">my testimony would not be valid,</span> for
2111 human speech has no truth unless it is supported by God, according
2112 to: &ldquo;God is true, but every man is a liar&rdquo; (Rom 3:4).
2113 Thus, if we take Christ as a man separated from the Deity and not
2114 in conformity with it, we find a lie both in his essence and in his
2115 words: &ldquo;Although I bear witness to myself, my testimony is
2116 true&rdquo; (below 8:14); &ldquo;I am not alone, because the Father
2117 is with me&rdquo; (below 16:32). And so, because he was not alone
2118 but with the Father, his testimony is true.</p>
2119 <p>Accordingly, to show that his testimony is true, not in virute
2120 of his humanity considered in itself, but in so far as it is united
2121 to his divinity and to the Word of God, he says, <span style=
2122 "font-weight: bold">But there is someone else who testifies on my
2123 behalf</span>: not John, but the Father, according to this
2124 explanation. Because if the testimony of Christ as man is not of
2125 itself true and productive, much less is the testimony of John.
2126 Therefore, the testimony of Christ is not verified by the testimony
2127 of John, but by the testimony of the Father. So this someone else
2128 who testifies is understood to be the Father. <span style=
2129 "font-weight: bold">And I know that the witness he bears on my
2130 behalf is true</span>, for he is truth: &ldquo;God is light,
2131 &ldquo;&lsquo; i.e., truth, &ldquo;and in him there is no
2132 darkness,&rdquo; i.e., lie (1 Jn 1:5).</p>
2133 <p>The first explanation, which is that given by Chrysostom, is
2134 nearer to the letter of the text.</p>
2135 <p>806 He also commends the testimony of John by reason of its
2136 authority, because it was sought after by the Jews, saying:
2137 <span style="font-weight: bold">You sent [messengers] to
2138 John.</span> As if to say: I know that his testimony is true and
2139 you should not reject it, because the great authority John enjoyed
2140 among you led you to seek his testimony about me; and you would not
2141 have done this if you did not think that he was worthy of belief:
2142 &ldquo;The Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to
2143 him&rdquo; (above 1:19). And on this occasion, John bore witness,
2144 not to himself, but <span style="font-weight: bold">to the
2145 truth</span>, i.e., to me. As a friend of the truth, he bore
2146 testimony to the truth, which is Christ: &ldquo;He declared openly,
2147 and did not deny, and stated clearly, &lsquo;I am not the
2148 Messiah&rsquo;&rdquo; (above 1:20).</p>
2149 <p>807 Then (v 34), he gives the reason why an appeal was made to
2150 the testimony of John. First, he excludes a supposed reason. Next,
2151 he presents the true reason (v 34b).</p>
2152 <p>808 Someone might think that John&rsquo;s testimony was brought
2153 in to assure them about Christ, on the ground that Christ&rsquo;s
2154 own testimony was not sufficient. He excludes this reason when he
2155 says, <span style="font-weight: bold">I myself do not need proof
2156 from men</span>. Here we should note that sometimes in the sciences
2157 a thing is proved by something else which is more evident to us,
2158 but which is less evident in itself; and at other times a thing is
2159 proved by something else which is more evident in itself and
2160 absolutely. Now, in this case, the issue is to prove that Christ is
2161 God. And, although the truth of Christ is, in itself and
2162 absolutely, more evident, yet it is proved by the testimony of
2163 John, which was better known to the Jews. So Christ, of himself,
2164 did not have any need of John&rsquo;s testimony; and this is what
2165 he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">I myself do not need proof
2166 from men</span>.</p>
2167 <p>809 But this seems to conflict with: &ldquo;You are my
2168 witnesses, said the Lord&rdquo; (Is 40:10); and with &ldquo;You
2169 will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all of Judea and Samaria,
2170 and to the remotest part of the world&rdquo; (Acts 1:8). So how can
2171 he say: <span style="font-weight: bold">I myself do not need proof
2172 from men</span>.</p>
2173 <p>This can be understood in two ways. In the first way, the sense
2174 is: <span style="font-weight: bold">I myself do not need proof from
2175 men</span>, as relying on it alone; but I have stronger testimony,
2176 that is, divine testimony: &ldquo;For me, it does not matter much
2177 if I am judged by you&rdquo; (1 Cor 4:3); &ldquo;You know that I
2178 have not desired the day of man,&rdquo; i.e., human glory (Jer
2179 17:16).</p>
2180 <p>Another interpretation is: <span style="font-weight: bold">I
2181 myself do not need proof from men</span>, insofar as the one giving
2182 witness is a man, but insofar as he is enlightened by God in order
2183 to testify: &ldquo;There was a man sent by God, whose name was
2184 John&rdquo; (above 1:6); &ldquo;We did not seek glory from
2185 men&rdquo; (1 Thes 2:6); &ldquo;1 do not seek my own glory&rdquo;
2186 (below 8:50). And so I receive the testimony of John not just as a
2187 man, but insofar as he was sent and enlightened by God in order to
2188 testify.</p>
2189 <p>A third explanation, and a better one, is: <span style=
2190 "font-weight: bold">I myself do not need proof from men</span>,
2191 i.e., human testimony. As far as I am concerned, I receive my
2192 authority from no one but God, who proves that I am great.</p>
2193 <p>810 Next (v 34b), he gives the real reason for appealing to
2194 John&rsquo;s testimony. First, he states the reason. Secondly, he
2195 explains it. The reason for appealing to this testimony was so that
2196 the Jews might be saved by believing in Christ, and this because of
2197 John&rsquo;s testimony. Thus he says: I do not need John&rsquo;s
2198 testimony for my sake, <span style="font-weight: bold">but I say
2199 this in order that you may be saved:</span> &ldquo;He desires the
2200 salvation of&rsquo; all men&rdquo; (1 Tim 2:4). &ldquo;Christ came
2201 into this world to save sinners&rdquo; (1 Tim 1:15).</p>
2202 <p>811 He explains his statement, in order that you may be saved:
2203 that is, because I am appealing to testimony you have accepted. And
2204 so he mentions that John was accepted by them: <span style=
2205 "font-weight: bold">He was a lamp, blazing and burning
2206 brightly.</span> First, he states that John was a witness accepted
2207 on his own merits. Secondly, he mentions to what degree he was
2208 accepted by them (v 35b).</p>
2209 <p>812 Three things perfected John and show that he was a witness
2210 accepted in his own right. The first concerns the condition of his
2211 nature, and he refers to this when he says, <span style=
2212 "font-weight: bold">He was a lamp</span>. The second concerns the
2213 perfection of his love, because he was a <span style=
2214 "font-weight: bold">blazing</span> lamp. The third is related to
2215 the perfection of his understanding, because he was a lamp that was
2216 <span style="font-weight: bold">burning brightly.</span></p>
2217 <p>John was perfect in his nature because he was a lamp, i.e.,
2218 enriched by grace and illumined by the light of the Word of God.
2219 Now a lamp differs from a light: for a light radiates light of
2220 itself, but a lamp does not give light of itself, but by
2221 participating in the light. Now the true light is Christ: &ldquo;He
2222 was the true light, which enlightens every man coming into this
2223 world&rdquo; (above 1:9). John, however, was not a light, as we
2224 read in the same place, but a lamp, because he was enlightened
2225 &ldquo;in order to bear witness to the light&rdquo; (above 1:8), by
2226 leading men to Christ. We read of this lamp: &ldquo;I have prepared
2227 a lamp for my anointed&rdquo; (Ps 131:17).</p>
2228 <p>Further, he was blazing and impassioned in his affections, so he
2229 says, <span style="font-weight: bold">blazing</span>. For some
2230 people are lamps only as to their office or rank, but they are
2231 snuffed out in their affections: for as a lamp cannot give light
2232 unless there is a fire blazing within it, so a spiritual lamp does
2233 not give any light unless it is first set ablaze and burns with the
2234 fire of love. Therefore, to be ablaze comes first, and the giving
2235 of light depends on it, because knowledge of the truth is given due
2236 to the blazing of love: &ldquo;If any one loves me, he will keep my
2237 word, and my Father will love him, and we will come to him, and
2238 make our home with him&rdquo; (below 14:23); and &ldquo;I have
2239 called you friends, because everything I have heard from my Father
2240 I have made known to you&rdquo; (below 15:15); &ldquo;You who fear
2241 the Lord, love him, and your hearts will be enlightened&rdquo; (Sir
2242 2:20).</p>
2243 <p>The two characteristics of fire are that it both blazes and
2244 shines. Its blazing signifies love for three reasons. First,
2245 because fire is the most active of all bodies; so too is the warmth
2246 of love (charity), so much so that nothing can withstand its force:
2247 &ldquo;The love of Christ spurs us on&rdquo; (2 Cor 5:14).
2248 Secondly, because just as fire, because it is very volatile, causes
2249 great unrest, so also this love of charity makes a person restless
2250 until he achieves his objective: &ldquo;Its light is fire and
2251 flame&rdquo; (Sg 8:6). Thirdly, just as fire is inclined to move
2252 upward, so too is charity; so much so that it joins us to God:
2253 &ldquo;He who abides in love abides in God, and God in him&rdquo;
2254 (1Jn 4:16).</p>
2255 <p>Finally, John had an intellect that was <span style=
2256 "font-weight: bold">burning brightly.</span> First, it was bright
2257 within, because of his knowledge of the truth: &ldquo;The Lord will
2258 fill your soul with brightness,&rdquo; i.e., he will make it shine
2259 (Is 58:11). Secondly, it was bright without, because of his
2260 preaching: &ldquo;You will shine in the world among them like
2261 stars, containing the word of life&rdquo; (Phil 2:15). Thirdly, it
2262 was bright because it manifested good works: &ldquo;Let your light
2263 so shine before men that they may see your good works&rdquo; (Mt
2264 5:16).</p>
2265 <p>813 And so, because John was of himself so acceptable&mdash;for
2266 he was a lamp, not smothered out but blazing, not dark but burning
2267 brightly&mdash;he deserved to be accepted by you, as indeed he was,
2268 because <span style="font-weight: bold">for a time you yourselves
2269 exulted in his light.</span> He fittingly links their exulting or
2270 rejoicing with light; because a man rejoices most is that which
2271 most pleases him. And among physical things nothing is more
2272 pleasant than light, according to: &ldquo;It is a delight for the
2273 eyes to see the sun&rdquo; (Sir 11:7). He says, <span style=
2274 "font-weight: bold">you yourselves exulted in his light,</span>
2275 i.e., you rested in John and put your end in him, thinking that he
2276 was the Messiah. But you did this only <span style=
2277 "font-weight: bold">for a time,</span> because you wavered on this;
2278 for when you saw that John was leading men to another, and not to
2279 himself, you turned away from him. Thus we read in Matthew (21:32)
2280 that the Jews did not believe in John. They belonged to that group
2281 referred to by Matthew (13:21 ) as believing &ldquo;for a
2282 while.&rdquo;</p>
2283 <p>814 Then (v 36), he presents the divine testimony. First, he
2284 mentions its greatness; and then he continues on to describe
2285 it.</p>
2286 <p>815 He says: I do not need proof from men for my sake, but for
2287 your sake, for <span style="font-weight: bold">I have testimony
2288 that is greater than that of John,</span> that is, the testimony of
2289 God, which is greater than the testimony of John: &ldquo;If we
2290 receive the testimony of men, the testimony of God is
2291 greater&rdquo; (1 Jn 5:9), It is greater, I say, because of its
2292 greater authority, greater knowledge, and infallible truth, for God
2293 cannot deceive: &ldquo;God is not like man, a liar&rdquo; (Nm
2294 23:19).</p>
2295 <p>816 God bore witness to Christ in three ways: by works, by
2296 himself, and by the Scriptures. First, he mentions his witness as
2297 given by the working of miracles; secondly, the way God gave
2298 witness by himself (v 37); thirdly, the witness given through the
2299 Scriptures (v 39).</p>
2300 <p>817 He says first: <span style="font-weight: bold">I have
2301 testimony that is greater than that of John,</span> that is, my
2302 works, i.e., the working of miracles, <span style=
2303 "font-weight: bold">the very works which my Father has given me to
2304 perform.</span> We should point out that it is natural for man to
2305 learn of the power and natures of things from their actions, and
2306 therefore our Lord fittingly says that the sort of person he is can
2307 be learned through the works he does. So, since he performed divine
2308 works by his own power, we should believe that he has divine power
2309 within him: &ldquo;If I had not done among them the works which no
2310 one else did, they would not have sin,&rdquo; that is, the sin of
2311 unbelief (below 15:24). And so he leads them to a knowledge of
2312 himself by appealing to his works, saying, <span style=
2313 "font-weight: bold">the very works which my Father has given
2314 me</span> in the Word, through an eternal generation, by giving me
2315 a power equal to his own. Or we could say, <span style=
2316 "font-weight: bold">the very works which my Father has given
2317 me,</span> in my conception, by making me one person who is both
2318 God and man, <span style="font-weight: bold">to perform,</span>
2319 i.e., to perform them by my own power. He says this to distinguish
2320 himself from those who do not perforrn miracles by their own power
2321 but have to obtain it as a favor from God; thus Peter says:
2322 &ldquo;In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth: stand up&rdquo;
2323 (Acts 3:6). Thus it was God, and not themselves, who accomplished
2324 these works; but Christ accomplished them by his own power:
2325 &ldquo;Lazarus, come forth,&rdquo; as John reports below (11:43).
2326 Accordingly, <span style="font-weight: bold">those works that I
2327 myself perform&mdash;they bear witness to me;</span> &ldquo;If you
2328 do not believe me, at least believe my works&rdquo; (below 10:38).
2329 We see from Mark (16:20) that God bears witness by the working of
2330 miracles: &ldquo;The Lord worked with them and confirmed the word
2331 by the signs that followed.&rdquo;</p>
2332 <p>818 Then (v 37), he presents the second way God bore witness to
2333 Christ, namely, by himself. First, he mentions the way; secondly,
2334 he shows that they were not able to receive this testimony.</p>
2335 <p>819 He says: It is not only the works which my Father has given
2336 me to perform that bear witness to me, but <span style=
2337 "font-weight: bold">the Father who sent me has himself given
2338 testimony on my behalf:</span> in the Jordan, when Christ was
2339 baptized (Mt 3:17); and on the mountain, when Christ was
2340 transfigured (Mt 17:5). For on both these occasions the voice of
2341 the Father was heard: &ldquo;This is my beloved Son.&rdquo; And so
2342 they should believe in Christ, as the true and natural Son of God:
2343 &ldquo;This is the testimony of God: he has borne witness to his
2344 Son&rdquo; ( 1 Jn 5:9). Consequently, anyone who does not believe
2345 that he is the Son of God, does not believe in the testimony of
493 God.</p> 2346 God.</p>
494 <p>742 How great then is the blindness of the Arians when they. say that Christ is less than God the 2347 <p>820 Someone could say that God also gave testimony to others by
495 Father: for they cannot understand in our Lord&#8217;s words what the Jews were able to understand. 2348 himself: for example, to Moses, on the mountain, with whom God
496 For the Arians say that Christ did not make himself equal to God, while the Jews saw this. There 2349 spoke while others were present. We, however, never heard his
497 is another way to settle this, from the very things mentioned in the text. For the Evangelist says 2350 testimony, as the Lord says: <span style="font-weight: bold">you
498 that the Jews persecuted Christ because he broke the Sabbath, because he said God is his Father, 2351 have neither heard his voice.</span> On the other hand, we read in
499 and because he made hiniselfequal to God. But Christ is either a liar or equal to God. But if he 2352 Deuteronomy (4:33): Did it ever happen before that the people heard
500 is equal to God, Christ is God by nature.</p> 2353 the voice of God speaking from the midst of fire, as you heard, and
501 <p>743 Finally, the Evangelist says, <span style="font-weight: bold">making himself equal to God, </span>not as though he was making 2354 have lived?&rdquo; Then how can Christ say: <span style=
502 himself become equal to God, because he was equal to God through an eternal generation. 2355 "font-weight: bold">you have neither heard his voice?</span></p>
503 Rather, the Evangelist is speaking according to the understanding of the Jews who, not believing 2356 <p>I reply, according to Chrysostom, that the Lord wishes to show
504 that Christ was the Son of God by nature, understood him to say that he was the Son of God in 2357 those established in a philosophical frame of mind that God gives
505 the sense of wishing to make himself equal to God; but they could not believe he was such: 2358 testimony to someone in two ways, namely, sensibly and
506 &#8220;because although you are a man, you make yourself God&#8221; (below 10:33), i.e., you say that you 2359 intelligibly. Sensibly, as by a sensible voice only; and in this
507 are God, understanding this as you wish to make yourself God.</p> 2360 way he gave witness to Moses on Mount Sinai: &ldquo;You heard his
508 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">&#160;</p> 2361 voice, and saw no form at all&rdquo; (Dt 4:12). Likewise, he gives
509 <p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-weight: bold">LECTURE 3</span></p> 2362 testimony by a sensible form, as he appeared to Abraham (Gn 26),
510 <BLOCKQUOTE><p>19 Jesus therefore replied and said to them:</p> 2363 and to Isaiah: &ldquo;I saw the Lord seated on a high and lofty
511 <p style="margin-left: 0.5in">&#8220;Amen, amen, I say to you, 2364 throne&rdquo; (Is 6:1). However, in these visions, neither the
512 <br>the Son cannot do anything of himself, 2365 audible voice nor the visible figure were like anything in the
513 <br>but only what he sees the Father doing. 2366 animal kingdom, except efficiently, in the sense that these were
514 <br>For whatever the Father does, 2367 formed by God. For since God is a spirit, he neither emits audible
515 <br>the Son does likewise. 2368 sounds nor can he be portrayed as a figure. But he does bear
516 <br>20a For the Father loves the Son, 2369 testimony in an intelligible manner by inspiring in the hearts of
517 <BR>and shows him everything that he does.&#8221;</p></BLOCKQUOTE> 2370 certain persons what they ought to believe and to hold: &ldquo;I
518 <p>744 Here we have Christ&#8217;s teaching on his life-giving power. First, his teaching is presented. 2371 will hear what the Lord God will speak within me&rdquo; (Ps 84:9);
519 Secondly, it is confirmed (v 3 1). Two things are done with the first. First, Christ&#8217;s teaching on 2372 &ldquo;I will lead her into the wilderness and there I will speak
520 his life-giving power in general is given. Secondly, it is presented in particular (v 20b). As to the 2373 to her heart,&rdquo; as we read in Hosea (2:14).</p>
521 first, three things are done. First, the origin of this power is mentioned. Secondly, the greatness 2374 <p>Now you were able to receive the testimony given in the first of
522 of this power, at (v 19b). Thirdly, the reason for each is given (v 20).</p> 2375 these ways; and this is not surprising, because they were the words
523 <p>745 We should point out, with respect to the first, that the Arians use what Christ said here, <span style="font-weight: bold">the 2376 and image of God only efficiently, as was said. But they were not
524 Son cannot do anything of himself, </span>to support their error that the Son is less than the Father. 2377 able to receive the testimony given in that intelligible voice; so
525 As the Evangelist said, the Jews persecuted Christ for making himself equal to God. But the 2378 he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">you have neither heard his
526 Arians say that when our Lord saw that this disturbed the Jews, he tried to correct this by stating 2379 voice,</span> i.e., you were not among those who shared in it.
