comparison john/english/John3.html @ 35:178aed5d2c3c

convert to XML
author ht
date Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:05:42 +0000
parents 25a799388159
children
comparison
equal deleted inserted replaced
34:2bc1f3a24bc0 35:178aed5d2c3c
1 <html> 1 <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
2 "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
3 <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
2 <head> 4 <head>
5 <meta name="generator" content=
6 "HTML Tidy for Cygwin (vers 25 March 2009), see www.w3.org" />
7 <title></title>
3 </head> 8 </head>
4 <body style=text-align:justify><blockquote> 9 <body style="text-align:justify">
5 <p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-size: 60pt">3</span></p> 10 <blockquote>
6 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style="font-weight: bold">LECTURE 1</span></p> 11 <p style="text-align: center"><span style=
7 <BLOCKQUOTE><p>1 There was a certain Pharisee named Nicodemus, a member of the Sanhedrin. 2 He came to 12 "font-size: 60pt">3</span></p>
8 Jesus at night and said to him, &#8220;Rabbi, we know that you are a teacher come from God, for no 13 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style=
9 one could perform the signs you perform, unless he had God with him.&#8221; 3 Jesus responded 14 "font-weight: bold">LECTURE 1</span></p>
10 and said to him,</p> 15 <blockquote>
11 <p style="margin-left: 0.5in">&#8220;Amen, amen, I say to you,<BR> 16 <p>1 There was a certain Pharisee named Nicodemus, a member of the
12 unless one is born again,<BR> 17 Sanhedrin. 2 He came to Jesus at night and said to him,
13 he cannot see the kingdom of God.&#8221;</p> 18 &ldquo;Rabbi, we know that you are a teacher come from God, for no
14 <p>4 Nicodemus said to him, &#8220;How can a man be born again when he is already an old man? Is it 19 one could perform the signs you perform, unless he had God with
15 possible for him to return to his mother&#8217;s womb and be born all over again?&#8221; 5 Jesus replied,</p> 20 him.&rdquo; 3 Jesus responded and said to him,</p>
16 <p style="margin-left: 0.5in">&#8220;Amen, amen, I say to you,<BR> 21 <p style="margin-left: 0.5in">&ldquo;Amen, amen, I say to
17 unless one is born again of water and the Holy Spirit,<BR> 22 you,<br />
18 he cannot enter the kingdom of God.<BR> 23 unless one is born again,<br />
19 6 What is born of flesh is itself flesh;<BR> 24 he cannot see the kingdom of God.&rdquo;</p>
20 and what is born of Spirit is itself spirit.&#8221;</p></BLOCKQUOTE> 25 <p>4 Nicodemus said to him, &ldquo;How can a man be born again when
21 <p>423 Above, the Evangelist showed Christ&#8217;s power in relation to changes affecting nature; 26 he is already an old man? Is it possible for him to return to his
22 here he shows it in relation to our reformation by grace, which is his principal subject. 27 mother&rsquo;s womb and be born all over again?&rdquo; 5 Jesus
23 Reformation by grace comes about through spiritual generation and by the conferring of 28 replied,</p>
24 benefits on those regenerated. First, then, he treats of spiritual generation. Secondly, of the 29 <p style="margin-left: 0.5in">&ldquo;Amen, amen, I say to
25 spiritual benefits divinely conferred on the regenerated, and this in chapter five.</p> 30 you,<br />
26 <p>As to the first he does two things. First, he treats of spiritual regeneration in relation to the 31 unless one is born again of water and the Holy Spirit,<br />
27 Jews. Secondly, of the spreading of the fruits of this regeneration even to foreign peoples, and 32 he cannot enter the kingdom of God.<br />
28 this in chapter four. Concerning the first he does two things. First, he explains spiritual 33 6 What is born of flesh is itself flesh;<br />
29 regeneration with words. Secondly, he completes it with deeds (3:22).</p> 34 and what is born of Spirit is itself spirit.&rdquo;</p>
30 <p>As to the first he does three things. First, he shows the need for a spiritual regeneration. 35 </blockquote>
31 Secondly, its quality (3:4). Thirdly, its mode and nature (3:9). As to the first he does two 36 <p>423 Above, the Evangelist showed Christ&rsquo;s power in
32 things. First, he mentions the occasion for showing this need. Secondly, the need itself for 37 relation to changes affecting nature; here he shows it in relation
33 this regeneration (3:3).</p> 38 to our reformation by grace, which is his principal subject.
34 <p>The occasion was presented by Nicodemus; hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">There was a certain Pharisee 39 Reformation by grace comes about through spiritual generation and
35 named Nicodemus. </span>And he describes him as to his person, from the time, and from his 40 by the conferring of benefits on those regenerated. First, then, he
36 statements.</p> 41 treats of spiritual generation. Secondly, of the spiritual benefits
37 <p>424 he describes his person in three ways. First, as to his religion, because he was a Pharisee, 42 divinely conferred on the regenerated, and this in chapter
38 hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">There was a certain Pharisee. </span>For there were two sects aniong the Jews: the 43 five.</p>
39 Pharisees and the Sadducees. The Pharisees were closer to us in their beliefs, for they 44 <p>As to the first he does two things. First, he treats of
40 believed in the resurrection, and admitted the existence of spiritual creatures. The Sadducees, 45 spiritual regeneration in relation to the Jews. Secondly, of the
41 on the other hand, disagree more with us, for they believed neither in the resurrection to come 46 spreading of the fruits of this regeneration even to foreign
42 nor in the existence of spirits. The former were called Pharisees, as being separated from the 47 peoples, and this in chapter four. Concerning the first he does two
43 others. And because their opinion was the more credible and nearer to the truth, it was easier 48 things. First, he explains spiritual regeneration with words.
44 for Nicodemus to be converted to Christ. &#8220;I lived as a Pharisee, according to the strictest sect 49 Secondly, he completes it with deeds (3:22).</p>
45 of our religion&#8221; (Acts 26:5).</p> 50 <p>As to the first he does three things. First, he shows the need
46 <p>425 As to his name he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">named Nicodemus, </span>which means &#8220;victor,&#8221; or &#8220;the victory of the 51 for a spiritual regeneration. Secondly, its quality (3:4). Thirdly,
47 people.&#8221; This signifies those who overcame the world through faith by being converted to 52 its mode and nature (3:9). As to the first he does two things.
48 Christ from Judaism. &#8220;This is the victory that overcomes the world, our faith&#8221; (1 Jn 5:4).</p> 53 First, he mentions the occasion for showing this need. Secondly,
49 <p>426 Thirdly, as to his rank he says, a <span style="font-weight: bold">member of the Sanhedrin. </span>For although our Lord did 54 the need itself for this regeneration (3:3).</p>
50 not choose the wise or powerful or those of high birth at the beginning, lest the power of the 55 <p>The occasion was presented by Nicodemus; hence he says,
51 faith be attributed to human widsom and power&#8212;&#8220;Not many of you are learned in the worldly 56 <span style="font-weight: bold">There was a certain Pharisee named
52 sense, not many powerful, not many of high birth. But God chose the simple ones of the 57 Nicodemus.</span> And he describes him as to his person, from the
53 world&#8221; (1 Cor 1:26)&#8212;still he willed to convert some of the wise and powerful to himself at 58 time, and from his statements.</p>
54 the very beginning. And he did this so that his doctrine would not be held in contempt, as 59 <p>424 he describes his person in three ways. First, as to his
55 being accepted exclusively by the lowly and uneducated, and so that the number of believers 60 religion, because he was a Pharisee, hence he says, <span style=
56 would not be attributed to the rusticity and ignorance of the converts rather than to the power 61 "font-weight: bold">There was a certain Pharisee.</span> For there
57 of the faith. However, he did not will that a large number of those converted to him be 62 were two sects aniong the Jews: the Pharisees and the Sadducees.
58 powerful and of high birth, lest, as has been said, it should be ascribed to human power and 63 The Pharisees were closer to us in their beliefs, for they believed
59 wisdom. And so it says, &#8220;many of those in authority believed in him&#8221; (below 12:42), among 64 in the resurrection, and admitted the existence of spiritual
60 whom was this Nicodemus. &#8220;The rulers of the people have come together&#8221; (Ps 46:10).</p> 65 creatures. The Sadducees, on the other hand, disagree more with us,
61 <p>427 Then he describes him as to the time, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">he came to Jesus at night. </span>In regard to 66 for they believed neither in the resurrection to come nor in the
62 this, it might be noted that in Scripture the quality of the time is mentioned as to certain 67 existence of spirits. The former were called Pharisees, as being
63 persons in order to indicate their knowledge or the condition of their actions. Here an obscure 68 separated from the others. And because their opinion was the more
64 time is mentioned, <span style="font-weight: bold">at night. </span>For the night is obscure and suited to the state of mind of 69 credible and nearer to the truth, it was easier for Nicodemus to be
65 Nicodemus, who did not come to Jesus free of care and anxiety, but in fear; for he was one of 70 converted to Christ. &ldquo;I lived as a Pharisee, according to the
66 those of whom it is said that they &#8220;believed in him; but they did not admit it because of the 71 strictest sect of our religion&rdquo; (Acts 26:5).</p>
67 Pharisees, so that they would not be expelled from the synagogue&#8221; (below 12:42). For their 72 <p>425 As to his name he says, <span style=
68 love was not perfect, so it continues, &#8220;For they loved the glory of men more than the glory of&#8217; 73 "font-weight: bold">named Nicodemus,</span> which means
69 God.&#8221;</p> 74 &ldquo;victor,&rdquo; or &ldquo;the victory of the people.&rdquo;
70 <p>Further, night was appropriate to his ignorance and the imperfect understanding he had of 75 This signifies those who overcame the world through faith by being
71 Christ: &#8220;The night has passed, and day is at hand. So let us cast-off the works of darkness&#8221; 76 converted to Christ from Judaism. &ldquo;This is the victory that
72 (Rom 13:12); &#8220;They have not known or understood; they are walking in darkness&#8221; (Ps 81:5).</p> 77 overcomes the world, our faith&rdquo; (1 Jn 5:4).</p>
73 <p>428 Then he is described from his statements, when he says that Nicodemus said to Jesus: 78 <p>426 Thirdly, as to his rank he says, a <span style=
74 <span style="font-weight: bold">Rabbi, we know that you are a teacher come from God. </span>Here he affirms Christ&#8217;s office as 79 "font-weight: bold">member of the Sanhedrin.</span> For although
75 teacher when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Rabbi, </span>and his power of acting, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">for no one could perform the 80 our Lord did not choose the wise or powerful or those of high birth
76 signs you perform, unles he had God with him. </span>And in both remarks he says what is true, 81 at the beginning, lest the power of the faith be attributed to
77 but he does not affirm enough.</p> 82 human widsom and power&mdash;&ldquo;Not many of you are learned in
78 <p>He is right is calling Jesus <span style="font-weight: bold">Rabbi, </span>i.e., Teacher, because, &#8220;You call me Teacher and Lord; and 83 the worldly sense, not many powerful, not many of high birth. But
79 you do well, for so I am,&#8221; as we read below (13:13). For Nicodemus had read what was 84 God chose the simple ones of the world&rdquo; (1 Cor
80 written in Joel (2:23): &#8220;Children of Sion, rejoice, and be joyful in the Lord your God, because 85 1:26)&mdash;still he willed to convert some of the wise and
81 he has given you a teacher of justice.&#8221; But he says too little, because he says that Jesus came 86 powerful to himself at the very beginning. And he did this so that
82 as a teacher from God, but is silent on whether he is God. For to come as a teacher from God 87 his doctrine would not be held in contempt, as being accepted
83 is common to all good prelates: &#8220;I will give you shepherds after my own heart, and they will 88 exclusively by the lowly and uneducated, and so that the number of
84 feed you with knowledge and doctrine,&#8221; as it says in Jeremiah (3:15). Therefore, this is not 89 believers would not be attributed to the rusticity and ignorance of
85 unique to Christ even though Christ taught in a manner unlike other men. For some teachers 90 the converts rather than to the power of the faith. However, he did
86 teach only from without, but Christ also instructs within, because &#8220;He was the true light, 91 not will that a large number of those converted to him be powerful
87 which enlightens every man&#8221; (above 1:9); thus he alone gives wisdom: &#8220;I will give you an 92 and of high birth, lest, as has been said, it should be ascribed to
88 eloquence and a wisdom&#8221; (Lk 21:15), and this is something that no mere man can say.</p> 93 human power and wisdom. And so it says, &ldquo;many of those in
89 <p>429 He affirms his power because of the signs he saw. As if to say: I believe that you have 94 authority believed in him&rdquo; (below 12:42), among whom was this
90 come as a teacher from God, <span style="font-weight: bold">for no one could perform the signs you perform. </span>And he is 95 Nicodemus. &ldquo;The rulers of the people have come
91 speaking the truth, because the signs which Christ did cannot be worked except by God, and 96 together&rdquo; (Ps 46:10).</p>
92 because God was with him: &#8220;He who sent me is with me&#8221; (below 8:29). But he says too little, 97 <p>427 Then he describes him as to the time, saying, <span style=
93 because he believed that Christ did not perform these signs through his own power, but as 98 "font-weight: bold">he came to Jesus at night.</span> In regard to
94 relying on the power of another; as though God were not with him by a unity of essence but 99 this, it might be noted that in Scripture the quality of the time
95 merely by an infusion of grace. But this is false, because Christ performed these signs not by 100 is mentioned as to certain persons in order to indicate their
96 an exterior power but by his own; for the power of God and of Christ is one and the same. It 101 knowledge or the condition of their actions. Here an obscure time
97 is similar to what the woman says to Elijah: &#8220;Because of this I know that you are a man of 102 is mentioned, <span style="font-weight: bold">at night.</span> For
98 God&#8221; (1 Kgs 17:24).</p> 103 the night is obscure and suited to the state of mind of Nicodemus,
99 <p>430 Then when he says that Jesus answered, <span style="font-weight: bold">Amen, amen, I say to you</span>, he sets down the 104 who did not come to Jesus free of care and anxiety, but in fear;
100 necessity for spiritual regeneration, because of the ignorance of Nicodemus. And so he says, 105 for he was one of those of whom it is said that they
101 <span style="font-weight: bold">Amen, amen</span>. Here we should note that this word, <span style="font-weight: bold">amen</span>, is a Hebrew word frequently 106 &ldquo;believed in him; but they did not admit it because of the
102 employed by Christ; hence out of reverence for him no Greek or Latin translator wanted to 107 Pharisees, so that they would not be expelled from the
103 translate it. Sometimes it means the same as &#8220;true&#8221; or &#8220;truly&#8221;; and sometimes the same as &#8220;so 108 synagogue&rdquo; (below 12:42). For their love was not perfect, so
104 be it.&#8221; Thus is the Psalms 71 (v 19), 88 (v 53), and 106, where we have, &#8220;So be it, so be it,&#8221; 109 it continues, &ldquo;For they loved the glory of men more than the
105 the Hebrew has &#8220;Amen, amen.&#8221; But John is the only Evangelist who duplicates or makes a 110 glory of&rsquo; God.&rdquo;</p>
106 twin use of this word. The reason for this is that the other Evangelists are concerned mainly 111 <p>Further, night was appropriate to his ignorance and the
107 with matters pertaining to the humanity of Christ, which, since they are easier to believe, need 112 imperfect understanding he had of Christ: &ldquo;The night has
108 less reinforcement; but John deals chiefly with things pertaining to the divinity of Christ, and 113 passed, and day is at hand. So let us cast-off the works of
109 these, since they are hidden and remote from men&#8217;s knowledge and experience, require 114 darkness&rdquo; (Rom 13:12); &ldquo;They have not known or
110 greater formal declaration.</p> 115 understood; they are walking in darkness&rdquo; (Ps 81:5).</p>
111 <p>431 Next we should point out that at first glance this answer of Christ seems to be entirely 116 <p>428 Then he is described from his statements, when he says that
112 foreign to Nicodemus&#8217; statement. For what connection is there between Nicodemus&#8217; 117 Nicodemus said to Jesus: <span style="font-weight: bold">Rabbi, we
113 statement, <span style="font-weight: bold">Rabbi, we know that you are a teacher come from God, </span>and the Lord&#8217;s reply, 118 know that you are a teacher come from God.</span> Here he affirms
114 <span style="font-weight: bold">unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.</span></p> 119 Christ&rsquo;s office as teacher when he says, <span style=
115 <p>But we should note, as has already been stated, that Nicodemus, having an imperfect opinion 120 "font-weight: bold">Rabbi,</span> and his power of acting, saying,
116 about Christ, affirmed that he was a teacher and performed these signs as a mere man. And so 121 <span style="font-weight: bold">for no one could perform the signs
117 the Lord wishes to show Nicodemus how he might arrive at a deeper understanding of him. 122 you perform, unles he had God with him.</span> And in both remarks
118 And as a matter of fact, the Lord might have done so with an argument, but because this 123 he says what is true, but he does not affirm enough.</p>
119 might have resulted in a quarrel&#8212;the opposite of which was prophesied about him: &#8220;He will 124 <p>He is right is calling Jesus <span style=
120 not quarrel&#8221; (Is 42:2)&#8212;he wished to lead him to a true understanding with gentleness. As if to 125 "font-weight: bold">Rabbi,</span> i.e., Teacher, because,
121 say: It is not strange that you regard me as a mere man, because one cannot know these 126 &ldquo;You call me Teacher and Lord; and you do well, for so I
122 secrets of the divinity unless he has achieved a spiritual regeneration. And this is what he 127 am,&rdquo; as we read below (13:13). For Nicodemus had read what
123 says: <span style="font-weight: bold">unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.</span></p> 128 was written in Joel (2:23): &ldquo;Children of Sion, rejoice, and
124 <p>432 Here we should point out that since vision is an act of life, then according to the diverse 129 be joyful in the Lord your God, because he has given you a teacher
125 kinds of life there will be diversity of vision. For there is a sentient life which some living 130 of justice.&rdquo; But he says too little, because he says that
126 things share in common, and this life has a sentient vision or knowledge. And there is also a 131 Jesus came as a teacher from God, but is silent on whether he is
127 spiritual life, by which man is made like God and other holy spirits; and this life enjoys a 132 God. For to come as a teacher from God is common to all good
128 spiritual vision. Now spiritual things cannot be seen by the sentient: &#8220;The sensual man does 133 prelates: &ldquo;I will give you shepherds after my own heart, and
129 not perceive those things that pertain to the Spirit of God&#8221; (1 Cor 2:14), but they are 134 they will feed you with knowledge and doctrine,&rdquo; as it says
130 perceived by the spiritual vision: &#8220;No one knows the things of God but the Spirit of God&#8221; (1 135 in Jeremiah (3:15). Therefore, this is not unique to Christ even
131 Cor 2:11). So the apostle says: &#8220;You did not receive the spirit of slavery, putting you in fear 136 though Christ taught in a manner unlike other men. For some
132 again, but the spirit of adoption&#8221; (Rom 8:15). And we receive this spirit through a spiritual 137 teachers teach only from without, but Christ also instructs within,
133 regenaration: &#8220;He saved us by the cleansing of regeneration in the Holy Spirit&#8221; (Ti 3:3). 138 because &ldquo;He was the true light, which enlightens every
134 Therefore, if spiritual vision comes only through the Holy Spirit, and if the Holy Spirit is 139 man&rdquo; (above 1:9); thus he alone gives wisdom: &ldquo;I will
135 given through a cleansing of spiritual regeneration, then it is only by a cleansing of 140 give you an eloquence and a wisdom&rdquo; (Lk 21:15), and this is
136 regeneration that we can see the kingdom of God. Thus he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">unless one is born again of 141 something that no mere man can say.</p>
137 water and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. </span>As if to say: It is not 142 <p>429 He affirms his power because of the signs he saw. As if to
138 surprising if you do not see the kingdom of God, because no one can see it unless he receives 143 say: I believe that you have come as a teacher from God,
139 the Holy Spirit, through whom one is reborn a son of God.</p> 144 <span style="font-weight: bold">for no one could perform the signs
140 <p>433 It is not only the royal throne that pertains to a kingdom, but also the things needed for 145 you perform.</span> And he is speaking the truth, because the signs
141 governing the kingdom, such as the royal dignity, royal favors, and the way of justice by 146 which Christ did cannot be worked except by God, and because God
142 which the kingdom is consolidated. Hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">he cannot see the kingdom of God, </span>i.e., 147 was with him: &ldquo;He who sent me is with me&rdquo; (below 8:29).
143 the glory and dignity of God, i.e., the mysteries of eternal salvation which are seen through 148 But he says too little, because he believed that Christ did not
144 the justice of faith: &#8220;The kingdom of God is not food and drink&#8221; (Rom 14:17).</p> 149 perform these signs through his own power, but as relying on the
145 <p>Now in the Old Law there was a spiritual regeneration; but it was imperfect and symbolic: 150 power of another; as though God were not with him by a unity of
146 &#8220;All were baptized into Moses, in the cloud and in the sea&#8221; (1 Cor 10:2), i.e., they received 151 essence but merely by an infusion of grace. But this is false,
147 baptism in symbol. Accordingly, they did see the mysteries of the kingdom of God, but only 152 because Christ performed these signs not by an exterior power but
148 symbolically: &#8220;seeing from afar&#8221; (Heb 11:13). But in the New Law there is an evident 153 by his own; for the power of God and of Christ is one and the same.
149 spiritual regeneration, although imperfect, because we are renewed only inwardly by grace, 154 It is similar to what the woman says to Elijah: &ldquo;Because of
150 but not outwardly by incorruption: &#8220;Although our outward nature is wasting away, yet our 155 this I know that you are a man of God&rdquo; (1 Kgs 17:24).</p>
151 inward nature is being renewed day by day&#8221; (2 Cor 4:16). And so we do see the kingdom of 156 <p>430 Then when he says that Jesus answered, <span style=
152 God and the mysteries of eternal salvation, but imperfectly, for as it says, &#8220;Now we see in a 157 "font-weight: bold">Amen, amen, I say to you</span>, he sets down
153 mirror, in an obscure manner&#8221; (1 Cor 13:12). But there is perfect regeneration in heaven, 158 the necessity for spiritual regeneration, because of the ignorance
154 because we will be renewed both inwardly and outwardly. And therefore we shall see the 159 of Nicodemus. And so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Amen,
155 kingdom of God in a most perfect way: &#8220;But then we will see face to face,&#8221; as is said in 1 160 amen</span>. Here we should note that this word, <span style=
156 Corinthians (13:12); and &#8220;When he appears we will be like him, because we will see him as 161 "font-weight: bold">amen</span>, is a Hebrew word frequently
157 he is&#8221; (1 Jn 3:2).</p> 162 employed by Christ; hence out of reverence for him no Greek or
158 <p>434 It is clear, therefore, that just as one does not have bodily vision unless he is born, so one 163 Latin translator wanted to translate it. Sometimes it means the
159 cannot have spiritual vision unless he is reborn. And according to the threefold regeneration, 164 same as &ldquo;true&rdquo; or &ldquo;truly&rdquo;; and sometimes
160 there is a threefold kind of vision.</p> 165 the same as &ldquo;so be it.&rdquo; Thus is the Psalms 71 (v 19),
161 <p>435 Note that the Greek reading is not &#8220;again,&#8221; but <i>anothe, </i>i.e., &#8220;from above,&#8221; which Jerome 166 88 (v 53), and 106, where we have, &ldquo;So be it, so be
162 translated as &#8220;again,&#8221; in order to suggest addition. And this is the way Jerome understood the 167 it,&rdquo; the Hebrew has &ldquo;Amen, amen.&rdquo; But John is the
163 saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">unless one is born again. </span>It is as if he were saying: Unless one is reborn once more 168 only Evangelist who duplicates or makes a twin use of this word.
164 through a fraternal generation.</p> 169 The reason for this is that the other Evangelists are concerned
165 <p>Chrysostoin, however, says that to be &#8220;born from above&#8221; is peculiar to the Son of God, 170 mainly with matters pertaining to the humanity of Christ, which,
166 because he alone is born from above: &#8220;The one who came from above is above all things&#8221; 171 since they are easier to believe, need less reinforcement; but John
167 (below 3:31). And Christ is said to be born from above both as to time (if we may speak 172 deals chiefly with things pertaining to the divinity of Christ, and
168 thus), because he was begotten from eternity: &#8220;Before the daystar I begot you&#8221; (Ps 109:3), and 173 these, since they are hidden and remote from men&rsquo;s knowledge
169 as to the principle of his generation, because he proceeds from the heavenly Father: &#8220;I came 174 and experience, require greater formal declaration.</p>
170 down from heaven not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me&#8221; (below 6:38). 175 <p>431 Next we should point out that at first glance this answer of
171 Therefore, because our regeneration is in the likeness of the Son of God, inasmuch as &#8220;Those 176 Christ seems to be entirely foreign to Nicodemus&rsquo; statement.
172 whom he foreknew he predestined to become conformed to the image of his Son&#8221; (Rom 177 For what connection is there between Nicodemus&rsquo; statement,
173 8:29), and because that generation is from above, our generation also is from above: both as 178 <span style="font-weight: bold">Rabbi, we know that you are a
174 to the time, because of our eternal predestination, &#8220;He chose us in him before the foundation 179 teacher come from God,</span> and the Lord&rsquo;s reply,
175 of the world&#8221; (Eph 1:4), and as to its being a gift of God, as we read below (6:44), &#8220;No one 180 <span style="font-weight: bold">unless one is born again, he cannot
176 can come to me unless the Father, who sent me, draws him&#8221;; and &#8220;You have been saved by 181 see the kingdom of God.</span></p>
177 the grace of God&#8221; (Eph 2:5).</p> 182 <p>But we should note, as has already been stated, that Nicodemus,
178 <p>436 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Nicodemus said to him, </span>he gives the manner of and the reason for 183 having an imperfect opinion about Christ, affirmed that he was a
179 this spiritual regeneration. First, the doubt of Nicodemus is set forth. Secondly, Christ&#8217;s 184 teacher and performed these signs as a mere man. And so the Lord
180 response (v 5).</p> 185 wishes to show Nicodemus how he might arrive at a deeper
181 <p>437 As to the first we should note that as stated in 1 Corinthians (2:14): &#8220;The sensual man 186 understanding of him. And as a matter of fact, the Lord might have
182 does not perceive those things that pertain to the Spirit of God.&#8221; And so because Nicodemus 187 done so with an argument, but because this might have resulted in a
183 was yet carnal and sensual, he was unable to grasp, except in a carnal manner, the things that 188 quarrel&mdash;the opposite of which was prophesied about him:
184 were said to him. Consequently, what the Lord said ,to him about spiritual regeneration, he 189 &ldquo;He will not quarrel&rdquo; (Is 42:2)&mdash;he wished to lead
185 understood of carnal generation. And this is what he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">How can a man be born again 190 him to a true understanding with gentleness. As if to say: It is
186 when he is already an old man?</span></p> 191 not strange that you regard me as a mere man, because one cannot
187 <p>We should note here, according to Chrysostom, that Nicodemus wanted to object to what was 192 know these secrets of the divinity unless he has achieved a
188 said by the Savior. But his objection is foolish, because Christ was speaking of spiritual 193 spiritual regeneration. And this is what he says: <span style=
189 regeneration, and he is objecting in terms of carnal regeneration. In like manner, all the 194 "font-weight: bold">unless one is born again, he cannot see the
190 reasons brought forth to attack the things of faith are foolish, since they are not according to 195 kingdom of God.</span></p>
191 the meaning of Sacred Scripture.</p> 196 <p>432 Here we should point out that since vision is an act of
192 <p>438 Nicodemus objected to the Lord&#8217;s statement that a man must be born again according to 197 life, then according to the diverse kinds of life there will be
193 the two ways in which this seemed impossible. In one way, on account of the irreversibility of 198 diversity of vision. For there is a sentient life which some living
194 human life; for a man cannot return to infancy from old age. Hence we read, &#8220;I am walking 199 things share in common, and this life has a sentient vision or
195 on a path,&#8221; namely, this present life, &#8220;by which I will not return&#8221; (Jb 16:23). And it is from 200 knowledge. And there is also a spiritual life, by which man is made
196 this point of view that he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">How can a man be born again when he is already an old 201 like God and other holy spirits; and this life enjoys a spiritual
197 man? </span>As if to say: Shall he become a child once more so that he can be reborn? &#8220;He will not 202 vision. Now spiritual things cannot be seen by the sentient:
198 return again to his home, and his place will not know him any more&#8221; (Jb 7:10). In the second 203 &ldquo;The sensual man does not perceive those things that pertain
199 way, regeneration seemed impossible because of the mode of carnal generation. Forin the 204 to the Spirit of God&rdquo; (1 Cor 2:14), but they are perceived by
200 beginning, when a man is generated, he is small in size, so that his mother&#8217;s womb can 205 the spiritual vision: &ldquo;No one knows the things of God but the
201 contain him; but later, after he is born, he continues to grow and reaches such a size that he 206 Spirit of God&rdquo; (1 Cor 2:11). So the apostle says: &ldquo;You
202 cannot be contained within his mother&#8217;s womb. And so Nicodemus says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Is it possible for 207 did not receive the spirit of slavery, putting you in fear again,
203 him to return to his mother&#8217;s womb and be born all over again? </span>As if to say: He cannot, 208 but the spirit of adoption&rdquo; (Rom 8:15). And we receive this
204 because the womb cannot contain him.</p> 209 spirit through a spiritual regenaration: &ldquo;He saved us by the
205 <p>439 But this does not apply to spiritual generation. For no matter how spiritually old a man 210 cleansing of regeneration in the Holy Spirit&rdquo; (Ti 3:3).