527 that he was not equal to the Father, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">Amen, amen, I say to you, the Son cannot do 2380 &ldquo;Everyone who has heard the Father and has learned, comes to
528 anything of himself, but only what he sees the Father doing. </span>As if to say: Do not interpret 2381 me&rdquo; (below 6:45). But you do not come to me. Therefore,
529 what I said, &#8220;My Father works even until now, and so do I, as meaning that I work as though I 2382 <span style="font-weight: bold">you have neither heard his voice
530 am equal to the Father. for I cannot do anything of myself. Therefore, they say, because the Son 2383 nor seen his image,</span> i.e., you do not have his intelligible
531 can do only <span style="font-weight: bold">what he sees the Father doing</span>, he is less than the Father. But this interpretation is 2384 testimony. Hence he adds: <span style="font-weight: bold">and you
532 false and erroneous. For if the Son were not equal to the Father, then the Son would not be the 2385 do not have his word abiding in your hearts,</span> i.e., you do
533 same as the Father; and this is contrary to: &#8220;I and the Father are one&#8221; (below 10:30). For equality 2386 not have his word that is inwardly inspired. And the reason is,
534 is considered with respect to greatness, which in divine realities is the essence itself. Hence, if 2387 <span style="font-weight: bold">for you do not believe in him whom
535 the Son were not equal to the Father, he would be different from him in essence.</p> 2388 he,</span> the Father, <span style="font-weight: bold">has
536 <p>746 To get the true meaning of Christ&#8217;s statement, we should know that in those matters which 2389 sent</span>. For the word of God leads to Christ, since Christ
537 seem to imply inferiority in the Son, it could be said, as some do, that they apply to Christ 2390 himself is the natural Word of God. But every word inspired by God
538 according to the nature he assumed; as when he said: &#8220;The Father is greater than I&#8221; (below 2391 is a certain participated likeness of that Word. Therefore, since
539 14:28). According to this, they would say that our Lord&#8217;s statement, <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son cannot do anything 2392 every participated likeness leads to its original, it is clear that
540 of himself, </span>should be understood of the Son in his assumed nature. However, this does not stand 2393 every word inspired by God leads to Christ. And so, because you are
541 up, because then one would be forced to say that whatever the Son of God did in his assumed 2394 not led to me, <span style="font-weight: bold">you do not have his
542 nature, the Father had done before him. For example, that the Father had walked upon the water 2395 word,</span> i.e., the inspired word of God, <span style=
543 as Christ did: otherwise, he would not have said, <span style="font-weight: bold">but only what he sees the Father doing.</span></p> 2396 "font-weight: bold">abiding in your hearts.</span> &ldquo;He who
544 <p>And if we say that whatever Christ did in his flesh, God the Father also did in so far as the Father 2397 does not believe in the Son of God does not have life abiding in
545 works in him, as said below (14:10): &#8220;The Father, who lives in me, he accomplishes the works,&#8221; 2398 him,&rdquo; as it says below (sic). He says <span style=
546 then Christ would be saying that <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son cannot do anything of himself, but only what he sees 2399 "font-weight: bold">abiding,</span> because although there is no
547 the Father doing </span>in him, i.e., in the Son. But this cannot stand either, because Christ&#8217;s next 2400 one who does not have some truth from God, they alone have the
548 statement, <span style="font-weight: bold">For whatever the Father, does, the Son does likewise, </span>could not, in this 2401 truth and the word abiding in them whose knowledge has progressed
549 interpretation, be applied to him, i.e., to Christ. For the Son, in his assumed nature, never created 2402 to the point where they have reached a knowledge of the true and
550 the world, as the Father did. Consequently, what we read here must not be understood as 2403 natural Word.</p>
551 pertaining to Christ&#8217;s assumed nature.</p> 2404 <p>821 Or we could say that, <span style="font-weight: bold">you
552 <p>747 According to Augustine, however, there is another way of understanding statements which 2405 have neither heard his voice,</span> can be taken as showing the
553 seem to, but do not, imply inferriority in the Son: namely, by referring them to the origin of the 2406 three ways in which God reveals things. This is done either by a
554 Son coming or begotten from the Father. For although the Son is equal to the Father in all things, 2407 sensible voice, as he bore witness to Christ in the Jordan and on
555 he receives all these things from the Father in an eternal begetting. But the Father gets these from 2408 the mountain, as in 2 Peter (1:16): &ldquo;We were eyewitnesses of
556 no one, for he is unbegotten. According to this explanation, the continuity of thought is the 2409 his greatness. For he received honor and glory from God the Father,
557 following: Why are you offended because I said that God is my Father, and because I made 2410 when a voice came from the heavens.&rdquo; And the Jews did not
558 myself equal to the Father? <span style="font-weight: bold">Amen, amen, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of himself. </span>As 2411 hear this. Or, God reveals things through a vision of his essence,
559 if to say: I am equal to the Father, but in such a way as to be from him, and not he from me; and 2412 which he reveals to the blessed. And they did not see this, because
560 whatever I may do, is in me from the Father.</p> 2413 &ldquo;while we are in the body, we are absent from the Lord&rdquo;
561 <p>748 According to this interpretation, mention is made of the power of the Son when he says, can, 2414 (2 Cor 5:6). Thirdly, it is accomplished by an interior word
562 and of his activity when he says, do. Both can be understood here, so that, first of all, the 2415 through an inspiration; and the Jews did not have this either.</p>
563 derivation of the Son&#8217;s power from the Father is shown, and secondly, the conformity of the 2416 <p>822 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Search
564 Son&#8217;s activity to that of the Father.</p> 2417 the Scriptures,</span> he gives the third way in which God bore
565 <p>749 As to the first, Hilary explains it this way: Shortly above our Lord said that he is equal to the 2418 witness to Christ, through the Scriptures. First, he mentions the
566 Father. Some heretics, basing themselves on certain scriptural texts which assert the unity and 2419 testimony of the Scriptures. Secondly, he shows that they were not
567 equality of the Son to the Father, claim that the Son is unbegotten. For example, the Sabellians, 2420 able to gather the fruit of this testimony (v 40).</p>
568 who say that the Son is identical in person with the Father. Therefore, so you do not understand 2421 <p>823 He says: <span style="font-weight: bold">Search the
569 this teaching in this way, he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son cannot do anything of himself, </span>for the Son&#8217;s power 2422 Scriptures.</span> As if to say: You do not have the word of God in
570 is identical with his nature. Therefore the Son has his power from the same source as he has his 2423 your hearts, but in the Scriptures; therefore, you must seek for it
571 being (<i>esse</i>); but he has his being (<i>esse</i>)<i> </i>from the Father: &#8220;I came forth from the Father, and I 2424 elsewhere than in your hearts. Hence, <span style=
572 have come into the world&#8221; (Jn 16:28). He also has his nature from the Father, because he is God 2425 "font-weight: bold">Search the Scriptures,</span> that is, the Old
573 from God; therefore, it is from him that the Son has his power (<i>posse</i>)<i>.</i></p> 2426 Testament, for the faith of Christ was contained in the Old
574 <p>So his statement, <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son cannot do anything of himself, but only what he sees the Father 2427 Testament, but not on the surface, for it lay hidden in its depths,
575 doing, </span>is the same as saying: The Son, just as he does not have his being (<i>esse</i>)<i> </i>except from the 2428 under shadowy symbols: &ldquo;Even to this day, when Moses is read,
576 Father, so he cannot do anything except from the Father. For in natural things, a thing receives 2429 a veil is over their hearts&rdquo; (2 Cor 3:15). Thus he
577 its power to act from the very thing from which it receives its being: for example, fire receives 2430 significantly says, Search, probe into the depths: &ldquo;If you
578 its power to ascend from the very thing from which it receives its form and being. Further, in 2431 search for her [wisdom] like money, and dig for her like a
579 saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son cannot do anything of himself, </span>no inequality is implied, because this refers to 2432 treasure, you will understand the fear of the Lord and will find
580 a relation; while equality and inequality refer to quantity.</p> 2433 the knowledge of God&rdquo; (Prv 2:4); &ldquo;Give me understanding
581 <p>750 Someone might misunderstand his saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">but only what he sees the Father doing, </span>and 2434 and I will search your commandments&rdquo; (Ps 118:34).</p>
582 take it to mean that the Son works or acts in the way he sees the Father acting, i.e., that the Father 2435 <p>The reason why you should search them I take from your own
583 acts first, and when the Son sees this, then the Son begins to act. It would be like two carpenters, 2436 opinion, because <span style="font-weight: bold">you think you have
584 a master and his apprentice, with the apprentice making a cabinet in the way he saw the master 2437 eternal life in them,</span> since we read in Ezekiel (18:19):
585 do. But this is not true for the Word, for it was said above (1:3): &#8220;All things were made through 2438 &ldquo;He who has kept my commands will live.&rdquo; But you are
586 him.&#8221; Therefore, the Father did not make something in such a way that the Son saw him doing 2439 mistaken; because although the precepts of the old law are living,
587 it and so learned from it.</p> 2440 they do not contain life in themselves. They are said to be living
588 <p>But this is said so that the communication of paternity to the Son might be designated in terms 2441 only to the extent that they lead to me, the Christ. Yet you use
589 of begetting or generation, which is fittingly described by the verb sees, because knowledge is 2442 them as though they contained life in themselves, and in this you
590 conveyed to us by another through seeing and hearing. For we receive our knowledge from things 2443 are mistaken, for they bear witness to me, i.e., they are living to
591 through seeing. and we receive knowledge from words through hearing, Now the Son is not other 2444 the extent that they lead to a knowledge of me. And they lead to a
592 than Wisdom, as we read: &#8220;I came forth out of the mouth of the Most High, the first-born before 2445 knowledge of me either by plain prophecies, as in Isaiah (7:14):
593 all creatures&#8221; (Sir 24:5). Accordingly, the derivation of the Son from the Father is nothing other 2446 &ldquo;A virgin will conceive.&rdquo; or in Deuteronomy (18:15):
594 than the derivation of divine Wisdom. And so, because the act of seeing indicates the derivation 2447 &ldquo;The Lord your God will raise up a prophet for you.&rdquo;;
595 of knowledge and wisdom from another, it is proper for the generation of the Son from the Father 2448 and so Acts (10:43) says: &ldquo;All the prophets bear witness to
596 to be indicated by an act of seeing; so that for the Son to see the Father doing something is 2449 him.&rdquo; The Scriptures also lead to a knowledge of Christ
597 nothing other than to proceed by an intellectual procession from the acting Father.</p> 2450 through the symbolic actions of the prophets; thus we read:
598 <p>Another possible explanation of this is given by Hilary. For him, the word sees eliminates all 2451 &ldquo;I have used resemblences in the ministry of the
599 imperfection from the generation of the Son or Word. For in physical generation, what is 2452 prophets&rdquo; (Hos 12:10). Knowledge of Christ is also given in
600 generated changes little by little in the course of time from what is imperfect to what is perfect, 2453 their sacraments and figures, as in the immolation of&rsquo; the
601 for such a thing is not perfect when it is first generated. But this is not so in eternal generation, 2454 lamb, and other symbolic sacraments of the law: &ldquo;The law has
602 since this is the generation of what is perfect from what is perfect. And so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">but only what 2455 only a shadow of the good things to come&rdquo; (Heb 10:1). And so,
603 he sees the Father doing. </span>For since the act of seeing is the act of a perfect thing, it is plain that 2456 because &ldquo;the Scriptures of the Old Testament gave much
604 the Son was begotten as perfect at once, as seeing at once, and not as coming to perfection over 2457 testimony about Christ, the Apostle says: &ldquo;He promised the
605 a course of time.</p> 2458 Good News before, through his prophets in the holy Scriptures; the
606 <p>751 Apropos of the second point, Chrysostom explains it as showing the conformity of the Father 2459 Good News of his Son, a descendant of David in his human
607 to the Son in operation. So that the sense is: I say that it is lawful for me to work on the Sabbath, 2460 nature&rdquo; (Rom 1:2).</p>
608 because my Father, too, continues to work, and I cannot do anything opposed to him: and this is 2461 <p>824 The fruit which you think you have in the Scriptures, that
609 because <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son cannot do anything of himself. </span>For one does something of himself when he 2462 is, eternal life, you will not be able to obtain, because in not
610 does not conform himself to another in his actions. But whoever is from another sins, if he is 2463 believing the testimonies of the Scriptures about me, <span style=
611 opposed to him: &#8220;Whoever speaks on his own, seeks his own glory&#8221; (below 7:18). Therefore, 2464 "font-weight: bold">you are unwilling to come to me,</span> i.e.,
612 whoever exists from another, but acts of himself, sins. Now the Son is from the Father; thus, if 2465 you do not wish to believe in me, in whom the fruit of these
613 he acts of himself, he sins; and this is impossible. So by saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son cannot do anything of 2466 Scriptures exists, <span style="font-weight: bold">in order to
614 himself, </span>he means nothing more than that the Son cannot sin. As if to say: You are persecuting 2467 possess that life</span> in me, the life which I give to those who
615 me unjustly for breaking the Sabbath, because I cannot sin, since I do not act in a way opposed 2468 believe in me: &ldquo;I give them eternal life&rdquo; (below
616 to my Father.</p> 2469 10:28); &ldquo;Wisdom infuses life into her children&rdquo; (Sir
617 <p>Augustine makes use of both of these explanations, that of of Hilary and the one given by 2470 4:12); &ldquo;He who finds me will find life, and will have
618 Chrysostom, but in different places.</p> 2471 salvation from the Lord&rdquo; (Prv 8:35).</p>
619 <p>752 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">For whatever the Father does, the Son does likewise, </span>he affirms the 2472 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">
620 greatness of Christ&#8217;s power. He excludes three things in the power of Christ: limitation, 2473 &nbsp;</p>
621 difference, and imperfection.</p> 2474 <p style="text-align: center"><span style=
622 <p>First, limitation is excluded. Since there are diverse agents in the world, and the first universal 2475 "font-weight: bold">LECTURE 7</span></p>
623 agent has power over all other agents, but the other agents, which are from him, have a limited 2476 <blockquote>
624 power in proportion to their rank in the order of causality, some might think that since the Son 2477 <p style="margin-left: 0.5in">41 &ldquo;Praise from men I do not
625 is not of himself, that he must have a power limited to certain existents, rather than a universal 2478 need,<br />
626 power over all, as the Father has. And so to exclude this he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">whatever the Father does, </span>i.e., 2479 42 but I know you,<br />
627 to all the things to which the Father&#8217;s power extends, the Son&#8217;s power also extends: &#8220;All things 2480 and you do not have the love of God in your hearts.<br />
628 were made through him&#8221; (above 1:3).</p> 2481 43 I have come in my Father&rsquo;s name,<br />
629 <p>Secondly, difference is excluded. For sometimes a thing that exists from another is able to do 2482 and yet you do not accept me.<br />
630 whatever that from which it exists does. And yet the things the former does are not the same as 2483 If someone else came in his own name,<br />
631 those done by that from which it is. For example, if one fire which exists from another can do 2484 you would be accepting him.<br />
632 whatever that other does, i.e., cause combustion, the act of causing combustion would be 2485 44 How can people like you believe,<br />
633 specifically the same in each, even though one fire ignites certain things and the other fire ignites 2486 when you crave praise from each other,<br />
634 different things. And so that you do not think that the Son&#8217;s activity is different from the activity 2487 and yet not even ask for that one praise<br />
635 of the Father in this way, he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">whatever</span> the Father does, the Son does, i.e., not different 2488 which is from God alone?<br />
636 things, but the very same.</p> 2489 45 Do not think that I will accuse you<br />
637 <p>Thirdly, imperfection is excluded. Sometimes one and the same thing comes from two agents: 2490 before my Father.<br />
638 from one as the principal and perfect agent, and from the other as an instrumental and imperfect 2491 The one who accuses you is Moses,<br />
639 agent. But it does not come in the same way, because the principal agent acts in a different way 2492 in whom you place your trust.<br />
640 from the instrumental agent: for the instrumental agent acts imperfectly, and in virtue of the 2493 46 If you believed Moses,<br />
641 other. And so that no one thinks that this is the way the Son does whatever the Father does, he 2494 you would perhaps believe me as well,<br />
642 says that whatever the Father does, the Son does <span style="font-weight: bold">likewise</span>, i.e., with the same power by which 2495 for it was about me that he wrote.<br />
643 the Father acts, the Son also acts; because the same power and the same perfection are in the 2496 47 But if you do not believe in his written statements,<br />
644 Father and the Son: &#8220;I was with him, forming all things&#8221; (Prv 8:30).</p> 2497 how will you believe in my spoken words?&rdquo;</p>
645 <p>753 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">For the Father loves the Son, </span>he gives the reason for each, i.e., for the 2498 </blockquote>
646 origin of the Son&#8217;s power and for its greatness. This reason is the love of the Father, who loves 2499 <p>825 After God confirmed the greatness of his power by the
647 the Son. Thus he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">For the Father loves the Son.</span></p> 2500 testimonies of men, of&rsquo;God, and of&rsquo; the Scriptures, he
648 <p>In order to understand how the Father&#8217;s love for the Son is the reason for the origin or 2501 here rebukes the Jews for being slow to believe. Now the Jews
649 communication of the Son&#8217;s power, we Should point out that a thing is loved in two ways. For 2502 persecuted Christ on two grounds: for breaking the Sabbath, by
650 since the good alone is loveable, a good can be related to love in two ways: as the cause of love, 2503 which he seemed to go against the law, and for saying that he is
651 or as caused by love. Now in us, the good causes love: for the cause of our loving something is 2504 the Son of God, by which he seemed to go against God. Thus they
652 its goodness, the goodness in it. Therefore, it is not good because we love it, but rather we love 2505 persecuted him on account of their reverence for God and their zeal
653 it because it is good. Accordingly. in us, love is caused by what is good. But it is different with 2506 for the law. And so our Lord wishes to show that their persecution
654 God, because God&#8217;s love itself is the cause of the goodness in the things that are loved. For it is 2507 of him was really inspired not by these motives, but by contrary
655 because God loves us that we are good, since to love is nothing else than to will a good to
656 someone. Thus, since God&#8217;s will is the cause of things, for &#8220;whatever he willed he made&#8221; (Ps
657 113:3), it is clear that God&#8217;s love is the cause of the goodness in things. Hence Denis says in <i>The
658 Divine Names</i> (c. 4) that the divine love did not allow itself to be without issue. So, if we wish
659 to consider the origin of the Son, let us see whether the love with which the Father loves the Son,
660 is the principle of his origin, so that he proceeds from it.</p>
661 <p>In divine realities, love is taken in two ways: essentially, so far as the Father and the Son and the
662 Holy Spirit love; and notionally or personally, so far as the Holy Spirit proceeds as Love. But in
663 neither of these ways of taking love can it be the principle of origin of the Son. For if is is taken
664 essentially, it implies an act of the will; and if that were the sense in which it is the principle of
665 origin of the Son, it would follow that the Father generated the Son, not by nature, but by
666 will&#8212;and this is false. Again, love is not understood notionally, as pertaining to the Holy Spirit.
667 For it would then follow that the Holy Spirit would be the principle of the Son&#8212;which is also
668 false. Indeed, no heretic ever went so far as to say this. For although love, notionally taken, is the
669 principle of all the gifts given to us by God, it is nevertheless not the principle of the Son; rather
670 it proceeds from the Father and the Son.</p>
671 <p>Consequently, we must say that this explanation is not taken from love as from a principle (<i>ex
672 principio</i>), but as from a sign (<i>ex signo</i>)<i>. </i>For since likeness is a cause of love (for every animal
673 loves its like), wherever a perfect likeness of God is found, there also is found a perfect love of
674 God. But the perfect likeness of the Father is in the Son, as is said: &#8220;He is the image of the
675 invisible God&#8221; (1:15); and &#8220;He is the brightness of the Father&#8217;s glory, and the image of his
676 substance&#8221; (Heb 1:3). Therefore, the Son is loved perfectly by the Father, and because the Father
677 perfectly loves the Son, this is a sign that the Father has shown him everything and has
678 communicated to him his very own [the Father&#8217;s] power and nature. And it is of this love that
679 we read above (3:5): &#8220;The Father loves the Son, and has put everything into his hands&#8221;; and,
680 &#8220;This is my beloved. Son&#8221; (Mt 3:17).</p>
681 <p>754 With respect to what follows, <span style="font-weight: bold">and shows him everything that he does, </span>we should point out
682 that someone can show another his works in two ways: either by sight, as an artisan shows his
683 apprentice the things he has made, or by hearing, as when he verbally instructs him). In whatever
684 of these ways shows is understood, there can follow something which is not appropriate, that is,
685 something that is not present when the Father shows things to the Son. For if we say the Father
686 shows things to the Son by sight, then it follows, as with humans, that the Father first does
687 something which he then shows to the Son; and that he does this by himself, without the Son. But
688 the Father does not show the Son things which he did before, for the Son himself says: &#8220;The Lord
689 possessed me at the beginning of his ways, before he made anything&#8221; (Prv 8:22). Nor does the
690 Father show the Son things he has done without the Son, for the Father does all things through
691 the Son: &#8220;All things were made through him&#8221; (above 1:3). If <span style="font-weight: bold">shows </span>is understood as a kind of
692 hearing, two things seem to follow. For the one who teaches by word first points out something
693 to the one who is ignorant; again, the word is something intermediate between the one showing
694 and the one being shown. But it is in neither of these ways that the Father shows things to the
695 Son: for he does not do so to one who is ignorant, since the Son is the Wisdom of the Father:
696 &#8220;Christ is the power of God, and the wisdom of God&#8221; (1 Cor 1:24); nor does the Father use some
697 intermediate word, because the Son himself is the Word of the Father: &#8220;The Word was with God&#8221;
698 (above 1:1).</p>
699 <p>Therefore, it is said that the Father <span style="font-weight: bold">shows </span>all that he does to the Son, inasmuch as he gives the
700 Son a knowledge of all of his works. For it is in this way that a master is said to show something
701 to his disciple, inasmuch as he gives him a knowledge of the things he makes. Hence, according
702 to Augustine, for the Father to show anything to the Son is nothing more than for the Father to
703 beget or generate the Son. And for the Son to see what the Father does is nothing more than for
704 the Son to receive his being (<i>esse</i>)<i> </i>and nature from the Father.</p>
705 <p>Nevertheless, this showing can be considered similar to seeing insofar as the Son is the
706 brightness of the paternal vision, as we read in Hebrews (1:3): for the Father, seeing and
707 understanding himself, conceives the Son, who is the concept of this vision. Again, it can be
708 considered similar to hearing insofar as the Son proceeds from the Father as the Word. As if to
709 say: <span style="font-weight: bold">The Father shows him everything, </span>insofar he he generates him as the brightness and
710 concept of his own wisdom, and as the Word. Thus the words, <span style="font-weight: bold">The Father shows, </span>refer to what
711 was said before: <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son cannot do anything of himself, but only what he sees the Father
712 doing. </span>And the word, everything, refers to, <span style="font-weight: bold">For whatever the Father does, the Son does
713 likewise.</span></p>
714 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">&#160;</p>
715 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style="font-weight: bold">LECTURE 4</span></p>
716 <BLOCKQUOTE><p>20b &#8220;Indeed, he will show him even greater works than these, such that you will be amazed. 21
717 For just as the Father raises the dead and grants life, so the Son grants life to those to whom he
718 wishes. 22 The Father himself judges no one, but he has given all judgment to the Son, 23 so that
719 all men may honor the Son as they honor the Father. Whoever does not honor the Son does not
720 honor the Father who sent him. 24 Amen, amen, I say to you, that whoever hears my voice and
721 believes in him who sent me, possesses eternal life; and he will not encounter judgment, but has
722 passed from death to life. 25 Amen, amen, I say to you, the hour is coming, and is now here,
723 when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God; and those who hear it will live.&#8221;</p></BLOCKQUOTE>
724 <p>755 Having pointed out the power of the Son in general, he now shows it in more detail. First,
725 the Lord discloses his life-giving power. Secondly, he clarifies what seemed obscure in what was
726 said before (v 26). As to the first he does two things. First, he shows that the Son has life-giving
727 power. Secondly, he teaches how life is received from the Son (v 24). Concerning the first he
728 does three things. First, he presents the life-giving power of the Son. Secondly, he gives a reason
729 for what he says (v 22). Thirdly, he shows the effect of this (v 23). With respect to the first he
730 does two things. First, he sets forth this life-giving power in general. Secondly, he expands on
731 it (v 21).</p>
732 <p>756 He says, to the first, <span style="font-weight: bold">Indeed, he will show even greater works than these. </span>As if to say: You
733 are astonished and affected by the power of the Son in his healing of the sick man, but the Father
734 will show <span style="font-weight: bold">even greater works than these, </span>as in raising the dead, such that you will be amazed.</p>
735 <p>757 This passage gives rise to two difficulties. First, about his saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">he will show</span>. For the
736 earlier statement that the Father shows everything to the Son (5:20) refers to his eternal
737 generation. How, then, can he say here, <span style="font-weight: bold">he will show</span>, if the Son is coeternal with him and
738 eternity does not allow of a future? The second difficulty is over, <span style="font-weight: bold">such that you will be amazed</span>.
739 For if he intends to show something to amaze the Jews, then he will be showing it to the Son at
740 the same time as to them; for they could not be amazed unless they saw it. And yet the Son saw
741 all things from eternity with the Father.</p>
742 <p>758 We must say that this is explained in three ways. The first way is given by Augustine, and
743 in it this future showing is referred to the disciples. For it is Christ&#8217;s custom that now and then
744 he says that what happens to his members happens to himself, as in Matthew (25:40): &#8220;As long
745 as you did it to one of the least of my brethren, you did it to me.&#8221; And then the meaning is this:
746 You saw the Son do something great in healing the sick man, and you were amazed; but the
747 Father <span style="font-weight: bold">will show him even greater works than these, </span>in his members, that is, the disciples: &#8220;He
748 will do greater things than these,&#8221; as we read below (14:12). He then says, <span style="font-weight: bold">such that you will
749 be amazed, </span>for the miracles of the disciples so amazed the Jews that a great many of them were
750 converted to the faith, as we see in the Acts.</p>
751 <p>759 The second explanation, also by Augustine, refers this showing to Christ according to his
752 assumed nature. For in Christ there is both a divine nature and a human nature, and in each he
753 has life-giving power from the Father, although not in the same way. According to his divinity
754 he has the power to give life to souls; but according to his assumed nature, he gives life to bodies.
755 Hence Augustine says: &#8220;The Word gives life to souls; but the Word made flesh gives life to
756 bodies.&#8221; For the resurrection of Christ and the mysteries which Christ fulfilled in his flesh are
757 the cause of the future resurrection of bodies: &#8220;God, who is rich in mercy, has brought us to life
758 in Christ&#8221; (Eph 2:5); &#8220;If it is preached that Christ rose from the dead, how can some of you say
759 that there is no resurrection of the dead&#8221; (1 Cor 15:12). The first life-giving power he has from
760 eternity; and he indicated this when he said: &#8220;The &#8216; Father shows him everything that he does&#8221;
761 (above 4:20), all of which he shows to his flesh.</p>
762 <p>The other life-giving power he has in time, and concerning this he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">he will show him even
763 greater works than these, </span>i.e., his power will be shown by the fact that he will do greater works,
764 by raising the dead. He will raise some of the dead here: as Lazarus, the young girl, and the
765 mother&#8217;s only son; and finally he will raise all on the day of judgment.</p>
766 <p>760 A third explanation refers this showing to Christ in his divine nature, according to the
767 custom of Scripture in sayfng that a thing is beginning to take place when it is beginning to be
768 known. For example: &#8220;All power has been given to me, in heaven and on earth&#8221; (Mt 28:18); for
769 although Christ had the complete fulness of power from eternity (because &#8220;whatever the Father
770 does, the Son does likewise&#8221;), he still speaks of this power as being given to him after the
771 resurrection, not because he was then receiving it for the first time, but because it was through
772 the glory of the resurrection that it became most known. In this interpretation, then, he says that
773 power is given to him insofar as he exercises it in some work. As if to say: <span style="font-weight: bold">he will show him
774 even greater works than these, </span>i.e., he will show by his works what has been given to him. And
775 this will come about when you are amazed, i.e., when the one who seems to you to be a mere
776 man is revealed to be a person of divine power and as God.</p>
777 <p>We could also take the word show as referring to an act of seeing, as was explained above [750].</p>
778 <p>761 Now he explains in more detail the life-giving power of the Son by indicating those greater
779 works which the Father will show the Son (v 21). Here we should point out that in the Old
780 Testament the divine power is particularly emphasized by the fact that God is the author of life:
781 &#8220;The Lord kills, and brings to life&#8221; (1 Sm 2:6); &#8220;1 will kill, and bring to life again&#8221; (Dt 32:39).
782 Now just as the Father has this power, so also does the Son; hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">For just as the
783 Father raises the dead and grants life, so the Son grants life to those to whom he wishes. </span>As
784 if to say: These are those greater works that the Father will show the Son, that is, he will give life
785 to the dead. Such works are obviously greater, for it is greater to raise the dead than for a sick
786 man to become well. Thus <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son grants life to those to whom he wishes, </span>i.e., by giving initial
787 life to the living, and by raising the dead.</p>
788 <p>We should not think that some are raised up by the Father and others by the Son. Rather, the
789 same ones who are raised and vivified by the Father, are raised and vivified by the Son also:
790 because just as the Father does all things through the Son, who is his power, so he also gives life
791 to all through the Son, who is life, as he says below: &#8220;I am the way, and the truth, and the life&#8221;
792 (14:6).</p>
793 <p>The Father does not raise up and give life through the Son as through an instrument, because then
794 the Son would not have freedom of power. And so to exclude this he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son grants life
795 to those to whom he wishes, </span>i.e., it lies in the freedom of his power to grant life to whom he
796 wills. For the Son does not will anything different than the Father wills: for just as they are one
797 substance, so they have one will; hence Matthew (20:15) says: &#8220;Is it not lawful for me to do as
798 I will?&#8221;</p>
799 <p>762 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">The Father himself judges no one, </span>he gives the reason for what was
800 said above, and indicates his own power. It should be remarked that there are two expositions for
801 the present passages: one is given by Augustine, and the other by Hilary and Chrysostom.</p>
802 <p>Augustine&#8217;s explanation is this. The Lord had said that just as the Father raises the dead, so also
803 does the Son. But so that we do not think that this refers only to those miracles the Son performs
804 in raising the dead to this life, and not to the Son&#8217;s raising to eternal life, he leads them to the
805 deeper consideration of the resurrection to occur at the future judgment. Thus he refers explicitly
806 to the judgment, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">The Father himself judges no one.</span></p>
807 <p>Another explanation by Augustine, in which the same meaning is maintained, is that the earlier
808 statement, <span style="font-weight: bold">just as the Father raises the dead and grants life, so the Son, </span>should be referred
809 to the resurrection of souls, which the Son causes inasmuch as he is the Word; but the text, <span style="font-weight: bold">The
810 Father himself judges no one, </span>should be referred to the resurrection of bodies, which the Son
811 causes inasmuch as he is the Word made flesh. For the resurrection of souls is accomplished
812 through the person of the Father and of the Son; and for this reason he mentions the Father and
813 Son together, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">just as the Father raises the dead ... so the Son. </span>But the resurrection of
814 bodies is accomplished through the humanity of the Son, according to which he is not coeternal
815 with the Father. Consequently, he attributes judgment solely to the Son.</p>
816 <p>763 Note the wonderful variety of expressions. The Father is first presented as acting and the Son
817 as resting, when it says: &#8220;the Son cannot do anything of himself, but only what he sees the Father
818 doing&#8221; (5:19); but here, on the contrary, the Son is presented as acting and the Father as resting:
819 <span style="font-weight: bold">The Father himself judges no one, but he has given all judgment to the Son. </span>We can see
820 from this that he is speaking from different points of view at different times. At first, he was
821 speaking of an action which belongs to the Father and the Son; thus he says that &#8220;the Son cannot
822 do anything of himself, but only what he sees the Father doing&#8221;; but here he is speaking of an
823 action by which the Son, as man, judges, and the Father does not: thus he says that the Father <span style="font-weight: bold">has
824 given all judgment to the Son. </span>For the Father will not appear at the judgment because, in accord
825 with what is just, God cannot appear in his divine nature before all who are to be judged: for
826 since our happiness consists in the vision of God, if the wicked were to see God in his own
827 nature, they would be enjoying happiness. Therefore, only the Son will appear, who alone has
828 an assumed nature. Therefore, he alone will judge who alone will appear to all. Yet he will judge
829 with the authority of the Father: &#8220;He is the one appointed by God to be the judge of the living and
830 of the dead&#8221; (Acts 10:42); and in the Psalm (71:1) we read: &#8220;O Lord, give your judgment to the
831 king.&#8221;</p>
832 <p>764 Then when he says, so <span style="font-weight: bold">that all men may honor the Son, </span>he gives the effect which results
833 from the power of the Son. First, he gives the effect. Secondly, he excludes an objection (v 23b).</p>
834 <p>765 He says that the Father has given all judgment to the Son, according to his human nature,
835 because in the incarnation the Son emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, under which
836 form he was dishonored by men, as is said below (8:49): &#8220;I honor my Father, and you have
837 dishonored me.&#8221; Therefore, judgment was given to the Son in his assumed nature in order <span style="font-weight: bold">that
838 all men may honor the Son as they honor the Father. </span>For on that day &#8220;they will see the Son
839 of Man coming with great power and glory&#8221; (Lk 21:27); &#8220;They fell on their faces and
840 worshipped, saying: &#8216;Blessing and glory, and wisdom and thanks, and honor, power and strength,
841 to our God&#8217;&#8221; (Rv 7:11).</p>
842 <p>766 Someone might say: I am willing to honor the Father, but do not care about the Son. This
843 cannot be, because <span style="font-weight: bold">Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent
844 him. </span>For it is one thing to honor God precisely as God, and another to honor the Father. For
845 someone may well honor God as the omnipotent and immutable Creator without honoring the
846 Son. But no one can honor God as Father without honoring the Son; for he cannot be called
847 Father if he does not have a Son. But if you dishonor the Son by diminishing his power, this also
848 dishonors the Father; because where you give less to the Son, you are taking away from the
849 power of the Father.</p>
850 <p>767 Another explanation, given by Augustine, is this. A twofold honor is due to Christ. One,
851 according to his divinity, in regard to which he is owed an honor equal to that given the Father;
852 and with respect to this he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">that all men may honor the Son as they honor the Father.