206 might become through sin, accordto the Psalm (31:3): &#8220;Because I kept silent, all my bones 211 Therefore, if spiritual vision comes only through the Holy Spirit,
207 grew old,&#8221; he can, with the help of divine grace, become new, according to the Psalm (102:5): 212 and if the Holy Spirit is given through a cleansing of spiritual
208 &#8220;Your youth will be renewed like the eagle&#8217;s.&#8221; And no matter how enormous he is, he can 213 regeneration, then it is only by a cleansing of regeneration that
209 enter the spiritual womb of the Church by the sacrament of baptism. And it is clear what that 214 we can see the kingdom of God. Thus he says, <span style=
210 spiritual womb is; otherwise it would never have been said: &#8220;From the womb, before the 215 "font-weight: bold">unless one is born again of water and the Holy
211 daystar, I begot you&#8221; (Ps 109:3). Yet there is a sense in which his objection applies. For just 216 Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.</span> As if to say: It
212 as a man, once he is born according to nature, cannot be reborn, so once he is born in a 217 is not surprising if you do not see the kingdom of God, because no
213 spiritual way through baptism, he cannot be reborn, because he cannot be baptized again: 218 one can see it unless he receives the Holy Spirit, through whom one
214 &#8220;One Lord, one faith, one baptism,&#8221; as we read in Ephesians (4:5).</p> 219 is reborn a son of God.</p>
215 <p>440 Then we have the answer of Christ. Concerning this he does three things. First, he 220 <p>433 It is not only the royal throne that pertains to a kingdom,
216 answers the arguments of Nicodemus by showing the nature of regeneration. Secondly, he 221 but also the things needed for governing the kingdom, such as the
217 explains this answer with a reason (v 6). Thirdly, he explains it with an example.</p> 222 royal dignity, royal favors, and the way of justice by which the
218 <p>441 He answers the objections by showing that he is speaking of a spiritual regeneration, not 223 kingdom is consolidated. Hence he says, <span style=
219 a carnal one. And this is what he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">unless one is born again of water and the Holy 224 "font-weight: bold">he cannot see the kingdom of God,</span> i.e.,
220 Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God. </span>As if to say: You are thinking of a carnal 225 the glory and dignity of God, i.e., the mysteries of eternal
221 generation, but I am speaking of a spiritual generation.</p> 226 salvation which are seen through the justice of faith: &ldquo;The
222 <p>Note that above he had said, <span style="font-weight: bold">he cannot see the kingdom of God, </span>while here he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">he 227 kingdom of God is not food and drink&rdquo; (Rom 14:17).</p>
223 cannot enter the kingdom of God, </span>which is the same thing. For no one can see the things of 228 <p>Now in the Old Law there was a spiritual regeneration; but it
224 the kingdom of God unless he enters it; and to the extent that he enters, he sees. &#8220;I will give 229 was imperfect and symbolic: &ldquo;All were baptized into Moses, in
225 him a white stone upon which is written a new name, which no one knows but he who 230 the cloud and in the sea&rdquo; (1 Cor 10:2), i.e., they received
226 receives it&#8221; (Rv 5:5).</p> 231 baptism in symbol. Accordingly, they did see the mysteries of the
227 <p>442 Now there is a reason why spiritual generation comes from the Spirit. It is necessary that 232 kingdom of God, but only symbolically: &ldquo;seeing from
228 the one generated be generated in the likeness of the one generating; but we are regenerated 233 afar&rdquo; (Heb 11:13). But in the New Law there is an evident
229 as sons of God, in the likeness of his true Son. Therefore, it is necessary that our spiritual 234 spiritual regeneration, although imperfect, because we are renewed
230 regeneration come about through that by which we are made like the true Son. and this conies 235 only inwardly by grace, but not outwardly by incorruption:
231 about by Our having his Spirit: &#8220;If any one does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is not his&#8221; 236 &ldquo;Although our outward nature is wasting away, yet our inward
232 (Rom 8:9); &#8220;By this we know that we abide in him, and he in us: because he has given us of 237 nature is being renewed day by day&rdquo; (2 Cor 4:16). And so we
233 his Spirit&#8221; (1 Jn 4:13). Thus spiritual regeneration must come from the Holy Spirit. &#8220;You did 238 do see the kingdom of God and the mysteries of eternal salvation,
234 not receive the spirit of slavery, putting you in fear again, but the spirit of adoption&#8221; (Rom 239 but imperfectly, for as it says, &ldquo;Now we see in a mirror, in
235 8:15); &#8220;It is the Spirit that gives life&#8221; (below 6:63).</p> 240 an obscure manner&rdquo; (1 Cor 13:12). But there is perfect
236 <p>443 Water, too, is necessary for this regeneration, and for three reasons. First, because of the 241 regeneration in heaven, because we will be renewed both inwardly
237 condition of human nature. For man consists of soul and body, and if the Spirit alone were 242 and outwardly. And therefore we shall see the kingdom of God in a
238 involved in his regeneration, this would indicate that only the spiritual part of man is 243 most perfect way: &ldquo;But then we will see face to face,&rdquo;
239 regenerated. Hence in order that the flesh also be regenerated, it is necessary that, in addition 244 as is said in 1 Corinthians (13:12); and &ldquo;When he appears we
240 to the Spirit through whom the soul is regenerated, something bodily be involved, through 245 will be like him, because we will see him as he is&rdquo; (1 Jn
241 which the body is regenerated; and this,is water.</p> 246 3:2).</p>
242 <p>Secondly, water is necessary for the sake of human knowledge. For, as Dionysius says, divine 247 <p>434 It is clear, therefore, that just as one does not have
243 wisdom so disposes all things that it provides for each thing according to its nature. Now it is 248 bodily vision unless he is born, so one cannot have spiritual
244 natural for man to know; and so it is fitting that spiritual things be conferred on men in such a 249 vision unless he is reborn. And according to the threefold
245 way that he may know them: &#8220;so that we may know what God has given us&#8221; (1 Cor 2:12). But 250 regeneration, there is a threefold kind of vision.</p>
246 the natural manner of this knowledge is that man know spiritual things by means of sensible 251 <p>435 Note that the Greek reading is not &ldquo;again,&rdquo; but
247 things, since all our knowledge begins in sense knowledge. Therefore, in order that we might 252 <i>anothe,</i> i.e., &ldquo;from above,&rdquo; which Jerome
248 understand what is spiritual in our regeneration, it was fitting that there be in it something 253 translated as &ldquo;again,&rdquo; in order to suggest addition.
249 sensible and material, that is, water, through which we understand that just as water washes 254 And this is the way Jerome understood the saying, <span style=
250 and cleanses the exterior in a bodily way, so through baptism a man is washed and cleansed 255 "font-weight: bold">unless one is born again.</span> It is as if he
256 were saying: Unless one is reborn once more through a fraternal
257 generation.</p>
258 <p>Chrysostoin, however, says that to be &ldquo;born from
259 above&rdquo; is peculiar to the Son of God, because he alone is
260 born from above: &ldquo;The one who came from above is above all
261 things&rdquo; (below 3:31). And Christ is said to be born from
262 above both as to time (if we may speak thus), because he was
263 begotten from eternity: &ldquo;Before the daystar I begot
264 you&rdquo; (Ps 109:3), and as to the principle of his generation,
265 because he proceeds from the heavenly Father: &ldquo;I came down
266 from heaven not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent
267 me&rdquo; (below 6:38). Therefore, because our regeneration is in
268 the likeness of the Son of God, inasmuch as &ldquo;Those whom he
269 foreknew he predestined to become conformed to the image of his
270 Son&rdquo; (Rom 8:29), and because that generation is from above,
271 our generation also is from above: both as to the time, because of
272 our eternal predestination, &ldquo;He chose us in him before the
273 foundation of the world&rdquo; (Eph 1:4), and as to its being a
274 gift of God, as we read below (6:44), &ldquo;No one can come to me
275 unless the Father, who sent me, draws him&rdquo;; and &ldquo;You
276 have been saved by the grace of God&rdquo; (Eph 2:5).</p>
277 <p>436 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Nicodemus
278 said to him,</span> he gives the manner of and the reason for this
279 spiritual regeneration. First, the doubt of Nicodemus is set forth.
280 Secondly, Christ&rsquo;s response (v 5).</p>
281 <p>437 As to the first we should note that as stated in 1
282 Corinthians (2:14): &ldquo;The sensual man does not perceive those
283 things that pertain to the Spirit of God.&rdquo; And so because
284 Nicodemus was yet carnal and sensual, he was unable to grasp,
285 except in a carnal manner, the things that were said to him.
286 Consequently, what the Lord said ,to him about spiritual
287 regeneration, he understood of carnal generation. And this is what
288 he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">How can a man be born
289 again when he is already an old man?</span></p>
290 <p>We should note here, according to Chrysostom, that Nicodemus
291 wanted to object to what was said by the Savior. But his objection
292 is foolish, because Christ was speaking of spiritual regeneration,
293 and he is objecting in terms of carnal regeneration. In like
294 manner, all the reasons brought forth to attack the things of faith
295 are foolish, since they are not according to the meaning of Sacred
296 Scripture.</p>
297 <p>438 Nicodemus objected to the Lord&rsquo;s statement that a man
298 must be born again according to the two ways in which this seemed
299 impossible. In one way, on account of the irreversibility of human
300 life; for a man cannot return to infancy from old age. Hence we
301 read, &ldquo;I am walking on a path,&rdquo; namely, this present
302 life, &ldquo;by which I will not return&rdquo; (Jb 16:23). And it
303 is from this point of view that he says, <span style=
304 "font-weight: bold">How can a man be born again when he is already
305 an old man?</span> As if to say: Shall he become a child once more
306 so that he can be reborn? &ldquo;He will not return again to his
307 home, and his place will not know him any more&rdquo; (Jb 7:10). In
308 the second way, regeneration seemed impossible because of the mode
309 of carnal generation. Forin the beginning, when a man is generated,
310 he is small in size, so that his mother&rsquo;s womb can contain
311 him; but later, after he is born, he continues to grow and reaches
312 such a size that he cannot be contained within his mother&rsquo;s
313 womb. And so Nicodemus says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Is it
314 possible for him to return to his mother&rsquo;s womb and be born
315 all over again?</span> As if to say: He cannot, because the womb
316 cannot contain him.</p>
317 <p>439 But this does not apply to spiritual generation. For no
318 matter how spiritually old a man might become through sin, accordto
319 the Psalm (31:3): &ldquo;Because I kept silent, all my bones grew
320 old,&rdquo; he can, with the help of divine grace, become new,
321 according to the Psalm (102:5): &ldquo;Your youth will be renewed
322 like the eagle&rsquo;s.&rdquo; And no matter how enormous he is, he
323 can enter the spiritual womb of the Church by the sacrament of
324 baptism. And it is clear what that spiritual womb is; otherwise it
325 would never have been said: &ldquo;From the womb, before the
326 daystar, I begot you&rdquo; (Ps 109:3). Yet there is a sense in
327 which his objection applies. For just as a man, once he is born
328 according to nature, cannot be reborn, so once he is born in a
329 spiritual way through baptism, he cannot be reborn, because he
330 cannot be baptized again: &ldquo;One Lord, one faith, one
331 baptism,&rdquo; as we read in Ephesians (4:5).</p>
332 <p>440 Then we have the answer of Christ. Concerning this he does
333 three things. First, he answers the arguments of Nicodemus by
334 showing the nature of regeneration. Secondly, he explains this
335 answer with a reason (v 6). Thirdly, he explains it with an
336 example.</p>
337 <p>441 He answers the objections by showing that he is speaking of
338 a spiritual regeneration, not a carnal one. And this is what he
339 says: <span style="font-weight: bold">unless one is born again of
340 water and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of
341 God.</span> As if to say: You are thinking of a carnal generation,
342 but I am speaking of a spiritual generation.</p>
343 <p>Note that above he had said, <span style="font-weight: bold">he
344 cannot see the kingdom of God,</span> while here he says,
345 <span style="font-weight: bold">he cannot enter the kingdom of
346 God,</span> which is the same thing. For no one can see the things
347 of the kingdom of God unless he enters it; and to the extent that
348 he enters, he sees. &ldquo;I will give him a white stone upon which
349 is written a new name, which no one knows but he who receives
350 it&rdquo; (Rv 5:5).</p>
351 <p>442 Now there is a reason why spiritual generation comes from
352 the Spirit. It is necessary that the one generated be generated in
353 the likeness of the one generating; but we are regenerated as sons
354 of God, in the likeness of his true Son. Therefore, it is necessary
355 that our spiritual regeneration come about through that by which we
356 are made like the true Son. and this conies about by Our having his
357 Spirit: &ldquo;If any one does not have the Spirit of Christ, he is
358 not his&rdquo; (Rom 8:9); &ldquo;By this we know that we abide in
359 him, and he in us: because he has given us of his Spirit&rdquo; (1
360 Jn 4:13). Thus spiritual regeneration must come from the Holy
361 Spirit. &ldquo;You did not receive the spirit of slavery, putting
362 you in fear again, but the spirit of adoption&rdquo; (Rom 8:15);
363 &ldquo;It is the Spirit that gives life&rdquo; (below 6:63).</p>
364 <p>443 Water, too, is necessary for this regeneration, and for
365 three reasons. First, because of the condition of human nature. For
366 man consists of soul and body, and if the Spirit alone were
367 involved in his regeneration, this would indicate that only the
368 spiritual part of man is regenerated. Hence in order that the flesh
369 also be regenerated, it is necessary that, in addition to the
370 Spirit through whom the soul is regenerated, something bodily be
371 involved, through which the body is regenerated; and this,is
372 water.</p>
373 <p>Secondly, water is necessary for the sake of human knowledge.
374 For, as Dionysius says, divine wisdom so disposes all things that
375 it provides for each thing according to its nature. Now it is
376 natural for man to know; and so it is fitting that spiritual things
377 be conferred on men in such a way that he may know them: &ldquo;so
378 that we may know what God has given us&rdquo; (1 Cor 2:12). But the
379 natural manner of this knowledge is that man know spiritual things
380 by means of sensible things, since all our knowledge begins in
381 sense knowledge. Therefore, in order that we might understand what
382 is spiritual in our regeneration, it was fitting that there be in
383 it something sensible and material, that is, water, through which
384 we understand that just as water washes and cleanses the exterior
385 in a bodily way, so through baptism a man is washed and cleansed
251 inwardly in a spiritual way.</p> 386 inwardly in a spiritual way.</p>
252 <p>Thirdly, water was necessary so that there might be a correspondence of causes. For the cause 387 <p>Thirdly, water was necessary so that there might be a
253 of our regeneration is the incarnate Word: &#8220;He gave them power to become the sons of God,&#8221; 388 correspondence of causes. For the cause of our regeneration is the
254 as we saw above (1:12). Therefore it was fitting that in the sacraments, which have their 389 incarnate Word: &ldquo;He gave them power to become the sons of
255 efficacy from the power of the incarnate Word, there be something corresponding to the 390 God,&rdquo; as we saw above (1:12). Therefore it was fitting that
256 Word, and something corresponding to the flesh, or body. And spiritually speaking, this is 391 in the sacraments, which have their efficacy from the power of the
257 water when the sacrament is baptism, so that through it we may be conformed to the death of 392 incarnate Word, there be something corresponding to the Word, and
258 Christ, since we are submerged in it during baptism as Christ was in the womb of the earth 393 something corresponding to the flesh, or body. And spiritually
259 for three days: &#8220;We are buried with him by baptism&#8221; (Rom 6:4).</p> 394 speaking, this is water when the sacrament is baptism, so that
260 <p>Further, this mystery was suggested in the first production of things, when the Spirit of God 395 through it we may be conformed to the death of Christ, since we are
261 hovered over the waters (Gn 1:2). But a greater power was conferred on water by contact with 396 submerged in it during baptism as Christ was in the womb of the
262 the most pure flesh of Christ; because in the beginning water brought forth crawling creatures 397 earth for three days: &ldquo;We are buried with him by
263 with living souls, but since Christ was baptized in the Jordan, water has yielded spiritual 398 baptism&rdquo; (Rom 6:4).</p>
264 souls.</p> 399 <p>Further, this mystery was suggested in the first production of
265 <p>444 It is clear that the Holy Spirit is God, since he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">unless one is born again of water 400 things, when the Spirit of God hovered over the waters (Gn 1:2).
266 and the Holy Spirit </span>(<i>ex aqua et Spiritu Sancto</i>).<i> </i>For above (1:13) he says: &#8220;who are born not 401 But a greater power was conferred on water by contact with the most
267 from blood, nor from the desires of the flesh, nor from man&#8217;s willing it, but from God (<i>ex 402 pure flesh of Christ; because in the beginning water brought forth
268 Deo</i>).&#8221; From this we can form the following argument: He from whom men are spiritually 403 crawling creatures with living souls, but since Christ was baptized
269 reborn is God; but men are spiritually reborn through the Holy Spirit, as it is stated here; 404 in the Jordan, water has yielded spiritual souls.</p>
270 therefore, the Holy Spirit is God.</p> 405 <p>444 It is clear that the Holy Spirit is God, since he says,
271 <p>445 Two questions arise here. First, if no one enters the kingdom of God unless he is born 406 <span style="font-weight: bold">unless one is born again of water
272 again of water, and if the fathers of old were not born again of water (for they were not 407 and the Holy Spirit</span> (<i>ex aqua et Spiritu Sancto</i>). For
273 baptized), then they have not entered the kingdom of God. Secondly, since baptism is of three 408 above (1:13) he says: &ldquo;who are born not from blood, nor from
274 kinds, that is, of water, of desire, and of blood, and many have been baptized in the latter two 409 the desires of the flesh, nor from man&rsquo;s willing it, but from
275 ways (who we say have entered the kingdom of God immediately, even though they were not 410 God (<i>ex Deo</i>).&rdquo; From this we can form the following
276 born again of water), it does not seem to be true to say that <span style="font-weight: bold">unless one is born again of 411 argument: He from whom men are spiritually reborn is God; but men
277 water and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God.</span></p> 412 are spiritually reborn through the Holy Spirit, as it is stated
278 <p>The answer to the first is that rebirth or regeneration from water and the Holy Spirit takes 413 here; therefore, the Holy Spirit is God.</p>
279 place in two ways: in truth and in symbol. Now the fathers of old, although they were not 414 <p>445 Two questions arise here. First, if no one enters the
280 reborn with a true rebirth, were nevertheless reborn with a symbolic rebirth, because they 415 kingdom of God unless he is born again of water, and if the fathers
281 always had a sense perceptible sign in which true rebirth was prefigured. So according to this, 416 of old were not born again of water (for they were not baptized),
282 thus reborn, they did enter the kingdom of God, after the ransom was paid.</p> 417 then they have not entered the kingdom of God. Secondly, since
283 <p>The answer to the second is that those who are reborn by a baptism of blood and fire, 418 baptism is of three kinds, that is, of water, of desire, and of
284 although they do not have regeneration in deed, they do have it in desire. Otherwise neither 419 blood, and many have been baptized in the latter two ways (who we
285 would the baptism of blood mean anything nor could there be a baptism of the Spirit. 420 say have entered the kingdom of God immediately, even though they
286 Consequently, in order that man may enter the kingdom of heaven, it is necessary that there 421 were not born again of water), it does not seem to be true to say
287 be a baptism of water in deed, as in the case of all baptized persons, or in desire, as in the case 422 that <span style="font-weight: bold">unless one is born again of
288 of the martyrs and catechumens, who are prevented by death from fulfilling their desire, or in 423 water and the Holy Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of
289 symbol, as in the case of the fathers of old.</p> 424 God.</span></p>
290 <p>446 It might be remarked that it was from this statement, <span style="font-weight: bold">unless one is born again of water 425 <p>The answer to the first is that rebirth or regeneration from
291 and the Holy Spirit, </span>that the Pelagians derived their error that children are baptized not in 426 water and the Holy Spirit takes place in two ways: in truth and in
292 order to be cleansed from sin, since they have none, but in order to be able to enter the 427 symbol. Now the fathers of old, although they were not reborn with
293 kingdom of God. But this is false, because as Augustine says in his book, <i>The Baptism of 428 a true rebirth, were nevertheless reborn with a symbolic rebirth,
294 Children, </i>it is not fitting for an image of God, namely, man, to be excluded from the kingdom 429 because they always had a sense perceptible sign in which true
295 of God except for some obstacle, which can be nothing but sin. Therefore, there must be 430 rebirth was prefigured. So according to this, thus reborn, they did
296 some sin, namely, original sin, in children who are excluded from the kingdom.</p> 431 enter the kingdom of God, after the ransom was paid.</p>
297 <p>447 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">What is born of flesh is itself flesh, </span>he proves by reason that it is 432 <p>The answer to the second is that those who are reborn by a
298 necessary to be born of water and the Holy Spirit. And the reasoning is this: No one can reach 433 baptism of blood and fire, although they do not have regeneration
299 the kingdom unless he is made spiritual; but no one is made spiritual except by the Holy 434 in deed, they do have it in desire. Otherwise neither would the
300 Spirit; therefore, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born again of the Holy 435 baptism of blood mean anything nor could there be a baptism of the
301 Spirit.</p> 436 Spirit. Consequently, in order that man may enter the kingdom of
302 <p>So he says, what is born of flesh (<i>ex carne</i>) is itself flesh, i.e., birth according to the flesh 437 heaven, it is necessary that there be a baptism of water in deed,
303 makes one be born into the life of the flesh: &#8220;The first man was from the earth, earthly&#8221; (1 438 as in the case of all baptized persons, or in desire, as in the
304 Cor 15:47); <span style="font-weight: bold">and what is born of Spirit </span>(<i>ex Spiritu</i>) , i.e., from the power of the Holy Spirit, 439 case of the martyrs and catechumens, who are prevented by death
305 <span style="font-weight: bold">is itself spirit, </span>i.e., spiritual.</p> 440 from fulfilling their desire, or in symbol, as in the case of the
306 <p>448 Note, however, that this preposition <i>ex </i>(from, of, by) sometines designates a material 441 fathers of old.</p>
307 cause, as when I say: &#8220;A knife is made of (<i>ex</i>)<i> </i>iron&#8221;; sometimes it designates an efficient 442 <p>446 It might be remarked that it was from this statement,
308 cause, as when I say: &#8220;The house was built by (<i>ex</i>)<i> </i>a carpenter.&#8221; Accordingly, the phrase, 443 <span style="font-weight: bold">unless one is born again of water
309 <span style="font-weight: bold">what is born of </span>(<i>ex</i>)<i> </i>flesh is itself flesh, can be understood according to either efficient or 444 and the Holy Spirit,</span> that the Pelagians derived their error
310 material causality. As efficient cause, indeed, because a power existing in flesh is productive 445 that children are baptized not in order to be cleansed from sin,
311 of generation; and as material cause, because some camal element in animals makes up the 446 since they have none, but in order to be able to enter the kingdom
312 animal generated. But nothing is said to be made out of spirit (<i>ex spiritu</i>)<i> </i>in a material sense, 447 of God. But this is false, because as Augustine says in his book,
313 since spirit is unchangeable, whereas matter is the subject of change; but it is said in the sense 448 <i>The Baptism of Children,</i> it is not fitting for an image of
314 of efficient causality.</p> 449 God, namely, man, to be excluded from the kingdom of God except for
315 <p>According to this, we can discern a threefold generation. One is materially and effectively 450 some obstacle, which can be nothing but sin. Therefore, there must
316 from (<i>ex</i>)<i> </i>the flesh, and is common to all who exist according to the flesh. Another is 451 be some sin, namely, original sin, in children who are excluded
317 according to the Spirit effectively, and according to it we are reborn as sons of God through 452 from the kingdom.</p>
318 the grace of the Holy Spirit, and are made spiritual. The third is midway, that is, only 453 <p>447 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">What is
319 materially from the flesh but effectively from the Holy Spirit. And this is true in the singular 454 born of flesh is itself flesh,</span> he proves by reason that it
320 case of Christ: because he was born deriving his flesh materially from the flesh of his mother, 455 is necessary to be born of water and the Holy Spirit. And the
321 but effectively from the Holy Spirit: &#8220;What she has conceived is of the Holy Spirit&#8221; (Mt 456 reasoning is this: No one can reach the kingdom unless he is made
322 1:20). Therefore, he was born holy: &#8220;The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of 457 spiritual; but no one is made spiritual except by the Holy Spirit;
323 the Most High will overshadow you. And so the Holy One who will be born from you, will be 458 therefore, no one can enter the kingdom of God unless he is born
324 called the Son of God&#8221; (Lk 1:35).</p> 459 again of the Holy Spirit.</p>
325 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">&#160;</p> 460 <p>So he says, what is born of flesh (<i>ex carne</i>) is itself
326 <CENTER><p><B>LECTURE 2</B></p></CENTER> 461 flesh, i.e., birth according to the flesh makes one be born into
327 <BLOCKQUOTE><p style="margin-left: 0.5in">7 &#8220;Do not be surprised that I said to you,<BR> 462 the life of the flesh: &ldquo;The first man was from the earth,
328 you must be born again.<BR> 463 earthly&rdquo; (1 Cor 15:47); <span style="font-weight: bold">and
329 8 The wind blows where it wills,<BR> 464 what is born of Spirit</span> (<i>ex Spiritu</i>) , i.e., from the
330 and you hear its sound, but you do not know<BR> 465 power of the Holy Spirit, <span style="font-weight: bold">is itself
331 where it comes from or where it goes.<BR> 466 spirit,</span> i.e., spiritual.</p>
332 So it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit.&#8221;</p> 467 <p>448 Note, however, that this preposition <i>ex</i> (from, of,
333 <p>9 &#8220;How can all this happen?&#8221; asked Nicodemus. 10 Jesus replied: &#8220;You are a teacher in Israel 468 by) sometines designates a material cause, as when I say: &ldquo;A
334 and you do not know these things? 469 knife is made of (<i>ex</i>) iron&rdquo;; sometimes it designates
335 <P style="margin-left: 0.5in">11 &#8220;Amen, amen I say to you,<BR> 470 an efficient cause, as when I say: &ldquo;The house was built by
336 that we know of what we speak,<BR> 471 (<i>ex</i>) a carpenter.&rdquo; Accordingly, the phrase,
337 and we bear witness of what we see;<BR> 472 <span style="font-weight: bold">what is born of</span> (<i>ex</i>)
338 but you do not accept our testimony.<BR> 473 flesh is itself flesh, can be understood according to either
339 12 If I spoke of earthly things,<BR> 474 efficient or material causality. As efficient cause, indeed,
340 and you did not believe me,<BR> 475 because a power existing in flesh is productive of generation; and
341 how will you believe if I tell you of heavenly things?<BR> 476 as material cause, because some camal element in animals makes up
342 13 No one has gone up to heaven<BR> 477 the animal generated. But nothing is said to be made out of spirit
343 except the One who came down from heaven,<BR> 478 (<i>ex spiritu</i>) in a material sense, since spirit is
344 the Son of Man, who lives in heaven.<BR> 479 unchangeable, whereas matter is the subject of change; but it is
345 14 Just as Moses lifted up the serpent in the desert,<BR> 480 said in the sense of efficient causality.</p>
346 so must the Son of Man be lifted up,<BR> 481 <p>According to this, we can discern a threefold generation. One is
347 15 so that everyone who believes in him may not be lost,<BR> 482 materially and effectively from (<i>ex</i>) the flesh, and is
348 but have eternal life.&#8221;</p></BLOCKQUOTE> 483 common to all who exist according to the flesh. Another is
349 <p>449 Above, in his instruction on spiritual generation, the Lord presented a reason; here he 484 according to the Spirit effectively, and according to it we are
350 gives an example. For we are led to see that Nicodemus was troubled when he heard that 485 reborn as sons of God through the grace of the Holy Spirit, and are
351 <span style="font-weight: bold">what is born of Spirit is itself spirit. </span>And so the Lord says to him, <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not be surprised that 486 made spiritual. The third is midway, that is, only materially from
352 I said to you, you must be born again.</span></p> 487 the flesh but effectively from the Holy Spirit. And this is true in
353 <p>Here we should note that there are two kinds of surprise or astonishment. One is the 488 the singular case of Christ: because he was born deriving his flesh
354 astonishment of devotion in the sense that someone, considering the great things of God, sees 489 materially from the flesh of his mother, but effectively from the
355 that they are incomprehensible to him; and so he is full of astonishment: &#8220;The Lord on high is 490 Holy Spirit: &ldquo;What she has conceived is of the Holy
356 wonderful&#8221; (Ps 92:4), &#8220;Your testimonies are wonderful&#8221; (Ps 118:129). Men are to be 491 Spirit&rdquo; (Mt 1:20). Therefore, he was born holy: &ldquo;The
357 encouraged, not discouraged, to this kind of astonishment The other is the astonishment of 492 Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will
358 disbelief, when someone does not believe what is said. So Matthew (13:54) says: &#8220;They were 493 overshadow you. And so the Holy One who will be born from you, will
359 astonished,&#8221; and further on adds that &#8220;They did not accept him.&#8221; It is from this kind of 494 be called the Son of God&rdquo; (Lk 1:35).</p>
360 astonishment that the Lord diverts Nicodeintis wheii he proposes an example and says: <span style="font-weight: bold">The 495 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">
361 wind</span> (<i>spiritus</i>, wind, spirit)<span style="font-weight: bold"> blows where it wills. </span>In the literal sense, the same words can he 496 &nbsp;</p>
362 explained in two ways.</p> 497 <center>
363 <p>450 In the first way, according to Chrysostom, spiritus is taken for the wind, as in Psalm 148 498 <p><b>LECTURE 2</b></p>
364 (v 8): &#8220;The winds of the storm that fulfill his word.&#8221; According to this interpretation, he says 499 </center>
365 four things about the wind. First, the power of the wind, when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">the wind blows 500 <blockquote>
366 where it wills. </span>And if you say that the wind has no will, one may answer that &#8220;will&#8221; is taken 501 <p style="margin-left: 0.5in">7 &ldquo;Do not be surprised that I
367 for a natural appetite, which is nothing more than a natural inclination, about which it is said: 502 said to you,<br />
368 &#8220;He created the weight of the wind&#8221; (Jb 28:25). Secondly, he tells the evidence for the wind, 503 you must be born again.<br />
369 when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">and you hear its sound, </span>where &#8220;sound&#8221; (<i>vox</i>, voice, sound) refers to the sound 504 8 The wind blows where it wills,<br />
370 the wind makes when it strikes a body. Of this we read: &#8220;The sound (<i>vox</i>) of your thunder was 505 and you hear its sound, but you do not know<br />
371 in the whirlwind&#8221; (Ps 76:19).</p> 506 where it comes from or where it goes.<br />
372 <p>Thirdly, he mentions the origin of the wind, which is unknown; so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">but you do not 507 So it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit.&rdquo;</p>
373 know where it comes from, </span>i.e., from where it starts: &#8220;He brings forth the winds out of his 508 <p>9 &ldquo;How can all this happen?&rdquo; asked Nicodemus. 10
374 storehouse&#8221; (Ps 134:7). Fourthly, he mentions the wind&#8217;s destination, which is also unknown; 509 Jesus replied: &ldquo;You are a teacher in Israel and you do not
375 so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">or where it goes</span> you do not know, i.e., where it remains.</p> 510 know these things?</p>
376 <p>And he applies this similarity to the subject under discussion, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">So it is with everyone 511 <p style="margin-left: 0.5in">11 &ldquo;Amen, amen I say to
377 who is born of the Spirit. </span>As if to say: If the wind, which is corporeal, has an origin which is 512 you,<br />
378 hidden and a course that is unknown, why are you surprised if you cannot understand the 513 that we know of what we speak,<br />
379 course of spiritual regeneration.</p> 514 and we bear witness of what we see;<br />
380 <p>451 Augustine objects to this explanation and says that the Lord was not speaking here about 515 but you do not accept our testimony.<br />
381 the wind, for we know where each of the winds comes from and where it goes. For &#8220;Auster&#8221; 516 12 If I spoke of earthly things,<br />
382 comes from the south and goes to the north; &#8220;Boreas&#8221; comes from the north and goes to the 517 and you did not believe me,<br />
383 south. Why, then, does the Lord say of this wind, you do not know where it comes from or 518 how will you believe if I tell you of heavenly things?<br />
384 where it goes?</p> 519 13 No one has gone up to heaven<br />
385 <p>One may answer that there are two ways in which the source of the wind might be unknown. 520 except the One who came down from heaven,<br />
386 In one way, in general: and in this way it is possible to know where it comes from, i.e., from 521 the Son of Man, who lives in heaven.<br />
387 which direction of the world, for example, that Auster comes from the south, and where it 522 14 Just as Moses lifted up the serpent in the desert,<br />
388 goes, that is, to the north. In another way, in particular: and in this sense it is not known 523 so must the Son of Man be lifted up,<br />
389 where the wind comes from, i.e., at which precise place it originated, or where it goes, i.e., 524 15 so that everyone who believes in him may not be lost,<br />
390 exactly where it stops. And almost all the Greek doctors agree with this exposition of 525 but have eternal life.&rdquo;</p>
391 Chrysostom.</p> 526 </blockquote>
392 <p>452 In another way, <i>spiritus</i> is taken for the Holy Spirit. And according to this, he mentions 527 <p>449 Above, in his instruction on spiritual generation, the Lord
393 four things about the Holy Spirit. First, his power, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">The Spirit blows where it wills, 528 presented a reason; here he gives an example. For we are led to see
394 </span>because it is by the free use of his power that he breathes where he wills and when he wills, 529 that Nicodemus was troubled when he heard that <span style=
395 by instructing hearts: &#8220;One and the same Spirit does all these things, distributing to each as he 530 "font-weight: bold">what is born of Spirit is itself spirit.</span>
396 wills&#8221; (1 Cor 12:11). This refutes the error of Macedonius who thought that the Holy Spirit 531 And so the Lord says to him, <span style="font-weight: bold">Do not
397 was the minister of the Father and the Son. But then he would not be breathing where he 532 be surprised that I said to you, you must be born again.</span></p>
398 willed, but where he was commanded.</p> 533 <p>Here we should note that there are two kinds of surprise or
399 <p>453 Secondly, he mentions the evidence for the Holy Spirit, when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">and you hear its 534 astonishment. One is the astonishment of devotion in the sense that
400 voice: </span>&#8220;Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts&#8221; (Ps 94:8).</p> 535 someone, considering the great things of God, sees that they are
401 <p>Chrysostom objects to this and says that this cannot pertain to the Holy Spirit. For the Lord 536 incomprehensible to him; and so he is full of astonishment:
402 was speaking to Nicodemus, who was still an unbeliever, and thus not fit to hear the voice of 537 &ldquo;The Lord on high is wonderful&rdquo; (Ps 92:4), &ldquo;Your
403 the Holy Spirit. We may answer to this, with Augustine, that there is a twofold voice of the 538 testimonies are wonderful&rdquo; (Ps 118:129). Men are to be
404 Holy Spirit. One is that by which he speaks inwardly in man&#8217;s heart; and only believers and 539 encouraged, not discouraged, to this kind of astonishment The other
405 the saints hear this voice, about which the Psalm (84:9) says: &#8220;I will hear what the Lord God 540 is the astonishment of disbelief, when someone does not believe
406 says within me.&#8221; The other voice is that by which the Holy Spirit speaks in the Scriptures or 541 what is said. So Matthew (13:54) says: &ldquo;They were
407 through those who preach, according to Matthew (10:20): &#8220;For it is not you who speak, but 542 astonished,&rdquo; and further on adds that &ldquo;They did not
408 the Holy Splirit who is speaking through you.&#8221; And this voice is heard by unbelievers and 543 accept him.&rdquo; It is from this kind of astonishment that the
409 sinners.</p> 544 Lord diverts Nicodeintis wheii he proposes an example and says:
410 <p>454 Thirdly, he refers to the origin of the Holy Spirit, which is hidden; thus he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">but you 545 <span style="font-weight: bold">The wind</span> (<i>spiritus</i>,
411 do not know where it comes from, </span>although you may hear its voice. And this is because the 546 wind, spirit) <span style="font-weight: bold">blows where it
412 Holy Spirit comes from the Father and the Son: &#8220;When the Paraclete comes, whom I will 547 wills.</span> In the literal sense, the same words can he explained
413 send you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father&#8221; (below 15:26). 548 in two ways.</p>
414 But the Father and the Son &#8220;dwell in inaccessible light, whom no man has seen or is able to 549 <p>450 In the first way, according to Chrysostom, spiritus is taken
415 see&#8221; (1 Tim 6:16).</p> 550 for the wind, as in Psalm 148 (v 8): &ldquo;The winds of the storm
416 <p>455 Fourthly, he gives the destination of the Holy Spirit, which is also hidden; and so he says, 551 that fulfill his word.&rdquo; According to this interpretation, he
417 you do not know where it goes, because the Spirit leads one to a hidden end, that is, eternal 552 says four things about the wind. First, the power of the wind, when
418 happiness. Thus it says in Ephesians (1:14) that the Holy Spirit is &#8220;the pledge of our 553 he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">the wind blows where it
419 inheritance.&#8221; And again, &#8220;The eye has not seen, nor has the ear heard, nor has the heart of 554 wills.</span> And if you say that the wind has no will, one may
420 man conceived, what God has prepared for those who love him&#8221; (1 Cor 2:9).</p> 555 answer that &ldquo;will&rdquo; is taken for a natural appetite,
421 <p>Or, <span style="font-weight: bold">you do not know where it comes from, </span>i.e., how the Spirit enters into a person, <span style="font-weight: bold">or 556 which is nothing more than a natural inclination, about which it is
422 where it goes, </span>i.e., to what perfection he may lead him: &#8220;If he comes toward me, I will not 557 said: &ldquo;He created the weight of the wind&rdquo; (Jb 28:25).
423 see him&#8221; (Jb 9:11).</p> 558 Secondly, he tells the evidence for the wind, when he says,
424 <p>456 <span style="font-weight: bold">So it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit, </span>i.e., they are like the Holy Spirit. And 559 <span style="font-weight: bold">and you hear its sound,</span>
425 no wonder: for as he had said before, &#8220;What is born of Spirit is itself spirit,&#8221; because the 560 where &ldquo;sound&rdquo; (<i>vox</i>, voice, sound) refers to the
426 qualities of the Holy Spirit are present in the spiritual man, just as the qualities of fire are 561 sound the wind makes when it strikes a body. Of this we read:
427 present in burning coal.</p> 562 &ldquo;The sound (<i>vox</i>) of your thunder was in the
428 <p>Therefore, the above four qualities of the Holy Spirit are found in one who has been born of 563 whirlwind&rdquo; (Ps 76:19).</p>
429 the Holy Spirit. First of all, he has freedom: &#8220;Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is 564 <p>Thirdly, he mentions the origin of the wind, which is unknown;
430 freedom&#8221; (2 Cor 3:17), for the Holy Spirit leads us to what is right: &#8220;Your good Spirit will 565 so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">but you do not know
431 lead me to the right path&#8221; (Ps 142:10); and he frees us from the slavery of sin and of the law: 566 where it comes from,</span> i.e., from where it starts: &ldquo;He
432 &#8220;The law of the Spirit, of life in Christ, has set me free&#8221; (Rom 8:2). Secondly, we get an 567 brings forth the winds out of his storehouse&rdquo; (Ps 134:7).
433 indication of him through the sound of his words; and when we hear them we know his 568 Fourthly, he mentions the wind&rsquo;s destination, which is also
434 spirituality, for it is out of the abundance of the heart that the mouth speaks.</p> 569 unknown; so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">or where it
435 <p>Thirdly, he has an origin and an end that are hidden, because no one can judge one who is 570 goes</span> you do not know, i.e., where it remains.</p>
436 spiritual: &#8220;The spiritual man judges all things, and he himself is judged by no one&#8221; (1 Cor 571 <p>And he applies this similarity to the subject under discussion,
437 2:15). Or, we do not know where such a person comes from, i.e., the source of his spiritual 572 saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">So it is with everyone who
438 birth, which is baptismal grace; or where he goes, i.e., of what he is made worthy, that is, of 573 is born of the Spirit.</span> As if to say: If the wind, which is
439 eternal life, which remains concealed from us.</p> 574 corporeal, has an origin which is hidden and a course that is
440 <p>457 Then the cause and reason for spiritual regeneration are set forth. First, a question is 575 unknown, why are you surprised if you cannot understand the course
441 asked by Nicodemus; secondly, the Lord&#8217;s answer is given (v 10).</p> 576 of spiritual regeneration.</p>
442 <p>458 It is apparent from the first that Nicodemus, as yet dull, and remaining a Jew on the level 577 <p>451 Augustine objects to this explanation and says that the Lord
443 of sense, was unable to understand the mysteries of Christ in spite of the examples and 578 was not speaking here about the wind, for we know where each of the
444 explanations that were given. And so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">How can all this happen?</span></p> 579 winds comes from and where it goes. For &ldquo;Auster&rdquo; comes
445 <p>There are two reasons why one may question about something. Some question because of 580 from the south and goes to the north; &ldquo;Boreas&rdquo; comes
446 disbelief, as did Zechariah, saying: &#8220;How will I know this? For I am an old man, and my wife 581 from the north and goes to the south. Why, then, does the Lord say
447 is advanced in age&#8221; (Lk 1:18); &#8220;He confounds those who search into mysteries&#8221; (Is 40:23). 582 of this wind, you do not know where it comes from or where it
448 Others, on the other hand, question because of a desire to know, as the Blessed Virgin did 583 goes?</p>
449 when she said to the angel: &#8220;How shall this be, since I do not know man?&#8221; (Lk 1:34). It is the 584 <p>One may answer that there are two ways in which the source of
450 latter who are instructed. And so, because Nicodemus asked from a desire to learn, he 585 the wind might be unknown. In one way, in general: and in this way
451 deserved to be instructed.</p> 586 it is possible to know where it comes from, i.e., from which
452 <p>459 And this is what follows: <span style="font-weight: bold">Jesus replied. </span>First the Lord chides him for his slowness. 587 direction of the world, for example, that Auster comes from the
453 Secondly, he answers his question (v 13).</p> 588 south, and where it goes, that is, to the north. In another way, in
454 <p>460 He chides him for his slowness, basing himself on three things. First, the condition of the 589 particular: and in this sense it is not known where the wind comes
455 person to whom he is speaking, when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">You are a teacher in Israel. </span>And here the 590 from, i.e., at which precise place it originated, or where it goes,
456 Lord did not chide him to insult him. Rather, because Nicodemus, presuming on his own 591 i.e., exactly where it stops. And almost all the Greek doctors
457 knowledge, was still relying on his status as a teacher, the Lord wished to make him a temple 592 agree with this exposition of Chrysostom.</p>
458 of the Holy Spirit by humbling him: &#8220;For whom will I have regard? For he who is humble and 593 <p>452 In another way, <i>spiritus</i> is taken for the Holy
459 of contrite spirit&#8221; (Is 66:2). And he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">You are a teacher, </span>because it is tolerable if a simple 594 Spirit. And according to this, he mentions four things about the
460 person cannot grasp profound truths, but in a teacher, it deserves rebuke. And so he says, You 595 Holy Spirit. First, his power, saying, <span style=
461 are a teacher, i.e., of the letter that kills (2 Cor 3:6), <span style="font-weight: bold">and you do not know these things? </span>i.e., 596 "font-weight: bold">The Spirit blows where it wills,</span> because
462 spiritual things. &#8220;For although you ought to be teachers by now, you yourselves need to be 597 it is by the free use of his power that he breathes where he wills
463 taught again&#8221; (Heb 5:12).</p> 598 and when he wills, by instructing hearts: &ldquo;One and the same
464 <p>461 You might say that the Lord would have rebuked Nicodemus justly if he had spoken to 599 Spirit does all these things, distributing to each as he
465 him about matters of the Old Law and he did not understand them; but he spoke to him about 600 wills&rdquo; (1 Cor 12:11). This refutes the error of Macedonius
466 the New Law. I answer that the things which the Lord says of spiritual generation are 601 who thought that the Holy Spirit was the minister of the Father and
467 contained in the Old Law, although under a figure, as is said in 1 Corinthians (10:2): &#8220;All 602 the Son. But then he would not be breathing where he willed, but
468 were baptized into Moses, in the cloud and in the sea.&#8221; And the prophets also said this: &#8220;I will 603 where he was commanded.</p>
469 pour clean water upon you, and you will be cleansed from all your uncleanness&#8221; (Ez 36:25).</p> 604 <p>453 Secondly, he mentions the evidence for the Holy Spirit, when
470 <p>462 Secondly, he rebukes him for his slowness on account of the character of the person who 605 he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">and you hear its
471 is speaking. For it is tolerable if one does not acquiesce to the statements of an ignorant 606 voice:</span> &ldquo;Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden
472 person; but it is reprehensible to reject the statements of a man who is wise and who 607 your hearts&rdquo; (Ps 94:8).</p>
473 possesses great authority. And so he says, Amen, amen I say to you, that we <span style="font-weight: bold">know of what 608 <p>Chrysostom objects to this and says that this cannot pertain to
474 we speak, and we bear witness of what we see. </span>For a qualified witness must base his 609 the Holy Spirit. For the Lord was speaking to Nicodemus, who was
475 testimony on hearing or sight: &#8220;What we have seen and heard&#8221; (1 Jn 1:3). And so the Lord 610 still an unbeliever, and thus not fit to hear the voice of the Holy
476 mentions both: <span style="font-weight: bold">we know of what we speak, and we bear witness of what </span>we see. Indeed, 611 Spirit. We may answer to this, with Augustine, that there is a
477 the Lord as man knows all things: &#8220;Lord, you know all things&#8221; (below 21:17); &#8220;The Lord, 612 twofold voice of the Holy Spirit. One is that by which he speaks
478 whose knowledge is holy, knows clearly&#8221; (2 Mc 6:30). Further, he sees all things by his 613 inwardly in man&rsquo;s heart; and only believers and the saints
479 divine knowledge: &#8220;I speak of what I have seen with my Father,&#8221; as we read below (8:38).</p> 614 hear this voice, about which the Psalm (84:9) says: &ldquo;I will
480 <p>He speaks in the plural, we know, we see, in order to suggest the mystery of the Trinity: &#8220;The 615 hear what the Lord God says within me.&rdquo; The other voice is
481 Father, who dwells in me, he does the works&#8221; (below 14:10). Or, we know, i.e., I, and others 616 that by which the Holy Spirit speaks in the Scriptures or through
482 who have been made spiritual, because &#8220;No one knows the Father but the Son, and he to 617 those who preach, according to Matthew (10:20): &ldquo;For it is
483 whom the Son wishes to reveal him&#8221; (Mt 11:27).</p> 618 not you who speak, but the Holy Splirit who is speaking through
484 <p><span style="font-weight: bold">But you do not accept our testimony, </span>so approved, so solid. &#8220;And his testimony no one 619 you.&rdquo; And this voice is heard by unbelievers and sinners.</p>
485 accepts (below 3:32).</p> 620 <p>454 Thirdly, he refers to the origin of the Holy Spirit, which
486 <p>463 Thirdly, he rebukes him for his slowness because of the quality of the things under 621 is hidden; thus he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">but you do
487 discussion. For it is not unusual when someone does not grasp difficult matters, but it is 622 not know where it comes from,</span> although you may hear its
488 inexcusable not to grasp easy things. So he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">If I spoke of earthly things, and you did 623 voice. And this is because the Holy Spirit comes from the Father
489 not believe, how will you believe if I tell you of heavenly things? </span>As if to say: If you do not 624 and the Son: &ldquo;When the Paraclete comes, whom I will send you
490 grasp these easy things, how will you be able to understand the progress of the Holy Spirit? 625 from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the
491 &#8220;What is on earth we find difficult, and who will search Out the things in heaven,&#8221; as is said 626 Father&rdquo; (below 15:26). But the Father and the Son
492 in Wisdom (9:10).</p> 627 &ldquo;dwell in inaccessible light, whom no man has seen or is able
493 <p>464 But one might object that the above does not show that the Lord spoke of earthly things 628 to see&rdquo; (1 Tim 6:16).</p>
494 to Nicodemus. I answer, according to Chrysostom, that the Lord&#8217;s statement, <span style="font-weight: bold">If I spoke of 629 <p>455 Fourthly, he gives the destination of the Holy Spirit, which
495 earthly things, </span>refers to the example of the wind. For the wind, being something which is 630 is also hidden; and so he says, you do not know where it goes,
496 generable and corruptible, is regarded as an earthly thing. Or one might say, again according 631 because the Spirit leads one to a hidden end, that is, eternal
497 to Chrysostom, that the spiritual generation which is given in baptism is heavenly as to its 632 happiness. Thus it says in Ephesians (1:14) that the Holy Spirit is
498 source, which sanctifies and regenerates; but it is earthly as to its subject, for the one 633 &ldquo;the pledge of our inheritance.&rdquo; And again, &ldquo;The
499 regenerated, man, is of the earth.</p> 634 eye has not seen, nor has the ear heard, nor has the heart of man
500 <p>Or one might answer, according to Augustine, that we must understand this in reference to 635 conceived, what God has prepared for those who love him&rdquo; (1
501 what Christ said earlier: &#8220;Destroy this temple,&#8221; which is earthly, because he said this about 636 Cor 2:9).</p>
502 the temple of his body, which he had taken from the earth.</p> 637 <p>Or, <span style="font-weight: bold">you do not know where it
503 <p><span style="font-weight: bold">If I spoke of earthly things, and you did not believe, how will you believe if I tell you of 638 comes from,</span> i.e., how the Spirit enters into a person,
504 heavenly things? </span>As if to say: If you do not believe in a spiritual generation occurring in 639 <span style="font-weight: bold">or where it goes,</span> i.e., to
505 time, how will you believe in the eternal generation of the Son? Or, if you do not believe 640 what perfection he may lead him: &ldquo;If he comes toward me, I
506 what I tell you about the power of my body, how will you believe what I tell you about the 641 will not see him&rdquo; (Jb 9:11).</p>
507 power of my divinity and about the power of the Holy Spirit?</p> 642 <p>456 <span style="font-weight: bold">So it is with everyone who
508 <p>465 <span style="font-weight: bold">Jesus replied. </span>Here he answers the question. First, he lays down the causes of spiritual 643 is born of the Spirit,</span> i.e., they are like the Holy Spirit.
509 regeneration. Secondly, he explains what he says (3:16). Now there are two causes of spiritual 644 And no wonder: for as he had said before, &ldquo;What is born of
510 regeneration, namely, the mystery of the incarnation of Christ, and his passion. So first, he 645 Spirit is itself spirit,&rdquo; because the qualities of the Holy
646 Spirit are present in the spiritual man, just as the qualities of
647 fire are present in burning coal.</p>
648 <p>Therefore, the above four qualities of the Holy Spirit are found
649 in one who has been born of the Holy Spirit. First of all, he has
650 freedom: &ldquo;Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is
651 freedom&rdquo; (2 Cor 3:17), for the Holy Spirit leads us to what
652 is right: &ldquo;Your good Spirit will lead me to the right
653 path&rdquo; (Ps 142:10); and he frees us from the slavery of sin
654 and of the law: &ldquo;The law of the Spirit, of life in Christ,
655 has set me free&rdquo; (Rom 8:2). Secondly, we get an indication of
656 him through the sound of his words; and when we hear them we know
657 his spirituality, for it is out of the abundance of the heart that
658 the mouth speaks.</p>
659 <p>Thirdly, he has an origin and an end that are hidden, because no
660 one can judge one who is spiritual: &ldquo;The spiritual man judges
661 all things, and he himself is judged by no one&rdquo; (1 Cor 2:15).
662 Or, we do not know where such a person comes from, i.e., the source
663 of his spiritual birth, which is baptismal grace; or where he goes,
664 i.e., of what he is made worthy, that is, of eternal life, which
665 remains concealed from us.</p>
666 <p>457 Then the cause and reason for spiritual regeneration are set
667 forth. First, a question is asked by Nicodemus; secondly, the
668 Lord&rsquo;s answer is given (v 10).</p>
669 <p>458 It is apparent from the first that Nicodemus, as yet dull,
670 and remaining a Jew on the level of sense, was unable to understand
671 the mysteries of Christ in spite of the examples and explanations
672 that were given. And so he says, <span style=
673 "font-weight: bold">How can all this happen?</span></p>
674 <p>There are two reasons why one may question about something. Some
675 question because of disbelief, as did Zechariah, saying: &ldquo;How
676 will I know this? For I am an old man, and my wife is advanced in
677 age&rdquo; (Lk 1:18); &ldquo;He confounds those who search into
678 mysteries&rdquo; (Is 40:23). Others, on the other hand, question
679 because of a desire to know, as the Blessed Virgin did when she
680 said to the angel: &ldquo;How shall this be, since I do not know
681 man?&rdquo; (Lk 1:34). It is the latter who are instructed. And so,
682 because Nicodemus asked from a desire to learn, he deserved to be
683 instructed.</p>
684 <p>459 And this is what follows: <span style=
685 "font-weight: bold">Jesus replied.</span> First the Lord chides him
686 for his slowness. Secondly, he answers his question (v 13).</p>
687 <p>460 He chides him for his slowness, basing himself on three
688 things. First, the condition of the person to whom he is speaking,
689 when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">You are a teacher in
690 Israel.</span> And here the Lord did not chide him to insult him.
691 Rather, because Nicodemus, presuming on his own knowledge, was
692 still relying on his status as a teacher, the Lord wished to make
693 him a temple of the Holy Spirit by humbling him: &ldquo;For whom
694 will I have regard? For he who is humble and of contrite
695 spirit&rdquo; (Is 66:2). And he says, <span style=
696 "font-weight: bold">You are a teacher,</span> because it is
697 tolerable if a simple person cannot grasp profound truths, but in a
698 teacher, it deserves rebuke. And so he says, You are a teacher,
699 i.e., of the letter that kills (2 Cor 3:6), <span style=
700 "font-weight: bold">and you do not know these things?</span> i.e.,
701 spiritual things. &ldquo;For although you ought to be teachers by
702 now, you yourselves need to be taught again&rdquo; (Heb 5:12).</p>
703 <p>461 You might say that the Lord would have rebuked Nicodemus
704 justly if he had spoken to him about matters of the Old Law and he
705 did not understand them; but he spoke to him about the New Law. I
706 answer that the things which the Lord says of spiritual generation
707 are contained in the Old Law, although under a figure, as is said
708 in 1 Corinthians (10:2): &ldquo;All were baptized into Moses, in
709 the cloud and in the sea.&rdquo; And the prophets also said this:
710 &ldquo;I will pour clean water upon you, and you will be cleansed
711 from all your uncleanness&rdquo; (Ez 36:25).</p>
712 <p>462 Secondly, he rebukes him for his slowness on account of the
713 character of the person who is speaking. For it is tolerable if one
714 does not acquiesce to the statements of an ignorant person; but it
715 is reprehensible to reject the statements of a man who is wise and
716 who possesses great authority. And so he says, Amen, amen I say to
717 you, that we <span style="font-weight: bold">know of what we speak,
718 and we bear witness of what we see.</span> For a qualified witness
719 must base his testimony on hearing or sight: &ldquo;What we have
720 seen and heard&rdquo; (1 Jn 1:3). And so the Lord mentions both:
721 <span style="font-weight: bold">we know of what we speak, and we
722 bear witness of what</span> we see. Indeed, the Lord as man knows
723 all things: &ldquo;Lord, you know all things&rdquo; (below 21:17);
724 &ldquo;The Lord, whose knowledge is holy, knows clearly&rdquo; (2
725 Mc 6:30). Further, he sees all things by his divine knowledge:
726 &ldquo;I speak of what I have seen with my Father,&rdquo; as we
727 read below (8:38).</p>
728 <p>He speaks in the plural, we know, we see, in order to suggest
729 the mystery of the Trinity: &ldquo;The Father, who dwells in me, he
730 does the works&rdquo; (below 14:10). Or, we know, i.e., I, and
731 others who have been made spiritual, because &ldquo;No one knows
732 the Father but the Son, and he to whom the Son wishes to reveal
733 him&rdquo; (Mt 11:27).</p>
734 <p><span style="font-weight: bold">But you do not accept our
735 testimony,</span> so approved, so solid. &ldquo;And his testimony
736 no one accepts (below 3:32).</p>
737 <p>463 Thirdly, he rebukes him for his slowness because of the
738 quality of the things under discussion. For it is not unusual when
739 someone does not grasp difficult matters, but it is inexcusable not
740 to grasp easy things. So he says, <span style=
741 "font-weight: bold">If I spoke of earthly things, and you did not
742 believe, how will you believe if I tell you of heavenly
743 things?</span> As if to say: If you do not grasp these easy things,
744 how will you be able to understand the progress of the Holy Spirit?
745 &ldquo;What is on earth we find difficult, and who will search Out
746 the things in heaven,&rdquo; as is said in Wisdom (9:10).</p>
747 <p>464 But one might object that the above does not show that the
748 Lord spoke of earthly things to Nicodemus. I answer, according to
749 Chrysostom, that the Lord&rsquo;s statement, <span style=
750 "font-weight: bold">If I spoke of earthly things,</span> refers to
751 the example of the wind. For the wind, being something which is
752 generable and corruptible, is regarded as an earthly thing. Or one
753 might say, again according to Chrysostom, that the spiritual
754 generation which is given in baptism is heavenly as to its source,
755 which sanctifies and regenerates; but it is earthly as to its
756 subject, for the one regenerated, man, is of the earth.</p>
757 <p>Or one might answer, according to Augustine, that we must
758 understand this in reference to what Christ said earlier:
759 &ldquo;Destroy this temple,&rdquo; which is earthly, because he
760 said this about the temple of his body, which he had taken from the
761 earth.</p>
762 <p><span style="font-weight: bold">If I spoke of earthly things,
763 and you did not believe, how will you believe if I tell you of
764 heavenly things?</span> As if to say: If you do not believe in a
765 spiritual generation occurring in time, how will you believe in the
766 eternal generation of the Son? Or, if you do not believe what I
767 tell you about the power of my body, how will you believe what I
768 tell you about the power of my divinity and about the power of the
769 Holy Spirit?</p>
770 <p>465 <span style="font-weight: bold">Jesus replied.</span> Here
771 he answers the question. First, he lays down the causes of
772 spiritual regeneration. Secondly, he explains what he says (3:16).
773 Now there are two causes of spiritual regeneration, namely, the
774 mystery of the incarnation of Christ, and his passion. So first, he
511 treats of the incarnation; secondly, of the passion (3:14).</p> 775 treats of the incarnation; secondly, of the passion (3:14).</p>
512 <p>466 Here we should consider, first of all, how this answer of Christ is an adequa~,e reply to 776 <p>466 Here we should consider, first of all, how this answer of
513 the question of Nicodemus. For above, when the Lord was speaking of the Spirit, he said: <span style="font-weight: bold">you 777 Christ is an adequa~,e reply to the question of Nicodemus. For
514 do not know where it comes from or where it </span>goes. We understand by this that spiritual 778 above, when the Lord was speaking of the Spirit, he said:
515 regeneration has a hidden source and a hidden end. Now the things in heaven are hidden from 779 <span style="font-weight: bold">you do not know where it comes from
516 us: &#8220;Who will search out the things in heaven?&#8221; (Wis 9:16). Therefore, the sense of 780 or where it</span> goes. We understand by this that spiritual
517 Nicodemus&#8217; question, <span style="font-weight: bold">How can all this happen? </span>is this: How can something come from the 781 regeneration has a hidden source and a hidden end. Now the things
518 secret things of heaven or go to the secret things of heaven? So before answering, the Lord 782 in heaven are hidden from us: &ldquo;Who will search out the things
519 expressed this interpretation of the question, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">how will you believe if I tell you of 783 in heaven?&rdquo; (Wis 9:16). Therefore, the sense of
520 heavenly things?</span></p> 784 Nicodemus&rsquo; question, <span style="font-weight: bold">How can
521 <p>And immediately he begins to show whose prerogative it is to ascend into heaven, namely, 785 all this happen?</span> is this: How can something come from the
522 anyone who came down from heaven, according to the statement of Ephesians (4:10): &#8220;He 786 secret things of heaven or go to the secret things of heaven? So
523 who descended is he who ascended.&#8221; This is verified even in natural things, namely, that each 787 before answering, the Lord expressed this interpretation of the
524 body tends to a place according to its origin or nature. And so in this way it can come about 788 question, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">how will you
525 that someone, through the Spirit, may go to a place which carnal persons do not know, i.e., by 789 believe if I tell you of heavenly things?</span></p>
526 ascending into heaven, if this is done through the power of one who descended from heaven: 790 <p>And immediately he begins to show whose prerogative it is to
527 because he descended in order that, in ascending, he might open a way for us: &#8220;He ascends, 791 ascend into heaven, namely, anyone who came down from heaven,
528 opening the way before them&#8221; (Mi 2:13).</p> 792 according to the statement of Ephesians (4:10): &ldquo;He who
529 <p>467 Some have fallen into error because of his saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">the One who came down from 793 descended is he who ascended.&rdquo; This is verified even in
530 heaven, the Son of Man. </span>For since Son of Man designates human nature, which is composed 794 natural things, namely, that each body tends to a place according
531 of soul and body, then because he says that the Son descended from heaven, Valentinus 795 to its origin or nature. And so in this way it can come about that
532 wanted to maintain that he even took his body from heaven and thus passed through the 796 someone, through the Spirit, may go to a place which carnal persons
533 Virgin without receiving anything from her, as water passes through a pipe; so that his body 797 do not know, i.e., by ascending into heaven, if this is done
534 was neither of an earthly substance nor taken from the Virgin. But this is contrary to the 798 through the power of one who descended from heaven: because he
535 statement of the Apostle, writing to the Romans (1:3): &#8220;who was made from the seed of 799 descended in order that, in ascending, he might open a way for us:
536 David according to the flesh.&#8221;</p> 800 &ldquo;He ascends, opening the way before them&rdquo; (Mi
537 <p>On the other hand, Origen said that he descended from heaven as to his soul, which, he says, 801 2:13).</p>
538 had been created along with the angels from the very beginning, and that later this soul 802 <p>467 Some have fallen into error because of his saying,
539 descended from heaven and took flesh from the Virgin. But this also conflicts with the 803 <span style="font-weight: bold">the One who came down from heaven,
540 Catholic faith, which teaches that souls do not exist before their bodies.</p> 804 the Son of Man.</span> For since Son of Man designates human
541 <p>468 Therefore, we should not understand that the Son of Man descended from heaven 805 nature, which is composed of soul and body, then because he says
542 according to his human nature, but only according to his divine nature. For since in Christ 806 that the Son descended from heaven, Valentinus wanted to maintain
543 there is one <i>suppositum</i>, or hypostasis, or person of the two natures, the divine and human 807 that he even took his body from heaven and thus passed through the
544 natures, then no matter from which of these two natures this <i>suppositum</i> is named, divine and 808 Virgin without receiving anything from her, as water passes through
545 human things can be attributed to him. For we can say that the Son of Man created the stars 809 a pipe; so that his body was neither of an earthly substance nor
546 and that the Son of God was crucified. But the Son of God was crucified, not according to his 810 taken from the Virgin. But this is contrary to the statement of the
547 divine nature, but according to his human nature; and the Son of Man created the stars 811 Apostle, writing to the Romans (1:3): &ldquo;who was made from the
548 according to his divine nature. And so in things that are said of Christ, the distinction is not to 812 seed of David according to the flesh.&rdquo;</p>
549 be taken with respect to that about which they are said, because divine and human things are 813 <p>On the other hand, Origen said that he descended from heaven as
550 said of God and man indifferently; but a distinction must be made with respect to that 814 to his soul, which, he says, had been created along with the angels
551 according to which they are said, because divine things are said of Christ according to his 815 from the very beginning, and that later this soul descended from
552 divine nature, but human things according to his human nature. Thus, to descend from heaven 816 heaven and took flesh from the Virgin. But this also conflicts with
553 is said of the Son of Man, not according to his human nature, but according to his divine 817 the Catholic faith, which teaches that souls do not exist before
554 nature, according to which it was appropriate to him to have been from heaven before the 818 their bodies.</p>
555 incarnation, as is said, &#8220;Heaven belongs to the Lord&#8221; (Ps 113:16).</p> 819 <p>468 Therefore, we should not understand that the Son of Man
556 <p>469 he is said to have come down, but not by local motion, becatise then he Would not have 820 descended from heaven according to his human nature, but only
557 remained in heaven; for nothing which moves locally remains in the place from which it 821 according to his divine nature. For since in Christ there is one
558 comes down. And so to exclude local motion, he adds, <span style="font-weight: bold">who lives in heaven. </span>As if to say: He 822 <i>suppositum</i>, or hypostasis, or person of the two natures, the
559 descended from heaven in such a way as yet to be in heaven. For he came down from heaven 823 divine and human natures, then no matter from which of these two
560 without ceasing to be above, yet assuming a nature which is from below. And because he is 824 natures this <i>suppositum</i> is named, divine and human things
561 not enclosed or held fast by his body which exists on earth, he was, according to his divinity, 825 can be attributed to him. For we can say that the Son of Man
562 in heaven and everywhere. And therefore to indicate that he is said to have come down in this 826 created the stars and that the Son of God was crucified. But the
563 way, because he assumed a [human] nature, he said, <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son of Man </span>came down, i.e., insofar 827 Son of God was crucified, not according to his divine nature, but
564 as he became Son of Man.</p> 828 according to his human nature; and the Son of Man created the stars
565 <p>470 Or it can be said, as Hilary does, that he came down from heaven as to his body: not that 829 according to his divine nature. And so in things that are said of
566 the material of Christ&#8217;s body came down from heaven, but that the power which formed it 830 Christ, the distinction is not to be taken with respect to that
567 was from heaven.</p> 831 about which they are said, because divine and human things are said
568 <p>471 But why does he say, <span style="font-weight: bold">No one has gone up to heaven except the Son of Man, who lives 832 of God and man indifferently; but a distinction must be made with
569 in heaven? </span>For have not Paul and Peter and the other saints gone up, according to 2 833 respect to that according to which they are said, because divine
570 Corinthians (5:1): &#8220;We have a house in the heavens.&#8221; I answer that no one goes up into 834 things are said of Christ according to his divine nature, but human
571 heaven except Christ and his members, i.e., those believers who are just. Accordingly, the 835 things according to his human nature. Thus, to descend from heaven
572 Son of God came down from heaven in order that, by making us his members, he might 836 is said of the Son of Man, not according to his human nature, but
573 prepare us to ascend into heaven: now, indeed, in hope, but later in reality. &#8220;He has raised us 837 according to his divine nature, according to which it was
574 up, and has given us a place in heaven in Christ Jesus&#8221; (Eph 2:6).</p> 838 appropriate to him to have been from heaven before the incarnation,
575 <p>472 Here he mentions the mystery of the passion, in virtue of which baptism has its efficacy: 839 as is said, &ldquo;Heaven belongs to the Lord&rdquo; (Ps
576 &#8220;We who have been baptized into Christ Jesus, have been baptized into his death&#8221; (Rom 6:3). 840 113:16).</p>
577 And with regard to this he does three things. First, he gives a symbol for the passion. 841 <p>469 he is said to have come down, but not by local motion,
578 Secondly, the manner of the passion. Thirdly, the fruit of the passion.</p> 842 becatise then he Would not have remained in heaven; for nothing
579 <p>473 He takes the symbol from the old law, in order to adapt to the understanding of 843 which moves locally remains in the place from which it comes down.