853 </span>Another honor is due the Son according to his humanity, but not one equal to that given the
854 Father; and with respect to this he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the
855 Father who sent him. </span>Thus in the first case he significantly used &#8220;as&#8221;; but now, the second time,
856 he does not say &#8220;as,&#8221; but states absolutely that the Son should be honored: &#8220;He who rejects you,
857 rejects me; and he who rejects me, rejects <span style="font-weight: bold">him who </span>sent me,&#8221; as we read in Luke (10:16).</p>
858 <p>768 Hilary and Chrysostom give a more literal explanation, but it is only slightly different. They
859 explain it this way. Our Lord said above, <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son grants life to those to whom he wishes. </span>Now
860 whoever does anything according to the free decision of his will acts because of his own
861 judgment. But it was stated above that &#8220;whatever the Father does, the Son does likewise&#8221; (5:19).
862 Therefore, the Son enjoys a free decision of his own will in all things, since he acts because of
863 his own judgment. Thus he immediately mentions judgment, saying that <span style="font-weight: bold">the Father himself
864 judges no one, </span>i.e., without or apart from the Son. Our Lord used this way of speaking below
865 (12:47): &#8220;I do not judge him,&#8221; i.e., I alone, &#8220;but the word that I have spoken will judge him on
866 the last day.&#8221; <span style="font-weight: bold">But he has given all judgment to the Son, </span>as he has given all things to him. For
867 as he has given him life and begotten him as living, so he has given him all judgment, i.e.,
868 begotten him as judge: &#8220;I judge only as I hear it&#8221; (below 5:30), i.e., just as I have being (<i>esse</i>)<i>
869 </i>from the Father, so also judgment. The reason for this is that the Son is nothing other than the
870 conception of the paternal wisdom, as was said. But each one judges by the concept of his
871 wisdom. Hence, just as the Father does all things through the Son, so he judges all things through
872 him. And the fruit of this is <span style="font-weight: bold">that all men may honor the Son as they honor the Father, </span>i.e., that
873 they may render to him the cult of &#8220;latria&#8221; as they do the Father. The rest does not change.</p>
874 <p>769 Hilary calls our attention to the remarkable relationship of the passages so that the errors
875 concerning eternal generation can be refuted. Two heresies have arisen concerning this eternal
876 generation. One was that of Arius, who said that the Son is less than the Father; and this is
877 contrary to their equality and unity. The other was that of Sabellius, who said that that there is
878 no distinction of persons in the divinity; and this is contrary to their origin.</p>
879 <p>So, whenever he mentions the unity and equality [of the Father and Son] , he immediately also
880 adds their distinction as persons according to origin, and conversely. Thus, because he mentions
881 the origin of the persons when he says, &#8220;the Son cannot do anything of himself, but only what
882 he sees the Father doing&#8221; (5:19), then, so we do not think this involves inequality, he at once
883 adds: &#8220;for whatever the Father does, the Son does likewise.&#8221; Conversely, when he states their
884 equality by saying: <span style="font-weight: bold">For just as the Father raises the dead and grants life, so the Son grants
885 life to those to whom he wishes, </span>then, so that we do not deny that the Son has an origin and is
886 begotten, he adds, <span style="font-weight: bold">the Father himself judges no one, but he has given all judgment to the
887 Son. </span>Similarly, when he mentions the equality of the persons by saying. <span style="font-weight: bold">so that all men may
888 honor the Son as they honor the Father.</span> he immediately adds something about a &#8220;mission,&#8221;
889 which indicates an origin, saying: <span style="font-weight: bold">Whoever does not honor the Son does not honor the Father
890 who sent him, </span>but not in such a way that involves a separation. Christ mentions such mission
891 below (8:29) in saying: &#8220;He who sent me is with me, and he has not left me alone.&#8221;</p>
892 <p>770 Above, our Lord showed that he had life-giving power; here he shows how someone can
893 share in this life coming from him. First, he tells how one can share in this life through him.
894 Secondly, he predicts its fulfillment (v 25).</p>
895 <p>771 With respect to the first, we should point out that there are four grades of life. One is found
896 in plants, which take nourishment, grow, reproduce, and are reproduced. Another is in animals
897 which only sense. Another in living things that move, that is, the perfect animals. Finally, there
898 is another form of life which is present in those who understand. Now among those grades of life
899 that exist, it is impossible that the foremost life be that found in plants, or in those with sensation,
900 or even in those with motion. For the first and foremost life must be that which is <i>per se, </i>not that
901 which is participated. This can be none other than intellectual life, for the other three forms are
902 common to a corporal and spiritual creature [as man]. Indeed, a body that lives is not life itself,
903 but one participating in life. Hence intellectual life is the first and foremost life, which is the
904 spiritual life, that is immediately received from the first principle of life, whence it is called the
905 life of wisdom. For this reason in the Scriptures life is attributed to wisdom: &#8220;He who finds me
906 finds life, and has salvation from the Lord&#8221; (Prv 8:35). Therefore we share life from Christ, who
907 is the Wisdom of God, insofar as our soul receives wisdom from him.</p>
908 <p>Now this intellectual life is made perfect by the true knowledge of divine Wisdom, which is
909 eternal life: &#8220;This is eternal life: that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ,
910 whom you have sent&#8221; (below 17:3). But no one can arrive at any wisdom except by faith. Hence
911 it is that in the sciences, no one acquires wisdom unless he first believes what is said by his
912 teacher. Therefore, if we wish to acquire this life of wisdom, we must believe through faith the
913 things that are proposed to us by it. &#8220;He who comes to God must believe that he is and rewards
914 those who seek him&#8221; (Heb 11:6); &#8220;If you do not believe, you will not understand,&#8221; as we read in
915 another version of Isaiah (28:16).</p>
916 <p>772 Thus, our Lord fittingly shows that the way of obtaining life is through faith, saying,
917 <span style="font-weight: bold">whoever hears my voice and believes in him who sent me, possesses eternal life. </span>First, he
918 mentions the merit of faith. Secondly, the reward of&#8217; faith, <span style="font-weight: bold">eternal life.</span></p>
919 <p>773 Concerning the merit of faith, he first indicates how faith is brought to us; and secondly, the
920 foundation of faith, that on which it rests.</p>
921 <p>Faith comes to us through the words of men: &#8220;Faith comes through hearing, and hearing through
922 the word of Christ&#8221; (Rom 10:17). But faith does not rest on man&#8217;s word, but on God himself:
923 &#8220;Abram believed God, who counted this as his justification&#8221; (Gn 15:6); &#8220;You who fear the Lord,
924 believe in him&#8221; (Sir 2:8). Thus we are lead to believe through the words of men, not in the man
925 himself who speaks, but in God, whose words he speaks: &#8220;When you heard the word we brought
926 you as God&#8217;s word, you did not receive it as the word of men, but, as what it really is, the word
927 of God&#8221; (1 Thes 2:13). Our Lord mentions these two things. First, how faith is brought to us,
928 when he says, whoever hears my voice [literally, word], which leads to faith. Secondly, he
929 mentions that on which faith rests, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">and believes in him who sent me, </span>i.e., not in me, but
930 in him in virtue of whom I speak.</p>
931 <p>This text can apply to Christ, as man, insofar as it is through Christ&#8217;s human words that men were
932 converted to the faith. And it can apply to Christ, as God, insofar as Christ is the Word of God.
933 For since Christ is the Word of God, it is clear that those who heard Christ were hearing the
934 Word of God, and as a consequence, were believing in God. And this is what he says: whoever
935 hears my word, i.e., me, the Word of God, and believes in him, i.e., the Father, whose Word I am.</p>
936 <p>774 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">possesses eternal life, </span>he mentions the reward of faith, and states three
937 things we will possess in the state of glory; but they are mentioned in reverse order. First, there
938 will be the resurrection from the dead. Secondly, we will have freedom from the future judgment.
939 Thirdly, we will enjoy everlasting life, for as we read in Matthew (c 25), the just will enter into
940 everlasting life. He mentions these three as belonging to the reward of faith; and the third was
941 mentioned first since it is desired more than the others.</p>
942 <p>775 So he says, whoever believes, i.e., through faith, <span style="font-weight: bold">possesses eternal life, </span>which consists in
943 the full vision of God. And it is fitting that one who believes on account of God certain things
944 that he does not see, should be brought to the full vision of these things: &#8220;These things are written
945 that you may believe ... and that believing you may have life in his name&#8221; (below 20:31).</p>
946 <p>776 He mentions the second when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">and he will not encounter judgment. </span>But the
947 Apostle says something which contradicts this: &#8220;We must all appear before the judgment seat of
948 Christ&#8221; (2 Cor 5:10), even the apostles. Therefore, even one who does believe will encounter
949 judgment. I answer that there are two kinds of judgment. One is a judgment of condemnation,
950 and no one encounters that judgment if he believes in God with a faith that is united with love
951 [ a &#8220;formed faith&#8221;]. We read about this judgment: &#8220;Do not enter into judgment with your servant,
952 for no living man is just in your sight&#8221;; and it was said above (3:18): &#8220;Whoever believes is not
953 judged.&#8221; There is also a judgment of separation and examination; and, as the Apostle says, all
954 must present themselves before the tribunal of Christ for this judgment. Of this judgment we
955 read: &#8220;Judge me, O God, and distinguish my cause from those people who are not holy&#8221; (Ps
956 42:1).</p>
957 <p>777 Thirdly, he mentions a reward when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">but has passed from death to life, </span>or &#8220;will
958 pass,&#8221; as another version says. This statement can be explained in two ways. First, it can refer
959 to the resurrection of the soul. In this case the obvious meaning is that he is saying: Through faith
960 we attain not only to eternal life and freedom from judgment, but also to the forgiveness of our
961 sins as well. Hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">but has passed, </span>from unbelief to belief, from injustice to justice:
962 &#8220;We know that we have passed from death to life&#8221; (1 Jn 3:14).</p>
963 <p>Secondly, this statement can be explained as referring to the resurrection of the body. Then it is
964 an elaboration of the phrase, <span style="font-weight: bold">possesses eternal life</span>. For some might think from what was said,
965 that whoever believes in God will never die, but live forever. But this is impossible, because all
966 men must pay the debt incurred by the. first sin, according to: &#8220;Where is the man who lives, and
967 will not see death?&#8221; (Ps 88:49). Consequently, we should not think that one who believes has
968 eternal life in such a way as never to die; rather, he will pass from thi&#8217;s life, through death, to life,
969 i.e., through the death of the body he will be revived to eternal life.</p>
970 <p>Or, &#8220;will pass,&#8221; might refer to the cause [of one&#8217;s resurrection] for when a person believes, he
971 already has the merit for a glorious resurrection: &#8220;Your dead will live, your slain will rise&#8221; (Is
972 26:19). And then, once released from the death of the old man, we will receive the life of the new
973 man, that is, Christ.</p>
974 <p>778 <span style="font-weight: bold">Amen, amen, I say to you... </span>Since some might doubt if any would pass from death to life,
975 our Lord predicts that this will happen, saying: I say that he [who believes] &#8220;will pass from death
976 to life&#8221;; and I say it before it actually occurs. And this is what he states, saying: <span style="font-weight: bold">Amen, amen,
977 I say to you, the hour is coming, </span>not determined by a necessity of fate, but by God&#8217;s decree: &#8220;It
978 is the last hour&#8221; (1 Jn 2:18). And so that we do not think that it is far off, he adds, <span style="font-weight: bold">and is now
979 here </span>&#8220;it is now the time for us to rise froin sleep&#8221; (Rom 13:11)&#8212;i.e., the hour is now here <span style="font-weight: bold">when
980 the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God; and those who hear it will live.</span></p>
981 <p>779 This can be explained in two ways. In one way as referring to the resurrection of the body,
982 and so it is said that <span style="font-weight: bold">the hour is coming, and is now here, </span>as if he had said: It is true that
983 eventually all will rise, but even now is the hour when some, whom the Lord was about to
984 resuscitate, <span style="font-weight: bold">shall hear the voice of the Son of God. </span>This is the way Lazarus heard it when it was
985 said to him, &#8220;Come forth,&#8221; as we read below (11:43); and in this way the daughter of the leader
986 of the synagogue heard it (Mt 9:18); and the widow&#8217;s son (Lk 7:12). Therefore, he says
987 significantly, <span style="font-weight: bold">and is now here, </span>because through me the dead already are beginning to be raised.</p>
988 <p>Another explanation is given by Augustine, according to which <span style="font-weight: bold">and is now here </span>refers to the
989 resurrection of the soul. For as was said above, resurrection is of two kinds: the resurrection of
990 bodies, which will happen in the future; this does not take place now, but will occur at the future
991 judgment. The other is the resurrection of souls from the death of unbelief to the life of faith, and
992 from the life of injustice to that of justice; and this is now here. Hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">the hour is
993 coming, and is now here, when the dead, </span>i.e., unbelievers and sinners, <span style="font-weight: bold">shall hear the voice of
994 the Son of God; and those who hear it will live, </span>according to the true faith.</p>
995 <p>780 This passage seems to imply two strange occurrences. One, when he says that the dead will
996 hear. The other, when he adds that it is through hearing that they will come to life again, as
997 though hearing comes before life, whereas hearing is a certain function of life. However, if we
998 refer this to the resurrection, it is true that the dead will hear, i.e., obey the voice of the Son of
999 God. For the voice expresses the interior concept. Now all nature obeys the slightest command
1000 of the divine will: &#8220;He calls into existence what does not exist&#8221; (Rom 4:17). According to this,
1001 then, wood, stones, all things, not just the dry bones but also the dust of dead bodies, <span style="font-weight: bold">shall hear
1002 the voice of the Son of God </span>so far as they obey his slightest will. And this belongs to Christ, not
1003 insofar as he is the Son of Man, but insofar as he is the Son of God, because all things obey the
1004 Word of God. And so he significantly says, <span style="font-weight: bold">of the Son of God; </span>&#8220;What kind of man is this, for
1005 the sea and winds obey him?&#8221; (Mt 8:27).</p>
1006 <p>If this statement (25b) is understood as referring to the resurrection of souls, then the reason for
1007 it is this: the voice of the Son of God has a life-giving power, that voice by which he moves the
1008 hearts of the faithful interiorly by inspiration, or exteriorly by his preaching and that of others:
1009 &#8220;The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life&#8221; (below 6:64). And so he gives life to the
1010 dead when he justifies the wicked. And since hearing is the way to life, either of nature through
1011 obedience, namely, by repairing nature, or the hearing of faith by repairing life and justice, he
1012 therefore says, <span style="font-weight: bold">and those who hear it, </span>by obedience as to the resurrection of the body, or by faith
1013 as to the resurrection of souls, will live, in the body in eternal life, and injustice in the life of
1014 grace.</p>
1015 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">&#160;</p>
1016 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style="font-weight: bold">LECTURE 5</span></p>
1017 <BLOCKQUOTE><p>26 &#8220;Indeed, just as the Father possesses life in himself, so he has given it to the Son to have life
1018 in himself. 27 And he [the Father] gave him the power to pass judgment, because he is the Son
1019 of Man. 28 Do not be surprised at this, since the hour is coming when all those burried in tombs
1020 will hear the voice of the Son of God. 29 And those who have done well will come forth to a
1021 resurrection of life; those who have done evil will come forth to a resurrection of judgment [i.e.,
1022 condemnation]. 30 I cannot do anything of myself, but I judge only as I hear it; and my judgment
1023 is just, because I am not seeking my own will, but the will of him who sent me.&#8221;</p></BLOCKQUOTE>
1024 <p>781 Above, our Lord showed that he had the power to give life and to judge; and he explained
1025 each by its effect. Here he shows how each of these powers belongs to him. First, he shows this
1026 with respect to his life-giving power. Secondly, with respect to his power to judge (v 27).</p>
1027 <p>782 So he says, first: I say that as the Father raises the dead, so I do also; and anyone who hears
1028 my word has eternal life. And I possess this because, <span style="font-weight: bold">just as the Father possesses life in
1029 himself, so he has given it to the Son to have life in himself.</span></p>
1030 <p>Apropos of this, we should note that some who live do not have life in themselves: as Paul, &#8220;I
1031 am living by faith in the Son of God&#8221; (Gal 2:20); and again in the same place: &#8220;it is not I who
1032 now live, but Christ lives in me.&#8221; Thus he lived, yet not in himself, but in another through whom
1033 he lived: as a body lives, although it does not have life in itself, but in a soul through which it
1034 lives. So that has life in itself which has an essential, non-participated life, i.e., that which is itself
1035 life. Now in every genus of things, that which is something through its essence is the cause of
1036 those things that are it by participation, as fire is the cause of all things afire. And so, that which
1037 is life through its essence, is the cause and principle of all life in living things. Accordingly, if
1038 something is to be a principle of life, it must be life through its essence. And so our Lord fittingly
1039 shows that he is the principle of all life by saying that he has life in himself, i.e., through his
1040 essence, when he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">just as the Father possesses life in himself, </span>i.e., as he is living through
1041 his essence, so does the Son. Therefore, as the Father is the cause of life, so also is his Son.</p>
1042 <p>Further, he shows the equality of the Son to the Father when he says, as <span style="font-weight: bold">the Father possesses
1043 life in himself; </span>and he shows their distinction when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">he has given it to the Son</span>. For the
1044 Father and the Son are equal in life; but they are distinct, because the Father gives, and the Son
1045 receives. However, we should not understand this to mean that the Son receives life from the
1046 Father as if the Son first existed without having life, as in lower things a first matter, already
1047 existing, receives a form, and as a subject receives accidents: because in the Son there is nothing
1048 that exists prior to the reception of life. For as Hilary says: &#8220;the Son has nothing unless it is
1049 begotten,&#8221; i.e., nothing but what he receives through his birth. And since the Father is life itself,
1050 the meaning of, <span style="font-weight: bold">he has given it to the Son to have life in himself, </span>is that the Father produced
1051 the Son as living. As if one were to say: the mind gives life to the word, not as though the word
1052 existed and then receives life, but because the mind produces the word in the same life by which
1053 it lives.</p>
1054 <p>783 According to Hilary, this passage destroys three heresies. First, that of the Arians, who said
1055 that the Son is inferior to the Father. They were forced by what was stated earlier, that is, &#8220;For
1056 whatever the Father does, the Son does likewise&#8221; (5:19), to say that the Son is equal to the Father
1057 in power; but they still denied that the Son is equal to the Father in nature. But now, this too is
1058 refuted by this statement, namely, <span style="font-weight: bold">just as the Father possesses life in himself, so he has given
1059 it to the Son to have life in himself. </span>For since life pertains to the nature, if the Son has life in
1060 himself as does the Father, it is clear that he has in himself, by his very origin, a nature indivisible
1061 froin and equal to that ofthe Father.</p>
1062 <p>The second error is also Arian: their denial that the Son is coeternal with the Father, when they
1063 say that the Son began to exist in time. This is destroyed when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son has life in
1064 himself. </span>For in all living things whose generation occurs in time, it is always possible to find
1065 something that at some time or other was not living. But in the Son, whatever is, is life itself.