580 Nicodemus; so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Just as Moses lifted up the serpent in the desert. </span>This refers to 844 And so to exclude local motion, he adds, <span style=
581 Numbers (21:5) when the Lord, faced with the Jewish people saying, &#8220;We are sick of this 845 "font-weight: bold">who lives in heaven.</span> As if to say: He
582 useless food,&#8221; sent serpents to punish them; and when the people came to Moses and he 846 descended from heaven in such a way as yet to be in heaven. For he
583 interceded with the Lord, the Lord commanded that for a remedy they make a serpent of 847 came down from heaven without ceasing to be above, yet assuming a
584 bronze; and this was to serve both as a remedy against those serpents and as a symbol of the 848 nature which is from below. And because he is not enclosed or held
585 Lord&#8217;s passion. Hence it says that this bronze serpent was lifted up as a sign (Nm 21:9).</p> 849 fast by his body which exists on earth, he was, according to his
586 <p>Now it is characteristic of serpents that they are poisonous, but not so the serpent of bronze, 850 divinity, in heaven and everywhere. And therefore to indicate that
587 although it was a symbol of a poisonous serpent. So, too, Christ did not have sin, which is 851 he is said to have come down in this way, because he assumed a
588 also a poison: &#8220;Sin, when it is fully developed, brings forth death&#8221; (Jas 1:15); but he had the 852 [human] nature, he said, <span style="font-weight: bold">the Son of
589 likeness of sin: &#8220;God sent his own Son, in the likeness of sinful flesh&#8221; (Rom 8:3). And thus 853 Man</span> came down, i.e., insofar as he became Son of Man.</p>
590 Christ had the effect of the serpent against the insurgence of inflamed concupiscences.</p> 854 <p>470 Or it can be said, as Hilary does, that he came down from
591 <p>474 He shows the manner of the passion when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">so must the Son of Man be lifted 855 heaven as to his body: not that the material of Christ&rsquo;s body
592 up: </span>and this refers to the lifting up of the cross. So below (12:34) when it says, &#8220;The Son of 856 came down from heaven, but that the power which formed it was from
593 Man must be lifted up,&#8221; it also has, &#8220;He said this to indicate the manner of his death.&#8221;</p> 857 heaven.</p>
594 <p>He willed to die lifted up, first of all, to cleanse the heavens: for since he had cleansed the 858 <p>471 But why does he say, <span style="font-weight: bold">No one
595 things on earth by the sanctity of his life, the things of the air were left to be cleansed by his 859 has gone up to heaven except the Son of Man, who lives in
596 death: &#8220;through him he should reconcile all things to himself, whether on earth or in the 860 heaven?</span> For have not Paul and Peter and the other saints
597 heavens, making peace through his blood&#8221; (Col 1:20). Secondly, to triumph over the demons 861 gone up, according to 2 Corinthians (5:1): &ldquo;We have a house
598 who prepare for war in the air: &#8220;the prince of the power of the air&#8221; (Eph 2:2). Thirdly, he 862 in the heavens.&rdquo; I answer that no one goes up into heaven
599 wished to die lifted up to draw our hearts to himself: &#8220;I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will 863 except Christ and his members, i.e., those believers who are just.
600 draw all to myself&#8221; (below 12:32). And fourthly, because in the death of the cross he was 864 Accordingly, the Son of God came down from heaven in order that, by
601 lifted up in the sense that there he triumphed over his enemies; so it is not called a death, but 865 making us his members, he might prepare us to ascend into heaven:
602 a lifting up: &#8220;He will drink from the stream on the way, therefore he will lift up his head&#8221; (Ps 866 now, indeed, in hope, but later in reality. &ldquo;He has raised us
603 109:7). Fifthly, he willed to die lifted up because the cross was the reason for his being lifted 867 up, and has given us a place in heaven in Christ Jesus&rdquo; (Eph
604 up, i.e., exalted: &#8220;He became obedient to the Father even to death, the death of the cross; on 868 2:6).</p>
605 account of which God has exalted him&#8221; (Phil 2:8).</p> 869 <p>472 Here he mentions the mystery of the passion, in virtue of
606 <p>475 Now the fruit of Christ&#8217;s passion is eternal life; hence he says, so <span style="font-weight: bold">that everyone who 870 which baptism has its efficacy: &ldquo;We who have been baptized
607 believes in him, </span>performing good works, <span style="font-weight: bold">may not be lost, but have eternal life. </span>And this 871 into Christ Jesus, have been baptized into his death&rdquo; (Rom
608 fruit corresponds to the fruit of the symbolic serpent. For whoever looked upon the serpent of 872 6:3). And with regard to this he does three things. First, he gives
609 bronze was freed from poison and his life was preserved. But he who looks upon the lifted up 873 a symbol for the passion. Secondly, the manner of the passion.
610 Son of Man, and believes in the crucified Christ, he is freed from poison and sin: &#8220;Whoever 874 Thirdly, the fruit of the passion.</p>
611 believes in me will never die&#8221; (below 11:26), and is preserved for eternal life. &#8220;These things 875 <p>473 He takes the symbol from the old law, in order to adapt to
612 are written that you may believe ... and that believing you may have life in his name&#8221; (below 876 the understanding of Nicodemus; so he says, <span style=
613 20:3 1).</p> 877 "font-weight: bold">Just as Moses lifted up the serpent in the
614 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">&#160;</p> 878 desert.</span> This refers to Numbers (21:5) when the Lord, faced
615 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style="font-weight: bold">LECTURE 3</span></p> 879 with the Jewish people saying, &ldquo;We are sick of this useless
616 <BLOCKQUOTE><p style="margin-left: 0.5in">16 &#8220;For God so loved the world 880 food,&rdquo; sent serpents to punish them; and when the people came
617 <BR>that he gave his Only Begotten Son, 881 to Moses and he interceded with the Lord, the Lord commanded that
618 <BR>so that whoever believes in him should not perish, 882 for a remedy they make a serpent of bronze; and this was to serve
619 <BR>but have eternal life. 883 both as a remedy against those serpents and as a symbol of the
620 <BR>17 God did not send his Son into the world 884 Lord&rsquo;s passion. Hence it says that this bronze serpent was
621 <br>to judge the world, 885 lifted up as a sign (Nm 21:9).</p>
622 <br>but that the world might he saved through him. 886 <p>Now it is characteristic of serpents that they are poisonous,
623 <br>18 Whoever believes in him is not judged; 887 but not so the serpent of bronze, although it was a symbol of a
624 <br>but whoever does not believe is already judged, 888 poisonous serpent. So, too, Christ did not have sin, which is also
625 <br>since he does not believe in the name of the 889 a poison: &ldquo;Sin, when it is fully developed, brings forth
626 <br>Only Begotten Son of God. 890 death&rdquo; (Jas 1:15); but he had the likeness of sin: &ldquo;God
627 <br>19 The judgment of condemnation is this: 891 sent his own Son, in the likeness of sinful flesh&rdquo; (Rom 8:3).
628 <br>the light came into the world, 892 And thus Christ had the effect of the serpent against the
629 <br>and men loved darkness more than the light, 893 insurgence of inflamed concupiscences.</p>
630 <br>because their deeds were evil. 894 <p>474 He shows the manner of the passion when he says,
631 <br>20 Everyone who practices evil hates the light, 895 <span style="font-weight: bold">so must the Son of Man be lifted
632 <br>and does not approach the light 896 up:</span> and this refers to the lifting up of the cross. So below
633 <br>for fear that his deeds might be exposed. 897 (12:34) when it says, &ldquo;The Son of Man must be lifted
634 <br>21 But everyone who practices the truth 898 up,&rdquo; it also has, &ldquo;He said this to indicate the manner
635 <br>comes to the light, 899 of his death.&rdquo;</p>
636 <BR>to make clear that his deeds are done in God.&#8221;</p></BLOCKQUOTE> 900 <p>He willed to die lifted up, first of all, to cleanse the
637 <p>476 Above, the Lord assigned as the cause of spiritual regeneration the coming down of the 901 heavens: for since he had cleansed the things on earth by the
638 Son and the lifting up of the Son of Man; and he set forth its fruit, which is eternal life. But 902 sanctity of his life, the things of the air were left to be
639 this fruit seemed unbelievable to men laboring under the necessity of dying. And so now the 903 cleansed by his death: &ldquo;through him he should reconcile all
640 Lord explains this. First, he proves the greatness of the fruit from the greatness of God&#8217;s love. 904 things to himself, whether on earth or in the heavens, making peace
905 through his blood&rdquo; (Col 1:20). Secondly, to triumph over the
906 demons who prepare for war in the air: &ldquo;the prince of the
907 power of the air&rdquo; (Eph 2:2). Thirdly, he wished to die lifted
908 up to draw our hearts to himself: &ldquo;I, if I am lifted up from
909 the earth, will draw all to myself&rdquo; (below 12:32). And
910 fourthly, because in the death of the cross he was lifted up in the
911 sense that there he triumphed over his enemies; so it is not called
912 a death, but a lifting up: &ldquo;He will drink from the stream on
913 the way, therefore he will lift up his head&rdquo; (Ps 109:7).
914 Fifthly, he willed to die lifted up because the cross was the
915 reason for his being lifted up, i.e., exalted: &ldquo;He became
916 obedient to the Father even to death, the death of the cross; on
917 account of which God has exalted him&rdquo; (Phil 2:8).</p>
918 <p>475 Now the fruit of Christ&rsquo;s passion is eternal life;
919 hence he says, so <span style="font-weight: bold">that everyone who
920 believes in him,</span> performing good works, <span style=
921 "font-weight: bold">may not be lost, but have eternal life.</span>
922 And this fruit corresponds to the fruit of the symbolic serpent.
923 For whoever looked upon the serpent of bronze was freed from poison
924 and his life was preserved. But he who looks upon the lifted up Son
925 of Man, and believes in the crucified Christ, he is freed from
926 poison and sin: &ldquo;Whoever believes in me will never die&rdquo;
927 (below 11:26), and is preserved for eternal life. &ldquo;These
928 things are written that you may believe ... and that believing you
929 may have life in his name&rdquo; (below 20:3 1).</p>
930 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">
931 &nbsp;</p>
932 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style=
933 "font-weight: bold">LECTURE 3</span></p>
934 <blockquote>
935 <p style="margin-left: 0.5in">16 &ldquo;For God so loved the
936 world<br />
937 that he gave his Only Begotten Son,<br />
938 so that whoever believes in him should not perish,<br />
939 but have eternal life.<br />
940 17 God did not send his Son into the world<br />
941 to judge the world,<br />
942 but that the world might he saved through him.<br />
943 18 Whoever believes in him is not judged;<br />
944 but whoever does not believe is already judged,<br />
945 since he does not believe in the name of the<br />
946 Only Begotten Son of God.<br />
947 19 The judgment of condemnation is this:<br />
948 the light came into the world,<br />
949 and men loved darkness more than the light,<br />
950 because their deeds were evil.<br />
951 20 Everyone who practices evil hates the light,<br />
952 and does not approach the light<br />
953 for fear that his deeds might be exposed.<br />
954 21 But everyone who practices the truth<br />
955 comes to the light,<br />
956 to make clear that his deeds are done in God.&rdquo;</p>
957 </blockquote>
958 <p>476 Above, the Lord assigned as the cause of spiritual
959 regeneration the coming down of the Son and the lifting up of the
960 Son of Man; and he set forth its fruit, which is eternal life. But
961 this fruit seemed unbelievable to men laboring under the necessity
962 of dying. And so now the Lord explains this. First, he proves the
963 greatness of the fruit from the greatness of God&rsquo;s love.
641 Secondly, he rejects a certain reply (v 17).</p> 964 Secondly, he rejects a certain reply (v 17).</p>
642 <p>477 Here we should note that the cause of all our good is the Lord and divine love. For to 965 <p>477 Here we should note that the cause of all our good is the
643 love is, properly speaking, to will good to someone. Therefore, since the will of God is the 966 Lord and divine love. For to love is, properly speaking, to will
644 cause of things, good comes to us because God loves us. And God&#8217;s love is the cause of the 967 good to someone. Therefore, since the will of God is the cause of
645 good of nature: &#8220;You love everything which exists&#8221; (Wis 11:2 5). It is also the cause of the 968 things, good comes to us because God loves us. And God&rsquo;s love
646 good which is grace: &#8220;I have loved you with an. everlasting love, and so I have drawn you&#8221; 969 is the cause of the good of nature: &ldquo;You love everything
647 i.e., through grace (Jer 3 1:3). But it is because of his great love that he gives us the good of 970 which exists&rdquo; (Wis 11:2 5). It is also the cause of the good
648 glory. So he shows us here, from four standpoints, that this love of God is the greatest.</p> 971 which is grace: &ldquo;I have loved you with an. everlasting love,
649 <p>First, from the person of the one loving, because it is God who loves, and immeasurably. So 972 and so I have drawn you&rdquo; i.e., through grace (Jer 3 1:3). But
650 he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">For God so loved: </span>&#8220;He has loved the people; all the holy ones are in his hand&#8221; (Dt 973 it is because of his great love that he gives us the good of glory.
651 33:3). Secondly, from the condition of the one who is loved, because it is man, a bodily 974 So he shows us here, from four standpoints, that this love of God
652 creature of the world, i.e., existing in sin: &#8220;God shows his love for us, because while we were 975 is the greatest.</p>
653 still his enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son&#8221; (Rom 5:8). Thus he 976 <p>First, from the person of the one loving, because it is God who
654 says, <span style="font-weight: bold">the world. </span>Thirdly, from the greatness of his gifts, for love is shown by a gift; as 977 loves, and immeasurably. So he says, <span style=
655 Gregory says: &#8220;The proof of love is given by action.&#8221; But God has given us the greatest of 978 "font-weight: bold">For God so loved:</span> &ldquo;He has loved
656 gifts, his Only Begotten Son, and so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">that he gave his Only Begotten Son. </span>&#8220;God did 979 the people; all the holy ones are in his hand&rdquo; (Dt 33:3).
657 not spare his own Soil, but delivered him up for all of us&#8221; (Rom 8:32).</p> 980 Secondly, from the condition of the one who is loved, because it is
658 <p>He says his Son, i.e., his natural Son, consubstantial, not an adopted son, i.e., not those sons 981 man, a bodily creature of the world, i.e., existing in sin:
659 of which the Psalmist says: &#8220;I said: You are gods&#8221; (Ps 81:6). This shows that the opinion of 982 &ldquo;God shows his love for us, because while we were still his
660 Arius is false: for if the Son of God were a creature, as he said, the immensity of God&#8217;s love 983 enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son&rdquo;
661 through the taking on of infinite goodness, which no creature can receive, could not have 984 (Rom 5:8). Thus he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">the
662 been revealed in him. He further says <span style="font-weight: bold">Only Begotten, </span>to show that God does not have a love 985 world.</span> Thirdly, from the greatness of his gifts, for love is
663 divided among many sons, but all of it is for that Son whom he gave to prove the immensity 986 shown by a gift; as Gregory says: &ldquo;The proof of love is given
664 of his love: &#8220;For the Father loves the Son, and shows him everything that he does&#8221; (below 987 by action.&rdquo; But God has given us the greatest of gifts, his
988 Only Begotten Son, and so he says, <span style=
989 "font-weight: bold">that he gave his Only Begotten Son.</span>
990 &ldquo;God did not spare his own Soil, but delivered him up for all
991 of us&rdquo; (Rom 8:32).</p>
992 <p>He says his Son, i.e., his natural Son, consubstantial, not an
993 adopted son, i.e., not those sons of which the Psalmist says:
994 &ldquo;I said: You are gods&rdquo; (Ps 81:6). This shows that the
995 opinion of Arius is false: for if the Son of God were a creature,
996 as he said, the immensity of God&rsquo;s love through the taking on
997 of infinite goodness, which no creature can receive, could not have
998 been revealed in him. He further says <span style=
999 "font-weight: bold">Only Begotten,</span> to show that God does not
1000 have a love divided among many sons, but all of it is for that Son
1001 whom he gave to prove the immensity of his love: &ldquo;For the
1002 Father loves the Son, and shows him everything that he does&rdquo;
1003 (below 5:20).</p>
1004 <p>Fourthly, from the greatness of its fruit, because through him
1005 we have eternal life. Hence he says, <span style=
1006 "font-weight: bold">so that whoever believes in him should not
1007 perish, but have eternal life,</span> which he obtained for us
1008 through the death of the cross.</p>
1009 <p>478 But did God give his Son with the intention that he should
1010 die on the cross? He did indeed give him for the death of the cross
1011 inasmuch as he gave him the will to suffer on it. And he did this
1012 in two ways. First, because as the Son of God he willed from
1013 eternity to assume flesh and to suffer for us; and this will he had
1014 from the Father. Secondly, because the will to suffer was infused
1015 into the soul of Christ by God.</p>
1016 <p>479 Note that above, when the Lord was speaking about the coming
1017 down which belongs to Christ according to his divinity, he called
1018 him the Son of God; and this because of the one <i>suppositum</i>
1019 of the two natures, as was explained above. And so divine things
1020 can be said about the <i>suppositum</i> of the human nature, and
1021 human things can be said about the <i>suppositum</i> of the divine
1022 nature, but not with reference to the same nature. Rather, divine
1023 things are said with reference to the divine nature, and human
1024 things with reference to the human nature. Now the specific reason
1025 why he here calls him the Son of God is that he set forth that gift
1026 as a sign of the divine love, through which the fruit of eternal
1027 life comes to us. And so, he should have been called by that name
1028 which indicates the power that produces eternal life; and this
1029 power is not in Christ as Son of Man but as Son of God: &ldquo;This
1030 is the true God and eternal life,&rdquo; as we read in 1 John
1031 (5:20); &ldquo;In him was life&rdquo; (above 1:4).</p>
1032 <p>480 Note also that he says, <span style=
1033 "font-weight: bold">should not perish.</span> Someone is said to be
1034 perishing when he is hindered from arriving at the end to which he
1035 is ordained. But the end to which man is ordained is eternal life,
1036 and as long as he sins, he turns himself from that end. And
1037 although while he is living he cannot entirely perish in the sense
1038 that he cannot be restored, yet when he dies in sin, then he
1039 entirely perishes: &ldquo;The way of the wicked will perish&rdquo;
1040 (Ps 1:7).</p>
1041 <p>He indicates the immensity of God&rsquo;s love in saying,
1042 <span style="font-weight: bold">have eternal life:</span> for by
1043 giving eternal life, he gives himself. For eternal life is nothing
1044 else than enjoying God. But to give oneself is a sign of great
1045 love: &ldquo;But God, who is rich in mercy, has brought us to life
1046 in Christ&rdquo; (Eph 2:5), i.e., he gave us eternal life.</p>
1047 <p>481 Here the Lord excludes an objection that might be made. For
1048 in the old law it was promised that the Lord would come to judge:
1049 &ldquo;The Lord will come to judge&rdquo; (Is 3:14). So someone
1050 might say that the Son of God had not come to give eternal life but
1051 in order to judge the world. The Lord rejects this. First, he shows
1052 that he has not come to judge. Secondly, he proves it (v 18).</p>
1053 <p>482 So he says: The Son of God has not come to judge, because
1054 <span style="font-weight: bold">God did not send his Son,</span>
1055 referring to his first coming, <span style="font-weight: bold">into
1056 the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved
1057 through him.</span> The same thing is found below (12:47): &ldquo;I
1058 did not come to judge the world, but to save the world.&rdquo;</p>
1059 <p>Now man&rsquo;s salvation is to attain to God: &ldquo;My
1060 salvation is in God&rdquo; (Ps 61:8). And to attain to God is to
1061 obtain eternal life; hence to be saved is the same as to have
1062 eternal life. However, because the Lord says, &ldquo;I did not come
1063 to judge the world,&rdquo; men should not be lazy or abuse
1064 God&rsquo;s mercy, or give themselves over to sin: because although
1065 in his first coming he did not come to judge but to forgive, yet in
1066 his second coming, as Chrysostom says, he will come to judge but
1067 not to forgive. &ldquo;At the appointed time I will judge with
1068 rigor&rdquo; (Ps 74:3).</p>
1069 <p>483 However, this seems to conflict with what is said below
1070 (9:39): &ldquo;1 came into this world to judge.&rdquo; I answer
1071 that there are two kinds of judgment. One is the judgment of
1072 distinction, and the Son has come for this in his first coming;
1073 because with his coming men are distinguished, some by blindness
1074 and some by the light of grace. The other is the judgment of
1075 condemnation; and he did not come for this as such.</p>
1076 <p>484 Now he proves what he had said, as though by a process of
1077 elimination, in the following way: Whoever will be judged will be
1078 either a believer or an unbeliever. But I have not come to judge
1079 unbelievers, because they are already judged. Therefore, from the
1080 outset, God did not send his Son to judge the world. So first he
1081 shows that believers are not judged. Secondly, that unbelievers are
1082 notjudged (v 18).</p>
1083 <p>485 He says therefore: I have not come to judge the world:
1084 because he did not come to judge believers, for <span style=
1085 "font-weight: bold">Whoever believes in him is not judged,</span>
1086 with the judgment of condemnation, with which no one who believes
1087 in him with faith informed by love is judged: &ldquo;Whoever
1088 believes ... will not encounter judgment, but will pass from death
1089 to life&rdquo; (below 5:24). But he is judged with the judgment of
1090 reward and approval, of which the Apostle says: &ldquo;It is the
1091 Lord who judges me&rdquo; (1 Cor 4:4).</p>
1092 <p>486 But will there be many believing sinners who will not be
1093 damned? I reply that some heretics [e.g., Origen] have said that no
1094 believer, however great a sinner he may be, will be damned, but he
1095 will be saved by reason of his foundation of salvation, namely, his
1096 faith, although he may suffer some [temporary] punishment. They
1097 take as the basis of their error the statement of the Apostle:
1098 &ldquo;No one can lay a foundation other that the one that has been
1099 laid, that is, Jesus Christ&rdquo; (1 Cor 3:11); and further on:
1100 &ldquo;If a man&rsquo;s building burns ... he himself will be saved
1101 as one fleeing through fire&rdquo; (3:15).</p>
1102 <p>But this view is clearly contrary to what the Apostle says in
1103 Galatians (5:1): &ldquo;It is obvious what proceeds from the flesh:
1104 lewd conduct, impurity, licentiousness ... Those who do such things
1105 will not inherit the kingdom of God.&rdquo; Therefore we must say
1106 that the foundation of salvation is not faith without charity
1107 (unformed faith), but faith informed by charity. Significantly
1108 therefore the Lord did not say, &ldquo;whoever believes him,&rdquo;
1109 but <span style="font-weight: bold">whoever believes in him,</span>
1110 that is, whoever by believing tends toward him through love
1111 <span style="font-weight: bold">is not judged,</span> because he
1112 does not sin mortally, thereby removing the foundation.</p>
1113 <p>Or one could say, following Chrysostom, that everyone who acts
1114 sinfully is not a believer: &ldquo;They profess to know God, but
1115 they deny him by their actions&rdquo; (Ti 1:16); but only one who
1116 acts worthily: &ldquo;Show me your faith by your works&rdquo; (Jas
1117 2:18). It is only such a one who is not judged and not condemned
1118 for unbelief.</p>
1119 <p>487 Here [the Lord] shows that unbelievers are not judged. First
1120 he makes the statement; secondly, he explains it (v 19).</p>
1121 <p>488 Concerning the first we should note, according to Augustine,
1122 that Christ does not say, &ldquo;whoever does not believe is
1123 judged,&rdquo; but rather <span style="font-weight: bold">is not
1124 judged.</span> This can be explained in three ways. For, according
1125 to Augustine, whoever does not believe is not judged, because he is
1126 already judged, not in fact, but in God&rsquo;s foreknowledge, that
1127 is, it is already known to God that he will be condemned:
1128 &ldquo;The Lord knows who are his&rdquo; (2 Tim 2:19). In another
1129 way: according to Chrysostom, <span style=
1130 "font-weight: bold">whoever does not believe is already
1131 judged,</span> that is, the very fact that he does not believe is
1132 for him a condemnation: for not to believe is not to adhere to the
1133 light&mdash;which is to live in darkness, and this is a momentous
1134 condemnation: &ldquo;All were bound with one chain of
1135 darkness&rdquo; (Wis 17:17). &ldquo;What kind ofjoy can I have, I
1136 who sit in darkness and do not see the light of heaven?&rdquo; (Tb
1137 5:12). In a third way: also according to Chrysostom, <span style=
1138 "font-weight: bold">whoever does not believe is not judged,</span>
1139 that is, being already condemned, he displays the obvious reason
1140 for his condemnation. This is like saying that a person who is
1141 proven guilty of death is already dead, even before the sentence of
1142 death has been passed on him, because he is as good as dead.</p>
1143 <p>Hence Gregory says that in passing judgments there is a twofold
1144 order. Some will be sentenced by a trial; such are the ones who
1145 have something not deserving of condemnation, namely, the good of
1146 faith, that is, sinners who believe. But unbelievers, Whose reason
1147 for condemnation is manifest, are sentenced without trial; and of
1148 these it is said, <span style="font-weight: bold">whoever does not
1149 believe is already judged.</span> &ldquo;In judgment the wicked
1150 will not stand&rdquo; (Ps 1:6), that is, stand in trial.</p>
1151 <p>489 It should be noted that to be judged is the same as to be
1152 condemned; and to be condemned is to be shut out from salvation, to
1153 which only one road leads, that is, the name of the Son of God:
1154 &ldquo;There is no other name under heaven given to men, by which
1155 we are saved&rdquo; (Acts 4:12); &ldquo;O&rsquo;God, save me by
1156 your name&rdquo; (Ps 53:3). Therefore, those who do not believe in
1157 the Son of God are cut off from salvation, and the cause of their
1158 damnation is evident.</p>
1159 <p>490 Here the Lord explains his statement that unbelievers have
1160 an evident cause for their condemnation. First, he sets forth the
1161 sign which shows this. Secondly, the fittingness of this sign (v
1162 20).</p>
1163 <p>491 In the sign he sets forth he does three things. First, he
1164 mentions the gift of God. Secondly, the perversity of mind in
1165 unbelievers. Thirdly, the cause of this perversity.</p>
1166 <p>So he says: It is abundantly clear that <span style=
1167 "font-weight: bold">whoever does not believe is already
1168 judged,</span> because <span style="font-weight: bold">the light
1169 came into the world.</span> For men were in the darkness of
1170 ignorance, and God destroyed this darkness by sending a light into
1171 the world so that men might know the truth: &ldquo;I am the light
1172 of the world. He who follows me does not walk in darkness, but will
1173 have the light of life&rdquo; (below 8:12); &ldquo;To enlighten
1174 those who sit in darkness and in the shadow of death&rdquo; (Lk
1175 1:78). Now the light came into the world because men could not come
1176 to it: for &ldquo;He dwells in inaccessible light, whom no man has
1177 seen or is able to see&rdquo; (1 Tim 6:16).</p>
1178 <p>It is also clear from the perversity of mind in unbelievers who
1179 <span style="font-weight: bold">loved darkness more than the
1180 light,</span> i.e., they preferred to remain in the darkness of
1181 ignorance rather than be instructed by Christ: &ldquo;They have
1182 rebelled against the light&rdquo; (Jb 24:13); &ldquo;Woe to you who
1183 substitute darkness for light, and light for darkness&rdquo; (Is
665 5:20).</p> 1184 5:20).</p>
666 <p>Fourthly, from the greatness of its fruit, because through him we have eternal life. Hence he 1185 <p>And the cause of this perversity is that <span style=
667 says, <span style="font-weight: bold">so that whoever believes in him should not perish, but have eternal life, </span>which he 1186 "font-weight: bold">their deeds were evil:</span> and such deeds do
668 obtained for us through the death of the cross.</p> 1187 not conform to the light but seek the darkness: &ldquo;Let us cast
669 <p>478 But did God give his Son with the intention that he should die on the cross? He did 1188 off the works of darkness&rdquo; (Rom 13:12), i.e., sins, which
670 indeed give him for the death of the cross inasmuch as he gave him the will to suffer on it. 1189 seek the darkness; &ldquo;Those who sleep, sleep at night&rdquo; (1
671 And he did this in two ways. First, because as the Son of God he willed from eternity to 1190 Thes 5:7); &ldquo;The eye of the adulterer watches for the
672 assume flesh and to suffer for us; and this will he had from the Father. Secondly, because the 1191 darkness,&rdquo; as we read in Job (24:15). Now it is by
673 will to suffer was infused into the soul of Christ by God.</p> 1192 withdrawing from the light,which is unpleasant to him, that one
674 <p>479 Note that above, when the Lord was speaking about the coming down which belongs to 1193 does not believe the light.</p>
675 Christ according to his divinity, he called him the Son of God; and this because of the one 1194 <p>492 But do all unbelievers produce evil works? It seems not: for
676 <i>suppositum</i> of the two natures, as was explained above. And so divine things can be said 1195 many Gentiles have acted with virtue; for example, Cato, and many
677 about the <i>suppositum</i> of the human nature, and human things can be said about the 1196 others. I answer, with Chrysostom, that is it one thing to work by
678 <i>suppositum</i> of the divine nature, but not with reference to the same nature. Rather, divine 1197 reason of virtue, and another by reason of a natural aptitude or
679 things are said with reference to the divine nature, and human things with reference to the 1198 disposition. For some act well because of their natural
680 human nature. Now the specific reason why he here calls him the Son of God is that he set 1199 disposition, because their temperament is not inclined in a
681 forth that gift as a sign of the divine love, through which the fruit of eternal life comes to us. 1200 contrary way. And even unbelievers can act well in this way. For
682 And so, he should have been called by that name which indicates the power that produces 1201 example, one may live chastely because he is not assailed by
683 eternal life; and this power is not in Christ as Son of Man but as Son of God: &#8220;This is the true 1202 concupiscence; and the same for the other virtues. But those who
684 God and eternal life,&#8221; as we read in 1 John (5:20); &#8220;In him was life&#8221; (above 1:4).</p> 1203 act well by reason of virtue do not depart from virute, in spite of
685 <p>480 Note also that he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">should not perish. </span>Someone is said to be perishing when he is 1204 inclinations to the contrary vice, because of the rightness of
686 hindered from arriving at the end to which he is ordained. But the end to which man is 1205 their reason and the goodness of their will; and this is proper to
687 ordained is eternal life, and as long as he sins, he turns himself from that end. And although 1206 believers.</p>
688 while he is living he cannot entirely perish in the sense that he cannot be restored, yet when 1207 <p>Or, one might answer that although unbelievers may have done
689 he dies in sin, then he entirely perishes: &#8220;The way of the wicked will perish&#8221; (Ps 1:7).</p> 1208 good things, they do not do them for love of virute but out of
690 <p>He indicates the immensity of God&#8217;s love in saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">have eternal life: </span>for by giving eternal 1209 vainglory. Further, they did not do all things well; for they
691 life, he gives himself. For eternal life is nothing else than enjoying God. But to give oneself is
692 a sign of great love: &#8220;But God, who is rich in mercy, has brought us to life in Christ&#8221; (Eph
693 2:5), i.e., he gave us eternal life.</p>
694 <p>481 Here the Lord excludes an objection that might be made. For in the old law it was
695 promised that the Lord would come to judge: &#8220;The Lord will come to judge&#8221; (Is 3:14). So
696 someone might say that the Son of God had not come to give eternal life but in order to judge
697 the world. The Lord rejects this. First, he shows that he has not come to judge. Secondly, he
698 proves it (v 18).</p>
699 <p>482 So he says: The Son of God has not come to judge, because <span style="font-weight: bold">God did not send his Son,
700 </span>referring to his first coming, <span style="font-weight: bold">into the world to judge the world, but that the world might
701 be saved through him. </span>The same thing is found below (12:47): &#8220;I did not come to judge the
702 world, but to save the world.&#8221;</p>
703 <p>Now man&#8217;s salvation is to attain to God: &#8220;My salvation is in God&#8221; (Ps 61:8). And to attain to
704 God is to obtain eternal life; hence to be saved is the same as to have eternal life. However,
705 because the Lord says, &#8220;I did not come to judge the world,&#8221; men should not be lazy or abuse
706 God&#8217;s mercy, or give themselves over to sin: because although in his first coming he did not
707 come to judge but to forgive, yet in his second coming, as Chrysostom says, he will come to
708 judge but not to forgive. &#8220;At the appointed time I will judge with rigor&#8221; (Ps 74:3).</p>
709 <p>483 However, this seems to conflict with what is said below (9:39): &#8220;1 came into this world
710 to judge.&#8221; I answer that there are two kinds of judgment. One is the judgment of distinction,
711 and the Son has come for this in his first coming; because with his coming men are
712 distinguished, some by blindness and some by the light of grace. The other is the judgment of
713 condemnation; and he did not come for this as such.</p>
714 <p>484 Now he proves what he had said, as though by a process of elimination, in the following
715 way: Whoever will be judged will be either a believer or an unbeliever. But I have not come
716 to judge unbelievers, because they are already judged. Therefore, from the outset, God did not
717 send his Son to judge the world. So first he shows that believers are not judged. Secondly,
718 that unbelievers are notjudged (v 18).</p>
719 <p>485 He says therefore: I have not come to judge the world: because he did not come to judge
720 believers, for <span style="font-weight: bold">Whoever believes in him is not judged, </span>with the judgment of condemnation,
721 with which no one who believes in him with faith informed by love is judged: &#8220;Whoever
722 believes ... will not encounter judgment, but will pass from death to life&#8221; (below 5:24). But he
723 is judged with the judgment of reward and approval, of which the Apostle says: &#8220;It is the Lord
724 who judges me&#8221; (1 Cor 4:4).</p>
725 <p>486 But will there be many believing sinners who will not be damned? I reply that some
726 heretics [e.g., Origen] have said that no believer, however great a sinner he may be, will be
727 damned, but he will be saved by reason of his foundation of salvation, namely, his faith,
728 although he may suffer some [temporary] punishment. They take as the basis of their error the
729 statement of the Apostle: &#8220;No one can lay a foundation other that the one that has been laid,
730 that is, Jesus Christ&#8221; (1 Cor 3:11); and further on: &#8220;If a man&#8217;s building burns ... he himself
731 will be saved as one fleeing through fire&#8221; (3:15).</p>
732 <p>But this view is clearly contrary to what the Apostle says in Galatians (5:1): &#8220;It is obvious
733 what proceeds from the flesh: lewd conduct, impurity, licentiousness ... Those who do such
734 things will not inherit the kingdom of God.&#8221; Therefore we must say that the foundation of
735 salvation is not faith without charity (unformed faith), but faith informed by charity.
736 Significantly therefore the Lord did not say, &#8220;whoever believes him,&#8221; but <span style="font-weight: bold">whoever believes
737 in him, </span>that is, whoever by believing tends toward him through love <span style="font-weight: bold">is not judged, </span>because
738 he does not sin mortally, thereby removing the foundation.</p>
739 <p>Or one could say, following Chrysostom, that everyone who acts sinfully is not a believer:
740 &#8220;They profess to know God, but they deny him by their actions&#8221; (Ti 1:16); but only one who
741 acts worthily: &#8220;Show me your faith by your works&#8221; (Jas 2:18). It is only such a one who is not
742 judged and not condemned for unbelief.</p>
743 <p>487 Here [the Lord] shows that unbelievers are not judged. First he makes the statement;
744 secondly, he explains it (v 19).</p>
745 <p>488 Concerning the first we should note, according to Augustine, that Christ does not say,
746 &#8220;whoever does not believe is judged,&#8221; but rather <span style="font-weight: bold">is not judged. </span>This can be explained in three
747 ways. For, according to Augustine, whoever does not believe is not judged, because he is
748 already judged, not in fact, but in God&#8217;s foreknowledge, that is, it is already known to God
749 that he will be condemned: &#8220;The Lord knows who are his&#8221; (2 Tim 2:19). In another way:
750 according to Chrysostom, <span style="font-weight: bold">whoever does not believe is already judged, </span>that is, the very fact
751 that he does not believe is for him a condemnation: for not to believe is not to adhere to the
752 light&#8212;which is to live in darkness, and this is a momentous condemnation: &#8220;All were bound
753 with one chain of darkness&#8221; (Wis 17:17). &#8220;What kind ofjoy can I have, I who sit in darkness
754 and do not see the light of heaven?&#8221; (Tb 5:12). In a third way: also according to Chrysostom,
755 <span style="font-weight: bold">whoever does not believe is not judged, </span>that is, being already condemned, he displays the
756 obvious reason for his condemnation. This is like saying that a person who is proven guilty of
757 death is already dead, even before the sentence of death has been passed on him, because he
758 is as good as dead.</p>
759 <p>Hence Gregory says that in passing judgments there is a twofold order. Some will be
760 sentenced by a trial; such are the ones who have something not deserving of condemnation,
761 namely, the good of faith, that is, sinners who believe. But unbelievers, Whose reason for
762 condemnation is manifest, are sentenced without trial; and of these it is said, <span style="font-weight: bold">whoever does
763 not believe is already judged. </span>&#8220;In judgment the wicked will not stand&#8221; (Ps 1:6), that is, stand
764 in trial.</p>
765 <p>489 It should be noted that to be judged is the same as to be condemned; and to be
766 condemned is to be shut out from salvation, to which only one road leads, that is, the name of
767 the Son of God: &#8220;There is no other name under heaven given to men, by which we are saved&#8221;
768 (Acts 4:12); &#8220;O&#8217;God, save me by your name&#8221; (Ps 53:3). Therefore, those who do not believe
769 in the Son of God are cut off from salvation, and the cause of their damnation is evident.</p>
770 <p>490 Here the Lord explains his statement that unbelievers have an evident cause for their
771 condemnation. First, he sets forth the sign which shows this. Secondly, the fittingness of this
772 sign (v 20).</p>
773 <p>491 In the sign he sets forth he does three things. First, he mentions the gift of God. Secondly,
774 the perversity of mind in unbelievers. Thirdly, the cause of this perversity.</p>
775 <p>So he says: It is abundantly clear that <span style="font-weight: bold">whoever does not believe is already judged, </span>because
776 <span style="font-weight: bold">the light came into the world. </span>For men were in the darkness of ignorance, and God
777 destroyed this darkness by sending a light into the world so that men might know the truth: &#8220;I
778 am the light of the world. He who follows me does not walk in darkness, but will have the
779 light of life&#8221; (below 8:12); &#8220;To enlighten those who sit in darkness and in the shadow of
780 death&#8221; (Lk 1:78). Now the light came into the world because men could not come to it: for
781 &#8220;He dwells in inaccessible light, whom no man has seen or is able to see&#8221; (1 Tim 6:16).</p>
782 <p>It is also clear from the perversity of mind in unbelievers who <span style="font-weight: bold">loved darkness more than the
783 light, </span>i.e., they preferred to remain in the darkness of ignorance rather than be instructed by
784 Christ: &#8220;They have rebelled against the light&#8221; (Jb 24:13); &#8220;Woe to you who substitute
785 darkness for light, and light for darkness&#8221; (Is 5:20).</p>
786 <p>And the cause of this perversity is that <span style="font-weight: bold">their deeds were evil: </span>and such deeds do not conform
787 to the light but seek the darkness: &#8220;Let us cast off the works of darkness&#8221; (Rom 13:12), i.e.,
788 sins, which seek the darkness; &#8220;Those who sleep, sleep at night&#8221; (1 Thes 5:7); &#8220;The eye of the
789 adulterer watches for the darkness,&#8221; as we read in Job (24:15). Now it is by withdrawing from
790 the light,which is unpleasant to him, that one does not believe the light.</p>
791 <p>492 But do all unbelievers produce evil works? It seems not: for many Gentiles have acted
792 with virtue; for example, Cato, and many others. I answer, with Chrysostom, that is it one
793 thing to work by reason of virtue, and another by reason of a natural aptitude or disposition.
794 For some act well because of their natural disposition, because their temperament is not
795 inclined in a contrary way. And even unbelievers can act well in this way. For example, one
796 may live chastely because he is not assailed by concupiscence; and the same for the other
797 virtues. But those who act well by reason of virtue do not depart from virute, in spite of
798 inclinations to the contrary vice, because of the rightness of their reason and the goodness of
799 their will; and this is proper to believers.</p>
800 <p>Or, one might answer that although unbelievers may have done good things, they do not do
801 them for love of virute but out of vainglory. Further, they did not do all things well; for they
802 failed to render to God the worship due him.</p> 1210 failed to render to God the worship due him.</p>
803 <p>493 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Everyone who practices evil hates the light, </span>he shows the 1211 <p>493 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Everyone
804 appropriateness of the sign he used. First, with respect to those who are evil. Secondly, with 1212 who practices evil hates the light,</span> he shows the
805 respect to the good.</p> 1213 appropriateness of the sign he used. First, with respect to those
806 <p>494 So he says: The reason why they did not love the light is that their works were evil. And 1214 who are evil. Secondly, with respect to the good.</p>
807 this is plain because <span style="font-weight: bold">Everyone who practices evil hates the light. </span>He does not say, 1215 <p>494 So he says: The reason why they did not love the light is
808 &#8220;practiced,&#8221; but rather practices: because if someone has acted in an evil way, but has 1216 that their works were evil. And this is plain because <span style=
809 repented and is sorry,seeing that he has done wrong, such a person does not hate the light but 1217 "font-weight: bold">Everyone who practices evil hates the
810 comes to the light. But Everyone who practices evil, i.e., persists in evil, is not sorry, nor does 1218 light.</span> He does not say, &ldquo;practiced,&rdquo; but rather
811 he come to the light, but he hates it; not because it reveals truth, but because it reveals a 1219 practices: because if someone has acted in an evil way, but has
812 person&#8217;s sins. For an evil person still wants to know the light and the truth; but he hates to be 1220 repented and is sorry,seeing that he has done wrong, such a person
813 unmasked by it. &#8220;If the dawn suddenly appears, they regard it as the shadow of death&#8221; Qb 1221 does not hate the light but comes to the light. But Everyone who
814 24:17). And so he <span style="font-weight: bold">does not approach the light; </span>and this <span style="font-weight: bold">for fear that his deeds might be 1222 practices evil, i.e., persists in evil, is not sorry, nor does he
815 exposed. </span>For no one who is unwilling to desert evil wants to be rebuked; this is fled from and 1223 come to the light, but he hates it; not because it reveals truth,
816 hated. &#8220;They hate the one who rebukes at the city gate&#8221; (Am 5:10); &#8220;A corrupt man does not 1224 but because it reveals a person&rsquo;s sins. For an evil person
817 love the one who rebukes him&#8221; (Prv 15:12).</p> 1225 still wants to know the light and the truth; but he hates to be
818 <p>495 Now he shows the same things with respect to the good, who practice the truth, i.e., 1226 unmasked by it. &ldquo;If the dawn suddenly appears, they regard it
819 perform good works. For truth is found not only in thought and words. but also in deeds. 1227 as the shadow of death&rdquo; Qb 24:17). And so he <span style=
820 Everyone of these <span style="font-weight: bold">comes to the light.</span></p> 1228 "font-weight: bold">does not approach the light;</span> and this
821 <p>But did anyone practice the truth before Christ? It seems not, for to practice the truth is not to 1229 <span style="font-weight: bold">for fear that his deeds might be
822 sin; and &#8220;before Christ all have sinned&#8221; (Rom 3:23). I answer, according to Augustine, that he 1230 exposed.</span> For no one who is unwilling to desert evil wants to
823 practices the truth in himself who is displeased at the evil he has done; and after leaving the 1231 be rebuked; this is fled from and hated. &ldquo;They hate the one
824 darkness, keeps himself from sin, and repenting of the past, <span style="font-weight: bold">comes to the light, </span>with the 1232 who rebukes at the city gate&rdquo; (Am 5:10); &ldquo;A corrupt man
825 special intention of making his actions known.</p> 1233 does not love the one who rebukes him&rdquo; (Prv 15:12).</p>
826 <p>496 But this conflicts with the teaching that no one should make public the good he has done; 1234 <p>495 Now he shows the same things with respect to the good, who
827 and this was a reason why the Lord rebuked the Pharisees. I answer that it is lawful to want 1235 practice the truth, i.e., perform good works. For truth is found
828 one&#8217;s works to be seen by God so that they may be approved: &#8220;It is not the one who 1236 not only in thought and words. but also in deeds. Everyone of these
829 commends himself who is approved, but the one whom God commends&#8221; (2 Cor 10:18); &#8220;My 1237 <span style="font-weight: bold">comes to the light.</span></p>
830 witness is in heaven,&#8221; as is said in Job (16:20). It is also lawful to want them to be seen by 1238 <p>But did anyone practice the truth before Christ? It seems not,
831 one&#8217;s own conscience, so that one may rejoice: &#8220;Our glory is this: the testimony of our 1239 for to practice the truth is not to sin; and &ldquo;before Christ
832 conscience&#8221; (2 Cor 1:12). But it is reprehensible to want them to be seen by men in order to 1240 all have sinned&rdquo; (Rom 3:23). I answer, according to
833 be praised or for one&#8217;s own glory. Yet, holy persons desire that their good works be known to 1241 Augustine, that he practices the truth in himself who is displeased
834 men for the sake of God&#8217;s glory and for the good of the faith: &#8220;Let your light so shine before 1242 at the evil he has done; and after leaving the darkness, keeps
835 men that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father in heaven&#8221; (Mt 5:16). Such a 1243 himself from sin, and repenting of the past, <span style=
836 person <span style="font-weight: bold">comes to the light to make clear that his deeds are done in God, </span>that is, according 1244 "font-weight: bold">comes to the light,</span> with the special
837 to God&#8217;s commandment or through the grace of God. For whatever good we do, whether it be 1245 intention of making his actions known.</p>
838 avoiding sin, repenting of what has been done, or doing good works, it is all from God: &#8220;You 1246 <p>496 But this conflicts with the teaching that no one should make
839 have accomplished all our works&#8221; (Is 26:12).</p> 1247 public the good he has done; and this was a reason why the Lord
840 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">&#160;</p> 1248 rebuked the Pharisees. I answer that it is lawful to want
841 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style="font-weight: bold">LECTURE 4</span></p> 1249 one&rsquo;s works to be seen by God so that they may be approved:
842 <BLOCKQUOTE><p>22 After this Jesus and his disciples came to Judean territory; he stayed there with his 1250 &ldquo;It is not the one who commends himself who is approved, but
843 disciples and was baptizing. 23 But John also was baptizing at Aenon near Salim, where the 1251 the one whom God commends&rdquo; (2 Cor 10:18); &ldquo;My witness
844 water was plentiful, and people kept coming and were baptized. 24 John, of course, had not 1252 is in heaven,&rdquo; as is said in Job (16:20). It is also lawful
845 yet been thrown into prison. 25 A controversy arose between the disciples of John and the 1253 to want them to be seen by one&rsquo;s own conscience, so that one
846 Jews concerning purification. 26 They went to John and said to him, &#8220;Rabbi, the man who 1254 may rejoice: &ldquo;Our glory is this: the testimony of our
847 was with you across the Jordan, the one of whom you have given testimony, he is here 1255 conscience&rdquo; (2 Cor 1:12). But it is reprehensible to want
848 baptizing, and all the people are flocking to him.&#8221;</p></BLOCKQUOTE> 1256 them to be seen by men in order to be praised or for one&rsquo;s
849 <p>497 Above, the Lord gave us his teaching on spiritual regeneration in words, here he 1257 own glory. Yet, holy persons desire that their good works be known
850 completes his teaching through action, by baptizing. First, two kinds of baptism are 1258 to men for the sake of God&rsquo;s glory and for the good of the
851 mentioned. Secondly, a question about their relationship is raised (v 25). As to the first, two 1259 faith: &ldquo;Let your light so shine before men that they may see
852 things are done. Mention is first made of the baptism of Christ. Secondly, of the baptism of 1260 your good works, and glorify your Father in heaven&rdquo; (Mt
853 John.</p> 1261 5:16). Such a person <span style="font-weight: bold">comes to the
854 <p>498 He says first, <span style="font-weight: bold">After this, </span>i.e., the teaching on spiritual regeneration, <span style="font-weight: bold">Jesus and his 1262 light to make clear that his deeds are done in God,</span> that is,
855 disciples came to Judean territory. </span>There is a question here about the literal meaning. For 1263 according to God&rsquo;s commandment or through the grace of God.
856 above, the Evangelist had said that the Lord had come from Galilee to Jerusalem, which is in 1264 For whatever good we do, whether it be avoiding sin, repenting of
857 Judean territory, where he taught Nicodemus. So how, after teaching Nicodemus, can he 1265 what has been done, or doing good works, it is all from God:
858 come into Judea, since he was already there?</p> 1266 &ldquo;You have accomplished all our works&rdquo; (Is 26:12).</p>
859 <p>Two answers are given to this. According to Bede, after his discussion with Nicodemus, 1267 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">
860 Christ went to Galilee, and after remaining there for a time, returned to Judea. And so <span style="font-weight: bold">After 1268 &nbsp;</p>
861 this Jesus and his disciples came to Judean territory, </span>should not be understood to mean 1269 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style=
862 that he came into Judea immediately after his talk with Nicodemus. Another explanation, 1270 "font-weight: bold">LECTURE 4</span></p>
863 given by Chrysostom, is that he did come into the territory of Judea immediately after this 1271 <blockquote>
864 discussion: for Christ wanted to preach where the people gathered, so that many might be 1272 <p>22 After this Jesus and his disciples came to Judean territory;
865 converted: &#8220;I have declared your justice in the great assembly&#8221; (Ps 3 9:10); &#8220;1 have spoken 1273 he stayed there with his disciples and was baptizing. 23 But John
866 openly to the world&#8221; (below 18:20). Now there were two places in Judea where the Jewish 1274 also was baptizing at Aenon near Salim, where the water was
867 people gathered: Jerusalem, where they went for their feasts, and the Jordan, where they 1275 plentiful, and people kept coming and were baptized. 24 John, of
868 gathered on account of John&#8217;s preaching and his baptism. And so the Lord used to visit both 1276 course, had not yet been thrown into prison. 25 A controversy arose
869 places; and after the feast days were over in Jerusalem, which is in one part of Judea, he went 1277 between the disciples of John and the Jews concerning purification.
870 to another part, to the Jordan, where John was baptizing.</p> 1278 26 They went to John and said to him, &ldquo;Rabbi, the man who was
871 <p>499 As for the moral sense, Judea means &#8220;confession,&#8221; to which Jesus came, for Christ visits 1279 with you across the Jordan, the one of whom you have given
872 those who confess their sins or speak in praise of God: &#8220;Judea became his sanctuary&#8221; (Ps 1280 testimony, he is here baptizing, and all the people are flocking to
873 113:2). He stayed there, because he did not make a merely temporary visit: &#8220;We will come to 1281 him.&rdquo;</p>
874 him, and make our abode with him,&#8221; as it says below (14:23). <span style="font-weight: bold">And was baptizing, </span>i.e., 1282 </blockquote>
875 cleansing from sin; because unless one confesses his sins he does not obtain forgiveness: &#8220;He 1283 <p>497 Above, the Lord gave us his teaching on spiritual
876 who hides his sins will not prosper&#8221; (Prv 28:13).</p> 1284 regeneration in words, here he completes his teaching through
877 <p>500 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">But John also was baptizing, </span>the Evangelist presents the baptism of 1285 action, by baptizing. First, two kinds of baptism are mentioned.
878 John. And in regard to this he does four things. First, he presents the person who is baptizing. 1286 Secondly, a question about their relationship is raised (v 25). As
879 Secondly, the place of the baptism. Thirdly, its fruit. Fourthly, the time.</p> 1287 to the first, two things are done. Mention is first made of the
880 <p>501 John is the person who is baptizing-, so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">John also was baptizing. </span>There is a 1288 baptism of Christ. Secondly, of the baptism of John.</p>
881 question about this: Since John&#8217;s baptism was ordained to the baptism of Christ, it seems that 1289 <p>498 He says first, <span style="font-weight: bold">After
882 John should have stopped baptizing when Christ started to baptize, just as the symbol does 1290 this,</span> i.e., the teaching on spiritual regeneration,
883 not continue when the truth comes. Three reasons are given for this. The first is in relation to 1291 <span style="font-weight: bold">Jesus and his disciples came to
884 Christ, for John baptized in order that Christ might be baptized by him. But it was not fitting 1292 Judean territory.</span> There is a question here about the literal
885 that John baptize just Christ; otherwise, on this point alone, it might seem that John&#8217;s baptism 1293 meaning. For above, the Evangelist had said that the Lord had come
886 was superior to Christ&#8217;s. Accordingly, it was expedient that John baptize others before Christ, 1294 from Galilee to Jerusalem, which is in Judean territory, where he
887 because before Christ&#8217;s teaching was to be made public it was necessary that men be prepared 1295 taught Nicodemus. So how, after teaching Nicodemus, can he come
888 for Christ by John&#8217;s baptism. In this way, the baptism of John is related to the baptism of 1296 into Judea, since he was already there?</p>
889 Christ as the catechesis or religious instruction given to prospects to teach and prepare them 1297 <p>Two answers are given to this. According to Bede, after his
890 for baptism is related to the true baptism. It was likewise important that John baptize others 1298 discussion with Nicodemus, Christ went to Galilee, and after
891 after he had baptized Christ, so that John&#8217;s baptism would not seem to be worthless. For the 1299 remaining there for a time, returned to Judea. And so <span style=
892 same reason, the practice of the ceremonies of the old law was not abolished as soon as the 1300 "font-weight: bold">After this Jesus and his disciples came to
893 truth came, but as Augustine says, the Jews could lawfully observe them for a time.</p> 1301 Judean territory,</span> should not be understood to mean that he
894 <p>The second reason relates to John. For if John had stopped baptizing at once after Christ 1302 came into Judea immediately after his talk with Nicodemus. Another
895 began baptizing, it might have been thought that he stopped out of envy or anger. And 1303 explanation, given by Chrysostom, is that he did come into the
896 because, as the Apostle says, &#8220;We ought to look after what is good, not only before God, but 1304 territory of Judea immediately after this discussion: for Christ
897 also before all men&#8221; (Rom 12:17), this is the reason why John did not stop at once.</p> 1305 wanted to preach where the people gathered, so that many might be
898 <p>The third reason relates to John&#8217;s disciples, who were already beginning to act like zealots 1306 converted: &ldquo;I have declared your justice in the great
899 toward Christ and his disciples, because they were baptizing. So if John had entirely stopped 1307 assembly&rdquo; (Ps 3 9:10); &ldquo;1 have spoken openly to the
900 from baptizing, it would have provoked his disciples to an even greater zeal and opposition to 1308 world&rdquo; (below 18:20). Now there were two places in Judea
901 Christ and his disciples. For even while John continued baptizing, they were hostile to 1309 where the Jewish people gathered: Jerusalem, where they went for
902 Christ&#8217;s baptism, as later events showed. And so John did not stop at once: &#8220;Take care that 1310 their feasts, and the Jordan, where they gathered on account of
903 your freedom does not become a hindrance to those who are weak,&#8221; as is said in 1 1311 John&rsquo;s preaching and his baptism. And so the Lord used to
904 Corinthians (8:9).</p> 1312 visit both places; and after the feast days were over in Jerusalem,
905 <p>502 The place of his baptism was <span style="font-weight: bold">at Aenon near Salim, where the water was plentiful. 1313 which is in one part of Judea, he went to another part, to the
906 </span>Another name for Salim is Salem, which is the village from which the king Melchizedek 1314 Jordan, where John was baptizing.</p>
907 came. It is called Salim here because among the Jews a reader may use any vowel he chooses 1315 <p>499 As for the moral sense, Judea means
908 in the middle of his words; hence it made no difference to the Jews whether it was 1316 &ldquo;confession,&rdquo; to which Jesus came, for Christ visits
909 pronounced Salim or Salem. He added, <span style="font-weight: bold">where the water was plentiful, </span>to explain the name 1317 those who confess their sins or speak in praise of God:
910 of this place, i.e., <span style="font-weight: bold">Aenon, </span>which is the same as &#8220;water.&#8221;</p> 1318 &ldquo;Judea became his sanctuary&rdquo; (Ps 113:2). He stayed
911 <p>503 The fruit of his baptism is the remission of sins; thus he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">people kept coming and 1319 there, because he did not make a merely temporary visit: &ldquo;We
912 were baptized, </span>i.e., cleansed: for as is stated in Matthew (3:5) and in Luke (3:7), great 1320 will come to him, and make our abode with him,&rdquo; as it says
913 crowds came to John.</p> 1321 below (14:23). <span style="font-weight: bold">And was
914 <p>504 The time is indicated when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">John had not yet been thrown into prison. </span>He says 1322 baptizing,</span> i.e., cleansing from sin; because unless one
915 this so that we may know that he began his narrative of Christ&#8217;s life before the other 1323 confesses his sins he does not obtain forgiveness: &ldquo;He who
916 Evangelists. For the others began their account only from the time of John&#8217;s imprisonment. 1324 hides his sins will not prosper&rdquo; (Prv 28:13).</p>
917 So Matthew (4:12) says: &#8220;When Jesus heard that John had been arrested, he withdrew into 1325 <p>500 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">But John
918 Galilee.&#8221; And so, because they had passed over the things that Christ did before John&#8217;s 1326 also was baptizing,</span> the Evangelist presents the baptism of
919 imprisonment, John, who was the last to write a Gospel, supplied these omissions. He 1327 John. And in regard to this he does four things. First, he presents
920 suggests this when he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">John had not yet been thrown into prison.</span></p> 1328 the person who is baptizing. Secondly, the place of the baptism.