1066 Consequently, he so received life itself that he has life in himself, so as always to have been
1067 living.</p>
1068 <p>Thirdly, by saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">he has given, </span>he destroys the error of Sabellius, who denied the distinction
1069 of persons. For if the Father gave life to the Son, it is obvious that the Father, who gave it, is
1070 other than the Son, who received it.</p>
1071 <p>784 Then (v 27), he makes it clear that he has the power to judge. First, he reveals his judiciary
1072 power. Secondly, he gives a reason for what he has said (v 30). As to the first he does two things.
1073 First, he indicates the origin of his judiciary power. Secondly, he shows that his judgment is just
1074 (v 29).</p>
1075 <p>785 With regard to the first, we should note that his statement, <span style="font-weight: bold">he [the Father] gave him the
1076 power, </span>can be understood in two ways. One way is that of Augustine; the other is that of
1077 Chrysostom.</p>
1078 <p>786 If we understand it as Chrysostom does, then this section is divided into two parts. First, he
1079 reveals the origin of his judiciary power. Secondly, he settles a difficulty (v 27b).</p>
1080 <p>Chrysostom punctuates this section in the following way. <span style="font-weight: bold">He gave him the power to pass
1081 judgment. </span>And then a new sentence begins: <span style="font-weight: bold">Because he is the Son of Man, do not be
1082 surprised at this. </span>The reason for this punctuation is that Paul of Samosata, an early heretic, who
1083 like Photius said that Christ was only a man and took his origin from the Virgin, punctuated it
1084 as: <span style="font-weight: bold">He gave him the power to pass judghnent because he is the Son of Man. </span>And then he
1085 began a new sentence: <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not be surprised at this, since the hour is coming. </span>It was as if he
1086 thought that it was necessary for judiciary power to be given to Christ because he is the Son of
1087 Man, that is, a mere man, who, of himself, cannot judge men. And so, if Christ is to judge others,
1088 he must be given the power to judge.</p>
1089 <p>But this, according to Chrysostom, cannot stand, because it is not at all in agreement with what
1090 is stated. For if it is because he is a man that he receives judiciary power, then for the same
1091 reason, since it would belong to every man to have judiciary power in virtue of his human nature,
1092 it would not belong to Christ any more than to other men. So we should not understand it this
1093 way. Rather, we should say that because Christ is the ineffable Son of God, he is on that account
1094 also judge. And this is what he says: The Father not only give him the power to give life, but <span style="font-weight: bold">also
1095 he gave him the power, </span>through eternal <span style="font-weight: bold">generation, to pass judgment, </span>just as he gave him,
1096 through eternal generation, to have life in himself: &#8220;He is the one appointed by God to be the
1097 judge of the living and of the dead,&#8221; as we read in Acts (10:42).</p>
1098 <p>He settles a difficulty when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not be surprised at this. </span>First, he mentions the
1099 difficulty. Secondly, he clears it up.</p>
1100 <p>787 The difficulty arose in the minds of the Jews and they were surprised because while they
1101 thought that Christ was no more than a man, he was saying things about himself that surpassed
1102 man and even the angels. So he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not be surprised at this, </span>that is, that I have said that
1103 the Son gives life to the dead and has the power to judge precisely <span style="font-weight: bold">because he is the Son of
1104 Man. </span>They were surprised because, although they thought he was only a man, they saw that he
1105 accomplished divine effects: &#8220;What kind of man is this, for the sea and winds obey him?&#8221; (Mt
1106 8:27). And he gives a reason why they should not be surprised, which is, because he who is the
1107 Son of Man is the Son of God. Although, as Chrysostom says, is it not said explicitly that the Son
1108 of Man is the Son of God, our Lord lays down the premises from which this statement necessarily
1109 follows: just as we notice that those who use syllogisms in their teaching do not express their
1110 main conclusion, but only that from which it follows with necessity. So our Lord does not say
1111 that he is the Son of God, but that the Son of Man is such that at his voice all the dead will rise.
1112 From this it necessarily follows that he is the Son of God: for it is a proper effect of God to raise
1113 the dead. Thus he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not be surprised at this, since the hour is coming when all those
1114 burried in tombs will hear the voice of the Son of God. </span>But he does not say of this hour, as
1115 he said above, &#8220;and is now here&#8221; (5:25). Again, here he says, all, which he did not say above:
1116 because at the first resurrection he raised only some, as Lazarus, the widow&#8217;s son and the young
1117 girl; but at the future resurrection, at the time of judgment, <span style="font-weight: bold">all will hear the voice of the Son of
1118 God, </span>and will rise. &#8220;I will open your graves, and lead you out of your tombs&#8221; (Ez 37:12).</p>
1119 <p>788 Augustine punctuates this passage in the following way. <span style="font-weight: bold">And he gave him the power to
1120 pass judgment because he is the Son of Man. </span>And then a new sentence follows: <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not be
1121 surprised at this. </span>In this interpretation there are two parts. The first concerns the power to judge
1122 granted to the Son of Man. In the second, the granting of an even greater power is made clear,
1123 at <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not be surprised at this.</span></p>
1124 <p>789 As to the first we should note that, according to the mind of Augustine, he spoke above of
1125 the resurrection of souls, which is accomplished through the Son of God, but here he is speaking
1126 of the resurrection of bodies, which is accomplished through the Son of Man. And because the
1127 general resurrection of bodies will take place at the time of judgment, he mentions the judgment
1128 first, in saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">And he [the Father] gave him, </span>i.e., Christ, <span style="font-weight: bold">the power to pass Judgment, </span>and
1129 this, <span style="font-weight: bold">because he is the Son of Man, </span>i.e., according to his human nature. Thus it is also after the
1130 resurrection that he says in Matthew (28:18): &#8220;All power has been given to me, in heaven and
1131 on earth.&#8221;</p>
1132 <p>There are three reasons why judiciary power has been given to Christ as man. First, in order that
1133 he might be seen by all: for it is necessary that a judge be seen by all who are to be judged. Now
1134 both the good and the wicked will be judged. And the good will see Christ in his divinity and in
1135 his humanity; while the wicked will not be able to see him in his divinity, because this vision is
1136 the happiness of the saints and is seedonly by the pure in heart: &#8220;Happy are the pure in heart, for
1137 they will see God&#8221; (Mt 5:8). And so, in order that Christ can be seen at the judgment not only by
1138 the good, but also by the wicked, he will judge in human form: &#8220;Every eye will see him, and all
1139 who pierced him&#8221; (Rv 1:7).</p>
1140 <p>Secondly, the power to judge was given to Christ as man because by the self-abasement of his
1141 passion he merited the glory of an exaltation. Thus, just as he who died arose, so that [human]
1142 form which was judged, will judge, and he who stood before a human judge will preside at the
1143 judgment of men. He who was falsely found guilty will condemn the truly guilty, as Augustine
1144 remarks in his work, <i>The Sayings of the Lord. </i>&#8220;Your cause has been judged as that of the wicked;
1145 but cause and judgment you will recover&#8221; (Jb 3 6.17).</p>
1146 <p>Thirdly, Christas man was given judiciary power to suggest the compassion of the judge. For it
1147 is very terrifying for a man to be judged by God: &#8220;It is a terrible thing to fall into the hands of the
1148 living God&#8221; (Heb 10:31); but it produces confidence for a man to have another man as his judge.
1149 Accordingly, so you can experience the compassion of your judge, you will have a man as judge:
1150 &#8220;We do not have a high priest who cannot have compassion on our weakness&#8221; (Heb 4:15).</p>
1151 <p>Thus, <span style="font-weight: bold">he gave him</span>, Christ, <span style="font-weight: bold">the power to pass judgment because he is the Son of Man.</span></p>
1152 <p>790 <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not be surprised at this, </span>for he has given him a greater power, that is, the power to raise
1153 the dead. Thus he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">since the hour is coming, </span>that is, the last hour at the end of the world:
1154 &#8220;The time has come, the day of slaughter is near&#8221; (Ez 7:7), <span style="font-weight: bold">when all those burried in tombs will
1155 hear the voice of the Son of God. </span>Above he did not say &#8220;all,&#8221; because there he was speaking
1156 of the spiritual resurrection, in which all did not rise at his first coming, for we read: &#8220;All do not
1157 have faith&#8221; (2 Thes 3:2). But here he is speaking of the resurrection of the body, and all will rise
1158 in this way, as we read in 1 Corinthians (15:20). He adds, <span style="font-weight: bold">those burried in tombs, </span>which he had
1159 not mentioned above, because only bodies, not souls, are in tombs, and it is the resurrection of
1160 bodies that will then take place.</p>
1161 <p><span style="font-weight: bold">All those burried in tombs will hear the voice of the Son of God. </span>This voice will be a sense
1162 perceptible sign of the Son of God, at whose sound all will be raised: &#8220;The Lord will come with
1163 the cry of the archangel and with the trumpet of God&#8221; (1 Thes 4:15); we find the same in 1
1164 Corinthians (15:52) and in Matthew (25:6): &#8220;There was a cry at midnight.&#8221; This voice will derive
1165 its power from the divinity of Christ: &#8220;He will make his voice a powerful voice,&#8221; as the Psalm
1166 (67:34) says.</p>
1167 <p>791 As we saw, Augustine says that the resurrection of the body will be accomplished through
1168 the Word made flesh, but the resurrection of the soul is accomplished through the Word. One
1169 may wonder how to understand this: whether we are talking about a first cause or a meritorious
1170 cause. If we are referring to a first cause, then it is clear that the divinity of Christ is the cause of
1171 the corporal and spiritual resurrection, i.e., of the resurrection of bodies and of souls, according
1172 to: &#8220;I will kill, and I will bring to life again&#8221; (Dt 32:39). But if we are referring to a meritorious
1173 cause, then it is the humanity of Christ which is the cause of both resurrections: because through
1174 the mysteries accomplished in the flesh of Christ we are restored not only to an incorruptible life
1175 in our bodies, but also to a spiritual life in our souls: &#8220;He was put to death on account of our sins,
1176 and he rose for our justification&#8221; (Rom 4:25). Accordingly, what Augustine says does not seem
1177 to be true.</p>
1178 <p>I answer that Augustine is speaking of the exemplary cause and of that cause by which that which
1179 is brought to life is made conformable to that which brings it to life: for everything that lives
1180 through another is conformed to that through which it lives. Now the resurrection of souls does
1181 not consist in souls being conformed to the humanity of Christ, but to the Word, because the life
1182 of the soul is through the Word alone; and so he says that the resurrection of souls takes place
1183 through the Word. But the resurrection of the body will consist in our bodies being conformed
1184 to the body of Christ through the life of glory, that is, through the glory of our bodies, according
1185 to: &#8220;He will change our lowly body so it is like his glorious body&#8221; (Phil 3:2 1). And it is from this
1186 point of view that he says that the resurrection of the body will take place through the Word made
1187 flesh.</p>
1188 <p>792 Then (v 29), he shows the justness of his judgment: because the good will be rewarded, and
1189 so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">And those who have done well will come forth to a resurrection of life, </span>i.e., to
1190 living in eternal glory; but the wicked will be damned, and so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">those who have done evil
1191 will come forth to a resurrection of judgment [i.e., condemnation], </span>i.e., they will rise for
1192 condemnation: &#8220;These,&#8221; the wicked, &#8220;will go into everlasting punishment; but the just will go
1193 to eternal life&#8221; (Mt 25:46); &#8220;Many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake: some
1194 to an everlasting life, and others to everlasting shame&#8221; (Dn 12:2).</p>
1195 <p>793 Note than when he was speaking above of the resurrection of souls, he said, &#8220;those who hear
1196 it,&#8221; the voice of the Son of God, &#8220;will live&#8221; (5:25); but here he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">will come forth. </span>He says
1197 this because of the wicked, who will be condemned: for their life should not be called a life, but
1198 rather an eternal death. Again, above he mentioned only faith, saying, &#8220;Whoever hears my voice
1199 and believes in him who sent me, possesses eternal life; and he will not encounter judgment&#8221;
1200 (5:24). But here he mentions works, so that we do not think that faith alone, without works, is
1201 sufficient for salvation, saying: <span style="font-weight: bold">And those who have done well will come forth to a
1202 resurrection of life. </span>As if to say: <span style="font-weight: bold">Those will come forth to a resurrection of life </span>who do not
1203 just believe, but who have accomplished good works along with their faith: &#8220;Faith without works
1204 is dead,&#8221; as we see from James (2:26).</p>
1205 <p>794 Then when he says, I cannot do anything of myself, he gives the reason for what he has just
1206 said. Now he had spoken of two things: the origin of his power, and the justness of his judgment.
1207 Consequently, he mentions the reason for each.</p>
1208 <p>795 The first point, when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">I cannot do anything of myself, </span>can be understood in two
1209 ways, even according to Augustine. First, as referring to the Son of Man in this manner: You say
1210 that you have the power to raise the dead because you are the Son of Man. But do you have this
1211 power precisely because you are the Son of Man? No, because <span style="font-weight: bold">I cannot do anything of myself,
1212 but I judge only as I hear it. </span>He does not say, &#8220;as I see,&#8221; as he said above; &#8220;The Son cannot do
1213 anything of himself, but only what he sees the Father doing&#8221; (5:19). But he does say, <span style="font-weight: bold">as I hear
1214 it: </span>for in this context &#8220;to hear&#8221; is the same as &#8220;to obey.&#8221; Now to obey belongs to one who
1215 receives a command, while to command pertains to one who is superior. Accordingly, because
1216 Christ, as man, is inferior to the Father, he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">as I hear it, </span>i.e., as infused into my soul by God.