921 <p>505 Note that by divine arrangement it came about that when Christ began to baptize, John 1329 Thirdly, its fruit. Fourthly, the time.</p>
922 did not continue his own baptizing and preaching for very long, in order not to create 1330 <p>501 John is the person who is baptizing-, so he says,
923 disunion among the people. But he was granted a little time so that it would not seem that he 1331 <span style="font-weight: bold">John also was baptizing.</span>
924 deserved to be repudiated, as was mentioned before. Again, by God&#8217;s arrangement, it came 1332 There is a question about this: Since John&rsquo;s baptism was
925 about that after the faith had been preached and the faithful converted, the temple was utterly 1333 ordained to the baptism of Christ, it seems that John should have
926 destroyed, in order that all the devotion and hope of the faithful could be directed to Christ.</p> 1334 stopped baptizing when Christ started to baptize, just as the
927 <p>506 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">A controversy arose</span>, he brings in the issue of the two baptisms. 1335 symbol does not continue when the truth comes. Three reasons are
928 First, the issue is mentioned. Secondly, it is brought to John&#8217;s attention (v 26). Thirdly, the 1336 given for this. The first is in relation to Christ, for John
929 issue is resolved.</p> 1337 baptized in order that Christ might be baptized by him. But it was
930 <p>507 Because both John and Christ were baptizing, the disciples of John, out of zeal for their 1338 not fitting that John baptize just Christ; otherwise, on this point
931 teacher, started a controversy over this. And this is what he says, A controversy arose, i.e., a 1339 alone, it might seem that John&rsquo;s baptism was superior to
932 dispute, <span style="font-weight: bold">between the disciples of John, </span>who were the first to raise the issue, <span style="font-weight: bold">and the Jews, 1340 Christ&rsquo;s. Accordingly, it was expedient that John baptize
933 </span>whom the disciples of John had rebuked for preferring Christ, because of the miracles he did, 1341 others before Christ, because before Christ&rsquo;s teaching was to
934 to John, who did not do any miracles. The issue was <span style="font-weight: bold">concerning purification, </span>i.e., baptizing. 1342 be made public it was necessary that men be prepared for Christ by
935 The cause of their envy and the reason why they started the controversy was the fact that John 1343 John&rsquo;s baptism. In this way, the baptism of John is related
936 sent those he baptized to Christ, but Christ did not send those he baptized to John. It seemed 1344 to the baptism of Christ as the catechesis or religious instruction
937 from this, and perhaps the Jews even said so, that Christ was greater than John. Thus, the 1345 given to prospects to teach and prepare them for baptism is related
938 disciples of John, having not yet become spiritual, quarreled with the Jews over the baptisms. 1346 to the true baptism. It was likewise important that John baptize
939 &#8220;While there is envy and fighting among you, are you not carnal?&#8221; (1 Cor 3:3).</p> 1347 others after he had baptized Christ, so that John&rsquo;s baptism
940 <p>508 They referred this issue to John; hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">They went to John. </span>If we examine this 1348 would not seem to be worthless. For the same reason, the practice
941 closely, we see that they were trying to incite John against Christ. Indeed, they are like the 1349 of the ceremonies of the old law was not abolished as soon as the
942 gossip and the double-tongued: &#8220;Those who gossip and are double-tongued are accursed, for 1350 truth came, but as Augustine says, the Jews could lawfully observe
943 they disturb many who are at peace&#8221; (Sir 28:15).</p> 1351 them for a time.</p>
944 <p>So they bring up four things calculated to set John against Christ. First, they recall the 1352 <p>The second reason relates to John. For if John had stopped
945 previous unimportant status of Christ. Secondly, the good John did for him. Thirdly, the role 1353 baptizing at once after Christ began baptizing, it might have been
946 which Christ took on. Fourthly, the loss to John because of Christ&#8217;s new role.</p> 1354 thought that he stopped out of envy or anger. And because, as the
947 <p>509 They recall Christ&#8217;s unimportance when they say, <span style="font-weight: bold">the man who was with you, </span>as one of 1355 Apostle says, &ldquo;We ought to look after what is good, not only
948 your disciples; and not the one you were with as your teacher. For there is no good reason for 1356 before God, but also before all men&rdquo; (Rom 12:17), this is the
949 envy if honor is shown to one who is greater; rather, envy is aroused when honor is given to 1357 reason why John did not stop at once.</p>
950 an inferior: &#8220;I have seen slaves on horses, and princes walking like slaves&#8221; (Ecc 10:7); &#8220;I 1358 <p>The third reason relates to John&rsquo;s disciples, who were
951 called my servant, and he did not answer me&#8221; (Jb 19:16). For a master is more disturbed at 1359 already beginning to act like zealots toward Christ and his
952 the rebellion of a servant and a subject than of anyone else.</p> 1360 disciples, because they were baptizing. So if John had entirely
953 <p>510 Secondly, they remind John of the good he did Christ. Thus they do not say, &#8220;the one 1361 stopped from baptizing, it would have provoked his disciples to an
954 whom you baptized,&#8221; because they would then be admitting the greatness of Christ which was 1362 even greater zeal and opposition to Christ and his disciples. For
955 shown during his baptism when the Holy Spirit came upon him in the form of a dove and in 1363 even while John continued baptizing, they were hostile to
956 the voice of the Father speaking to him. So they say, <span style="font-weight: bold">the one of whom you have given 1364 Christ&rsquo;s baptism, as later events showed. And so John did not
957 testimony, </span>i.e., we are very angry that the one you made famous and admired dares to repay 1365 stop at once: &ldquo;Take care that your freedom does not become a
958 you in this way: &#8220;The one who ate my bread has lifted his heel against me&#8221; (Ps 40:10). They 1366 hindrance to those who are weak,&rdquo; as is said in 1 Corinthians
959 said this because those who seek their own glory and personal profit from their office become 1367 (8:9).</p>
960 dejected if their office is taken over by someone else</p> 1368 <p>502 The place of his baptism was <span style=
961 <p>511 And so thirdly, they even add that Christ took over John&#8217;s office for himself, when they 1369 "font-weight: bold">at Aenon near Salim, where the water was
962 say, <span style="font-weight: bold">he is here baptizing, </span>i.e., he is exercising your office; and this also distrubed them very 1370 plentiful.</span> Another name for Salim is Salem, which is the
963 much. For we generally see that men of the same craft are envious and underhanded with 1371 village from which the king Melchizedek came. It is called Salim
964 respect to one another; a potter envies another potter, but does not envy a carpenter. So, even 1372 here because among the Jews a reader may use any vowel he chooses
965 teachers, who are seeking their own honor, become sad if another teaches the truth. In 1373 in the middle of his words; hence it made no difference to the Jews
966 opposition to them, Gregory says: &#8220;The mind of a holy pastor wishes that others teach the 1374 whether it was pronounced Salim or Salem. He added, <span style=
967 truth which he cannot teach all by himself.&#8221; So also Moses: &#8220;Would that all the people might 1375 "font-weight: bold">where the water was plentiful,</span> to
968 prophesy,&#8221; as we read in Numbers (11:29).</p> 1376 explain the name of this place, i.e., <span style=
969 <p>512 Yet they were not satisfied with merely disturbing John, rather they report something that 1377 "font-weight: bold">Aenon,</span> which is the same as
970 should really excite him, that is, the loss that John seemed to be having because of the office 1378 &ldquo;water.&rdquo;</p>
971 Christ took over. They give this when they say: <span style="font-weight: bold">and all the people are flocking to him, </span>i.e., 1379 <p>503 The fruit of his baptism is the remission of sins; thus he
972 the ones who used to come to you. In other words, they have rejected and disowned you, and 1380 says, <span style="font-weight: bold">people kept coming and were
973 now are all going to his baptism. It is clear from Matthew (11:7) that they used to go to John: 1381 baptized,</span> i.e., cleansed: for as is stated in Matthew (3:5)
974 &#8220;What did you go into the desert to see?&#8221; The same envy affected the Pharisees against 1382 and in Luke (3:7), great crowds came to John.</p>
975 Christ; so they said: &#8220;Look, the whole world has gone after him&#8221; (below 12:19). However, all 1383 <p>504 The time is indicated when he says, <span style=
976 this did not set John againt Christ, for he was not a reed swaying in the wind, and this is clear 1384 "font-weight: bold">John had not yet been thrown into
977 from John&#8217;s answer to their question.</p> 1385 prison.</span> He says this so that we may know that he began his
978 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">&#160;</p> 1386 narrative of Christ&rsquo;s life before the other Evangelists. For
979 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style="font-weight: bold">LECTURE 5</span></p> 1387 the others began their account only from the time of John&rsquo;s
980 <BLOCKQUOTE><p>27 John replied and said:</p> 1388 imprisonment. So Matthew (4:12) says: &ldquo;When Jesus heard that
981 <p style="margin-left: 0.5in">&#8220;No one can lay hold of anything 1389 John had been arrested, he withdrew into Galilee.&rdquo; And so,
982 <br>unless it is given to him from heaven. 1390 because they had passed over the things that Christ did before
983 <p>28 &#8220;You yourselves are witnesses to the fact that I said: I am not the Christ, but the one sent 1391 John&rsquo;s imprisonment, John, who was the last to write a
984 before him.</p> 1392 Gospel, supplied these omissions. He suggests this when he says:
985 <p style="margin-left: 0.5in">>29 &#8220;It is the groom who has the bride. 1393 <span style="font-weight: bold">John had not yet been thrown into
986 <br>The groom&#8217;s friend waits there and listens to him, 1394 prison.</span></p>
987 <br>rejoicing at hearing his voice. 1395 <p>505 Note that by divine arrangement it came about that when
988 <br>Therefore in this case my joy is complete. 1396 Christ began to baptize, John did not continue his own baptizing
989 <br>30 He must increase, 1397 and preaching for very long, in order not to create disunion among
990 <br>and I must decrease. 1398 the people. But he was granted a little time so that it would not
991 <br>31 The One who came from above 1399 seem that he deserved to be repudiated, as was mentioned before.
992 <br>is above all things. 1400 Again, by God&rsquo;s arrangement, it came about that after the
993 <br>He who is of earth is earthly, 1401 faith had been preached and the faithful converted, the temple was
994 <br>and speaks of earthly things. 1402 utterly destroyed, in order that all the devotion and hope of the
995 <br>32a The One who comes from heaven 1403 faithful could be directed to Christ.</p>
996 <br>is above all things, 1404 <p>506 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">A
997 <br>and he testifies to what he sees, 1405 controversy arose</span>, he brings in the issue of the two
998 <BR>and to what he hears.</p></BLOCKQUOTE> 1406 baptisms. First, the issue is mentioned. Secondly, it is brought to
999 <p>513 Here we have John&#8217;s answer to the question presented to him by his disciples. Their 1407 John&rsquo;s attention (v 26). Thirdly, the issue is resolved.</p>
1000 question contained two points: a complaint about the office Christ took on, and so they said, 1408 <p>507 Because both John and Christ were baptizing, the disciples
1001 <span style="font-weight: bold">he is here baptizing; </span>and about Christ&#8217;s increasing fame and reputation among the people, 1409 of John, out of zeal for their teacher, started a controversy over
1002 and so they said, <span style="font-weight: bold">all the people are flocking to him. </span>Accordingly, John directs his answer to 1410 this. And this is what he says, A controversy arose, i.e., a
1003 these two complaints. First he answers the complaint about the office Christ took on. 1411 dispute, <span style="font-weight: bold">between the disciples of
1004 Secondly, the complaint about Christ&#8217;s increasing reputation (v 30). As to the first he does 1412 John,</span> who were the first to raise the issue, <span style=
1005 two things. First, he shows the source of Christ&#8217;s office and of his own. Secondly, their 1413 "font-weight: bold">and the Jews,</span> whom the disciples of John
1006 difference (v 28). Thirdly, how Christ and he are related to these offices.</p> 1414 had rebuked for preferring Christ, because of the miracles he did,
1007 <p>514 As to the first, note that although John&#8217;s disciples broach their question maliciously, and 1415 to John, who did not do any miracles. The issue was <span style=
1008 so deserve to be rebuked, John nevertheless does not sharply reprove them; and this because 1416 "font-weight: bold">concerning purification,</span> i.e.,
1009 of their imperfection. For he feared that they might be provoked by a rebuke, leave him, and, 1417 baptizing. The cause of their envy and the reason why they started
1010 joining forces with the Pharisees, publicly harass Christ. In acting this way he was putting 1418 the controversy was the fact that John sent those he baptized to
1011 into practice what is said of the Lord: &#8220;The burised reed he will not break&#8221; (Is 42:3). Again, 1419 Christ, but Christ did not send those he baptized to John. It
1012 we should also note that he begins his answer not by telling them what is great and wonderful 1420 seemed from this, and perhaps the Jews even said so, that Christ
1013 about Christ, but what is common and obvious; and he did this on account oftheir envy. For 1421 was greater than John. Thus, the disciples of John, having not yet
1014 since the excellence of a person provokes others to envy, if John had stressed Christ&#8217;s 1422 become spiritual, quarreled with the Jews over the baptisms.
1015 excellence at once, he would have fed the fire of their envy.</p> 1423 &ldquo;While there is envy and fighting among you, are you not
1016 <p>515 Thus he states something unpretentious, and says, <span style="font-weight: bold">No one can lay hold of anything 1424 carnal?&rdquo; (1 Cor 3:3).</p>
1017 unless it is given to him from heaven; </span>and he said this to them in order to inspire them with 1425 <p>508 They referred this issue to John; hence he says,
1018 reverence. As if to say: If all men are going to him, it is God&#8217;s doing, because <span style="font-weight: bold">no one can lay 1426 <span style="font-weight: bold">They went to John.</span> If we
1019 hold of anything, </span>in the order of perfection and goodness, unless it is given to him from 1427 examine this closely, we see that they were trying to incite John
1020 heaven. Therefore, if you oppose him, you oppose God. &#8220;If this plan or work is from men, it 1428 against Christ. Indeed, they are like the gossip and the
1021 will fail,&#8221; as is said in Acts (5:38). This is the way Chrysostom explains it, applying these 1429 double-tongued: &ldquo;Those who gossip and are double-tongued are
1430 accursed, for they disturb many who are at peace&rdquo; (Sir
1431 28:15).</p>
1432 <p>So they bring up four things calculated to set John against
1433 Christ. First, they recall the previous unimportant status of
1434 Christ. Secondly, the good John did for him. Thirdly, the role
1435 which Christ took on. Fourthly, the loss to John because of
1436 Christ&rsquo;s new role.</p>
1437 <p>509 They recall Christ&rsquo;s unimportance when they say,
1438 <span style="font-weight: bold">the man who was with you,</span> as
1439 one of your disciples; and not the one you were with as your
1440 teacher. For there is no good reason for envy if honor is shown to
1441 one who is greater; rather, envy is aroused when honor is given to
1442 an inferior: &ldquo;I have seen slaves on horses, and princes
1443 walking like slaves&rdquo; (Ecc 10:7); &ldquo;I called my servant,
1444 and he did not answer me&rdquo; (Jb 19:16). For a master is more
1445 disturbed at the rebellion of a servant and a subject than of
1446 anyone else.</p>
1447 <p>510 Secondly, they remind John of the good he did Christ. Thus
1448 they do not say, &ldquo;the one whom you baptized,&rdquo; because
1449 they would then be admitting the greatness of Christ which was
1450 shown during his baptism when the Holy Spirit came upon him in the
1451 form of a dove and in the voice of the Father speaking to him. So
1452 they say, <span style="font-weight: bold">the one of whom you have
1453 given testimony,</span> i.e., we are very angry that the one you
1454 made famous and admired dares to repay you in this way: &ldquo;The
1455 one who ate my bread has lifted his heel against me&rdquo; (Ps
1456 40:10). They said this because those who seek their own glory and
1457 personal profit from their office become dejected if their office
1458 is taken over by someone else</p>
1459 <p>511 And so thirdly, they even add that Christ took over
1460 John&rsquo;s office for himself, when they say, <span style=
1461 "font-weight: bold">he is here baptizing,</span> i.e., he is
1462 exercising your office; and this also distrubed them very much. For
1463 we generally see that men of the same craft are envious and
1464 underhanded with respect to one another; a potter envies another
1465 potter, but does not envy a carpenter. So, even teachers, who are
1466 seeking their own honor, become sad if another teaches the truth.
1467 In opposition to them, Gregory says: &ldquo;The mind of a holy
1468 pastor wishes that others teach the truth which he cannot teach all
1469 by himself.&rdquo; So also Moses: &ldquo;Would that all the people
1470 might prophesy,&rdquo; as we read in Numbers (11:29).</p>
1471 <p>512 Yet they were not satisfied with merely disturbing John,
1472 rather they report something that should really excite him, that
1473 is, the loss that John seemed to be having because of the office
1474 Christ took over. They give this when they say: <span style=
1475 "font-weight: bold">and all the people are flocking to him,</span>
1476 i.e., the ones who used to come to you. In other words, they have
1477 rejected and disowned you, and now are all going to his baptism. It
1478 is clear from Matthew (11:7) that they used to go to John:
1479 &ldquo;What did you go into the desert to see?&rdquo; The same envy
1480 affected the Pharisees against Christ; so they said: &ldquo;Look,
1481 the whole world has gone after him&rdquo; (below 12:19). However,
1482 all this did not set John againt Christ, for he was not a reed
1483 swaying in the wind, and this is clear from John&rsquo;s answer to
1484 their question.</p>
1485 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">
1486 &nbsp;</p>
1487 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style=
1488 "font-weight: bold">LECTURE 5</span></p>
1489 <blockquote>
1490 <p>27 John replied and said:</p>
1491 <p style="margin-left: 0.5in">&ldquo;No one can lay hold of
1492 anything<br />
1493 unless it is given to him from heaven.</p>
1494 <p>28 &ldquo;You yourselves are witnesses to the fact that I said:
1495 I am not the Christ, but the one sent before him.</p>
1496 <p style="margin-left: 0.5in">&gt;29 &ldquo;It is the groom who has
1497 the bride.<br />
1498 The groom&rsquo;s friend waits there and listens to him,<br />
1499 rejoicing at hearing his voice.<br />
1500 Therefore in this case my joy is complete.<br />
1501 30 He must increase,<br />
1502 and I must decrease.<br />
1503 31 The One who came from above<br />
1504 is above all things.<br />
1505 He who is of earth is earthly,<br />
1506 and speaks of earthly things.<br />
1507 32a The One who comes from heaven<br />
1508 is above all things,<br />
1509 and he testifies to what he sees,<br />
1510 and to what he hears.</p>
1511 </blockquote>
1512 <p>513 Here we have John&rsquo;s answer to the question presented
1513 to him by his disciples. Their question contained two points: a
1514 complaint about the office Christ took on, and so they said,
1515 <span style="font-weight: bold">he is here baptizing;</span> and
1516 about Christ&rsquo;s increasing fame and reputation among the
1517 people, and so they said, <span style="font-weight: bold">all the
1518 people are flocking to him.</span> Accordingly, John directs his
1519 answer to these two complaints. First he answers the complaint
1520 about the office Christ took on. Secondly, the complaint about
1521 Christ&rsquo;s increasing reputation (v 30). As to the first he
1522 does two things. First, he shows the source of Christ&rsquo;s
1523 office and of his own. Secondly, their difference (v 28). Thirdly,
1524 how Christ and he are related to these offices.</p>
1525 <p>514 As to the first, note that although John&rsquo;s disciples
1526 broach their question maliciously, and so deserve to be rebuked,
1527 John nevertheless does not sharply reprove them; and this because
1528 of their imperfection. For he feared that they might be provoked by
1529 a rebuke, leave him, and, joining forces with the Pharisees,
1530 publicly harass Christ. In acting this way he was putting into
1531 practice what is said of the Lord: &ldquo;The burised reed he will
1532 not break&rdquo; (Is 42:3). Again, we should also note that he
1533 begins his answer not by telling them what is great and wonderful
1534 about Christ, but what is common and obvious; and he did this on
1535 account oftheir envy. For since the excellence of a person provokes
1536 others to envy, if John had stressed Christ&rsquo;s excellence at
1537 once, he would have fed the fire of their envy.</p>
1538 <p>515 Thus he states something unpretentious, and says,
1539 <span style="font-weight: bold">No one can lay hold of anything
1540 unless it is given to him from heaven;</span> and he said this to
1541 them in order to inspire them with reverence. As if to say: If all
1542 men are going to him, it is God&rsquo;s doing, because <span style=
1543 "font-weight: bold">no one can lay hold of anything,</span> in the
1544 order of perfection and goodness, unless it is given to him from
1545 heaven. Therefore, if you oppose him, you oppose God. &ldquo;If
1546 this plan or work is from men, it will fail,&rdquo; as is said in
1547 Acts (5:38). This is the way Chrysostom explains it, applying these
1022 words to Christ.</p> 1548 words to Christ.</p>
1023 <p>Augustine, on the other hand, does much better when he refers them to John. <span style="font-weight: bold">No one can lay 1549 <p>Augustine, on the other hand, does much better when he refers
1024 hold of anything unless it is given to him from heaven: </span>as if to say: You are zealous on my 1550 them to John. <span style="font-weight: bold">No one can lay hold
1025 behalf and you want me to be greater than Christ; but that has not been given to me, and I do 1551 of anything unless it is given to him from heaven:</span> as if to
1026 not wish to usurp it: &#8220;No one takes this honor on himself&#8221; (Heb 5:4). This is the origin of 1552 say: You are zealous on my behalf and you want me to be greater
1027 their offices.</p> 1553 than Christ; but that has not been given to me, and I do not wish
1028 <p>516 Then follows the difference of their offices, when he says, You yourselves are witnesses. 1554 to usurp it: &ldquo;No one takes this honor on himself&rdquo; (Heb
1029 As if to say: From the testimony which I bore to him, you can know the office committed to 1555 5:4). This is the origin of their offices.</p>
1030 me by Christ: for You yourselves are witnesses, i.e., you can testify, <span style="font-weight: bold">to the fact that I said: I 1556 <p>516 Then follows the difference of their offices, when he says,
1031 am not the Christ</span>&#8212;&#8220;He declared openly and did not deny&#8221; (above 1:20)&#8212;<span style="font-weight: bold">but the one sent 1557 You yourselves are witnesses. As if to say: From the testimony
1032 before him, </span>as a herald before a judge. And so from my own testimony you can know my 1558 which I bore to him, you can know the office committed to me by
1033 office, which is to go before Christ and prepare the way for him: &#8220;There was a man sent by 1559 Christ: for You yourselves are witnesses, i.e., you can testify,
1034 God, whose name was John&#8221; (above 1:6). But the office of Christ is to judge and to preside. If 1560 <span style="font-weight: bold">to the fact that I said: I am not
1035 we look at this closely we can see that John, like a skilful disputant, answers them with their 1561 the Christ</span>&mdash;&ldquo;He declared openly and did not
1036 own arguments: &#8220;I judge you out of your own mouth,&#8221; as said in Luke (19:22).</p> 1562 deny&rdquo; (above 1:20)&mdash;<span style="font-weight: bold">but
1037 <p>517 He shows how John is related to his own office when he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">It is the groom who has 1563 the one sent before him,</span> as a herald before a judge. And so
1038 the bride. </span>First, he gives a simile. Secondly, he applies it to his own situation. With respect 1564 from my own testimony you can know my office, which is to go before
1039 to the first he does two things. First, he gives a simile which applies to Christ; and secondly, 1565 Christ and prepare the way for him: &ldquo;There was a man sent by
1040 to himself.</p> 1566 God, whose name was John&rdquo; (above 1:6). But the office of
1041 <p>518 As to the first, we should note that on the human level it is the groom who regulates, 1567 Christ is to judge and to preside. If we look at this closely we
1042 governs and has the bride. Hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">It is the groom who has the bride. </span>Now the 1568 can see that John, like a skilful disputant, answers them with
1043 groom is Christ: &#8220;Like a bridegroom coming out of his bridal chamber&#8221; (Ps 18:6). His bride is 1569 their own arguments: &ldquo;I judge you out of your own
1044 the Church, which is joined to him by faith: &#8220;I will espouse you to myself in faith&#8221; Mos 2:20). 1570 mouth,&rdquo; as said in Luke (19:22).</p>
1045 In keeping with this figure, Zipporah said to Moses: &#8220;You are a spouse of blood to me&#8221; (Ex 1571 <p>517 He shows how John is related to his own office when he says:
1046 4:25). We read of the marriage: &#8220;The marriage of the Lamb has come&#8221; (Rv 19:7). So, because 1572 <span style="font-weight: bold">It is the groom who has the
1047 Christ is the groom, he has the bride, that is, the Church; but my part is only to rejoice in the 1573 bride.</span> First, he gives a simile. Secondly, he applies it to
1048 fact that he has the bride.</p> 1574 his own situation. With respect to the first he does two things.
1049 <p>519 Consequently he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">The groom&#8217;s friend waits there and listens to him, rejoicing at 1575 First, he gives a simile which applies to Christ; and secondly, to
1050 hearing his voice. </span>Although John had said earlier that he was not worthy to unfasten the strap 1576 himself.</p>
1051 of Jesus&#8217; sandal, he here calls himself the friend of Jesus in order to bring out the faithfulness 1577 <p>518 As to the first, we should note that on the human level it
1052 of his love for Christ. For a servant does not act in the spirit of love in regard to the things 1578 is the groom who regulates, governs and has the bride. Hence he
1053 that pertain to his master, but in a spirit of servitude; while a friend, on the other hand, seeks 1579 says, <span style="font-weight: bold">It is the groom who has the
1054 his friend&#8217;s interests out of love and faithfulness. Hence a faithful servant is like a friend to 1580 bride.</span> Now the groom is Christ: &ldquo;Like a bridegroom
1055 his master: &#8220;If you have a faithful servant, treat him like yourself&#8221; (Sir 33:31). Indeed, it is 1581 coming out of his bridal chamber&rdquo; (Ps 18:6). His bride is the
1056 proof of a servant&#8217;s faithfulness when he rejoices in the prosperity of his master, and when he 1582 Church, which is joined to him by faith: &ldquo;I will espouse you
1057 obtains various goods, not for himself, but for his master. And so because John did not keep 1583 to myself in faith&rdquo; Mos 2:20). In keeping with this figure,
1058 the bride entrusted to his care for himself, but for the groom, we can see that he was a faithful 1584 Zipporah said to Moses: &ldquo;You are a spouse of blood to
1059 servant and a friend of the groom. It is to suggest this that he calls himself <span style="font-weight: bold">the groom&#8217;s 1585 me&rdquo; (Ex 4:25). We read of the marriage: &ldquo;The marriage
1060 friend.</span></p> 1586 of the Lamb has come&rdquo; (Rv 19:7). So, because Christ is the
1061 <p>Those who are friends of the truth should act in the same way, not turning the bride entrusted 1587 groom, he has the bride, that is, the Church; but my part is only
1062 to their care to their own advantage and glory, but treating her honorably for the honor and 1588 to rejoice in the fact that he has the bride.</p>
1063 glory of the groom; otherwise they would not be friends of the groom but adulterers. This is 1589 <p>519 Consequently he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">The
1064 why Gregory says that a servant who is sent by the groom with gifts for the bride is guilty of 1590 groom&rsquo;s friend waits there and listens to him, rejoicing at
1065 adulterous thoughts if he himself desires to please the bride. This is not what the Apostle did: 1591 hearing his voice.</span> Although John had said earlier that he
1066 &#8220;I espoused you to one husband in order to present you to Christ as a chaste virgin&#8221; (2 Cor 1592 was not worthy to unfasten the strap of Jesus&rsquo; sandal, he
1067 11:2). And John did the same, because he did not keep the bride, i.e., the faithful, for himself, 1593 here calls himself the friend of Jesus in order to bring out the
1068 but brought them to the groom, that is, to Christ.</p> 1594 faithfulness of his love for Christ. For a servant does not act in
1069 <p>520 And so by saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">the groom&#8217;s friend, </span>he suggests the faithfulness of his love. Further, 1595 the spirit of love in regard to the things that pertain to his
1070 he suggests his constancy when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">waits, </span>firm in friendship and faithfulness, not 1596 master, but in a spirit of servitude; while a friend, on the other
1071 extolling himself above what he really is: &#8220;I will stand my watch&#8221; (Hb 2:1); &#8220;Be steadfast and 1597 hand, seeks his friend&rsquo;s interests out of love and
1072 unchanging&#8221; (1 Cor 15:58); &#8220;A faithful friend, if he is constant, is like another self&#8221; (Sir 1598 faithfulness. Hence a faithful servant is like a friend to his
1073 6:11).</p> 1599 master: &ldquo;If you have a faithful servant, treat him like
1074 <p>He suggests his attention when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">and listens to him, </span>i.e., attentively considers the way 1600 yourself&rdquo; (Sir 33:31). Indeed, it is proof of a
1075 in which the groom is united to the bride. For according to Chrysostom, these words explain 1601 servant&rsquo;s faithfulness when he rejoices in the prosperity of
1076 the manner of this marriage, for it is accomplished through faith, and &#8220;faith comes through 1602 his master, and when he obtains various goods, not for himself, but
1077 hearing&#8221; (Rom 10:17). Or, he <span style="font-weight: bold">listens to him, </span>i.e., reverently obeys him, by caring for the 1603 for his master. And so because John did not keep the bride
1078 bride according to the commands of the groom: &#8220;I will listen to him as my master,&#8221; as is said 1604 entrusted to his care for himself, but for the groom, we can see
1079 in Isaiah (50:4). This is in opposition to those evil prelates who do not follow Christ&#8217;s 1605 that he was a faithful servant and a friend of the groom. It is to
1080 command in governing the Church.</p> 1606 suggest this that he calls himself <span style=
1081 <p>Likewise, he hints at his spiritual joy when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">rejoicing at hearing his voice, </span>that is, 1607 "font-weight: bold">the groom&rsquo;s friend.</span></p>
1082 when the groom talks to his bride. And he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">rejoicing </span>(literally, &#8220;rejoicing with joy&#8221;), to 1608 <p>Those who are friends of the truth should act in the same way,
1083 show the truth and perfection of his joy. For one whose rejoicing is not over the good, does 1609 not turning the bride entrusted to their care to their own
1084 not rejoice with true joy. And so, if it made me sad that Christ, who is the true groom, 1610 advantage and glory, but treating her honorably for the honor and
1085 preaches to the bride, i.e., the Church, I would not be a friend of the groom; but I am not sad.</p> 1611 glory of the groom; otherwise they would not be friends of the
1086 <p>521 Therefore in this case my joy is complete, namely, in seeing what I have so long desired, 1612 groom but adulterers. This is why Gregory says that a servant who
1087 that is, the groom speaking to his bride. Or, my joy is complete, i.e., brought to its perfect and 1613 is sent by the groom with gifts for the bride is guilty of
1088 due measure, when the bride. is united to the groom, because I now have my grace and I have 1614 adulterous thoughts if he himself desires to please the bride. This
1089 completed my work: &#8220;I will rejoice in the Lord, and I will take joy in God, my Jesus&#8221; (Hb 1615 is not what the Apostle did: &ldquo;I espoused you to one husband
1090 3:18).</p> 1616 in order to present you to Christ as a chaste virgin&rdquo; (2 Cor
1091 <p>522 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">He must increase, and I must decrease, </span>he answers their question 1617 11:2). And John did the same, because he did not keep the bride,
1092 as to their complaint about the increasing esteem given to Christ. First, he notes that such an 1618 i.e., the faithful, for himself, but brought them to the groom,
1093 increase is fitting. Secondly, he gives the reason for it (v 31).</p> 1619 that is, to Christ.</p>
1094 <p>523 So he says: You say that all the people are flocking to him, i.e., to Christ, and therefore 1620 <p>520 And so by saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">the
1095 that he is growing in honor and esteem among the people. But I say that this is not 1621 groom&rsquo;s friend,</span> he suggests the faithfulness of his
1096 unbecoming, because He must increase, not in himself, but in relation to others, in the sense 1622 love. Further, he suggests his constancy when he says, <span style=
1097 that his power becoipe more and more known. <span style="font-weight: bold">And I must decrease, </span>in the reverence and 1623 "font-weight: bold">waits,</span> firm in friendship and
1098 esteem of the people: for esteem and reverence are not due to me as if I were a principal; but 1624 faithfulness, not extolling himself above what he really is:
1099 they are due to Christ. And therefore since he has come, the signs of honor are diminishing in 1625 &ldquo;I will stand my watch&rdquo; (Hb 2:1); &ldquo;Be steadfast
1100 my regard, but increasing in regard to Christ, just as with the coming of the prince, the office 1626 and unchanging&rdquo; (1 Cor 15:58); &ldquo;A faithful friend, if
1101 of the ambassador ceases: &#8220;When the perfect comes, what is imperfect will pass away&#8221; (1 Cor 1627 he is constant, is like another self&rdquo; (Sir 6:11).</p>
1102 13:10). And just as in the heavens the morning star appears and gives light before the sun, 1628 <p>He suggests his attention when he says, <span style=
1103 only to cease giving light when the sun appears, so John went before Christ and is compared 1629 "font-weight: bold">and listens to him,</span> i.e., attentively
1104 to the morning star: &#8220;Can you bring out the morning star?&#8221; (Jb 38:32).</p> 1630 considers the way in which the groom is united to the bride. For
1105 <p>This is also signified in John&#8217;s birth and in his death. In his birth, because John was born at a 1631 according to Chrysostom, these words explain the manner of this
1106 time when the days are getting shorter; Christ, however, was born when the days are growing 1632 marriage, for it is accomplished through faith, and &ldquo;faith
1107 longer, on the twenty-fifth of December. In his death, because John dies shortened by 1633 comes through hearing&rdquo; (Rom 10:17). Or, he <span style=
1108 decapitation; but Christ died raised up by the lifting up of the cross.</p> 1634 "font-weight: bold">listens to him,</span> i.e., reverently obeys
1109 <p>524 In the moral sense, this should take place in each one of us. Christ must increase in you, 1635 him, by caring for the bride according to the commands of the
1110 i.e., you should grow in the knowledge and love of Christ, because the more you are able to 1636 groom: &ldquo;I will listen to him as my master,&rdquo; as is said
1111 grasp him by knowledge and love, the more Christ increases in you; just as the more one 1637 in Isaiah (50:4). This is in opposition to those evil prelates who
1112 improves in seeing one and the same light, the more that light seems to increase. 1638 do not follow Christ&rsquo;s command in governing the Church.</p>
1113 Consequently, as men advance in this way, their self-esteem decreases; because the more one 1639 <p>Likewise, he hints at his spiritual joy when he says,
1114 knows of the divine greatness, the less he thinks of his human smallness. As we read in 1640 <span style="font-weight: bold">rejoicing at hearing his
1115 Proverbs (30:1): &#8220;The revelation spoken by the man close to God&#8221;; and then there follows: &#8220;I 1641 voice,</span> that is, when the groom talks to his bride. And he
1116 am the most foolish of men, and the wisdom of men is not in me.&#8221; &#8220;I have heard you, but now 1642 says, <span style="font-weight: bold">rejoicing</span> (literally,
1117 I see you, and so I reprove myself, and do penance in dust and ashes,&#8221; as we read in Job 1643 &ldquo;rejoicing with joy&rdquo;), to show the truth and perfection
1644 of his joy. For one whose rejoicing is not over the good, does not
1645 rejoice with true joy. And so, if it made me sad that Christ, who
1646 is the true groom, preaches to the bride, i.e., the Church, I would
1647 not be a friend of the groom; but I am not sad.</p>
1648 <p>521 Therefore in this case my joy is complete, namely, in seeing
1649 what I have so long desired, that is, the groom speaking to his
1650 bride. Or, my joy is complete, i.e., brought to its perfect and due
1651 measure, when the bride. is united to the groom, because I now have
1652 my grace and I have completed my work: &ldquo;I will rejoice in the
1653 Lord, and I will take joy in God, my Jesus&rdquo; (Hb 3:18).</p>
1654 <p>522 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">He must
1655 increase, and I must decrease,</span> he answers their question as
1656 to their complaint about the increasing esteem given to Christ.
1657 First, he notes that such an increase is fitting. Secondly, he
1658 gives the reason for it (v 31).</p>
1659 <p>523 So he says: You say that all the people are flocking to him,
1660 i.e., to Christ, and therefore that he is growing in honor and
1661 esteem among the people. But I say that this is not unbecoming,
1662 because He must increase, not in himself, but in relation to
1663 others, in the sense that his power becoipe more and more known.
1664 <span style="font-weight: bold">And I must decrease,</span> in the
1665 reverence and esteem of the people: for esteem and reverence are
1666 not due to me as if I were a principal; but they are due to Christ.
1667 And therefore since he has come, the signs of honor are diminishing
1668 in my regard, but increasing in regard to Christ, just as with the
1669 coming of the prince, the office of the ambassador ceases:
1670 &ldquo;When the perfect comes, what is imperfect will pass
1671 away&rdquo; (1 Cor 13:10). And just as in the heavens the morning
1672 star appears and gives light before the sun, only to cease giving
1673 light when the sun appears, so John went before Christ and is
1674 compared to the morning star: &ldquo;Can you bring out the morning
1675 star?&rdquo; (Jb 38:32).</p>
1676 <p>This is also signified in John&rsquo;s birth and in his death.
1677 In his birth, because John was born at a time when the days are
1678 getting shorter; Christ, however, was born when the days are
1679 growing longer, on the twenty-fifth of December. In his death,
1680 because John dies shortened by decapitation; but Christ died raised
1681 up by the lifting up of the cross.</p>
1682 <p>524 In the moral sense, this should take place in each one of
1683 us. Christ must increase in you, i.e., you should grow in the
1684 knowledge and love of Christ, because the more you are able to
1685 grasp him by knowledge and love, the more Christ increases in you;
1686 just as the more one improves in seeing one and the same light, the
1687 more that light seems to increase. Consequently, as men advance in
1688 this way, their self-esteem decreases; because the more one knows
1689 of the divine greatness, the less he thinks of his human smallness.
1690 As we read in Proverbs (30:1): &ldquo;The revelation spoken by the
1691 man close to God&rdquo;; and then there follows: &ldquo;I am the
1692 most foolish of men, and the wisdom of men is not in me.&rdquo;
1693 &ldquo;I have heard you, but now I see you, and so I reprove
1694 myself, and do penance in dust and ashes,&rdquo; as we read in Job
1118 (42:5).</p> 1695 (42:5).</p>
1119 <p>525 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">The One who came from above is above all things, </span>he gives the 1696 <p>525 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">The One
1120 reason for what he has just said. And he does this in two ways. First, on the basis of Christ&#8217;s 1697 who came from above is above all things,</span> he gives the reason
1121 origin. And secondly, by considering Christ&#8217;s teaching.</p> 1698 for what he has just said. And he does this in two ways. First, on
1122 <p>526 Regarding the first, we should note that in order for a thing to be perfect, it must reach 1699 the basis of Christ&rsquo;s origin. And secondly, by considering
1123 the goal fixed for it by its origin; for example, if one is born from a king, he should continue 1700 Christ&rsquo;s teaching.</p>
1124 to progress until he becomes a king. Now Christ has an origin that is most excellent and 1701 <p>526 Regarding the first, we should note that in order for a
1125 eternal; therefore he must increase by the manifestation of his power, in relation to others, 1702 thing to be perfect, it must reach the goal fixed for it by its
1126 until it is recognized that he is above all things. Thus he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">The One who came from 1703 origin; for example, if one is born from a king, he should continue
1127 above, </span>that is, Christ, according to his divinity. &#8220;No one has gone up to heaven except the 1704 to progress until he becomes a king. Now Christ has an origin that
1128 One who came down from heaven&#8221; (above 3:13); &#8220;You are from below, I am from above&#8221; 1705 is most excellent and eternal; therefore he must increase by the
1129 (below 8:23).</p> 1706 manifestation of his power, in relation to others, until it is
1130 <p>527 Or, he <span style="font-weight: bold">came from above, </span>as to his human nature, i.e., from the &#8220;highest&#8221; condition of 1707 recognized that he is above all things. Thus he says, <span style=
1131 human nature, by assuming it according to what was predominant in it in each of its states. 1708 "font-weight: bold">The One who came from above,</span> that is,
1132 For human nature is considered in three states. First, is the state of human nature before sin; 1709 Christ, according to his divinity. &ldquo;No one has gone up to
1133 and from this state he took his purity by assuming a flesh unmarked by the stain of original 1710 heaven except the One who came down from heaven&rdquo; (above
1134 sin: &#8220;A lamb without blemish&#8221; (Ex 12:5). The second state is after sin; and from this he took 1711 3:13); &ldquo;You are from below, I am from above&rdquo; (below
1135 his capability to suffer and die by assuming the likeness of sinful flesh as regards its 1712 8:23).</p>
1136 punishment, but not in its guilt: &#8220;God sent his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh&#8221; (Rom 1713 <p>527 Or, he <span style="font-weight: bold">came from
1137 8:3). The third state is that of resurrection and glory; and from this he took his impossibility 1714 above,</span> as to his human nature, i.e., from the
1138 of sinning and his joy of soul.</p> 1715 &ldquo;highest&rdquo; condition of human nature, by assuming it
1139 <p>528 Here we must be on guard against the error of those who say that there was left in Adam 1716 according to what was predominant in it in each of its states. For
1140 something materially unmarked by the original stain, and this was passed on to his 1717 human nature is considered in three states. First, is the state of
1141 descendants; for example, to the Blessed Virgin, and that Christ&#8217;s body was formed from this. 1718 human nature before sin; and from this state he took his purity by
1142 This is heretical, because whatever existed in Adam in a material way was marked by the 1719 assuming a flesh unmarked by the stain of original sin: &ldquo;A
1143 stain of original sin. Further, the matter from which the body of Christ was formed was 1720 lamb without blemish&rdquo; (Ex 12:5). The second state is after
1144 purified by the power of the Holy Spirit when he sanctified the Blessed Virgin.</p> 1721 sin; and from this he took his capability to suffer and die by
1145 <p>529 <span style="font-weight: bold">The One who came from above, </span>according to his divinity as well as his human nature, 1722 assuming the likeness of sinful flesh as regards its punishment,
1146 <span style="font-weight: bold">is above all things, </span>both by eminence of rank: &#8220;The Lord is high above all nations&#8221; (Ps 1723 but not in its guilt: &ldquo;God sent his own Son in the likeness
1147 112:4), and by his authority and power: &#8220;He has made him the head of the Church,&#8221; as is said 1724 of sinful flesh&rdquo; (Rom 8:3). The third state is that of
1148 in Ephesians (1:22).</p> 1725 resurrection and glory; and from this he took his impossibility of
1149 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">&#160;</p> 1726 sinning and his joy of soul.</p>
1150 <p>530 Now he gives the reason for what he had said above (v 30), by considering the teaching 1727 <p>528 Here we must be on guard against the error of those who say
1151 of Christ. First, he describes the doctrine of Christ and its grandeur. Secondly, the difference 1728 that there was left in Adam something materially unmarked by the
1152 in those who receive or reject this doctrine (v 32b). He does two things with respect to the 1729 original stain, and this was passed on to his descendants; for
1153 first. First, he describes John&#8217;s doctrine. Secondly, he describes the doctrine of Christ (v 32).</p> 1730 example, to the Blessed Virgin, and that Christ&rsquo;s body was
1154 <p>531 As to the first we should note that a man is known mainly by what he says: &#8220;Your accent 1731 formed from this. This is heretical, because whatever existed in
1155 gives you away&#8221; (Mt 26:73); &#8220;Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks&#8221; (Mt 1732 Adam in a material way was marked by the stain of original sin.
1156 12:34). This is why the quality of a teaching or doctrine is considered according to the quality 1733 Further, the matter from which the body of Christ was formed was
1157 of its origin. Accordingly, in order to understand the quality of John&#8217;s doctrine, we should 1734 purified by the power of the Holy Spirit when he sanctified the
1158 first consider his origin. So he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">He who is of earth, </span>that is John, not only as to the matter 1735 Blessed Virgin.</p>
1159 from. which he was made, but also in his efficient cause: because the body of John was 1736 <p>529 <span style="font-weight: bold">The One who came from
1160 formed by a created power: &#8220;They dwell in houses of clay, and have a foundation of earth&#8221; 1737 above,</span> according to his divinity as well as his human
1161 (Jb 4:19). Secondly, we should consider the quality of John himself, which is earthly; and so 1738 nature, <span style="font-weight: bold">is above all things,</span>
1162 he says, is earthly. Thirdly, the quality of his teaching is described: he <span style="font-weight: bold">speaks of earthly 1739 both by eminence of rank: &ldquo;The Lord is high above all
1163 things. </span>&#8220;You will speak of the earth&#8221; (Is 29:4).</p> 1740 nations&rdquo; (Ps 112:4), and by his authority and power:
1164 <p>532 But since John was full of the Holy Spirit while still in his mother&#8217;s womb, how can he 1741 &ldquo;He has made him the head of the Church,&rdquo; as is said in
1165 be said to speak of earthly things? I answer that, according to Chrysostom, John says he 1742 Ephesians (1:22).</p>
1166 speaks of earthly things by comparison with the teaching of Christ. As if to say: The things I 1743 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">
1167 speak of are slight and inferior as becomes one of an earthly nature, in comparison to him &#8220;in 1744 &nbsp;</p>
1168 whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge&#8221; (Col 2:3); &#8220;As the heavens are 1745 <p>530 Now he gives the reason for what he had said above (v 30),
1169 high above the earth, so my ways are high above your ways&#8221; (Is 55:9).</p> 1746 by considering the teaching of Christ. First, he describes the
1170 <p>Or we could say according to Augustine, and this is a better explanation, that we can consider 1747 doctrine of Christ and its grandeur. Secondly, the difference in
1171 what any person has of himself and what he has received from another. Now John and every 1748 those who receive or reject this doctrine (v 32b). He does two
1172 mere human of himself is of the earth. Therefore, from this standpoint, he has nothing to 1749 things with respect to the first. First, he describes John&rsquo;s
1173 speak of except earthly things. And it&#8217; he does speak of divine things, it is due to a divine 1750 doctrine. Secondly, he describes the doctrine of Christ (v 32).</p>
1174 enlightenment: &#8220;Your heart has visions, but unless they come from the Almighty, ignore 1751 <p>531 As to the first we should note that a man is known mainly by
1175 them&#8221; (Sir 34:6). So the Apostle says, &#8220;It is not 1, but the grace of God which is with me&#8221; (1 1752 what he says: &ldquo;Your accent gives you away&rdquo; (Mt 26:73);
1176 Cor 15:10); &#8220;For it is not you who speak, but the Holy Spirit who is speaking through you&#8221; 1753 &ldquo;Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks&rdquo;
1177 (Mt 10:20). Accordingly, as regards John, he <span style="font-weight: bold">is earthly and speaks of earthly things. </span>And if 1754 (Mt 12:34). This is why the quality of a teaching or doctrine is
1178 there was anything divine in him, it did not come from him, as he was the recipient, but from 1755 considered according to the quality of its origin. Accordingly, in
1756 order to understand the quality of John&rsquo;s doctrine, we should
1757 first consider his origin. So he says, <span style=
1758 "font-weight: bold">He who is of earth,</span> that is John, not
1759 only as to the matter from. which he was made, but also in his
1760 efficient cause: because the body of John was formed by a created
1761 power: &ldquo;They dwell in houses of clay, and have a foundation
1762 of earth&rdquo; (Jb 4:19). Secondly, we should consider the quality
1763 of John himself, which is earthly; and so he says, is earthly.
1764 Thirdly, the quality of his teaching is described: he <span style=
1765 "font-weight: bold">speaks of earthly things.</span> &ldquo;You
1766 will speak of the earth&rdquo; (Is 29:4).</p>
1767 <p>532 But since John was full of the Holy Spirit while still in
1768 his mother&rsquo;s womb, how can he be said to speak of earthly
1769 things? I answer that, according to Chrysostom, John says he speaks
1770 of earthly things by comparison with the teaching of Christ. As if
1771 to say: The things I speak of are slight and inferior as becomes
1772 one of an earthly nature, in comparison to him &ldquo;in whom are
1773 hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge&rdquo; (Col 2:3);
1774 &ldquo;As the heavens are high above the earth, so my ways are high
1775 above your ways&rdquo; (Is 55:9).</p>
1776 <p>Or we could say according to Augustine, and this is a better
1777 explanation, that we can consider what any person has of himself
1778 and what he has received from another. Now John and every mere
1779 human of himself is of the earth. Therefore, from this standpoint,
1780 he has nothing to speak of except earthly things. And it&rsquo; he
1781 does speak of divine things, it is due to a divine enlightenment:
1782 &ldquo;Your heart has visions, but unless they come from the
1783 Almighty, ignore them&rdquo; (Sir 34:6). So the Apostle says,
1784 &ldquo;It is not 1, but the grace of God which is with me&rdquo; (1
1785 Cor 15:10); &ldquo;For it is not you who speak, but the Holy Spirit
1786 who is speaking through you&rdquo; (Mt 10:20). Accordingly, as
1787 regards John, he <span style="font-weight: bold">is earthly and
1788 speaks of earthly things.</span> And if there was anything divine
1789 in him, it did not come from him, as he was the recipient, but from
1179 the one enlightening him.</p> 1790 the one enlightening him.</p>
1180 <p>533 Now he describes the doctrine of Christ. And he does three things. First, he shows its 1791 <p>533 Now he describes the doctrine of Christ. And he does three
1181 origin, which is heavenly; hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">The One who comes from heaven is above all 1792 things. First, he shows its origin, which is heavenly; hence he
1182 things. </span>For although the body of Christ was of the earth as regards the matter of which it was 1793 says, <span style="font-weight: bold">The One who comes from heaven
1183 made, yet it came from heaven as to its efficient cause, inasmuch as his body was formed by 1794 is above all things.</span> For although the body of Christ was of
1184 divine power. It also came from heaven because the eternal and uncreated person of the Son 1795 the earth as regards the matter of which it was made, yet it came
1185 came from heaven by assuming a body. &#8220;No one has gone up to heaven except the One who 1796 from heaven as to its efficient cause, inasmuch as his body was
1186 came down from heaven, the Son of Man, who lives in heaven&#8221; (above 3:13).</p> 1797 formed by divine power. It also came from heaven because the
1187 <p>Secondly, he shows the dignity of Christ, which is very great; so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">is above all things. 1798 eternal and uncreated person of the Son came from heaven by
1188 </span>This was explained above.</p> 1799 assuming a body. &ldquo;No one has gone up to heaven except the One
1189 <p>Thirdly, he infers the dignity of Christ&#8217;s doctrine, which is most certain, because <span style="font-weight: bold">he testifies 1800 who came down from heaven, the Son of Man, who lives in
1190 to what he sees and to what he hears. </span>For Christ, as God, is truth itself; but as man, he is its 1801 heaven&rdquo; (above 3:13).</p>
1191 witness: &#8220;For this was I born, and for this I came into the world: to testify to the truth&#8221; (below 1802 <p>Secondly, he shows the dignity of Christ, which is very great;
1192 18:37). Therefore, he gives testimony to himself: &#8220;You testify to yourself&#8221; (below 8:13). And 1803 so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">is above all
1193 he testifies to what is certain, because his testimony is about what he has heard with the 1804 things.</span> This was explained above.</p>
1194 Father: &#8220;I speak to the world what I have heard from my Father&#8221; (below 8:26); &#8220;What we 1805 <p>Thirdly, he infers the dignity of Christ&rsquo;s doctrine, which
1195 have seen and heard&#8221; (1 Jn 1:3).</p> 1806 is most certain, because <span style="font-weight: bold">he
1196 <p>534 Note that knowledge of a thing is acquired in through sight and in one way another way 1807 testifies to what he sees and to what he hears.</span> For Christ,
1197 through hearing. For by sight, a knowledge of a thing in acquired by means of the very thing 1808 as God, is truth itself; but as man, he is its witness: &ldquo;For
1198 seen; but by hearing, a thing is not made known by the very voice that is heard, but by means 1809 this was I born, and for this I came into the world: to testify to
1199 of the understanding of the one speaking. And so, because the Lord has knowledge which he 1810 the truth&rdquo; (below 18:37). Therefore, he gives testimony to
1200 has received from the Father, he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">to what he sees, </span>insofar as he proceeds from the 1811 himself: &ldquo;You testify to yourself&rdquo; (below 8:13). And he
1201 essence of the Father; <span style="font-weight: bold">and to what he hears, insofar </span>as he proceeds as the Word of the 1812 testifies to what is certain, because his testimony is about what
1202 Father&#8217;s intellect. Now because among intellectual beings, their act of being is other than 1813 he has heard with the Father: &ldquo;I speak to the world what I
1203 their act of understanding, their knowledge through sight is other than their knowledge 1814 have heard from my Father&rdquo; (below 8:26); &ldquo;What we have
1204 through hearing. But in God the Father, the act of being (<i>esse</i>)<i> </i>and the act of understanding 1815 seen and heard&rdquo; (1 Jn 1:3).</p>
1205 (<i>intelligere</i>) are the same. Thus in the Son, to see and hear are the same thing. Moreover, 1816 <p>534 Note that knowledge of a thing is acquired in through sight
1206 since even in one who sees there is not the essence of the thing seen in itself but only its 1817 and in one way another way through hearing. For by sight, a
1207 similitude, as also in the hearer there is not the actual thought of the speaker but only an 1818 knowledge of a thing in acquired by means of the very thing seen;
1208 indication of it, so the one who sees is not the essence of the thing in itself, nor is the listener 1819 but by hearing, a thing is not made known by the very voice that is
1209 the very thought expressed. In the Son, however, the very essence of the Father is received by 1820 heard, but by means of the understanding of the one speaking. And
1210 generation, and he himself is the Word; and so in him to see and to hear are the same.</p> 1821 so, because the Lord has knowledge which he has received from the
1211 <p>And so John concludes that since the doctrine of Christ has more grandeur and is more certain 1822 Father, he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">to what he
1212 than his, one must listen to Christ rather than to him.</p> 1823 sees,</span> insofar as he proceeds from the essence of the Father;
1213 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">&#160;</p> 1824 <span style="font-weight: bold">and to what he hears,
1214 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style="font-weight: bold">LECTURE 6</span></p> 1825 insofar</span> as he proceeds as the Word of the Father&rsquo;s
1215 <BLOCKQUOTE><p style="margin-left: 0.5in">32b &#8220;And his testimony no one accepts. 1826 intellect. Now because among intellectual beings, their act of
1216 <br>33 But whoever accepts his testimony 1827 being is other than their act of understanding, their knowledge
1217 <br>has given a sign [or certifies] that God is true. 1828 through sight is other than their knowledge through hearing. But in
1218 <br>34 For the One whom God sends 1829 God the Father, the act of being (<i>esse</i>) and the act of
1219 <br>speaks the words of God, 1830 understanding (<i>intelligere</i>) are the same. Thus in the Son,
1220 <br>for God does not bestow the Spirit in fractions. 1831 to see and hear are the same thing. Moreover, since even in one who
1221 <br>35 The Father loves the Son, 1832 sees there is not the essence of the thing seen in itself but only
1222 <br>and has put everything into his hands. 1833 its similitude, as also in the hearer there is not the actual
1223 <br>36 Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life. 1834 thought of the speaker but only an indication of it, so the one who
1224 <br>But whoever is unbelieving in the Son 1835 sees is not the essence of the thing in itself, nor is the listener
1225 <br>will not see life; 1836 the very thought expressed. In the Son, however, the very essence
1226 <BR>rather, the anger of God rests on him.&#8221;</p></BLOCKQUOTE> 1837 of the Father is received by generation, and he himself is the
1227 <p>535 Above, John the Baptist commended the teaching of Christ; here, however, he considers 1838 Word; and so in him to see and to hear are the same.</p>
1228 the difference in those who receive it. Thus, he treats of the faith that must be given to this 1839 <p>And so John concludes that since the doctrine of Christ has more
1229 teaching. And he does three things. First, he shows the scarcity of those who believe. 1840 grandeur and is more certain than his, one must listen to Christ
1230 Secondly, the obligation to believe (v 33). Lastly, the reward for belief (v 36).</p> 1841 rather than to him.</p>
1231 <p>536 He says therefore: I say that Christ has certain knowledge and that he speaks the truth. 1842 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">
1232 Yet although few accept his testimony, that is no reflection on his teaching, because it is not 1843 &nbsp;</p>
1233 the fault of the teaching but of those who do not accept it: namely, the disciples of John, who 1844 <p style="text-align: center; margin-bottom: 0.125in"><span style=
1234 did not yet believe, and the Pharisees, who slandered his teaching. Thus he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">And his 1845 "font-weight: bold">LECTURE 6</span></p>
1235 testimony no one accepts.</span></p> 1846 <blockquote>
1236 <p>537 <span style="font-weight: bold">No one</span> can be explained in two ways. First, so that it implies a few; and so some did 1847 <p style="margin-left: 0.5in">32b &ldquo;And his testimony no one
1237 accept his testimony. He shows that some did accept it when he adds, &#8220;But whoever accepts 1848 accepts.<br />
1238 his testimony.&#8221; The Evangelist used this way of speaking before when he said: &#8220;He came unto 1849 33 But whoever accepts his testimony<br />
1239 his own, and his own did not receive him&#8221; (above 1:11): because a few did receive him.</p> 1850 has given a sign [or certifies] that God is true.<br />
1240 <p>In another way, to accept his testimony is understood as to believe in God. But no one can 1851 34 For the One whom God sends<br />
1241 believe of himself, but only due to God: &#8220;You are saved by grace&#8221; (Eph 2:8). And so he says, 1852 speaks the words of God,<br />
1242 his testimony no one accepts, i.e., of himself, but it is given to him by God.</p> 1853 for God does not bestow the Spirit in fractions.<br />
1243 <p>This can be explained in another way by realizing that Scripture refers to people in two ways. 1854 35 The Father loves the Son,<br />
1244 As long as we are in this world the wicked are mingled with the good; and so Scripture 1855 and has put everything into his hands.<br />
1245 sometimes speaks of &#8220;the people,&#8221; or &#8220;they,&#8221; meaning those who are good; while at other 1856 36 Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life.<br />
1246 times, the same words can refer to the wicked. We can see this in Jeremiah (26): for first it 1857 But whoever is unbelieving in the Son<br />
1247 says that all the people and the priests sought to kill Jeremiah, and this referred to those who 1858 will not see life;<br />
1248 were evil; then at once it says that all the people sought to free him, and this referred to those 1859 rather, the anger of God rests on him.&rdquo;</p>
1249 who were good. In the same way, John the Baptist says, looking to the left, i.e., toward those 1860 </blockquote>
1250 who are evil, <span style="font-weight: bold">And his testimony no one accepts; </span>and later, referring to those on the right, 1861 <p>535 Above, John the Baptist commended the teaching of Christ;
1251 i.e., to the good, he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">But whoever accepts his testimony.</span></p> 1862 here, however, he considers the difference in those who receive it.
1252 <p>538 <span style="font-weight: bold">But whoever accepts his testimony. </span>Here he speaks of the obligation to believe, i.e., to 1863 Thus, he treats of the faith that must be given to this teaching.