1217 We read of this kind of hearing in Psalm 84 (v 9): &#8220;1 will hear what the Lord God says in me.&#8221;
1218 But above he said &#8220;sees,&#8221; because he was then speaking of himself as the Word of God.</p>
1219 <p>796 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">and my judgment is just, </span>he shows the justness of his judgment. For
1220 he had said: &#8220;Those who have done well will come forth to a resurrection of life.&#8221; But some
1221 might say: Will he be partial and uneven when he punishes and rewards? So he answers: No,
1222 saying: <span style="font-weight: bold">my judgment is just; </span>and the reason is <span style="font-weight: bold">because I am not seeking my own will, but the
1223 will of him who sent me. </span>For there are two wills in our Lord Jesus Christ: one is a divine will,
1224 which is the same as the will of the Father; the other is a human will, which is proper to himself,
1225 just as it is proper to him to be a man. A human will is borne to its own good; but in Christ it was
1226 ruled and regulated by right reason, so that it would always be conformed in all things to the
1227 divine will. Accordingly he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">I am not seeking my own will, </span>which as such is inclined to
1228 its own good, <span style="font-weight: bold">but the will of him who sent me, </span>that is, the Father: &#8220;I have desired to do your
1229 will, my God&#8221; (Ps 39:9); &#8220;Not as I will, but as you will&#8221; (Mt 26:39).</p>
1230 <p>If this is carefully considered, the Lord is assigning the true nature of a just judgment, saying:
1231 <span style="font-weight: bold">because I am not seeking my own will. </span>For one&#8217;s judgment is just when it is passed according
1232 to the norm of law. But the divine will is the norm and the law of the created will. And so, the
1233 created will, and the reason, which is regulated according to the norm of the divine will, is just,
1234 and its judgment is just.</p>
1235 <p>797 Secondly, it is explained as referring to the Son of God; and then the aforesaid division still
1236 remains the same. Thus Christ, as the Divine Word showing the origin of his power, says: <span style="font-weight: bold">I
1237 cannot do anything of myself, </span>in the way he said above, &#8220;the Son cannot do anything of
1238 himself&#8221; (5:19). For his very doing and his power are his being (<i>esse</i>); but being (<i>esse</i>)<i> </i>in him
1239 is from another, that is, from his Father. And so, just as he is not of himself (a <i>se</i>), so of himself
1240 he cannot do anything: &#8220;I do nothing of myself&#8221; (below 8:28).</p>
1241 <p>His statement, <span style="font-weight: bold">I judge only as I hear it, </span>is explained as his previous statement, &#8220;only what he
1242 sees the Father doing&#8221; (above 5:19). For we acquire science or any knowledge through sight and
1243 hearing (for these two senses are those most used in learning). But because sight and hearing are
1244 different is us, we acquire knowledge in one way through sight, that is, by discovering things, and
1245 in a different way through hearing, that is, by being taught. But in the Son of God, sight and
1246 hearing are the same; thus, when he says either &#8220;sees&#8221; or &#8220;hears,&#8221; the meaning is the same so far
1247 as the acquisition of knowledge is concerned. And because judgment in any intelletual nature
1248 comes from knowledge, he says significantly, <span style="font-weight: bold">I judge only as I hear it, </span>i.e., as I have acquired
1249 knowledge together with heing from the Father, so I judge: &#8220;Everything I have heard from my
1250 Father I have made known to you&#8221; (below 15:15).</p>
1251 <p>798 Showing the justness of his judgment he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">and my judgment is just: </span>the reason being,
1252 <span style="font-weight: bold">because I am not seeking my own will</span>. But do not the Father and the Son have the same will?
1253 I answer that the Father and the Son do have the same will, but the Father does not have his will
1254 from another, whereas the Son does have his will from another, i.e., from the Father. Thus the
1255 Son accomplishes his own will as from another, i.e., as having it from another; but the Father
1256 accomplishes his will as his own, i.e., not having it from another. Thus he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">I am not seeking
1257 my own will</span>, that is, such as would be mine if it originated from myself, but my will, as being
1258 from another, that is from the Father.</p>
1259 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">&#160;</p>
1260 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style="font-weight: bold">LECTURE 6</span></p>
1261 <BLOCKQUOTE><p style=margin-left:0.5in>31 &#8220;If I were to bear witness to myself,
1262 <br>my testimony would not be valid.
1263 <br>32 But there is someone else who testifies
1264 <br>on my behalf, and I know that the witness
1265 <br>he bears on my behalf is true.
1266 <br>33 You sent [messengers] to John;
1267 <br>and he bore witness to the truth.
1268 <br>34 I myself do not need proof from men;
1269 <br>but I say this in order that you may be saved.
1270 <br>35 He was a lamp, blazing and burning brightly.
1271 <br>And for a while you yourselves exulted in his light.
1272 <br>36 But I have testimony that is greater than that of John.
1273 <br>The very works which my Father has given me
1274 <br>to perform&#8212;those works that I myself perform&#8212;
1275 <br>they bear witness to me that the Father sent me.
1276 <br>37 Moreover, the Father who sent me has himself
1277 <br>given testimony on my behalf,
1278 <br>but you have neither heard his voice,
1279 <br>nor seen his image;
1280 <br>38 and you do not have his word abiding in your hearts,
1281 <br>for you do not believe in him whom he has sent.
1282 <br>39 Search the Scriptures,
1283 <br>since you think you have eternal life in them;
1284 <br>they too bear witness to me.
1285 <br>40 Yet you are unwilling to come to me
1286 <BR>in order to possess that life.&#8221;</p></BLOCKQUOTE>
1287 <p>799 Having given us the teaching on the life-giving power of the Son, he now confirms it. First,
1288 he confirms, with several testimonies, what he had said about the excellence of his power. In the
1289 second place, he reproves them because of their slowness to believe (v 41). He does two things
1290 about the first. First, he states why there was a need to resort to such testimonies. Secondly, he
1291 invokes the testimonies (v 32).</p>
1292 <p>800 The need to appeal to testimony arose because the Jews did not believe in him; for this
1293 reason he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">If I were to bear witness to myself, my testimony would not be valid </span>(<i>verum</i>,
1294 valid, true). Some may find this statement puzzling: for if our Lord says of himself, &#8220;I am the
1295 truth&#8221; (below 14:6), how can his testimony not be valid? If he is the truth, in whom shall one
1296 believe if the truth itself is not believed in? We may answer, according to Chrysostom, that our
1297 Lord is speaking here of himself from the point of view of the opinion of others, so that his
1298 meaning is: <span style="font-weight: bold">If I were to bear witness to myself, my testimony would not be valid </span>so far as
1299 your outlook is concerned, because you do not accept what I say about myself unless it is
1300 confirmed by other testimony: &#8220;You are bearing witness to yourself; your testimony is not valid&#8221;
1301 (below 8:13).</p>
1302 <p>801 Next, he presents these testimonies: first, a human testimony; secondly, a divine testimony.
1303 He does two things about the first. First, he mentions the testimony of John; secondly, he tells
1304 why this testimony was given (v 34). With respect to the first he does two things. First, he brings
1305 in the testimony; secondly, he commends it (v 32).</p>
1306 <p>802 He brings on the witness when he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">But there is someone else who testifies on my
1307 behalf. </span>This is, in the opinion of Chrysostom, John the Baptist, of whom we read above: &#8220;There
1308 was a man sent by God, whose name was John. He came as a witness, that he might bear witness
1309 to the light&#8221; (1:6).</p>
1310 <p>803 He commends John&#8217;s testimony on two grounds: first, because of its truth; secondly, because
1311 of its authority, for the Jews had sought it (v 33).</p>
1312 <p>804 He commends his testimony because of its truth, saying: <span style="font-weight: bold">And I know, </span>from certain
1313 experience, that the witness he, that is, John, <span style="font-weight: bold">bears on my behalf is true. </span>His father, Zechariah,
1314 had prophesied this of him: &#8220;You will go before the face of the Lord to prepare his way, to give
1315 his people a knowledge of salvation&#8221; (Lk 1:76). Now it is obvious that false testimony is not a
1316 testimony that saves, because lying is a cause of death: &#8220;A lying mouth kills the soul&#8221; (Wis 1:11).
1317 Therefore, if John&#8217;s testimony was for the purpose of giving knowledge of salvation to his
1318 people, his testimony is true.</p>
1319 <p>805 The Gloss has a different explanation of this: <span style="font-weight: bold">If I were to bear witness to myself, my
1320 testimony would not be valid. </span>For above, Christ was referring to himself as God, but here he
1321 is referring to himself as a man. And the meaning is: If I, namely, a man, were to bear witness
1322 to myself, i.e., apart from God, that is, which God the Father does not certify, then it follows that
1323 <span style="font-weight: bold">my testimony would not be valid, </span>for human speech has no truth unless it is supported by God,
1324 according to: &#8220;God is true, but every man is a liar&#8221; (Rom 3:4). Thus, if we take Christ as a man
1325 separated from the Deity and not in conformity with it, we find a lie both in his essence and in
1326 his words: &#8220;Although I bear witness to myself, my testimony is true&#8221; (below 8:14); &#8220;I am not
1327 alone, because the Father is with me&#8221; (below 16:32). And so, because he was not alone but with
1328 the Father, his testimony is true.</p>
1329 <p>Accordingly, to show that his testimony is true, not in virute of his humanity considered in itself,
1330 but in so far as it is united to his divinity and to the Word of God, he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">But there is someone
1331 else who testifies on my behalf</span>: not John, but the Father, according to this explanation. Because
1332 if the testimony of Christ as man is not of itself true and productive, much less is the testimony
1333 of John. Therefore, the testimony of Christ is not verified by the testimony of John, but by the
1334 testimony of the Father. So this someone else who testifies is understood to be the Father. <span style="font-weight: bold">And
1335 I know that the witness he bears on my behalf is true</span>, for he is truth: &#8220;God is light, &#8220;&#8216; i.e.,
1336 truth, &#8220;and in him there is no darkness,&#8221; i.e., lie (1 Jn 1:5).</p>
1337 <p>The first explanation, which is that given by Chrysostom, is nearer to the letter of the text.</p>
1338 <p>806 He also commends the testimony of John by reason of its authority, because it was sought
1339 after by the Jews, saying: <span style="font-weight: bold">You sent [messengers] to John. </span>As if to say: I know that his testimony
1340 is true and you should not reject it, because the great authority John enjoyed among you led you
1341 to seek his testimony about me; and you would not have done this if you did not think that he was
1342 worthy of belief: &#8220;The Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to him&#8221; (above 1:19). And
1343 on this occasion, John bore witness, not to himself, but <span style="font-weight: bold">to the truth</span>, i.e., to me. As a friend of
1344 the truth, he bore testimony to the truth, which is Christ: &#8220;He declared openly, and did not deny,
1345 and stated clearly, &#8216;I am not the Messiah&#8217;&#8221; (above 1:20).</p>
1346 <p>807 Then (v 34), he gives the reason why an appeal was made to the testimony of John. First, he
1347 excludes a supposed reason. Next, he presents the true reason (v 34b).</p>
1348 <p>808 Someone might think that John&#8217;s testimony was brought in to assure them about Christ, on
1349 the ground that Christ&#8217;s own testimony was not sufficient. He excludes this reason when he says,
1350 <span style="font-weight: bold">I myself do not need proof from men</span>. Here we should note that sometimes in the sciences a
1351 thing is proved by something else which is more evident to us, but which is less evident in itself;
1352 and at other times a thing is proved by something else which is more evident in itself and
1353 absolutely. Now, in this case, the issue is to prove that Christ is God. And, although the truth of
1354 Christ is, in itself and absolutely, more evident, yet it is proved by the testimony of John, which
1355 was better known to the Jews. So Christ, of himself, did not have any need of John&#8217;s testimony;
1356 and this is what he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">I myself do not need proof from men</span>.</p>
1357 <p>809 But this seems to conflict with: &#8220;You are my witnesses, said the Lord&#8221; (Is 40:10); and with
1358 &#8220;You will be my witnesses in Jerusalem and in all of Judea and Samaria, and to the remotest part
1359 of the world&#8221; (Acts 1:8). So how can he say: <span style="font-weight: bold">I myself do not need proof from men</span>.</p>
1360 <p>This can be understood in two ways. In the first way, the sense is: <span style="font-weight: bold">I myself do not need proof
1361 from men</span>, as relying on it alone; but I have stronger testimony, that is, divine testimony: &#8220;For
1362 me, it does not matter much if I am judged by you&#8221; (1 Cor 4:3); &#8220;You know that I have not
1363 desired the day of man,&#8221; i.e., human glory (Jer 17:16).</p>
1364 <p>Another interpretation is: <span style="font-weight: bold">I myself do not need proof from men</span>, insofar as the one giving
1365 witness is a man, but insofar as he is enlightened by God in order to testify: &#8220;There was a man
1366 sent by God, whose name was John&#8221; (above 1:6); &#8220;We did not seek glory from men&#8221; (1 Thes
1367 2:6); &#8220;1 do not seek my own glory&#8221; (below 8:50). And so I receive the testimony of John not just
1368 as a man, but insofar as he was sent and enlightened by God in order to testify.</p>
1369 <p>A third explanation, and a better one, is: <span style="font-weight: bold">I myself do not need proof from men</span>, i.e., human
1370 testimony. As far as I am concerned, I receive my authority from no one but God, who proves
1371 that I am great.</p>
1372 <p>810 Next (v 34b), he gives the real reason for appealing to John&#8217;s testimony. First, he states the
1373 reason. Secondly, he explains it. The reason for appealing to this testimony was so that the Jews
1374 might be saved by believing in Christ, and this because of John&#8217;s testimony. Thus he says: I do
1375 not need John&#8217;s testimony for my sake, <span style="font-weight: bold">but I say this in order that you may be saved: </span>&#8220;He
1376 desires the salvation of&#8217; all men&#8221; (1 Tim 2:4). &#8220;Christ came into this world to save sinners&#8221; (1
1377 Tim 1:15).</p>
1378 <p>811 He explains his statement, in order that you may be saved: that is, because I am appealing
1379 to testimony you have accepted. And so he mentions that John was accepted by them: <span style="font-weight: bold">He was
1380 a lamp, blazing and burning brightly. </span>First, he states that John was a witness accepted on his
1381 own merits. Secondly, he mentions to what degree he was accepted by them (v 35b).</p>
1382 <p>812 Three things perfected John and show that he was a witness accepted in his own right. The
1383 first concerns the condition of his nature, and he refers to this when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">He was a lamp</span>. The
1384 second concerns the perfection of his love, because he was a <span style="font-weight: bold">blazing </span>lamp. The third is related
1385 to the perfection of his understanding, because he was a lamp that was <span style="font-weight: bold">burning brightly.</span></p>
1386 <p>John was perfect in his nature because he was a lamp, i.e., enriched by grace and illumined by
1387 the light of the Word of God. Now a lamp differs from a light: for a light radiates light of itself,
1388 but a lamp does not give light of itself, but by participating in the light. Now the true light is
1389 Christ: &#8220;He was the true light, which enlightens every man coming into this world&#8221; (above 1:9).
1390 John, however, was not a light, as we read in the same place, but a lamp, because he was
1391 enlightened &#8220;in order to bear witness to the light&#8221; (above 1:8), by leading men to Christ. We read
1392 of this lamp: &#8220;I have prepared a lamp for my anointed&#8221; (Ps 131:17).</p>
1393 <p>Further, he was blazing and impassioned in his affections, so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">blazing</span>. For some people
1394 are lamps only as to their office or rank, but they are snuffed out in their affections: for as a lamp
1395 cannot give light unless there is a fire blazing within it, so a spiritual lamp does not give any light
1396 unless it is first set ablaze and burns with the fire of love. Therefore, to be ablaze comes first, and
1397 the giving of light depends on it, because knowledge of the truth is given due to the blazing of
1398 love: &#8220;If any one loves me, he will keep my word, and my Father will love him, and we will
1399 come to him, and make our home with him&#8221; (below 14:23); and &#8220;I have called you friends,
1400 because everything I have heard from my Father I have made known to you&#8221; (below 15:15);
1401 &#8220;You who fear the Lord, love him, and your hearts will be enlightened&#8221; (Sir 2:20).</p>
1402 <p>The two characteristics of fire are that it both blazes and shines. Its blazing signifies love for
1403 three reasons. First, because fire is the most active of all bodies; so too is the warmth of love
1404 (charity), so much so that nothing can withstand its force: &#8220;The love of Christ spurs us on&#8221; (2 Cor
1405 5:14). Secondly, because just as fire, because it is very volatile, causes great unrest, so also this
1406 love of charity makes a person restless until he achieves his objective: &#8220;Its light is fire and flame&#8221;
1407 (Sg 8:6). Thirdly, just as fire is inclined to move upward, so too is charity; so much so that it
1408 joins us to God: &#8220;He who abides in love abides in God, and God in him&#8221; (1Jn 4:16).</p>
1409 <p>Finally, John had an intellect that was <span style="font-weight: bold">burning brightly. </span>First, it was bright within, because of
1410 his knowledge of the truth: &#8220;The Lord will fill your soul with brightness,&#8221; i.e., he will make it
1411 shine (Is 58:11). Secondly, it was bright without, because of his preaching: &#8220;You will shine in
1412 the world among them like stars, containing the word of life&#8221; (Phil 2:15). Thirdly, it was bright
1413 because it manifested good works: &#8220;Let your light so shine before men that they may see your
1414 good works&#8221; (Mt 5:16).</p>
1415 <p>813 And so, because John was of himself so acceptable&#8212;for he was a lamp, not smothered out
1416 but blazing, not dark but burning brightly&#8212;he deserved to be accepted by you, as indeed he was,
1417 because <span style="font-weight: bold">for a time you yourselves exulted in his light. </span>He fittingly links their exulting or
1418 rejoicing with light; because a man rejoices most is that which most pleases him. And among
1419 physical things nothing is more pleasant than light, according to: &#8220;It is a delight for the eyes to
1420 see the sun&#8221; (Sir 11:7). He says, <span style="font-weight: bold">you yourselves exulted in his light, </span>i.e., you rested in John and
1421 put your end in him, thinking that he was the Messiah. But you did this only <span style="font-weight: bold">for a time, </span>because
1422 you wavered on this; for when you saw that John was leading men to another, and not to himself,
1423 you turned away from him. Thus we read in Matthew (21:32) that the Jews did not believe in
1424 John. They belonged to that group referred to by Matthew (13:21 ) as believing &#8220;for a while.&#8221;</p>
1425 <p>814 Then (v 36), he presents the divine testimony. First, he mentions its greatness; and then he
1426 continues on to describe it.</p>
1427 <p>815 He says: I do not need proof from men for my sake, but for your sake, for <span style="font-weight: bold">I have testimony
1428 that is greater than that of John, </span>that is, the testimony of God, which is greater than the
1429 testimony of John: &#8220;If we receive the testimony of men, the testimony of God is greater&#8221; (1 Jn
1430 5:9), It is greater, I say, because of its greater authority, greater knowledge, and infallible truth,
1431 for God cannot deceive: &#8220;God is not like man, a liar&#8221; (Nm 23:19).</p>
1432 <p>816 God bore witness to Christ in three ways: by works, by himself, and by the Scriptures. First,
1433 he mentions his witness as given by the working of miracles; secondly, the way God gave witness
1434 by himself (v 37); thirdly, the witness given through the Scriptures (v 39).</p>
1435 <p>817 He says first: <span style="font-weight: bold">I have testimony that is greater than that of John, </span>that is, my works, i.e.,
1436 the working of miracles, <span style="font-weight: bold">the very works which my Father has given me to perform. </span>We
1437 should point out that it is natural for man to learn of the power and natures of things from their
1438 actions, and therefore our Lord fittingly says that the sort of person he is can be learned through
1439 the works he does. So, since he performed divine works by his own power, we should believe
1440 that he has divine power within him: &#8220;If I had not done among them the works which no one else
1441 did, they would not have sin,&#8221; that is, the sin of unbelief (below 15:24). And so he leads them
1442 to a knowledge of himself by appealing to his works, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">the very works which my Father
1443 has given me </span>in the Word, through an eternal generation, by giving me a power equal to his own.