1253 submit oneself to divine truth. As to this he does four things. First, he presents the divine 1864 And he does three things. First, he shows the scarcity of those who
1254 truth. Secondly, he speaks of the proclamation of the divine truth (v 34). Thirdly, of the 1865 believe. Secondly, the obligation to believe (v 33). Lastly, the
1255 ability to proclaim it ( v 34b). Fourthly, he gives the reason for this ability (v 35).</p> 1866 reward for belief (v 36).</p>
1256 <p>539 Man&#8217;s obligation to the faith is to submit himself to divine truth, and so he says that if 1867 <p>536 He says therefore: I say that Christ has certain knowledge
1257 few accept his testimony that means that some do. Hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">whoever accepts his 1868 and that he speaks the truth. Yet although few accept his
1258 testimony, </span>i.e., whoever he may be, <span style="font-weight: bold">has given a sign, </span>i.e., he ought to affix a certain sign or 1869 testimony, that is no reflection on his teaching, because it is not
1259 has in fact placed a seal in his own heart, that Christ is God. And he [Christ] is true, because 1870 the fault of the teaching but of those who do not accept it:
1260 he said that he is God. If he were not, he would not be true, but it is written: &#8220;God is true&#8221; 1871 namely, the disciples of John, who did not yet believe, and the
1261 (Rom 3:4). Concerning this seal it is said: &#8220;Set me as a seal on your heart&#8221; (Sg 8:6), and &#8220;The 1872 Pharisees, who slandered his teaching. Thus he says, <span style=
1262 foundation of God stands firm, bearing a seal, etc.&#8221; as we read in 2 Timothy (2:19).</p> 1873 "font-weight: bold">And his testimony no one accepts.</span></p>
1263 <p>Or, following Chrysostom, he has given a sign, i.e., he has shown <span style="font-weight: bold">that God, </span>that is, the 1874 <p>537 <span style="font-weight: bold">No one</span> can be
1264 Father, <span style="font-weight: bold">is true, </span>because he sent his Son whom he promised to send. The Fvangelist says this 1875 explained in two ways. First, so that it implies a few; and so some
1265 to show that those who do not believe Christ deny the truthfulness of the Father.</p> 1876 did accept his testimony. He shows that some did accept it when he
1266 <p>540 Then immediately he adds a commendation of divine truth, saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">For the One whom 1877 adds, &ldquo;But whoever accepts his testimony.&rdquo; The
1267 God sends speaks the words of God. </span>As if to say: He has given this as a sign, namely, that 1878 Evangelist used this way of speaking before when he said: &ldquo;He
1268 Christ, whose testimony he accepts, <span style="font-weight: bold">the One whom God sends speaks the words of God. 1879 came unto his own, and his own did not receive him&rdquo; (above
1269 </span>Consequently, one who believes Christ believes the Father: &#8220;I speak to the world what I have 1880 1:11): because a few did receive him.</p>
1270 heard from the Father&#8221; (below 8:26). So he expressed verbally nothing but the Father and the 1881 <p>In another way, to accept his testimony is understood as to
1271 words of the Father, because he has been sent by the Father, and because he is the Word of 1882 believe in God. But no one can believe of himself, but only due to
1272 the Father. Hence, he says that he even bespeaks the Father.</p> 1883 God: &ldquo;You are saved by grace&rdquo; (Eph 2:8). And so he
1273 <p>Or, if the statement <span style="font-weight: bold">God is true </span>refers to Christ, we understand the distinction of persons; for 1884 says, his testimony no one accepts, i.e., of himself, but it is
1274 since the Father is true God, and Christ is true God, it follows that the true God sent the true 1885 given to him by God.</p>
1275 God, who is distinct from him in person, but not in nature.</p> 1886 <p>This can be explained in another way by realizing that Scripture
1276 <p>541 The ability to proclaim divine truth is present in Christ in the highest degree, because he 1887 refers to people in two ways. As long as we are in this world the
1277 does not receive the Spirit in a partial way; and so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">for God does not bestow the 1888 wicked are mingled with the good; and so Scripture sometimes speaks
1278 Spirit in fractions.</span></p> 1889 of &ldquo;the people,&rdquo; or &ldquo;they,&rdquo; meaning those
1279 <p>You might say that although God sent Christ, yet not all that Christ says is from God, but only 1890 who are good; while at other times, the same words can refer to the
1280 some of the things; for even the prophets spoke at times from their own spirit, and at other 1891 wicked. We can see this in Jeremiah (26): for first it says that
1281 times from the Spirit of God. For example, we read that the prophet Nathan (2 Sm 7:3), 1892 all the people and the priests sought to kill Jeremiah, and this
1282 speaking out of his own spirit, advised David to build a temple, but that later, under the 1893 referred to those who were evil; then at once it says that all the
1283 influence of the Spirit of God, he retracted this. However, the Baptist shows that such is not 1894 people sought to free him, and this referred to those who were
1284 the case with Christ. For the prophets receive the Spirit of God only fractionally, i.e., in 1895 good. In the same way, John the Baptist says, looking to the left,
1285 reference to some things, but not as to all things. Consequently, not all they say are the words 1896 i.e., toward those who are evil, <span style=
1286 of God. But Christ, who received the Spirit fully and in regards to all things, speaks the words 1897 "font-weight: bold">And his testimony no one accepts;</span> and
1287 of God as to all things.</p> 1898 later, referring to those on the right, i.e., to the good, he says,
1288 <p>542 But how can the Holy Spirit be given in fractions, since he is immense or infinite, 1899 <span style="font-weight: bold">But whoever accepts his
1289 according to the Creed of Athanasius: &#8220;Immense is the Father, immense the Son, immense the 1900 testimony.</span></p>
1290 Holy Spirit&#8221;? I answer that the Holy Spirit is given in fractions, not in respect to his essence 1901 <p>538 <span style="font-weight: bold">But whoever accepts his
1291 or power, according to which he is infinite, but as to his gifts, which are given fractionally: 1902 testimony.</span> Here he speaks of the obligation to believe,
1292 &#8220;Grace has been given to each of us according to degree&#8221; (Eph 4:7).</p> 1903 i.e., to submit oneself to divine truth. As to this he does four
1293 <p>543 We should note that we can understand in two ways what is said here, namely, that God 1904 things. First, he presents the divine truth. Secondly, he speaks of
1294 the Father did not give the Spirit to Christ in a partial way. We can understand it as applying 1905 the proclamation of the divine truth (v 34). Thirdly, of the
1295 to Christ as God, and, in another way, as applying to Christ as man. Something is given to 1906 ability to proclaim it ( v 34b). Fourthly, he gives the reason for
1296 someone in order that he may have it: and it is appropriate to Christ to have the Spirit, both as 1907 this ability (v 35).</p>
1297 God and as man. And so he has the Holy Spirit with respect to both. As man, Christ has the 1908 <p>539 Man&rsquo;s obligation to the faith is to submit himself to
1298 Holy Spirit as Sanctifier: &#8220;The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because the Lord has anointed 1909 divine truth, and so he says that if few accept his testimony that
1299 me&#8221; (Is 6 1:1), namely, as man. But as God, he has the Holy Spirit only as manifesting 1910 means that some do. Hence he says, <span style=
1300 himself, inasmuch as the Spirit proceeds from him: &#8220;He will give glory to me,&#8221; that is, make 1911 "font-weight: bold">whoever accepts his testimony,</span> i.e.,
1301 known, &#8220;because he will have received from me,&#8221; as is said below (16:14).</p> 1912 whoever he may be, <span style="font-weight: bold">has given a
1302 <p>Therefore, both as God and as man, Christ has the Holy Spirit beyond measure. For God the 1913 sign,</span> i.e., he ought to affix a certain sign or has in fact
1303 Father is said to give the Holy Spirit without measure to Christ as God, because he gives to 1914 placed a seal in his own heart, that Christ is God. And he [Christ]
1304 Christ the power and might to bring forth (<i>spirandi</i>)<i> </i>the Holy Spirit, who, since he is infinite, 1915 is true, because he said that he is God. If he were not, he would
1305 was infinitely given to him by the Father: for the Father gives it just as he himself has it, so 1916 not be true, but it is written: &ldquo;God is true&rdquo; (Rom
1306 that the Holy Spirit proceeds from him as much as from the Son. And he gave him this by an 1917 3:4). Concerning this seal it is said: &ldquo;Set me as a seal on
1307 everlasting generation. Similarly, Christ as man has the Holy Spirit without measure, for the 1918 your heart&rdquo; (Sg 8:6), and &ldquo;The foundation of God stands
1308 Holy Spirit is given to different men in differing degrees, because grace is given to each &#8220;by 1919 firm, bearing a seal, etc.&rdquo; as we read in 2 Timothy
1309 measure&#8221; [cf., e.g., Mk 4:24; Mt 7:2]. But Christ as man did not receive a certain amount of 1920 (2:19).</p>
1310 grace; and so he did not receive the Holy Spirit in any limited degree.</p> 1921 <p>Or, following Chrysostom, he has given a sign, i.e., he has
1311 <p>544 It should be noted, however, that there are three kinds of grace in Christ: the grace of [the 1922 shown <span style="font-weight: bold">that God,</span> that is, the
1312 hypostatic] union, the grace of a singular person, which is habitual, and the grace of headship, 1923 Father, <span style="font-weight: bold">is true,</span> because he
1313 which animates all the members. And Christ received each of these graces without measure.</p> 1924 sent his Son whom he promised to send. The Fvangelist says this to
1314 <p>The grace of union, which is not habitual grace, but a certain gratuitous gift, is given to Christ 1925 show that those who do not believe Christ deny the truthfulness of
1315 in order that in his human nature he be the true Son of God, not by participation, but by 1926 the Father.</p>
1316 nature, insofar as the human nature of Christ is united to the Son of God in person. This union 1927 <p>540 Then immediately he adds a commendation of divine truth,
1317 is called a grace because he had it without any preceding merits. Now the divine nature is 1928 saying, <span style="font-weight: bold">For the One whom God sends
1318 infinite; hence from that union he received an infinite gift. Thus it was not by degree or 1929 speaks the words of God.</span> As if to say: He has given this as
1319 measure that he received the Holy Spirit, i.e., the gift and grace of union which, as gratuitous, 1930 a sign, namely, that Christ, whose testimony he accepts,
1320 is attributed to the Holy Spirit.</p> 1931 <span style="font-weight: bold">the One whom God sends speaks the
1321 <p>His grace is termed habitual insofar as the soul of Christ was full of grace and wisdom: &#8220;the 1932 words of God.</span> Consequently, one who believes Christ believes
1322 Only Begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth&#8221; (above 1:14). We might wonder if Christ 1933 the Father: &ldquo;I speak to the world what I have heard from the
1323 did receive this grace without measure. For since such grace is a created gift, we must admit 1934 Father&rdquo; (below 8:26). So he expressed verbally nothing but
1324 that it has a finite essence. Therefore, as far as its essence is concerned, since it is something 1935 the Father and the words of the Father, because he has been sent by
1325 created, this habitual grace was finite. Yet Christ is not said to have received this in a limited 1936 the Father, and because he is the Word of the Father. Hence, he
1326 degree for three reasons.</p> 1937 says that he even bespeaks the Father.</p>
1327 <p>First, becatise of the one who is receiving the grace. For it is plain that each thing&#8217;s nature has 1938 <p>Or, if the statement <span style="font-weight: bold">God is
1328 a finite capacity, because even though one might receive an infinite good by knowing, loving 1939 true</span> refers to Christ, we understand the distinction of
1329 and enjoying it, nevertheless one receives it by enjoying it in a finite way. Further, each 1940 persons; for since the Father is true God, and Christ is true God,
1330 creature has, according to its species and nature, a finite amount of capacity. But this does not 1941 it follows that the true God sent the true God, who is distinct
1331 make it impossible for the divine power to make another creature possessing a greater 1942 from him in person, but not in nature.</p>
1332 capacity; but then such a creature would not be of a nature which is specifically the same, just 1943 <p>541 The ability to proclaim divine truth is present in Christ in
1333 as when one is added to three, there is another species of number. Therefore, when some 1944 the highest degree, because he does not receive the Spirit in a
1334 nature is not given as much of the divine goodness as its natural capacity is able to contain, 1945 partial way; and so he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">for
1335 then it is seen to be given to it by measure; but when its total natural capacity is filled, it is not 1946 God does not bestow the Spirit in fractions.</span></p>
1336 given to it by measure, because even though there is a measure on the part of the one 1947 <p>You might say that although God sent Christ, yet not all that
1337 receiving, there is none on the part of the one giving, who is prepared to give all. Thus, if 1948 Christ says is from God, but only some of the things; for even the
1338 someone takes a pail to a river, he sees water present without measure, although he takes the 1949 prophets spoke at times from their own spirit, and at other times
1339 water by measure on account of the limited dimensions of the pail. Thus, the habitual grace of 1950 from the Spirit of God. For example, we read that the prophet
1340 Christ is indeed finite according to its essence, but it is said to be given in an infinite way and 1951 Nathan (2 Sm 7:3), speaking out of his own spirit, advised David to
1341 not by measure or partially, because as much was given to him as created nature was able to 1952 build a temple, but that later, under the influence of the Spirit
1342 hold.</p> 1953 of God, he retracted this. However, the Baptist shows that such is
1343 <p>Secondly, Christ did not receive habitual grace in a limited way by considering the gift which 1954 not the case with Christ. For the prophets receive the Spirit of
1344 is received. For every form or act, considered in its very nature, is not finite in the way in 1955 God only fractionally, i.e., in reference to some things, but not
1345 which it is made finite by the subject in which it is received. Nevertheless, there is nothing to 1956 as to all things. Consequently, not all they say are the words of
1346 prevent it from being finite in its essence, insofar as its existence (<i>esse</i>) is<i> </i>received in some 1957 God. But Christ, who received the Spirit fully and in regards to
1347 subject. For that is infinite according to its essence which has the entire fulness of being 1958 all things, speaks the words of God as to all things.</p>
1348 (<i>essendi</i>): and this is true of God alone, who is the supreme <i>esse. </i>But if we consider some 1959 <p>542 But how can the Holy Spirit be given in fractions, since he
1349 &#8220;spiritual&#8221; form as not existing in a subject, for example, whiteness or color, it would not be 1960 is immense or infinite, according to the Creed of Athanasius:
1350 infinite in essence, because its essence would be confined to some genus or species; 1961 &ldquo;Immense is the Father, immense the Son, immense the Holy
1351 nevertheless it would still possess the entire fulness of that species. Thus, considering the 1962 Spirit&rdquo;? I answer that the Holy Spirit is given in fractions,
1352 nature of the species, it would be without limit or measure, since it would have everything 1963 not in respect to his essence or power, according to which he is
1353 that can pertain to that species. But if whiteness or color should be received into some 1964 infinite, but as to his gifts, which are given fractionally:
1354 subject, it does not always have everything that pertains necessarily and always to the nature 1965 &ldquo;Grace has been given to each of us according to
1355 of this form, but only when the subject has it as perfectly as it is capable of being possessed, 1966 degree&rdquo; (Eph 4:7).</p>
1356 i.e., when the way the subject possesses it is equivalent to the power of the thing possessed. 1967 <p>543 We should note that we can understand in two ways what is
1357 Thus, Christ&#8217;s habitual grace was finite according to its essence; yet it is said to have been in 1968 said here, namely, that God the Father did not give the Spirit to
1358 him without a limit or measure because he received everything that could pertain to the nature 1969 Christ in a partial way. We can understand it as applying to Christ
1359 of grace. Others, however, do not receive all this, but one receives in one way, and another in 1970 as God, and, in another way, as applying to Christ as man.
1360 another way: &#8220;There are different graces&#8221;</p> 1971 Something is given to someone in order that he may have it: and it
1361 <p>The third reason for saying that the habitual grace of Christ was not received in a limited way 1972 is appropriate to Christ to have the Spirit, both as God and as
1362 is based on its cause. For an effect is in some way present in its cause. Therefore, if someone 1973 man. And so he has the Holy Spirit with respect to both. As man,
1363 has an infinite power to produce something, he is said to have what can be produced without 1974 Christ has the Holy Spirit as Sanctifier: &ldquo;The Spirit of the
1364 measure and, in a way, infinitely. For example, if someone has a fountain which could 1975 Lord is upon me, because the Lord has anointed me&rdquo; (Is 6
1365 produce an infinite amount of water, he would be said to have water in an infinite way and 1976 1:1), namely, as man. But as God, he has the Holy Spirit only as
1366 without measure. Thus, the soul of Christ has infinite grace and grace without measure from 1977 manifesting himself, inasmuch as the Spirit proceeds from him:
1367 the fact that he has united to himself the Word, which is the infinite and unfailing source of 1978 &ldquo;He will give glory to me,&rdquo; that is, make known,
1368 the entire emanation of all created things.</p> 1979 &ldquo;because he will have received from me,&rdquo; as is said
1369 <p>From what has been said, it is clear that the grace of Christ which is called capital grace, 1980 below (16:14).</p>
1370 insofar as he is head of the Church, is infinite in its influence. For from the fact that he 1981 <p>Therefore, both as God and as man, Christ has the Holy Spirit
1371 possessed that from which the gifts of the Spirit could flow out without measure, he received 1982 beyond measure. For God the Father is said to give the Holy Spirit
1372 the power to pour them out without measure, so that the grace of Christ is sufficient not 1983 without measure to Christ as God, because he gives to Christ the
1373 merely for the salvation of some men, but for all the people of the entire world: &#8220;He is the 1984 power and might to bring forth (<i>spirandi</i>) the Holy Spirit,
1374 offering for our sins; and not for ours only, but also for those of the entire world&#8221; ( 1 Jn 2:2), 1985 who, since he is infinite, was infinitely given to him by the
1375 and even for many worlds, if they exsited.</p> 1986 Father: for the Father gives it just as he himself has it, so that
1376 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">&#160;</p> 1987 the Holy Spirit proceeds from him as much as from the Son. And he
1377 <p>545 Christ also had the ability appropriate for declaring divine truth, because all things are in 1988 gave him this by an everlasting generation. Similarly, Christ as
1378 his power; hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">The Father loves the Son, and has put everything into his 1989 man has the Holy Spirit without measure, for the Holy Spirit is
1379 hands. </span>This can refer to Christ both as man and as God, but in different ways. If it refers to 1990 given to different men in differing degrees, because grace is given
1380 Christ according to his divine nature, then <span style="font-weight: bold">loves </span>does not indicate a principle but a sign: for 1991 to each &ldquo;by measure&rdquo; [cf., e.g., Mk 4:24; Mt 7:2]. But
1381 we cannot say that the Father gives all things to the Son because he loves him. There are two 1992 Christ as man did not receive a certain amount of grace; and so he
1382 reasons for this. First, because to love is an act of the will; but to give a nature to the Son is to 1993 did not receive the Holy Spirit in any limited degree.</p>
1383 generate him. Therefore, if the Father gave a nature to the Son by his will, the will of the 1994 <p>544 It should be noted, however, that there are three kinds of
1384 Father would be the principle of the generation of the Son; and then it would follow that the 1995 grace in Christ: the grace of [the hypostatic] union, the grace of
1385 Father generated the Son by will, and not by nature; and this is the Arian heresy.</p> 1996 a singular person, which is habitual, and the grace of headship,
1386 <p>Secondly, because the love of the Father for the Son is the Holy Spirit. So, if the love of the 1997 which animates all the members. And Christ received each of these
1387 Father for the Son were the reason why the Father put everything into his hands, it would 1998 graces without measure.</p>
1388 follow that the Holy Spirit would be the principle of the generation of the Son; and this is not 1999 <p>The grace of union, which is not habitual grace, but a certain
1389 acceptable. Therefore, we should say that <span style="font-weight: bold">loves </span>implies only a sign. As if to say: The perfect 2000 gratuitous gift, is given to Christ in order that in his human
1390 love with which <span style="font-weight: bold">the Father loves the Son, </span>is a sign that the Father <span style="font-weight: bold">has put everything into 2001 nature he be the true Son of God, not by participation, but by
1391 his hands, </span>i.e., everything which the Father has: &#8220;All things have been given to me by my 2002 nature, insofar as the human nature of Christ is united to the Son
1392 Father- (Mt 11:27); &#8220;Jesus, knowing that the Fallier had given all things into his hands&#8221; 2003 of God in person. This union is called a grace because he had it
1393 (below 13:3).</p> 2004 without any preceding merits. Now the divine nature is infinite;
1394 <p>But if loves refers to Christ as man, then it implies the notion of a principle, so that the Father 2005 hence from that union he received an infinite gift. Thus it was not
1395 is said to have put everything into the hands of the Son, everything, that is, that is in heaven 2006 by degree or measure that he received the Holy Spirit, i.e., the
1396 and on earth: &#8220;All authority has been given to me, in heaven and on earth,&#8221; as he says in 2007 gift and grace of union which, as gratuitous, is attributed to the
1397 Matthew (28:18); &#8220;He has appointed him [the Son] the heir of all things&#8221; (Heb 1:2). And the 2008 Holy Spirit.</p>
1398 reason why the Father gives to the Son is because he loves the Son; hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">The 2009 <p>His grace is termed habitual insofar as the soul of Christ was
1399 Father loves the Son, </span>for the Father&#8217;s love is the reason for creating each creature: &#8220;You love 2010 full of grace and wisdom: &ldquo;the Only Begotten of the Father,
1400 everything which exists, and hate nothing which you have made&#8221; (Wis 11:25). Concerning 2011 full of grace and truth&rdquo; (above 1:14). We might wonder if
1401 his love for the Son we read in Matthew (3:17): &#8220;This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well 2012 Christ did receive this grace without measure. For since such grace
1402 pleased&#8221;; &#8220;He has brought us into the kingdom of the Son of his love,&#8221; that is, i.e., of his 2013 is a created gift, we must admit that it has a finite essence.
1403 beloved Son (Col 1:13).</p> 2014 Therefore, as far as its essence is concerned, since it is
1404 <p>546 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, </span>he shows the fruit of 2015 something created, this habitual grace was finite. Yet Christ is
1405 faith. First, he sets forth the reward for faith. Secondly, the penalty for unbelief (v 36b).</p> 2016 not said to have received this in a limited degree for three
1406 <p>547 The reward for faith is beyond our comprehension, because it is eternal life. Hence he 2017 reasons.</p>
1407 says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life. </span>And this is shown from what has already 2018 <p>First, becatise of the one who is receiving the grace. For it is
1408 been said. For if the Father has given everything he has to the Son, and the Father has eternal 2019 plain that each thing&rsquo;s nature has a finite capacity, because
1409 life, then he has given to the Son to be eternal life: &#8220;Just as the Father possesses life in 2020 even though one might receive an infinite good by knowing, loving
1410 himself, so he has given it to the Son to have life in himself&#8221; (below 5:26): and this belongs 2021 and enjoying it, nevertheless one receives it by enjoying it in a
1411 to Christ insofar as he is the true and natural Son of God. &#8220;That you may be in his true Son, 2022 finite way. Further, each creature has, according to its species
1412 Christ. This is the true God and eternal life&#8221; (1 Jn 5:20). <span style="font-weight: bold">Whoever believes in the Son </span>has 2023 and nature, a finite amount of capacity. But this does not make it
1413 that toward which he tends, that is, the Son, in whom he believes. But the Son is eternal life; 2024 impossible for the divine power to make another creature possessing
1414 therefore, whoever believes in him has eternal life. As it says below (10:27): &#8220;My sheep hear 2025 a greater capacity; but then such a creature would not be of a
1415 my voice ... and I give them eternal life.&#8221;</p> 2026 nature which is specifically the same, just as when one is added to
1416 <p>548 The penalty for unbelief is unendurable, both as to the punishment of loss and as to the 2027 three, there is another species of number. Therefore, when some
1417 punishment of sense. As to the punishment of loss, because it deprives one of life; hence he 2028 nature is not given as much of the divine goodness as its natural
1418 says, <span style="font-weight: bold">whoever is unbelieving in the Son will not see life. </span>He does not say, &#8220;will not have,&#8221; 2029 capacity is able to contain, then it is seen to be given to it by
1419 but will not see, because eternal life consists in the vision of the true life: &#8220;This is eternal life: 2030 measure; but when its total natural capacity is filled, it is not
1420 that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent&#8221; (below 2031 given to it by measure, because even though there is a measure on
1421 17:3): and unbelievers will not have this vision and this knowledge: &#8220;Let him not see the 2032 the part of the one receiving, there is none on the part of the one
1422 brooks of honey&#8221; (Jb 4:19), that is, the sweetness of eternal life. And he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">will not see, 2033 giving, who is prepared to give all. Thus, if someone takes a pail
1423 </span>because to see life itself is the proper reward for faith united with love.</p> 2034 to a river, he sees water present without measure, although he
1424 <p>The punishment of sense is unendurable because one is severely punished; so he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">the 2035 takes the water by measure on account of the limited dimensions of
1425 anger of God rests on him. </span>For in the Scriptures anger indicates the pain with which God 2036 the pail. Thus, the habitual grace of Christ is indeed finite
1426 punishes those who are evil. So when he says, the anger of God, the Father, rests on him, it is 2037 according to its essence, but it is said to be given in an infinite
1427 the same as saying: They will feel punishment from God the Father.</p> 2038 way and not by measure or partially, because as much was given to
1428 <p>Although the Father &#8220;has given all judgment to the Son,&#8221; as we read below (5:22), the Baptist 2039 him as created nature was able to hold.</p>
1429 refers this to the Father in order to lead the Jews to believe in the Son. It is written about this 2040 <p>Secondly, Christ did not receive habitual grace in a limited way
1430 judgment: &#8220;It is a terrible thing to fall into the hands of the living God&#8221; (Heb 10:31). He says, 2041 by considering the gift which is received. For every form or act,
1431 <span style="font-weight: bold">rests on him</span>, because this punishment will never be absent from the unbelieving, and 2042 considered in its very nature, is not finite in the way in which it
1432 because all who are born into this mortal life are the objects of God&#8217;s anger, which was first 2043 is made finite by the subject in which it is received.
1433 felt by Adam: &#8220;We were by nature,&#8221; that is, through birth, &#8220;children of anger&#8221; (Eph 2:3). And 2044 Nevertheless, there is nothing to prevent it from being finite in
1434 we are freed from this anger only by faith in Christ; and so the anger of God rests on those 2045 its essence, insofar as its existence (<i>esse</i>) is received in
1435 who do not believe in Christ, the Son of God.</p> 2046 some subject. For that is infinite according to its essence which
2047 has the entire fulness of being (<i>essendi</i>): and this is true
2048 of God alone, who is the supreme <i>esse.</i> But if we consider
2049 some &ldquo;spiritual&rdquo; form as not existing in a subject, for
2050 example, whiteness or color, it would not be infinite in essence,
2051 because its essence would be confined to some genus or species;
2052 nevertheless it would still possess the entire fulness of that
2053 species. Thus, considering the nature of the species, it would be
2054 without limit or measure, since it would have everything that can
2055 pertain to that species. But if whiteness or color should be
2056 received into some subject, it does not always have everything that
2057 pertains necessarily and always to the nature of this form, but
2058 only when the subject has it as perfectly as it is capable of being
2059 possessed, i.e., when the way the subject possesses it is
2060 equivalent to the power of the thing possessed. Thus,
2061 Christ&rsquo;s habitual grace was finite according to its essence;
2062 yet it is said to have been in him without a limit or measure
2063 because he received everything that could pertain to the nature of
2064 grace. Others, however, do not receive all this, but one receives
2065 in one way, and another in another way: &ldquo;There are different
2066 graces&rdquo;</p>
2067 <p>The third reason for saying that the habitual grace of Christ
2068 was not received in a limited way is based on its cause. For an
2069 effect is in some way present in its cause. Therefore, if someone
2070 has an infinite power to produce something, he is said to have what
2071 can be produced without measure and, in a way, infinitely. For
2072 example, if someone has a fountain which could produce an infinite
2073 amount of water, he would be said to have water in an infinite way
2074 and without measure. Thus, the soul of Christ has infinite grace
2075 and grace without measure from the fact that he has united to
2076 himself the Word, which is the infinite and unfailing source of the
2077 entire emanation of all created things.</p>
2078 <p>From what has been said, it is clear that the grace of Christ
2079 which is called capital grace, insofar as he is head of the Church,
2080 is infinite in its influence. For from the fact that he possessed
2081 that from which the gifts of the Spirit could flow out without
2082 measure, he received the power to pour them out without measure, so
2083 that the grace of Christ is sufficient not merely for the salvation
2084 of some men, but for all the people of the entire world: &ldquo;He
2085 is the offering for our sins; and not for ours only, but also for
2086 those of the entire world&rdquo; ( 1 Jn 2:2), and even for many
2087 worlds, if they exsited.</p>
2088 <p style="margin-bottom: 0.125in; margin-bottom: 0.125in">
2089 &nbsp;</p>
2090 <p>545 Christ also had the ability appropriate for declaring divine
2091 truth, because all things are in his power; hence he says,
2092 <span style="font-weight: bold">The Father loves the Son, and has
2093 put everything into his hands.</span> This can refer to Christ both
2094 as man and as God, but in different ways. If it refers to Christ
2095 according to his divine nature, then <span style=
2096 "font-weight: bold">loves</span> does not indicate a principle but
2097 a sign: for we cannot say that the Father gives all things to the
2098 Son because he loves him. There are two reasons for this. First,
2099 because to love is an act of the will; but to give a nature to the
2100 Son is to generate him. Therefore, if the Father gave a nature to
2101 the Son by his will, the will of the Father would be the principle
2102 of the generation of the Son; and then it would follow that the
2103 Father generated the Son by will, and not by nature; and this is
2104 the Arian heresy.</p>
2105 <p>Secondly, because the love of the Father for the Son is the Holy
2106 Spirit. So, if the love of the Father for the Son were the reason
2107 why the Father put everything into his hands, it would follow that
2108 the Holy Spirit would be the principle of the generation of the
2109 Son; and this is not acceptable. Therefore, we should say that
2110 <span style="font-weight: bold">loves</span> implies only a sign.
2111 As if to say: The perfect love with which <span style=
2112 "font-weight: bold">the Father loves the Son,</span> is a sign that
2113 the Father <span style="font-weight: bold">has put everything into
2114 his hands,</span> i.e., everything which the Father has: &ldquo;All
2115 things have been given to me by my Father- (Mt 11:27);
2116 &ldquo;Jesus, knowing that the Fallier had given all things into
2117 his hands&rdquo; (below 13:3).</p>
2118 <p>But if loves refers to Christ as man, then it implies the notion
2119 of a principle, so that the Father is said to have put everything
2120 into the hands of the Son, everything, that is, that is in heaven
2121 and on earth: &ldquo;All authority has been given to me, in heaven
2122 and on earth,&rdquo; as he says in Matthew (28:18); &ldquo;He has
2123 appointed him [the Son] the heir of all things&rdquo; (Heb 1:2).
2124 And the reason why the Father gives to the Son is because he loves
2125 the Son; hence he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">The Father
2126 loves the Son,</span> for the Father&rsquo;s love is the reason for
2127 creating each creature: &ldquo;You love everything which exists,
2128 and hate nothing which you have made&rdquo; (Wis 11:25). Concerning
2129 his love for the Son we read in Matthew (3:17): &ldquo;This is my
2130 beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased&rdquo;; &ldquo;He has
2131 brought us into the kingdom of the Son of his love,&rdquo; that is,
2132 i.e., of his beloved Son (Col 1:13).</p>
2133 <p>546 Then when he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">Whoever
2134 believes in the Son has eternal life,</span> he shows the fruit of
2135 faith. First, he sets forth the reward for faith. Secondly, the
2136 penalty for unbelief (v 36b).</p>
2137 <p>547 The reward for faith is beyond our comprehension, because it
2138 is eternal life. Hence he says, <span style=
2139 "font-weight: bold">Whoever believes in the Son has eternal
2140 life.</span> And this is shown from what has already been said. For
2141 if the Father has given everything he has to the Son, and the
2142 Father has eternal life, then he has given to the Son to be eternal
2143 life: &ldquo;Just as the Father possesses life in himself, so he
2144 has given it to the Son to have life in himself&rdquo; (below
2145 5:26): and this belongs to Christ insofar as he is the true and
2146 natural Son of God. &ldquo;That you may be in his true Son, Christ.
2147 This is the true God and eternal life&rdquo; (1 Jn 5:20).
2148 <span style="font-weight: bold">Whoever believes in the Son</span>
2149 has that toward which he tends, that is, the Son, in whom he
2150 believes. But the Son is eternal life; therefore, whoever believes
2151 in him has eternal life. As it says below (10:27): &ldquo;My sheep
2152 hear my voice ... and I give them eternal life.&rdquo;</p>
2153 <p>548 The penalty for unbelief is unendurable, both as to the
2154 punishment of loss and as to the punishment of sense. As to the
2155 punishment of loss, because it deprives one of life; hence he says,
2156 <span style="font-weight: bold">whoever is unbelieving in the Son
2157 will not see life.</span> He does not say, &ldquo;will not
2158 have,&rdquo; but will not see, because eternal life consists in the
2159 vision of the true life: &ldquo;This is eternal life: that they may
2160 know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have
2161 sent&rdquo; (below 17:3): and unbelievers will not have this vision
2162 and this knowledge: &ldquo;Let him not see the brooks of
2163 honey&rdquo; (Jb 4:19), that is, the sweetness of eternal life. And
2164 he says, <span style="font-weight: bold">will not see,</span>
2165 because to see life itself is the proper reward for faith united
2166 with love.</p>
2167 <p>The punishment of sense is unendurable because one is severely
2168 punished; so he says: <span style="font-weight: bold">the anger of
2169 God rests on him.</span> For in the Scriptures anger indicates the
2170 pain with which God punishes those who are evil. So when he says,
2171 the anger of God, the Father, rests on him, it is the same as
2172 saying: They will feel punishment from God the Father.</p>
2173 <p>Although the Father &ldquo;has given all judgment to the
2174 Son,&rdquo; as we read below (5:22), the Baptist refers this to the
2175 Father in order to lead the Jews to believe in the Son. It is
2176 written about this judgment: &ldquo;It is a terrible thing to fall
2177 into the hands of the living God&rdquo; (Heb 10:31). He says,
2178 <span style="font-weight: bold">rests on him</span>, because this
2179 punishment will never be absent from the unbelieving, and because
2180 all who are born into this mortal life are the objects of
2181 God&rsquo;s anger, which was first felt by Adam: &ldquo;We were by
2182 nature,&rdquo; that is, through birth, &ldquo;children of
2183 anger&rdquo; (Eph 2:3). And we are freed from this anger only by
2184 faith in Christ; and so the anger of God rests on those who do not
2185 believe in Christ, the Son of God.</p>
2186 </blockquote>
1436 </body> 2187 </body>
1437
1438 </html> 2188 </html>