1444 Or we could say, <span style="font-weight: bold">the very works which my Father has given me, </span>in my conception, by making
1445 me one person who is both God and man, <span style="font-weight: bold">to perform, </span>i.e., to perform them by my own power.
1446 He says this to distinguish himself from those who do not perforrn miracles by their own power
1447 but have to obtain it as a favor from God; thus Peter says: &#8220;In the name of Jesus Christ of
1448 Nazareth: stand up&#8221; (Acts 3:6). Thus it was God, and not themselves, who accomplished these
1449 works; but Christ accomplished them by his own power: &#8220;Lazarus, come forth,&#8221; as John reports
1450 below (11:43). Accordingly, <span style="font-weight: bold">those works that I myself perform&#8212;they bear witness to me;
1451 </span>&#8220;If you do not believe me, at least believe my works&#8221; (below 10:38). We see from Mark (16:20)
1452 that God bears witness by the working of miracles: &#8220;The Lord worked with them and confirmed
1453 the word by the signs that followed.&#8221;</p>
1454 <p>818 Then (v 37), he presents the second way God bore witness to Christ, namely, by himself.
1455 First, he mentions the way; secondly, he shows that they were not able to receive this testimony.</p>
1456 <p>819 He says: It is not only the works which my Father has given me to perform that bear witness
1457 to me, but <span style="font-weight: bold">the Father who sent me has himself given testimony on my behalf: </span>in the Jordan,
1458 when Christ was baptized (Mt 3:17); and on the mountain, when Christ was transfigured (Mt
1459 17:5). For on both these occasions the voice of the Father was heard: &#8220;This is my beloved Son.&#8221;
1460 And so they should believe in Christ, as the true and natural Son of God: &#8220;This is the testimony
1461 of God: he has borne witness to his Son&#8221; ( 1 Jn 5:9). Consequently, anyone who does not believe
1462 that he is the Son of God, does not believe in the testimony of God.</p>
1463 <p>820 Someone could say that God also gave testimony to others by himself: for example, to
1464 Moses, on the mountain, with whom God spoke while others were present. We, however, never
1465 heard his testimony, as the Lord says: <span style="font-weight: bold">you have neither heard his voice. </span>On the other hand, we
1466 read in Deuteronomy (4:33): Did it ever happen before that the people heard the voice of God
1467 speaking from the midst of fire, as you heard, and have lived?&#8221; Then how can Christ say: <span style="font-weight: bold">you
1468 have neither heard his voice?</span></p>
1469 <p>I reply, according to Chrysostom, that the Lord wishes to show those established in a
1470 philosophical frame of mind that God gives testimony to someone in two ways, namely, sensibly
1471 and intelligibly. Sensibly, as by a sensible voice only; and in this way he gave witness to Moses
1472 on Mount Sinai: &#8220;You heard his voice, and saw no form at all&#8221; (Dt 4:12). Likewise, he gives
1473 testimony by a sensible form, as he appeared to Abraham (Gn 26), and to Isaiah: &#8220;I saw the Lord
1474 seated on a high and lofty throne&#8221; (Is 6:1). However, in these visions, neither the audible voice
1475 nor the visible figure were like anything in the animal kingdom, except efficiently, in the sense
1476 that these were formed by God. For since God is a spirit, he neither emits audible sounds nor can
1477 he be portrayed as a figure. But he does bear testimony in an intelligible manner by inspiring in
1478 the hearts of certain persons what they ought to believe and to hold: &#8220;I will hear what the Lord
1479 God will speak within me&#8221; (Ps 84:9); &#8220;I will lead her into the wilderness and there I will speak
1480 to her heart,&#8221; as we read in Hosea (2:14).</p>
1481 <p>Now you were able to receive the testimony given in the first of these ways; and this is not
1482 surprising, because they were the words and image of God only efficiently, as was said. But they
1483 were not able to receive the testimony given in that intelligible voice; so he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">you have
1484 neither heard his voice, </span>i.e., you were not among those who shared in it. &#8220;Everyone who has
1485 heard the Father and has learned, comes to me&#8221; (below 6:45). But you do not come to me.
1486 Therefore, <span style="font-weight: bold">you have neither heard his voice nor seen his image, </span>i.e., you do not have his
1487 intelligible testimony. Hence he adds: <span style="font-weight: bold">and you do not have his word abiding in your hearts,
1488 </span>i.e., you do not have his word that is inwardly inspired. And the reason is, <span style="font-weight: bold">for you do not believe
1489 in him whom he, </span>the Father, <span style="font-weight: bold">has sent</span>. For the word of God leads to Christ, since Christ himself
1490 is the natural Word of God. But every word inspired by God is a certain participated likeness of
1491 that Word. Therefore, since every participated likeness leads to its original, it is clear that every
1492 word inspired by God leads to Christ. And so, because you are not led to me, <span style="font-weight: bold">you do not have
1493 his word, </span>i.e., the inspired word of God, <span style="font-weight: bold">abiding in your hearts. </span>&#8220;He who does not believe in
1494 the Son of God does not have life abiding in him,&#8221; as it says below (sic). He says <span style="font-weight: bold">abiding,
1495 </span>because although there is no one who does not have some truth from God, they alone have the
1496 truth and the word abiding in them whose knowledge has progressed to the point where they have
1497 reached a knowledge of the true and natural Word.</p>
1498 <p>821 Or we could say that, <span style="font-weight: bold">you have neither heard his voice, </span>can be taken as showing the three
1499 ways in which God reveals things. This is done either by a sensible voice, as he bore witness to
1500 Christ in the Jordan and on the mountain, as in 2 Peter (1:16): &#8220;We were eyewitnesses of his
1501 greatness. For he received honor and glory from God the Father, when a voice came from the
1502 heavens.&#8221; And the Jews did not hear this. Or, God reveals things through a vision of his essence,
1503 which he reveals to the blessed. And they did not see this, because &#8220;while we are in the body, we
1504 are absent from the Lord&#8221; (2 Cor 5:6). Thirdly, it is accomplished by an interior word through
1505 an inspiration; and the Jews did not have this either.</p>
1506 <p>822 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Search the Scriptures, </span>he gives the third way in which God bore
1507 witness to Christ, through the Scriptures. First, he mentions the testimony of the Scriptures.
1508 Secondly, he shows that they were not able to gather the fruit of this testimony (v 40).</p>
1509 <p>823 He says: <span style="font-weight: bold">Search the Scriptures. </span>As if to say: You do not have the word of God in your
1510 hearts, but in the Scriptures; therefore, you must seek for it elsewhere than in your hearts. Hence,
1511 <span style="font-weight: bold">Search the Scriptures, </span>that is, the Old Testament, for the faith of Christ was contained in the
1512 Old Testament, but not on the surface, for it lay hidden in its depths, under shadowy symbols:
1513 &#8220;Even to this day, when Moses is read, a veil is over their hearts&#8221; (2 Cor 3:15). Thus he
1514 significantly says, Search, probe into the depths: &#8220;If you search for her [wisdom] like money, and
1515 dig for her like a treasure, you will understand the fear of the Lord and will find the knowledge
1516 of God&#8221; (Prv 2:4); &#8220;Give me understanding and I will search your commandments&#8221; (Ps 118:34).</p>
1517 <p>The reason why you should search them I take from your own opinion, because <span style="font-weight: bold">you think you
1518 have eternal life in them, </span>since we read in Ezekiel (18:19): &#8220;He who has kept my commands
1519 will live.&#8221; But you are mistaken; because although the precepts of the old law are living, they do
1520 not contain life in themselves. They are said to be living only to the extent that they lead to me,
1521 the Christ. Yet you use them as though they contained life in themselves, and in this you are
1522 mistaken, for they bear witness to me, i.e., they are living to the extent that they lead to a
1523 knowledge of me. And they lead to a knowledge of me either by plain prophecies, as in Isaiah
1524 (7:14): &#8220;A virgin will conceive.&#8221; or in Deuteronomy (18:15): &#8220;The Lord your God will raise up
1525 a prophet for you.&#8221;; and so Acts (10:43) says: &#8220;All the prophets bear witness to him.&#8221; The
1526 Scriptures also lead to a knowledge of Christ through the symbolic actions of the prophets; thus
1527 we read: &#8220;I have used resemblences in the ministry of the prophets&#8221; (Hos 12:10). Knowledge of
1528 Christ is also given in their sacraments and figures, as in the immolation of&#8217; the lamb, and other
1529 symbolic sacraments of the law: &#8220;The law has only a shadow of the good things to come&#8221; (Heb
1530 10:1). And so, because &#8220;the Scriptures of the Old Testament gave much testimony about Christ,
1531 the Apostle says: &#8220;He promised the Good News before, through his prophets in the holy
1532 Scriptures; the Good News of his Son, a descendant of David in his human nature&#8221; (Rom 1:2).</p>
1533 <p>824 The fruit which you think you have in the Scriptures, that is, eternal life, you will not be able
1534 to obtain, because in not believing the testimonies of the Scriptures about me, <span style="font-weight: bold">you are unwilling
1535 to come to me, </span>i.e., you do not wish to believe in me, in whom the fruit of these Scriptures
1536 exists, <span style="font-weight: bold">in order to possess that life </span>in me, the life which I give to those who believe in me: &#8220;I
1537 give them eternal life&#8221; (below 10:28); &#8220;Wisdom infuses life into her children&#8221; (Sir 4:12); &#8220;He
1538 who finds me will find life, and will have salvation from the Lord&#8221; (Prv 8:35).</p>
1539 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">&#160;</p>
1540 <p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-weight: bold">LECTURE 7</span></p>
1541 <BLOCKQUOTE><p style="margin-left: 0.5in">41 &#8220;Praise from men I do not need,
1542 <br>42 but I know you,
1543 <br>and you do not have the love of God in your hearts.
1544 <br>43 I have come in my Father&#8217;s name,
1545 <br>and yet you do not accept me.
1546 <br>If someone else came in his own name,
1547 <br>you would be accepting him.
1548 <br>44 How can people like you believe,
1549 <br>when you crave praise from each other,
1550 <br>and yet not even ask for that one praise
1551 <br>which is from God alone?
1552 <br>45 Do not think that I will accuse you
1553 <br>before my Father.
1554 <br>The one who accuses you is Moses,
1555 <br>in whom you place your trust.
1556 <br>46 If you believed Moses,
1557 <br>you would perhaps believe me as well,
1558 <br>for it was about me that he wrote.
1559 <br>47 But if you do not believe in his written statements,
1560 <BR>how will you believe in my spoken words?&#8221;</p></BLOCKQUOTE>
1561 <p>825 After God confirmed the greatness of his power by the testimonies of men, of&#8217;God, and of&#8217;
1562 the Scriptures, he here rebukes the Jews for being slow to believe. Now the Jews persecuted
1563 Christ on two grounds: for breaking the Sabbath, by which he seemed to go against the law, and
1564 for saying that he is the Son of God, by which he seemed to go against God. Thus they persecuted
1565 him on account of their reverence for God and their zeal for the law. And so our Lord wishes to
1566 show that their persecution of him was really inspired not by these motives, but by contrary
1567 reasons.</p> 2508 reasons.</p>
1568 <p>He first shows that the cause of their unbelief was their lack of reverence for God. Secondly, that 2509 <p>He first shows that the cause of their unbelief was their lack
1569 another cause of their unbelief was their lack of reverence for Moses (v 45). As to the first he 2510 of reverence for God. Secondly, that another cause of their
1570 does two things. First, he shows their irreverence for God. Secondly, he shows that this is the 2511 unbelief was their lack of reverence for Moses (v 45). As to the
1571 cause of their unbelief (v 44). Concerning the first he does two things. First, he mentions their 2512 first he does two things. First, he shows their irreverence for
1572 lack of reverence for God. Secondly, he makes this obvious by a sign (v 43). With respect to the 2513 God. Secondly, he shows that this is the cause of their unbelief (v
1573 first he does two things. First, he rejects what they might have assumed to be his intention, from 2514 44). Concerning the first he does two things. First, he mentions
1574 what he had said before. Secondly, he presents his real intention (v 42).</p> 2515 their lack of reverence for God. Secondly, he makes this obvious by
1575 <p>826 The Jews might have assumed that Christ was seeking some kind of praise from men, since 2516 a sign (v 43). With respect to the first he does two things. First,
1576 he had reminded them of so many witnesses to himself, as John, God, his own works, and the 2517 he rejects what they might have assumed to be his intention, from
1577 testimony of the Scriptures. Against this thought he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Praise from men I do not need, </span>i.e., 2518 what he had said before. Secondly, he presents his real intention
1578 I do not seek praise from men; for I have not come to be an example of one seeking human glory: 2519 (v 42).</p>
1579 &#8220;We did not seek glory from men&#8221; (1 Thes 2:6). Or, <span style="font-weight: bold">Praise from men I do not need</span>, i.e., I do 2520 <p>826 The Jews might have assumed that Christ was seeking some
1580 not need human praise, because from eternity I have glory with the Father: &#8220;Glorify me, Father, 2521 kind of praise from men, since he had reminded them of so many
1581 with the glory I had before the world was made&#8221; (below 17:5). For I have not come to be 2522 witnesses to himself, as John, God, his own works, and the
1582 glorified by men, but rather to glorify them, since all glory proceeds from me (Wis 7:25) 2523 testimony of the Scriptures. Against this thought he says,
1583 [&#8220;Wisdom is a pure emanation of the glory of the almighty God.&#8221;] It is through this wisdom that 2524 <span style="font-weight: bold">Praise from men I do not
1584 I have glory. God is said to be praised and glorified by men&#8212;&#8220;Glorify the Lord as much as you 2525 need,</span> i.e., I do not seek praise from men; for I have not
1585 are able; he will still surpass even that&#8221; (Sir 43:30)&#8212;not that he might become by this more 2526 come to be an example of one seeking human glory: &ldquo;We did not
1586 glorious, but so that he might appear glorious among us.</p> 2527 seek glory from men&rdquo; (1 Thes 2:6). Or, <span style=
1587 <p>827 Thus Christ presented the various testimonies to himself not for the reason they thought, but 2528 "font-weight: bold">Praise from men I do not need</span>, i.e., I
1588 for another one: because <span style="font-weight: bold">I know you, </span>i.e., I have made known about you, that <span style="font-weight: bold">you do not have 2529 do not need human praise, because from eternity I have glory with
1589 the love of God in your hearts, </span>although you pretend to have it. And so you are not persecuting 2530 the Father: &ldquo;Glorify me, Father, with the glory I had before
1590 me because of your love for God. You would be persecuting me for the love of God if God and 2531 the world was made&rdquo; (below 17:5). For I have not come to be
1591 the Scriptures did not bear witness to me; but God himself bears. witness to me by himself, his 2532 glorified by men, but rather to glorify them, since all glory
1592 works and in the Scriptures, as has been said. Consequently, if you truly loved God, then so far 2533 proceeds from me (Wis 7:25) [&ldquo;Wisdom is a pure emanation of
1593 from rejecting me, you would come to me. You, therefore, do not love God.</p> 2534 the glory of the almighty God.&rdquo;] It is through this wisdom
1594 <p>Another interpretation would be this. It is as though he were saying: I have not brought in these 2535 that I have glory. God is said to be praised and glorified by
1595 witnesses because I wanted your praise; but I know you do not love God and your waywardness 2536 men&mdash;&ldquo;Glorify the Lord as much as you are able; he will
1596 makes me sad, and I want to lead you back to the way of truth: &#8220;Now they have seen and hated 2537 still surpass even that&rdquo; (Sir 43:30)&mdash;not that he might
1597 both me and my Father&#8221; (below 15:24); &#8220;The pride of those who hate you continuously rises,&#8221; 2538 become by this more glorious, but so that he might appear glorious
1598 as the Psalm (73:23) says.</p> 2539 among us.</p>
1599 <p>828 Here we should point out that God cannot be hated in himself by anyone, nor can he be hated 2540 <p>827 Thus Christ presented the various testimonies to himself not
1600 with respect to all his effects, since every good in things comes from God, and it is impossible 2541 for the reason they thought, but for another one: because
1601 for anyone to hate all good, for he will at least love existence and life. But someone may hate 2542 <span style="font-weight: bold">I know you,</span> i.e., I have
1602 some effect of God, insofar as this is opposed to what he desires: for example, he might hate 2543 made known about you, that <span style="font-weight: bold">you do
1603 punishment, and things of that sort. It is from this point of view that God is said to be hated.</p> 2544 not have the love of God in your hearts,</span> although you
1604 <p>829 Then (v 43), he gives a sign that they do not love God. First, a present sign; secondly, a 2545 pretend to have it. And so you are not persecuting me because of
1605 future sign (v 43b).</p> 2546 your love for God. You would be persecuting me for the love of God
1606 <p>830 The present sign concerns his own coming; so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">I have come in my Father&#8217;s name. 2547 if God and the Scriptures did not bear witness to me; but God
1607 </span>As if to say: What I say is obvious, for if one loves his Lord, it is clear that he will honor and 2548 himself bears. witness to me by himself, his works and in the
1608 receive one who comes from him, and seek to honor him. But <span style="font-weight: bold">I have come in my Father&#8217;s 2549 Scriptures, as has been said. Consequently, if you truly loved God,
1609 name, </span>and I make his name known to the world: &#8220;I have made your name known to those you 2550 then so far from rejecting me, you would come to me. You,
1610 have given me&#8221; (below 17:6), <span style="font-weight: bold">and yet you do not accept me. </span>Therefore, you do not love him. 2551 therefore, do not love God.</p>
1611 The Son is said to make his Father known to men because, although the Father, as God, was 2552 <p>Another interpretation would be this. It is as though he were
1612 known&#8212;&#8220;God is known in Judah&#8221; (Ps 75:1)&#8212;yet he was not known as the natural Father of the 2553 saying: I have not brought in these witnesses because I wanted your
1613 Son before Christ came. Thus Solomon asked: &#8220;What is his name? And what is the name of his 2554 praise; but I know you do not love God and your waywardness makes
1614 son?&#8221; Prv 30:4).</p> 2555 me sad, and I want to lead you back to the way of truth: &ldquo;Now
1615 <p>831 The future sign concerns the coming of the Antichrist. For the Jews could say: Although you 2556 they have seen and hated both me and my Father&rdquo; (below
1616 come in his name, we have not accepted you, because we will not accept anyone but God the 2557 15:24); &ldquo;The pride of those who hate you continuously
1617 Father. The Lord speaks against this, and says that it cannot be, because you will accept another, 2558 rises,&rdquo; as the Psalm (73:23) says.</p>
1618 who will come, not in the Father&#8217;s name, but in his own name; and what is more, he will come, 2559 <p>828 Here we should point out that God cannot be hated in himself
1619 not in the name of the Father, but <span style="font-weight: bold">in his own name, </span>precisely because he will not seek the glory 2560 by anyone, nor can he be hated with respect to all his effects,
1620 of the Father but his own. And whatever he does, he will attribute it, not to the Father, but to 2561 since every good in things comes from God, and it is impossible for
1621 himself: &#8220;who opposes and is exalted above all that is called God, or is worshipped&#8221; (2 Thes 2:4). 2562 anyone to hate all good, for he will at least love existence and
1622 <span style="font-weight: bold">You would be accepting him; </span>and so the Apostle continues in the same letter: &#8220;God will send 2563 life. But someone may hate some effect of God, insofar as this is
1623 them a misleading influence so that they might believe what is false&#8221; (2 Thes 2:11). And this, 2564 opposed to what he desires: for example, he might hate punishment,
1624 because they did not accept the true teaching, that they might be saved. So the Gloss says: 2565 and things of that sort. It is from this point of view that God is
1625 &#8220;Because the Jews were unwilling to accept Christ, the penalty for this sin will be, fittingly 2566 said to be hated.</p>
1626 enough, that they will receive the Antichrist; with the result that those who were unwilling to 2567 <p>829 Then (v 43), he gives a sign that they do not love God.
1627 believe the truth, will believe a lie.&#8221;</p> 2568 First, a present sign; secondly, a future sign (v 43b).</p>
1628 <p>According to Augustine, however, we can understand this text as applying to heretics and false 2569 <p>830 The present sign concerns his own coming; so he says,
1629 teachers: who spread a teaching that comes from their own hearts and not from the mouth of 2570 <span style="font-weight: bold">I have come in my Father&rsquo;s
1630 God, and who praise themselves and despise the name of God. Of such persons it is written: 2571 name.</span> As if to say: What I say is obvious, for if one loves
1631 &#8220;You have heard that the Antichrist is coming; and now many antichrists have appeared&#8221; (1 Jn 2572 his Lord, it is clear that he will honor and receive one who comes
1632 2:18). So it is clear that your persecution of me does not spring from your love for God, but from 2573 from him, and seek to honor him. But <span style=
1633 your hatred and envy of him. And this was the reason why they did not believe.</p> 2574 "font-weight: bold">I have come in my Father&rsquo;s name,</span>
1634 <p>832 He concludes: <span style="font-weight: bold">How can people like you believe, when you crave praise from each other, 2575 and I make his name known to the world: &ldquo;I have made your
1635 </span>i.e., human praise, <span style="font-weight: bold">and yet not even ask for that one praise which is from God alone? </span>which 2576 name known to those you have given me&rdquo; (below 17:6),
1636 is true glory. The reason they could not believe in Christ was that, since their proud minds were 2577 <span style="font-weight: bold">and yet you do not accept
1637 craving their own glory and praise, they considered themselves superior to others in glory, and 2578 me.</span> Therefore, you do not love him. The Son is said to make
1638 regarded it as a disgrace to believe in Christ, who seemed common and poor. And this was why 2579 his Father known to men because, although the Father, as God, was
1639 they could not believe in him. The one who can believe in Christ is the person of humble heart, 2580 known&mdash;&ldquo;God is known in Judah&rdquo; (Ps 75:1)&mdash;yet
1640 who seeks the glory of God alone, and who strives to please him. And so we read: &#8220;Many of the 2581 he was not known as the natural Father of the Son before Christ
1641 leaders believed in him; but they did not admit it because of the Pharisees, so that they would not 2582 came. Thus Solomon asked: &ldquo;What is his name? And what is the
1642 be expelled from the synagogue&#8221; (below 12:42). We can see from this just how dangerous 2583 name of his son?&rdquo; Prv 30:4).</p>
1643 vainglory is. For this reason Cicero says: &#8220;Let a man beware of that glory that robs him of all 2584 <p>831 The future sign concerns the coming of the Antichrist. For
1644 freedom; that freedom for which a man of great spirit should risk everything.&#8221; And the Gloss 2585 the Jews could say: Although you come in his name, we have not
1645 says: &#8220;It is a great vice to boast and to strive for human praise: to desire that others think you 2586 accepted you, because we will not accept anyone but God the Father.
1646 have what you really do not have.&#8221;</p> 2587 The Lord speaks against this, and says that it cannot be, because
1647 <p>833 Then (v 45), he shows that they do not have zeal for Moses. First, how Moses was against 2588 you will accept another, who will come, not in the Father&rsquo;s
1648 them. Secondly, he gives the reason for this opposition (v 46). As to the first he does two things 2589 name, but in his own name; and what is more, he will come, not in
1649 First, he rejects their false zeal; secondly, he shows them true zeal, <span style="font-weight: bold">The one who accuses you 2590 the name of the Father, but <span style="font-weight: bold">in his
1650 is Moses.</span></p> 2591 own name,</span> precisely because he will not seek the glory of
1651 <p>834 As to the first he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not think that I will accuse you before my Father. </span>There are 2592 the Father but his own. And whatever he does, he will attribute it,
1652 three reasons for his saying this. First, the Son of God did not come into the world to condemn 2593 not to the Father, but to himself: &ldquo;who opposes and is
1653 the world, but to save it. So he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not think </span>that I have come to condemn, I have come to 2594 exalted above all that is called God, or is worshipped&rdquo; (2
1654 free: &#8220;God did not send his Son into the world to judge the world,&#8221; that is, to condemn the world, 2595 Thes 2:4). <span style="font-weight: bold">You would be accepting
1655 &#8220;but that the world might be saved through him&#8221; (above 3:17). And so the blood of Christ cries 2596 him;</span> and so the Apostle continues in the same letter:
1656 out, not to accuse, but to forgive: &#8220;We have the blood of Christ, crying out better than that of 2597 &ldquo;God will send them a misleading influence so that they might
1657 Abel&#8221; (Heb 12:24), whose blood cried out to accuse; &#8220;Who will accuse God&#8217;s elect? It is Christ 2598 believe what is false&rdquo; (2 Thes 2:11). And this, because they
1658 who justifies. Who is it, then, who will condemn?&#8221; (Rom 8:33). As to his second reason for 2599 did not accept the true teaching, that they might be saved. So the
1659 saying this, he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not think that I will accuse you before my Father, </span>because I will not 2600 Gloss says: &ldquo;Because the Jews were unwilling to accept
1660 be the one to accuse you, but to judge you: &#8220;The Father has given all judgment to the Son&#8221; (above 2601 Christ, the penalty for this sin will be, fittingly enough, that
1661 5:22). The third reason is: <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not think that I, </span>i.e., I alone, <span style="font-weight: bold">will accuse you before my Father 2602 they will receive the Antichrist; with the result that those who
1662 </span>for what you are doing to me; for even Moses will accuse you for not believing him in the things 2603 were unwilling to believe the truth, will believe a lie.&rdquo;</p>
1663 he said of me.</p> 2604 <p>According to Augustine, however, we can understand this text as
1664 <p>835 Consequently he adds: <span style="font-weight: bold">The one who accuses you is Moses, in whom you place your trust, 2605 applying to heretics and false teachers: who spread a teaching that
1665 </span>because you believe you are saved through his precepts. Moses accuses them in two ways. 2606 comes from their own hearts and not from the mouth of God, and who
1666 Materially, because they deserved to be accused for transgressing his commands: &#8220;Those who 2607 praise themselves and despise the name of God. Of such persons it
1667 have sinned under the law, will be judged by the law&#8221; (Rom 2:12). Again, Moses accuses them 2608 is written: &ldquo;You have heard that the Antichrist is coming;
1668 because he and the other saints will have authority in the judgment: &#8220;The two-edged swords will 2609 and now many antichrists have appeared&rdquo; (1 Jn 2:18). So it is
1669 be in their hands&#8221; (Ps 149:6).</p> 2610 clear that your persecution of me does not spring from your love
1670 <p>836 He presents the reason for this opposition when he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">If you believed Moses, you would 2611 for God, but from your hatred and envy of him. And this was the
1671 perhaps believe me as well, </span>as is clear from &#8220;The Lord your God will raise up a prophet for you, 2612 reason why they did not believe.</p>
1672 from your nation and your brothers; he will be like me: you will listen to him&#8221; (Dt 18:15), and 2613 <p>832 He concludes: <span style="font-weight: bold">How can people
1673 from all the sacrifices, which were a symbol of Christ. He says, perhaps, to indicate that their will 2614 like you believe, when you crave praise from each other,</span>
1674 acts from a free judgment, and not to imply that there is any doubt on the part of God.</p> 2615 i.e., human praise, <span style="font-weight: bold">and yet not
1675 <p>837 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">But if you do not believe in his written statements, how will you 2616 even ask for that one praise which is from God alone?</span> which
1676 believe in my spoken words? </span>he gives a sign of this opposition. He does this by comparing two 2617 is true glory. The reason they could not believe in Christ was
1677 things, and then denying of the lesser of them what is denied of the greater. First, there is a 2618 that, since their proud minds were craving their own glory and
1678 comparison between Moses and Christ: for although Christ, absolutely speaking, is greater than 2619 praise, they considered themselves superior to others in glory, and
1679 Moses, Moses was the greater in reputation among the Jews. Thus he says: If you do not believe 2620 regarded it as a disgrace to believe in Christ, who seemed common
1680 Moses, you will not believe me either. Secondly, he compares the way in which they presented 2621 and poor. And this was why they could not believe in him. The one
1681 their teaching: Moses gave his precepts in a written form; and so they can be studied for a long 2622 who can believe in Christ is the person of humble heart, who seeks
1682 time, and are not easily forgotten. Hence they impose a stronger obligation to believe. But Christ 2623 the glory of God alone, and who strives to please him. And so we
1683 presented his teachings in spoken words. Thus he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">But if you do not believe in his written 2624 read: &ldquo;Many of the leaders believed in him; but they did not
1684 statements, </span>which you have preserved in your <span style="font-weight: bold">books, how will you believe in my spoken 2625 admit it because of the Pharisees, so that they would not be
1685 words?</span></p> 2626 expelled from the synagogue&rdquo; (below 12:42). We can see from
2627 this just how dangerous vainglory is. For this reason Cicero says:
2628 &ldquo;Let a man beware of that glory that robs him of all freedom;
2629 that freedom for which a man of great spirit should risk
2630 everything.&rdquo; And the Gloss says: &ldquo;It is a great vice to
2631 boast and to strive for human praise: to desire that others think
2632 you have what you really do not have.&rdquo;</p>
2633 <p>833 Then (v 45), he shows that they do not have zeal for Moses.
2634 First, how Moses was against them. Secondly, he gives the reason
2635 for this opposition (v 46). As to the first he does two things
2636 First, he rejects their false zeal; secondly, he shows them true
2637 zeal, <span style="font-weight: bold">The one who accuses you is
2638 Moses.</span></p>
2639 <p>834 As to the first he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">Do
2640 not think that I will accuse you before my Father.</span> There are
2641 three reasons for his saying this. First, the Son of God did not
2642 come into the world to condemn the world, but to save it. So he
2643 says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not think</span> that I
2644 have come to condemn, I have come to free: &ldquo;God did not send
2645 his Son into the world to judge the world,&rdquo; that is, to
2646 condemn the world, &ldquo;but that the world might be saved through
2647 him&rdquo; (above 3:17). And so the blood of Christ cries out, not
2648 to accuse, but to forgive: &ldquo;We have the blood of Christ,
2649 crying out better than that of Abel&rdquo; (Heb 12:24), whose blood
2650 cried out to accuse; &ldquo;Who will accuse God&rsquo;s elect? It
2651 is Christ who justifies. Who is it, then, who will condemn?&rdquo;
2652 (Rom 8:33). As to his second reason for saying this, he says:
2653 <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not think that I will accuse you
2654 before my Father,</span> because I will not be the one to accuse
2655 you, but to judge you: &ldquo;The Father has given all judgment to
2656 the Son&rdquo; (above 5:22). The third reason is: <span style=
2657 "font-weight: bold">Do not think that I,</span> i.e., I alone,
2658 <span style="font-weight: bold">will accuse you before my
2659 Father</span> for what you are doing to me; for even Moses will
2660 accuse you for not believing him in the things he said of me.</p>
2661 <p>835 Consequently he adds: <span style="font-weight: bold">The
2662 one who accuses you is Moses, in whom you place your trust,</span>
2663 because you believe you are saved through his precepts. Moses
2664 accuses them in two ways. Materially, because they deserved to be
2665 accused for transgressing his commands: &ldquo;Those who have
2666 sinned under the law, will be judged by the law&rdquo; (Rom 2:12).
2667 Again, Moses accuses them because he and the other saints will have
2668 authority in the judgment: &ldquo;The two-edged swords will be in
2669 their hands&rdquo; (Ps 149:6).</p>
2670 <p>836 He presents the reason for this opposition when he says:
2671 <span style="font-weight: bold">If you believed Moses, you would
2672 perhaps believe me as well,</span> as is clear from &ldquo;The Lord
2673 your God will raise up a prophet for you, from your nation and your
2674 brothers; he will be like me: you will listen to him&rdquo; (Dt
2675 18:15), and from all the sacrifices, which were a symbol of Christ.
2676 He says, perhaps, to indicate that their will acts from a free
2677 judgment, and not to imply that there is any doubt on the part of
2678 God.</p>
2679 <p>837 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">But if
2680 you do not believe in his written statements, how will you believe
2681 in my spoken words?</span> he gives a sign of this opposition. He
2682 does this by comparing two things, and then denying of the lesser
2683 of them what is denied of the greater. First, there is a comparison
2684 between Moses and Christ: for although Christ, absolutely speaking,
2685 is greater than Moses, Moses was the greater in reputation among
2686 the Jews. Thus he says: If you do not believe Moses, you will not
2687 believe me either. Secondly, he compares the way in which they
2688 presented their teaching: Moses gave his precepts in a written
2689 form; and so they can be studied for a long time, and are not
2690 easily forgotten. Hence they impose a stronger obligation to
2691 believe. But Christ presented his teachings in spoken words. Thus
2692 he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">But if you do not believe
2693 in his written statements,</span> which you have preserved in your
2694 <span style="font-weight: bold">books, how will you believe in my
2695 spoken words?</span></p>
2696 </blockquote>
1686 </body> 2697 </body>
1687
1688 </html> 2698 </html>